You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As of now, processing RAW files literally deletes my system's RAM and will crash computers it's so slow, this is due to the insanely out of control multiprocessing threads implementation.
I think it's due time for a better implementation. One optimization would be thumbnails: extracting a full size JPEG from the RAW file, and then extracting a tiny thumbnail from that yields a large IO processing time that NEEDS to be cut down if full library processing is going to be anywhere near feasible.
preview-generator may yield a good results, but due to it being a rather new module, we should leave open options for multiple possible processing methods in the commandline options.
Perhaps looking into external image processing programs would be a good idea, including them as different 'thumbnail methods'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As of now, processing RAW files literally deletes my system's RAM and will crash computers it's so slow, this is due to the insanely out of control multiprocessing threads implementation.
I think it's due time for a better implementation. One optimization would be thumbnails: extracting a full size JPEG from the RAW file, and then extracting a tiny thumbnail from that yields a large IO processing time that NEEDS to be cut down if full library processing is going to be anywhere near feasible.
preview-generator may yield a good results, but due to it being a rather new module, we should leave open options for multiple possible processing methods in the commandline options.
Perhaps looking into external image processing programs would be a good idea, including them as different 'thumbnail methods'.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: