-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 593
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
targetArchitectures Not Generating Multi-Platform Container Images as Expected #4862
Comments
Thank you for your contribution! This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. In order to keep it open, please remove stale label or add a comment within the next 10 days. If you need a Piper team member to remove the stale label make sure to add |
Hi @SAP/jenkins-library-team, Can someone please remove the stale label and help me with the issue resolution? Thanks & Best Regards, |
Hi @SAP/jenkins-library-team, Can you please update whether this is possible and working? Thanks & Best Regards, |
I'm also interested on multiarch builds with kanikoExecute. We're currently jumping through hoops to get both arm64 and amd64 built. |
Thank you for your contribution! This issue is stale because it has been open 60 days with no activity. In order to keep it open, please remove stale label or add a comment within the next 10 days. If you need a Piper team member to remove the stale label make sure to add |
@SAP/jenkins-library-team Please remove the stale marker, thx |
The feature for building multi-arch Docker images with
kanikoExecute
optiontargetArchitectures
seems not to be working as expected. Despite setting the correct values, container images are not being built for multiple platforms.The PR #3515 has introduced the mentioned feature but the behaviour is not changing when I use the option.
Can you please clarify if this rollout was intended for all languages or is specific to language (like. Golang). Additionally, are there any specifications or requirements that Jenkins needs to meet for the proper functioning of this feature?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: