-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
organ specific terms of vascular tissue #662
Comments
Yes, I suggest we write a DP for these. From there automated checking, cross-product generation etc should be easy |
I think a fully combinatorial approach would lead to regrettable
overpopulation. I.e. we have a standard strategy for creating the terms,
but only allow them to be created when there is some demonstrated existing
use/need.
BS
…On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Pankaj Jaiswal ***@***.***> wrote:
We have terms like
Accession PO:0025612
Name stem cortex
Definition A portion of shoot axis cortex (PO:0000223) that is part of a
stem (PO:0009047).
This is useful when annotating objects associated with 'cortex' region
that is part_of a stem. However, we need some consistency on spatial terms
like this and a guidance for users, when to have terms like this or when
not to.
e.g.
we don't have similar spatial terms for use such as
- stem metaxylem
- root xylem
- shoot axis (stem) xylem
- root phloem
- shoot axis (stem) phloem
Ideas....
Either we create spatial terms like these in an automated way or have
consistency across the ontology to either have them or not have them. This
would help the users. I suggest going the former route by creating them in
an automated process.
Otherwise, we may have to use some annotation column in the GAF to address
this relationship. Which may work for the object (gene/qtl) annotations
submitted via GAF. It will not work when a person annotates a histological
specimen/section of a stem or root.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#662>, or mute the
thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH6qNxidlCjeN3CLGzYleUTD34REsgKdks5rcLlOgaJpZM4L_qqs>
.
|
What I propose is generation of a simple csv with the cross-product. Editors can then go through this, prune things out, and just get a general idea of the morphospace |
As part of this work, I suggest replacing textual definitions like this:
textual defs are for humans. Users will be able to see the equivalence axioms and the IDs (which will actually be hyperlinked) in amigo, ontobee, ols etc |
Great. Can you generate a csv template and we can work on it.
…On 2/13/2017 1:48 PM, Chris Mungall wrote:
As part of this work, I suggest replacing textual definitions like this:
|A portion of shoot axis cortex (PO:0000223) that is part of a stem
(PO:0009047) |
|A portion of shoot axis cortex that is part of a stem |
textual defs are for humans. Users will be able to see the equivalence
axioms and the IDs (which will actually be hyperlinked) in amigo,
ontobee, ols etc
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#662 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AHCSQEYJNRL9oXCpGnngkKS9Icgy-1Bnks5rcM-WgaJpZM4L_qqs>.
--
Pankaj Jaiswal, PhD
President, OSU Chapter Phi Kappa Phi
Associate Professor
Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology
2082 Cordley Hall
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR, 97331
USA
Ph.: +1-541-737-8471
Fax: +1-541-737-3573
email: [email protected]
Web: http://jaiswallab.cgrb.oregonstate.edu
http://icbo-conference.org
http://phikappaphi.oregonstate.edu
|
OK I started by just reverse engineering a CSV for all https://github.com/Planteome/plant-ontology/blob/mine-design-patterns/modules/part_whole.csv This is still on a branch, awaiting @marieALaporte review Note you'll soon be able to edit these csvs using Taboggan (think: phenote on the web integrated with github). cc @DoctorBud |
On 2/13/2017 2:41 PM, Chris Mungall wrote:
curious: why the interest in vascular tissue specifically?
We are going to use image annotation software AISO for a class to help
us annotate images with ontology terms. Idea is to build an annotated
image (with labelled segments) library for teaching an d training
machine learning algorithms. Baring few additional structures, the
vascular system has most common structures between leaf, stem and xylem
e.g.
https://image.slidesharecdn.com/bio23rootstemleaf-090519192018-phpapp01/95/chapter-23-lecture-roots-stems-leaves-8-728.jpg?cb=1242761004
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/dd/99/44/dd99440793074ec4900909f31296f1e4.jpg
…--
Pankaj Jaiswal, PhD
President, OSU Chapter Phi Kappa Phi
Associate Professor
Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology
2082 Cordley Hall
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR, 97331
USA
Ph.: +1-541-737-8471
Fax: +1-541-737-3573
email: [email protected]
Web: http://jaiswallab.cgrb.oregonstate.edu
http://icbo-conference.org
http://phikappaphi.oregonstate.edu
|
stems
http://images.slideplayer.com/22/6381454/slides/slide_31.jpg
root
http://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/431/flashcards/2857431/jpg/root-ranunculus-5001366751256717.jpg
https://classconnection.s3.amazonaws.com/263/flashcards/2443263/jpg/root-smilax-650-14112C6F5825907CC50.jpg
With common tissue types
…On 2/13/2017 3:04 PM, Jaiswal, Pankaj - OSU wrote:
On 2/13/2017 2:41 PM, Chris Mungall wrote:
> curious: why the interest in vascular tissue specifically?
We are going to use image annotation software AISO for a class to help
us annotate images with ontology terms. Idea is to build an annotated
image (with labelled segments) library for teaching an d training
machine learning algorithms. Baring few additional structures, the
vascular system has most common structures between leaf, stem and
xylem e.g.
https://image.slidesharecdn.com/bio23rootstemleaf-090519192018-phpapp01/95/chapter-23-lecture-roots-stems-leaves-8-728.jpg?cb=1242761004
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/dd/99/44/dd99440793074ec4900909f31296f1e4.jpg
--
Pankaj Jaiswal, PhD
President, OSU Chapter Phi Kappa Phi
Associate Professor
Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology
2082 Cordley Hall
Oregon State University
Corvallis, OR, 97331
USA
Ph.: +1-541-737-8471
Fax: +1-541-737-3573
email: [email protected]
Web: http://jaiswallab.cgrb.oregonstate.edu
http://icbo-conference.org
http://phikappaphi.oregonstate.edu
|
Here is what the PO PxW XP looks like: https://github.com/Planteome/plant-ontology/blob/mine-design-patterns/modules/part_whole-grid.md |
So what we need is a list of the plant parts that you would like to populate with the vascular tissue part of terms- suggest we start with root, leaf and shoot axis? |
sounds good to me
BS
…On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Laurel Cooper ***@***.***> wrote:
So what we need is a list of the plant parts that you would like to
populate with the vascular tissue part of terms- suggest we start with
root, leaf and shoot axis?
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#662 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AH6qN3js7huo7HDzzrguAeKTiFW0NsPNks5rdO1ygaJpZM4L_qqs>
.
|
We have terms like
Accession PO:0025612
Name stem cortex
Definition A portion of shoot axis cortex (PO:0000223) that is part of a stem (PO:0009047).
This is useful when annotating objects associated with 'cortex' region that is part_of a stem. However, we need some consistency on spatial terms like this and a guidance for users, when to have terms like this or when not to.
e.g.
we don't have similar spatial terms for use such as
Ideas....
Either we create spatial terms like these in an automated way or have consistency across the ontology to either have them or not have them. This would help the users. I suggest going the former route by creating them in an automated process.
Otherwise, we may have to use some annotation column in the GAF to address this relationship. Which may work for the object (gene/qtl) annotations submitted via GAF. It will not work when a person annotates a histological specimen/section of a stem or root.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: