Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OMPIRBuilder] Init default kernel max-threads with -1 #218

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: amd-trunk-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

skatrak
Copy link

@skatrak skatrak commented Dec 2, 2024

This patch removes the initialization of the MaxThreads global value and related kernel attributes based on the default workgroup size of the target architecture whenever an explicit value is not specified by the user through thread_limit or num_threads clauses.

Instead, leave these undefined cases represented as a -1 value.

This patch removes the initialization of the MaxThreads global value and
related kernel attributes based on the default workgroup size of the target
architecture whenever an explicit value is not specified by the user through
`thread_limit` or `num_threads` clauses.

Instead, leave these undefined cases represented as a -1 value.
@@ -6238,13 +6238,7 @@ OpenMPIRBuilder::InsertPointTy OpenMPIRBuilder::createTargetInit(
if (Bounds.MinTeams > 1 || Bounds.MaxTeams.front() > 0)
writeTeamsForKernel(T, *Kernel, Bounds.MinTeams, Bounds.MaxTeams.front());

// If MaxThreads not set, select the maximum between the default workgroup
// size and the MinThreads value.
int32_t MaxThreadsValue = Bounds.MaxThreads.front();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What was this value before the change?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was a function argument. My change was only to refactor these arguments into a structure. Here's a cleaned-up version of these changes, which I'm trying to upstream: llvm#116050.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants