You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 20, 2018. It is now read-only.
Several extensions here have specified licence name to be "Apache License, Version 2.0" instead of the SPDX identifier "Apache-2.0". This is causing an issue with the npm licence dependency checker package: "licence-checker" which can't exclude this licence since it has a comma in the licence name. I'm trying at both ends to fix this, but if you could change the licences to be named as per the guidelines in the documentation of npm package.json it would really help (See: https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json#license)
Several extensions here have specified licence name to be "Apache License, Version 2.0" instead of the SPDX identifier "Apache-2.0". This is causing an issue with the npm licence dependency checker package: "licence-checker" which can't exclude this licence since it has a comma in the licence name. I'm trying at both ends to fix this, but if you could change the licences to be named as per the guidelines in the documentation of npm package.json it would really help (See: https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package.json#license)
Also see: https://spdx.org/licenses/
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: