-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide curated Plant Ontology document to be imported to BIP #412
Comments
creating a brassica-specific crop ontology will still take until end of July currently we suggest using the Trait ontology and plant ontology. |
Currently, we have 6 PlantParts in our data (each of them already used for at least 1 PlantTrial), that we should map to PO terms:
Anyway, it looks like more questions for you :). Perhaps also a data curation issue. |
Also - another question - which PO namespace(s) should we import to the PlantParts table? |
you are bumping into the same issues as I did here. I contacted the PO people by raising an issue here but no response. Yes, Whole Plots etc should not be there. can you show me an example in BIP where this is the case? |
For instance: https://bip.tgac.ac.uk/data_tables?model=plant_scoring_units&query[plant_trials.id]=2 (average of blocks). Together with "Units scored", "Sample size" and "Frame size" it looks to me like one of those "mean data" trial submissions. Would you be able to curate such cases? |
This is a curation issue for later. Plant part should be a trait term, in this case the whole plant. The average of blocks should be part of the experimental design, maybe in the design factors table. or even just in the trait descriptor "materials and methods" column. |
Closing this and moving the remaining curation issue for #530 |
This will extend the current Plant Part table. If possible it would be great to have it in the OBO format.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: