Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
Simply, the client does not directly use the Discord API unlike to other clients. I've added this as it is the key difference between other clients like Cordless, which mainly do XHR requests to get data about the Discord. WebCord does use for that purpose the official Discord website and does any of these by itself. And while Discord website does send some requests, it's still a safer choice as requests are always send the way Discord intended to do so, with the same parameters and API version Discord could expects from their official version. This greatly eliminates the risk of being banned due to being a selfbot (a bot with regular user account) and makes WebCord easier to hide as it behaves from Discord's side exactly as a Chromium browser. I plan however to change that for a Fosscord instances – their web clients aren't that great and consistent with Discord's styling, so its better to implement an API-based client for them. This will however take time and I won't likely be implemented in the nearest future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
^ Title ^
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions