You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Comment added by Aroma Abeysinghe to ACCESS Integrated Science Gateways v1 Integration Roadmap document in Google docs before it was migrated to GitHub: "Science gateway providers are different from gateway owners. Providers could be platforms like SciGaP, Tapis, etc and owners could be just the community leader, tool owners, etc. So most of the time it would be the owner who would make these requests as the allocation is owned by them.".
We either need to define our terminology, like Science Gateway provider, operator, or owner, or just switch to the term "Science Gateway Operator"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Comment added by Aroma Abeysinghe to ACCESS Integrated Science Gateways v1 Integration Roadmap document in Google docs before it was migrated to GitHub: "Science gateway providers are different from gateway owners. Providers could be platforms like SciGaP, Tapis, etc and owners could be just the community leader, tool owners, etc. So most of the time it would be the owner who would make these requests as the allocation is owned by them.".
We either need to define our terminology, like Science Gateway provider, operator, or owner, or just switch to the term "Science Gateway Operator"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: