You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In my application I need the raw literals so I have to postprocess these literals and remove these qualifiers. In general I find a good practice to leave the labels simple without additional information and leave it upon the client to construct denormalized textual content based on the use-cases (e.g. for some full-text-search solution), so I was wondering what is the rationale behind publishing the ontology with these qualifiers?
Or maybe is the raw literal available somewhere else that I didn't notice?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Synonyms are appended with their type qualifiers (
(narrow)
,(exact)
, etc.), e.g.obo:TO_0000074
oboInOwl:hasExactSynonym "blast disease resistance trait (exact)"or
obo:TO_0000074
oboInOwl:hasNarrowSynonym "blast disease susceptibility (narrow)"In my application I need the raw literals so I have to postprocess these literals and remove these qualifiers. In general I find a good practice to leave the labels simple without additional information and leave it upon the client to construct denormalized textual content based on the use-cases (e.g. for some full-text-search solution), so I was wondering what is the rationale behind publishing the ontology with these qualifiers?
Or maybe is the raw literal available somewhere else that I didn't notice?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: