You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That's a good point.
I think that in the context of EO, it is the same. the X nutrient treatment is an X treatment.
A 'plant nutrient treatment' is defined as 'A plant chemical treatment (EO:0007189) involving a plant nutrient or a combination of plant nutrients.'. The assumption here is that the chemicals listed under that are considered as nutrients for a plant. Or at least, this is my understanding of the EO hierarchy. I see the nutrient part of the classes as being useful for classification purposes.
But I can see the example when after a certain amount of the chemical, the chemical would not have the role of nutrient and could maybe start to hurt the plant.
@cmungall do you really think that they should be modelled differently ?
terms that are in the eo.tsv but not in the exposure csvs
the atom ones need to be replaced by ion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: