Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to the new GOpt-based framework in Insight #4163

Open
8 of 9 tasks
BingqingLyu opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
8 of 9 tasks

Switch to the new GOpt-based framework in Insight #4163

BingqingLyu opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@BingqingLyu
Copy link
Collaborator

BingqingLyu commented Aug 20, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Currently, we are switching the default compilation stack from the older, IRCore-based implementation to the new, GOpt-based framework. A related issue is #3736.

This issue track the progress in switching to GOpt in Insight, based on Groot Store.

  1. bug fix and new features
  1. comprehensive tests
    Support importing the test graphs, and add test suits based on the new GOpt-based compilation, in the Insight+Groot ci, including:
  • prepare test graphs, including modern graph, movie graph and ldbc graph
  • Gremlin Tests on ModernGraph
  • Cypher Tests on MovieGraph
  • Pattern Tests, IC Tests, etc. on LdbcGraph
@BingqingLyu BingqingLyu self-assigned this Sep 18, 2024
longbinlai pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 24, 2024
<!--
Thanks for your contribution! please review
https://github.com/alibaba/GraphScope/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md before
opening an issue.
-->

## What do these changes do?

<!-- Please give a short brief about these changes. -->

As titled.
This pr add test suits based on the new GOpt-based compilation, in the
Insight+Groot ci, including:
* Gremlin Tests on ModernGraph
* Cypher Tests on MovieGraph
* Pattern Tests, IC Tests, SimpleTest on LdbcGraph

## Related issue number

<!-- Are there any issues opened that will be resolved by merging this
change? -->

#4163

---------

Co-authored-by: shirly121 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant