You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Observed on Niri.
If a client commits the surface for an XdgToplevel with a buffer already attached, this should be a protocol error according to the XDG shell docs, but this does not appear to happen under Smithay. Instead, the compositor will appear to send the first configure using the size of the attached buffer. Does not happen under wlroots.t
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Supreeeme
changed the title
Commiting an XdgToplevel with a buffer attach doesn't result in an error
Initial commit of an XdgToplevel with a buffer already attached doesn't result in an error
Mar 18, 2024
Observed on Niri.
If a client commits the surface for an XdgToplevel with a buffer already attached, this should be a protocol error according to the XDG shell docs, but this does not appear to happen under Smithay. Instead, the compositor will appear to send the first configure using the size of the attached buffer. Does not happen under wlroots.t
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: