You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The average angle that the coronal hole is subjected to uses the Pythagorean formula to calculate the angle. Should we change the formula so that it uses non-Euclidian geometry or is the scale so large that it becomes irrelevant?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Which coordinate system if you measure the width in HeliographicStonyhurst (HGS) then I don't think you need to do anything, if you measure it in HelioprojectiveCartesian (HPC) then I don't think you need to do anything either but not sure how useful that measurement is?
The average angle that the coronal hole is subjected to uses the Pythagorean formula to calculate the angle. Should we change the formula so that it uses non-Euclidian geometry or is the scale so large that it becomes irrelevant?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: