Any chance of adding the 22V10 ?

[waltje]

Hi:

Great project, using it with the Digital (which you seem to have mis-spelled, see PR) simulation package.

What are the chances of you adding the 22V10 device?

Just hoping... ;-)

[YulienPohl]

Thanks.
I would have implemented the GAL20V10, but there was not enough information about the inner workings, as with the GAL16V8, to implement it.

[waltje]

Oh.  Looking at their datasheets, I'd have guessed the 22V10 just has "more of the same". I am finishing up a C version of the jedec2hex converter, will commit that.

…

--Fred I would have implemented the GAL20V10, but there was not enough information about the inner workings, as with the GAL16V8, to implement it. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[YulienPohl]

Oh. Looking at their datasheets, I'd have guessed the 22V10 just has "more of the same"

The 22V10 has on each OLMC a different bit width, which would require a complete redesign.
I myself do not have enough time for such hobby projects anymore.

[waltje]

Ohyeah, that is true, they allowed for variable product terms. Well, I will look into it, as this is a useful tool. Thanks for writing it! Fred

Oh. Looking at their datasheets, I'd have guessed the 22V10 just has "more of the same"

The 22V10 has on each OLMC a different bit width, which would require a complete redesign. I myself do not have enough time for such hobby projects anymore. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>