You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Apologies if this is a dumb question, but I was curious if the usage of XLNet for fine-tuning utilises the cached memory feature for long sequences.
My preliminary understanding is that XLNet is able to get around the issue of fixed segment lengths that BERT has, and that this discussion in this repo seems to show pretraining was completed with cached memory.
But when using XLNet through simpletransformers, is there a particular setting I need to set for cached memory to be used for fine-tuning? Or is it already done by default?
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hi there,
Apologies if this is a dumb question, but I was curious if the usage of XLNet for fine-tuning utilises the cached memory feature for long sequences.
My preliminary understanding is that XLNet is able to get around the issue of fixed segment lengths that BERT has, and that this discussion in this repo seems to show pretraining was completed with cached memory.
But when using XLNet through simpletransformers, is there a particular setting I need to set for cached memory to be used for fine-tuning? Or is it already done by default?
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions