Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why did you replace libsecp256k1 with secp256k1? #196

Open
winston-wen opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Why did you replace libsecp256k1 with secp256k1? #196

winston-wen opened this issue Jan 18, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@winston-wen
Copy link

winston-wen commented Jan 18, 2023 •
edited
Loading

I've be struggling on porting multi-party-ecdsa to SGX. It's really tedious work to port the C & Rust hybrid crate secp256k1. So I resort to your advice -- is there any pitfall with the pure Rust crate libsecp256k1 ?
@winston-wen winston-wen changed the title Why did you replace libsecp256k Why did you replace libsecp256k1 with secp256k1? Jan 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@winston-wen