Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changing coronal hole angle formula? #29

Open
imogenagle opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Changing coronal hole angle formula? #29

imogenagle opened this issue Jul 18, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@imogenagle
Copy link

The average angle that the coronal hole is subjected to uses the Pythagorean formula to calculate the angle. Should we change the formula so that it uses non-Euclidian geometry or is the scale so large that it becomes irrelevant?

@samaloney
Copy link
Member

Which coordinate system if you measure the width in HeliographicStonyhurst (HGS) then I don't think you need to do anything, if you measure it in HelioprojectiveCartesian (HPC) then I don't think you need to do anything either but not sure how useful that measurement is?

@imogenagle
Copy link
Author

imogenagle commented Jul 29, 2024

    """calculate area of CH with minimal projection effects"""

    trupixar = abs(area / np.cos(ang))
    truarcar = trupixar * (dattoarc**2)
    trummar = truarcar * ((6.96e08 / rs) ** 2)

@imogenagle
Copy link
Author

I think it should be in heliographic stonyhurst

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants