Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reproducibility of Paper Results #17

Open
marja-w opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Reproducibility of Paper Results #17

marja-w opened this issue Jan 10, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@marja-w
Copy link

marja-w commented Jan 10, 2023

Hello,

I have been trying to reproduce the results that you have presented in the paper, but my pre-trained and fine-tuned adapters only achieve an accuracy of about 0.6 on the GLUE dataset (using 4_pretrain_adapter.py, glue_1_download_glue.sh, glue_2_finetune_adapter.sh).

Since the random walks are generated using a probability, could you share the exact random walks that you used in your experiment? Maybe the bad performance is caused by the difference in training data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant