Explicitly export types not referenced by exported types

[aniketh-varma]

Fixes #686

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.00%. Comparing base (0a043f2) to head (7f32845).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #822   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.99%   99.00%           
=======================================
  Files          74       74           
  Lines       11499    11505    +6     
  Branches     1673     1673           
=======================================
+ Hits        11384    11390    +6     
  Misses        109      109           
  Partials        6        6           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[thehenrytsai]

This is awesome @aniketh-varma!! Is it possible for you to add the check in integrity-check.yml to make sure the job fails if new warnings are introduced going forward (assuming there were no other warnings needing fixing), so that your work is not in vain again.

[aniketh-varma]

Hey @thehenrytsai, I do see that the other warnings are still there. This PR addresses only the following warnings-

[warning]... defined in... but not included in the documentation

Should I go ahead and a check for only these warnings?

[aniketh-varma]

Hi @thehenrytsai, do you have any suggestions for the comment above?

[LiranCohen]

Hey @aniketh-varma! I looked at the remaining warnings and maybe those are better suited for a separate PR. I'll approve this one so that we can get it merged in.

[aniketh-varma]

Hi @thehenrytsai @taniashiba @LiranCohen, please assign the points label to this PR. Can this be considered as Medium? :)

[taniashiba]

We're on it, @aniketh-varma !

[blackgirlbytes]

Added medium points for you @aniketh-varma !