Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harmonize and reassess format of date constraint parameters #58

Open
kklein opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Harmonize and reassess format of date constraint parameters #58

kklein opened this issue Sep 19, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers question Further information is requested

Comments

@kklein
Copy link
Collaborator

kklein commented Sep 19, 2022

An example of such a parameter would be add_date_min_constraint and its min_value parameter.

First, it should be clarified, what currently works. Exemplary questions to ask:

  • Can timestamps be used, as opposed to dates?
  • Can the parameters strictly only be strings or do datetime objects with appropriate __str__ methods work as well?
  • Is the currently suggested format, e.g. “‘20121230’”, the only one working?

Second, it should be asked how it should work. Some questions to ask:

  • What are the respective ISO standards?
  • What formats to which databases support?
@kklein kklein added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers question Further information is requested labels Sep 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant