CHEMH-60, CHEMH-61: Section background colors

[jenbreese]

READY FOR REVIEW

Summary

• Adding a dark grey and a light grey section background.

Review By (Date)

• time allows

Criticality

• Normal

Urgency

• Normal

Review Tasks

Setup tasks and/or behavior to test

1. Check out this branch
2. Rebuild Cache and import config drush cr ; drush ci
3. Create a basic page and use the background colors and the padding.
4. Add examples of all the elements to see they work on the dark grey background in particular.
5. Verify there aren't any missing components for the dark background.
6. Verify the padding works.
7. The logic was resused from the IRSR work.

Site Configuration Sync

• Is there a config:export in this PR that changes the config sync directory?

Front End Validation

• Design is approved by @ user?
• HTML validation: Is the markup using the appropriate semantic tags and passes validation? Or, QA request ticket created?
• Cross-browser testing: Has been performed? Or, QA request ticket created?
• Automated accessibility: Scans performed? Or, QA request ticket created?
• Manual accessibility: Manually tested? Or, QA request ticket created?

Backend / Functional Validation

Code

• Are the naming conventions following our standards?
• Does the code have sufficient inline comments?
• Is there anything in this code that would be hidden or hard to discover through the UI?
• Are there any code smells?
• Are tests provided? eg (unit, behat, or codeception)

Code security

• Are all forms properly sanitized?
• Any obvious security flaws or new areas for attack?

General

• Is there anything included in this PR that is not related to the problem it is trying to solve?
• Is the approach to the problem appropriate?

Affected Projects or Products

• Does this PR impact any particular projects, products, or modules?

Associated Issues and/or People

- CHEMH-60
- CHEMH-61

Resources

• AMP Tool
• Accessibility Manual Test Script
• HTML Validator
• Browserstack and link to Browserstack Credentials

[jdwjdwjdw]

Looks good to me, thanks @jenbreese!