You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the scenario where the rightmost element is chosen as the pivot, and all other elements are greater than the pivot (e.g., [6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]), the code handles the out-of-bounds behavior as follows: array[-1] is undefined. When undefined is compared against a number, it is coerced into NaN, resulting in false for the comparison.
While this approach works and is quite clever, I believe it could be beneficial to make the handling of these cases more explicit. This would enhance the readability and maintainability of the code, making it easier for newcomers to understand and for the code to be adapted or modified in the future.
I suggest taking a more conventional approach, such as:
while(array[--j]>pivot){if(j===left)break;}
This change would make the algorithm's logic more straightforward and easier to follow, without relying on special JavaScript behavior.
Thank you for considering this request. I'm open to feedback and suggestions on how to further improve the code.
Examples
No response
Possible workarounds
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Motivation
I've been reviewing the Quicksort partition implementation in this repository. Specifically, I'm focusing on the following segment of the code:
In the scenario where the rightmost element is chosen as the pivot, and all other elements are greater than the pivot (e.g.,
[6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
), the code handles the out-of-bounds behavior as follows:array[-1]
isundefined
. Whenundefined
is compared against a number, it is coerced intoNaN
, resulting infalse
for the comparison.While this approach works and is quite clever, I believe it could be beneficial to make the handling of these cases more explicit. This would enhance the readability and maintainability of the code, making it easier for newcomers to understand and for the code to be adapted or modified in the future.
I suggest taking a more conventional approach, such as:
This change would make the algorithm's logic more straightforward and easier to follow, without relying on special JavaScript behavior.
Thank you for considering this request. I'm open to feedback and suggestions on how to further improve the code.
Examples
No response
Possible workarounds
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: