-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Failure of application of RFC 0006 - Governance #90
Comments
I'm not one to stir up drama and I'm writing this as a complete outsider to how Quilt generally functions, but it seems concerning to me that an admin board member was forcefully removed with no vote even though the agreed upon procedures directly state that it's required. As I understand it, LambdAurora is (was?) a respectable member of the Quilt project from early on and a respectable figure within the modding scene as a whole, so this is a confusing thing to see and concerns me greatly about the integrity of how the Quilt project is administrated. The lack of any response (publicly, at least) for three weeks is also concerning for something so serious. I obviously don't know what happened, and there has certainly been communication that I'm unaware of between different parties, but this is a very concerning thing to have lying around, and I think some sort of further explanation or public statement would be in order. |
@ChristianLW OroArmor claimed on a commit comment on the website repository that they were drafting a blog article about this. As far as I'm aware, a vote would've resulted in her removal anyway. |
Okay so apparently I've been misinformed. There will likely be no blog post. |
Hi, I guess I'm now supposed to be a former Quilt Admin Board member.
Though, I have an issue.
I have been forcefully removed with no regards of RFC 0006 - Governance, specifically the Removal Of Staff section, which states:
No vote has been held, this should make the removal, for anyone who still cares anyway.
Given the direction this is taking I guess you should just amend the RFC anyway since it seems to hold of little importance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: