New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supporting several locks without centralization #24

Open

scls19fr opened this issue Oct 29, 2018 · 1 comment

Member

scls19fr commented Oct 29, 2018 •

edited

Loading

Supporting several locks without centralization of data to avoid single point of failure might be considered.

Distributed database or private blockchain are possible implementations of such concepts.

https://www.quora.com/How-is-the-blockchain-different-from-distributed-databases-in-terms-of-record-keeping

https://www.findbestopensource.com/tagged/distributed-database

https://githubreviews.com/explore/databases/distributed-databases

rqlite
http://www.rqlite.com/ -> http://www.philipotoole.com/tag/rqlite/
https://github.com/rqlite/rqlite

https://www.cockroachlabs.com

http://alinousdb.com

https://www.rethinkdb.com

https://www.bigchaindb.com/

Member Author

scls19fr commented Oct 29, 2018 •

edited

Loading

SQLAlchemy have a dialect driver for rqlite https://github.com/rqlite/sqlalchemy-rqlite
Not sure if it's well maintained

Bedrockdb
https://bedrockdb.com/
https://github.com/Expensify/Bedrock

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment