Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failure of application of RFC 0006 - Governance #90

Open
LambdAurora opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Failure of application of RFC 0006 - Governance #90

LambdAurora opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@LambdAurora
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, I guess I'm now supposed to be a former Quilt Admin Board member.

Though, I have an issue.

I have been forcefully removed with no regards of RFC 0006 - Governance, specifically the Removal Of Staff section, which states:

Any team member or administrative board member may be removed by a majority vote of all eligible organization members. The following members are eligible:

  • All members of the relevant team
  • All members of all the sub teams of the relevant team
  • All members of all the parent teams of the relevant team
  • When the team in question is the Admin Board: All members of all teams

No vote has been held, this should make the removal, for anyone who still cares anyway.

Given the direction this is taking I guess you should just amend the RFC anyway since it seems to hold of little importance.

@ChristianLW
Copy link

I'm not one to stir up drama and I'm writing this as a complete outsider to how Quilt generally functions, but it seems concerning to me that an admin board member was forcefully removed with no vote even though the agreed upon procedures directly state that it's required.

As I understand it, LambdAurora is (was?) a respectable member of the Quilt project from early on and a respectable figure within the modding scene as a whole, so this is a confusing thing to see and concerns me greatly about the integrity of how the Quilt project is administrated.

The lack of any response (publicly, at least) for three weeks is also concerning for something so serious.

I obviously don't know what happened, and there has certainly been communication that I'm unaware of between different parties, but this is a very concerning thing to have lying around, and I think some sort of further explanation or public statement would be in order.

@sylv256
Copy link

sylv256 commented Jul 17, 2024

@ChristianLW OroArmor claimed on a commit comment on the website repository that they were drafting a blog article about this. As far as I'm aware, a vote would've resulted in her removal anyway.

@sylv256
Copy link

sylv256 commented Jul 17, 2024

Okay so apparently I've been misinformed. There will likely be no blog post.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants