-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
wheat_TD.csv
We can't make this file beautiful and searchable because it's too large.
826 lines (826 loc) · 661 KB
/
wheat_TD.csv
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
"Curation";"Variable ID";"Variable name";"Variable synonyms";"Context of use";"Growth stage";"Variable status";"Variable Xref";"Institution";"Scientist";"Date";"Language";"Crop";"Trait ID";"Trait name";"Trait class";"Trait description";"Trait synonyms";"Main trait abbreviation";"Alternative trait abbreviations";"Entity";"Attribute";"Trait status";"Trait Xref";"Method ID";"Method name";"Method class";"Method description";"Formula";"Method reference";"Scale ID";"Scale name";"Scale class";"Decimal places";"Lower limit";"Upper limit";"Scale Xref";"Category 1";"Category 2";"Category 3";"Category 4";"Category 5";"Category 6";"Category 7";"Category 8";"Category 9";"Category 10";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001034";"BM_Calc_gm2";"BM_g_m2";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29020";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000005";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at maturity.";"Biological yield";"BM";"AGBM, BMMat, BIOMAS";"Plant";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";;;"CO_321:0001027";"BM Computation";"Computation";"Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. Biomass as other yield components can be calculated or measured individually (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000805";"g/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001035";"BM_Calc_kgha";"BM_kg_ha";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29022";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000005";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at maturity.";"Biological yield";"BM";"AGBM, BMMat, BIOMAS";"Plant";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";;;"CO_321:0001027";"BM Computation";"Computation";"Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. Biomass as other yield components can be calculated or measured individually (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000804";"kg/ha";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"20000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001036";"BM_Calc_tha";"BM_t_ha";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_18010";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000005";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at maturity.";"Biological yield";"BM";"AGBM, BMMat, BIOMAS";"Plant";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";;;"CO_321:0001027";"BM Computation";"Computation";"Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. Biomass as other yield components can be calculated or measured individually (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000432";"t/ha";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"20.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001037";"BM_M_gPlnt";"BM_g_pl";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29903";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000005";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at maturity.";"Biological yield";"BM";"AGBM, BMMat, BIOMAS";"Plant";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";;;"CO_321:0000229";"BM Measurement";"Measurement";"Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. Biomass as other yield components can be calculated or measured individually (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0001431";"g/plant";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001038";"BM_M_gPlot";"BM_g_plot";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22668";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000005";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at maturity.";"Biological yield";"BM";"AGBM, BMMat, BIOMAS";"Plant";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";;;"CO_321:0000229";"BM Measurement";"Measurement";"Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. Biomass as other yield components can be calculated or measured individually (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000412";"g/plot";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"12000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001039";"BM_M_kgPlot";"BM_kg_plot";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22669";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000005";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at maturity.";"Biological yield";"BM";"AGBM, BMMat, BIOMAS";"Plant";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";;;"CO_321:0000229";"BM Measurement";"Measurement";"Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. Biomass as other yield components can be calculated or measured individually (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000806";"kg/plot";"Numerical";"3.0";"1.0";"6.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001040";"AcdTol_E_1to5";"ACDTOL _1_5";"Trial evaluation";"DS15-DS65";;"BMS_29004";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000078";"Acid soil tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant tolerance to acid soil.";;"AcdTol";;"Plant";"Acid soil tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000299";"AcdTol Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth of plants per plot/entry in a low pH (acid) soil field and rate the tolerance.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 15)";"CO_321:0000464";"1-5 TOL scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= highly susceptible";"4= tolerant";"5= highly tolerant";"2= susceptible";"3= intermediate";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001041";"AgrScr_E_0to9";"AGRSCR_0_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Generally DS69-DS81";;"BMS_23052";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000162";"Agronomic score";"Agronomical traits";"Rating of overall agronomic attributes and health of plants.";"Phenotypic acceptability";"AgrScr";"AGRSCR";"Plant";"Phenotypic acceptability";;;"CO_321:0000351";"AgrScr Estimation";"Estimation";"For agronomic score observe visually detectable signs of factors limiting yields and rate.";;;"CO_321:0000885";"0-9 scoring scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= very poor (VP)";"3= poor to fair (P-F)";"4= fair (F)";"1= very poor to poor (VP-P)";"2= poor (P)";"7= good to very good (G-VG)";"8= very good (VG)";"5= fair to good (F-G)";"6= good (G)";"9= excellent (E)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001042";"AgrScr_E_1to9";"AGRSCR_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Generally DS69-DS81";;"BMS_23051";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000162";"Agronomic score";"Agronomical traits";"Rating of overall agronomic attributes and health of plants.";"Phenotypic acceptability";"AgrScr";"AGRSCR";"Plant";"Phenotypic acceptability";;;"CO_321:0000351";"AgrScr Estimation";"Estimation";"For agronomic score observe visually detectable signs of factors limiting yields and rate.";;;"CO_321:0000884";"1-9 scoring scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= very poor (VP)";"4= poor to fair (P-F)";"5= fair (F)";"2= very poor to poor (VP-P)";"3= poor (P)";"8= good to very good (G-VG)";"9= very good (VG)";"6= fair to good (F-G)";"7= good (G)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001043";"AgrScr_E_1to5";"AGRSCR_1_5";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Generally DS69-DS81";;"BMS_23050";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000162";"Agronomic score";"Agronomical traits";"Rating of overall agronomic attributes and health of plants.";"Phenotypic acceptability";"AgrScr";"AGRSCR";"Plant";"Phenotypic acceptability";;;"CO_321:0000351";"AgrScr Estimation";"Estimation";"For agronomic score observe visually detectable signs of factors limiting yields and rate.";;;"CO_321:0000462";"1-5 scoring scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= very poor (VP)";"4= good (G)";"5= very good (VG)";"2= poor (P)";"3= fair (F)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001044";"AtritResp_E_1to8";"ATRIT _1_8__RESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29015";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000082";"Alternaria leaf blight plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Alternaria leaf blight response in the plants caused by the agent Alternaria triticina.";;"AtritResp";;"Leaf";"Alternaria leaf blight plant response";;;"CO_321:0000304";"AtritResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Alternaria leaf blight field response.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000471";"1-8 generic disease field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no visible infection (0)";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small lesions surrounded by necrotic areas";"I= intermediate (M), lesions of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis";"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small lesions";"R-MR= resistant to moderately resistance (R-MR)";"S= susceptible (S), large lesions, no necrosis or chlorosis";"MS= moderately Susceptible (MS), medium-sized lesions, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible";"MS-S= moderately susceptible to susceptible (MS-S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001045";"AlTol_E_1to9";"ALUTOL_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS15-DS65";;"BMS_29005";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000079";"Aluminum tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant tolerance to aluminum.";;"AlTol";"ALUTOL";"Plant";"Aluminum tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000300";"AlTol Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth of plants per plot/entry in a soil presenting aluminum toxicity and rate the tolerance.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 15)";"CO_321:0000468";"1-9 TOL scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= highly susceptible";"4= susceptible to moderately susceptible";"5= moderately susceptible";"2= highly susceptible to susceptible";"3= susceptible";"8= tolerant";"9= highly tolerant";"6= moderately susceptible to moderately tolerant";"7= moderately tolerant";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001046";"AntDmg_E_pct";"ANTDMG_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29013";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000084";"Ant damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by ants.";;"AntDmg";;"Plant";"Ant damage";;;"CO_321:0000305";"AntDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for ant damage.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001047";"Ant_date_ymd";"ANTD_yyyymmdd, ANTD, ANTDATE";"Trial evaluation";"Flowering half complete (DS65)";;"BMS_29012";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000121";"Anthesis time";"Phenological traits";"Anthesis or flowering time is the period during which a flower is fully open and functional. pollination and fertilization occur during this period.";"Flowering time";"Ant";"Flowering, Flw, A";"Plant";"Anthesis time";;;"CO_321:0000832";"Ant DS65 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of anthesis (DS65) when 50% of spikes have flowered (i.e. at least 1 anther dehisced).";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000850";"yyyymmdd";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001048";"Ant_dto_day";"DTA_days, DAYSAN, ANT";"Trial evaluation";"Flowering half complete (DS65)";;"BMS_22674";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000121";"Anthesis time";"Phenological traits";"Anthesis or flowering time is the period during which a flower is fully open and functional. pollination and fertilization occur during this period.";"Flowering time";"Ant";"Flowering, Flw, A";"Plant";"Anthesis time";;;"CO_321:0000336";"Ant DS65 DT Computation";"Computation";"Number of days required from sowing to when 50% of spikes have flowered (DS65). However, when planting in dry soils in dryland areas it is counted from the first day of rainfall or irrigation which is sufficient for germination, or from emergence date.";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001049";"AphDmg_E_pct";"APHDMG_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22924";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000085";"Aphid damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by various species of aphids.";"DMGAPH";"AphDmg";;"Plant";"Aphid damage";;;"CO_321:0000306";"AphDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for aphid damage.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001050";"AphDmg_E_1to5";"APHDMG_1_5";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_23208";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000085";"Aphid damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by various species of aphids.";"DMGAPH";"AphDmg";;"Plant";"Aphid damage";;;"CO_321:0000306";"AphDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for aphid damage.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001051";"ArmyWDmg_E_pct";"ARMDMG_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29014";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000086";"Armyworm damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by armyworm.";;"ArmyWDmg";"ARMDMG";"Plant";"Armyworm damage";;;"CO_321:0000307";"ArmyWDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for armyworm damage.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001052";"AwnLng_M_cm";"AWNLNG _cm";"Trial evaluation";"DS75-DS89";;"BMS_29018";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000026";"Awn length";"Morphological traits";"Awn length.";;"AwnLng";;"Awn";"Length";;;"CO_321:0000247";"AwnLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for awn length.";;;"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";"1.0";"5.0";"90.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001053";"BLBInc_E_0to9pcttext";"BLB_0_9text__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22827";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000931";"Bacterial leaf blight incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Wheat bacterial leaf blight incidence in the plants caused by the agent pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. symptoms: small (less than 0.04 inches) water-soaked lesions expand and eventually coalesce. Initial lesions become necrotic and turn from gray-green to tan-white. Entire leaves may become necrotic, but heads and glumes are typically symptomless.";"BLB, PSYRI";"BLBInc";"PsyriInc";"Leaf";"Bacterial leaf blight incidence";;;"CO_321:0000346";"BLBInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Bacterial leaf blight incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 1997 (Chapter 3)";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001054";"BLBSev_E_00to99";"BLB_00_99__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22826";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000932";"Bacterial leaf blight severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Wheat bacterial leaf blight severity in the plants caused by the agent Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. symptoms: small (less than 0.04 inches) water-soaked lesions expand and eventually coalesce. initial lesions become necrotic and turn from gray-green to tan-white. Entire leaves may become necrotic, but heads and glumes are typically symptomless.";"BLB, PSYRI";"BLBSev";"PsyriSev";"Leaf";"Bacterial leaf blight severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001055";"BLSSev_E_00to99";"BLS_00_99";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29019";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001019";"Bacterial leaf streak severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Bacterial leaf streak severity in the plants caused by the agent Xanthomonas translucens. The disease, called black chaff when on the glumes.";"BLS, black chaff";"BLSSev";"PsyriSev";"Leaf";"Bacterial leaf streak severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001056";"HgramInc_E_0to9pcttext";"HGRAM_0_9text";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22835";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000933";"Barley Helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence in the plants caused by the agent Drechslera graminea (helminthosporium gramineum).";;"HgramInc";;"Leaf";"Barley Helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence";;;"CO_321:0000691";"HgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Barley Helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001057";"HgramInc_E_pct";"HGRAM_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22836";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000933";"Barley Helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence in the plants caused by the agent Drechslera graminea (helminthosporium gramineum).";;"HgramInc";;"Leaf";"Barley Helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence";;;"CO_321:0000691";"HgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Barley Helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001058";"HgramInc_E_0to9pct";"HGRAM_0_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22834";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000933";"Barley Helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence in the plants caused by the agent Drechslera graminea (helminthosporium gramineum).";;"HgramInc";;"Leaf";"Barley Helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence";;;"CO_321:0000691";"HgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Barley Helminthosporium leaf stripe incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001059";"PhordCI_Calc_pct";"PHORD_pct__CI";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_23042";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000692";"Barley leaf rust coefficient of infection";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley leaf rust incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia hordei.";"Barley leaf rust CI";"PhordCI";;"Leaf";"Barley leaf rust coefficient of infection";;;"CO_321:0001026";"Rust Coefficient of infection Computation";"Computation";"Coefficient of infection (CI) calculated by multiplying the severity times a constant for host response: where immune = 0.0, R=0.2, MR =0.4, MS =0.8, and S=1.0.";"xxxx";"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001060";"PhordInc_E_1to9";"PHORD_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_23044";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000935";"Barley leaf rust incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley leaf rust incidence in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia hordei.";;"PhordInc";;"Leaf";"Barley leaf rust incidence";;;"CO_321:0000648";"PhordInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Barley leaf rust incidence.";;"Roelfs, A.P., R.P. Singh, and E.E. Saari. 1992. Rust Diseases of Wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.";"CO_321:0000465";"1-9 incidence scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= low to medium";"5= medium";"2= very low";"3= low";"8= very high";"9= severe";"6= medium to high";"7= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001061";"PhordSev_E_pct";"PHORD_pct__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29135";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000647";"Barley leaf rust severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley leaf rust severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia hordei.";;"PhordSev";;"Leaf";"Barley leaf rust severity";;;"CO_321:0000693";"Rust severity Estimation";"Estimation";"Severity of rust is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001062";"PhordSev_E_0to12";"PHORD_0_12__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_23043";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000647";"Barley leaf rust severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley leaf rust severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia hordei.";;"PhordSev";;"Leaf";"Barley leaf rust severity";;;"CO_321:0000324";"Modified cobb scale for severity";"Estimation";"Severity of leaf/stem/stripe rust is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000753";"0-12 Modified Cobb Scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= 0% (no uredia)";"10= 10% (3.7% occupied by uredia)";"20= 20% (7.4% occupied by uredia)";"1= 1% (0.37% occupied by uredia)";"5= 5% (1.85% occupied by uredia)";"50= 50% (18.5% occupied by uredia)";"60= 60% (22.2% occupied by uredia)";"30= 30% (11.1% occupied by uredia)";"40= 40% (14.8% occupied by uredia)";"80= 80% (29.6% occupied by uredia)";"90= 90% (33.3% occupied by uredia)";"70= 70% (25.9% occupied by uredia)";"100= 100% (37% occupied by uredia)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001063";"RsecaInc_E_0to9pcttext";"RSECA_0_9text";"Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22812";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000936";"Barley scald incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley scald incidence in the plants caused by the agent Rhynchosporium secalis.";;"RsecaInc";"RSECA";"Plant";"Barley scald incidence";;;"CO_321:0000372";"RsecaInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for barley scald incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001064";"RSecaSev_E_00to99text";"RSECA_00_99text__SEV";"Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22813";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000710";"Barley scald severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley scald severity in the plants caused by the agent Rhynchosporium secalis.";;"RsecaSev";"RSECA";"Plant";"Barley scald severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000728";"Double digit (00-99) + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001065";"RsecaSev_E_00to99";"RSECA_00_99__SEV";"Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22811";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000710";"Barley scald severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley scald severity in the plants caused by the agent Rhynchosporium secalis.";;"RsecaSev";"RSECA";"Plant";"Barley scald severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001066";"BSMV_E_0to9pct";"BSMV_0_9";"Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_29025";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000095";"Barley stripe mosaic incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley stripe mosaic incidence in the plants caused by barley stripe mosaic virus.";;"BSMV";;"Plant";"Barley stripe mosaic incidence";;;"CO_321:0000315";"BSMV Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for barley stripe mosaic virus incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001067";"BYDInc_E_0to9pcttext";"BYD_0_9text";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22848";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000096";"Barley yellow dwarf incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Wheat yellow dwarf incidence in the plants caused by the agent wheat yellow dwarf virus.";;"BYDInc";"BYDV";"Plant";"Barley yellow dwarf incidence";;;"CO_321:0000316";"BYDInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for barley yellow dwarf incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001068";"BYDInc_E_pct";"BYD_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_22849";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000096";"Barley yellow dwarf incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Wheat yellow dwarf incidence in the plants caused by the agent wheat yellow dwarf virus.";;"BYDInc";"BYDV";"Plant";"Barley yellow dwarf incidence";;;"CO_321:0000316";"BYDInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for barley yellow dwarf incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001069";"BYDInc_E_0to9pct";"BYD_0_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_22847";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000096";"Barley yellow dwarf incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Wheat yellow dwarf incidence in the plants caused by the agent wheat yellow dwarf virus.";;"BYDInc";"BYDV";"Plant";"Barley yellow dwarf incidence";;;"CO_321:0000316";"BYDInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for barley yellow dwarf incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001070";"BirdDmg_E_pct";"BIRDDMG_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22921";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000087";"Bird damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by birds.";;"BirdDmg";"DmgBird, BIRDDMG, DMGBIR";"Plant";"Bird damage";;;"CO_321:0000308";"BirdDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for bird damage.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001071";"BirdDmg_E_1to5";"BIRDDMG_1_5, BirdDmg_N_T_S_M_V";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22715";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000087";"Bird damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by birds.";;"BirdDmg";"DmgBird, BIRDDMG, DMGBIR";"Plant";"Bird damage";;;"CO_321:0000308";"BirdDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for bird damage.";;;"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001072";"BlkPtInc_E_pct";"BLKPT_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_22846";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000097";"Black point incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Black point incidence in the plants caused by the fungal species such as Helminthosporium sativum (Cochliobolus sativus), Alternaria alternata and fusarium spp. also black point symptoms are associated to physiological disorders.";;"BlkPtInc";;"Grain";"Black point incidence";;;"CO_321:0000694";"BlkPtInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Black point incidence is usually expressed as the percentage of grain with black point symptoms.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001073";"BlkPtInc_E_0to9pct";"BLKPT_0_9";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_22844";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000097";"Black point incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Black point incidence in the plants caused by the fungal species such as Helminthosporium sativum (Cochliobolus sativus), Alternaria alternata and fusarium spp. also black point symptoms are associated to physiological disorders.";;"BlkPtInc";;"Grain";"Black point incidence";;;"CO_321:0000694";"BlkPtInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Black point incidence is usually expressed as the percentage of grain with black point symptoms.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001074";"Boot_date_ymd";"BOOTD_yyyymmdd, BOOTD, BOOTDATE";"Research-intensive characterization";"Boot swollen (DS45)";;"BMS_29023";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000191";"Booting time";"Phenological traits";"Booting time is just prior to spike emergence, when the flag leaf sheath encloses the growing spike.";;"Boot";"Booting, B";"Plant";"Booting time";;;"CO_321:0000833";"Boot DS45 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record booting stage (DS45) when 50% of culms present boot swollen.";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000850";"yyyymmdd";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001075";"Boot_dateInit_ymd";"IBD_yyyymmdd, IBD";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS39-DS41";;"BMS_29100";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000191";"Booting time";"Phenological traits";"Booting time is just prior to spike emergence, when the flag leaf sheath encloses the growing spike.";;"Boot";"Booting, B";"Plant";"Booting time";;;"CO_321:0000841";"Boot DS39 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of initiation of booting stage when 50% of the culms expected to produce spikes are between DS39 (Flag leaf ligule/collar just visible) and DS41 (Flag leaf sheath extending).";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000850";"yyyymmdd";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001076";"Boot_dto_day";"DTB_days, DTB, BOOT";"Research-intensive characterization";"Boot swollen (DS45)";;"BMS_29037";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000191";"Booting time";"Phenological traits";"Booting time is just prior to spike emergence, when the flag leaf sheath encloses the growing spike.";;"Boot";"Booting, B";"Plant";"Booting time";;;"CO_321:0000376";"Boot DS45 DT Computation";"Computation";"Number of days from sowing to booting stage (DS45). However, when planting in dry soils in dryland areas it is counted from the first day of rainfall or irrigation which is sufficient for germination, or from emergence date.";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001077";"Boot_dtoInit_day";"DTIB_days, DTIB";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS39-DS41";;"BMS_29041";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000191";"Booting time";"Phenological traits";"Booting time is just prior to spike emergence, when the flag leaf sheath encloses the growing spike.";;"Boot";"Booting, B";"Plant";"Booting time";;;"CO_321:0000379";"Boot DS39 DT Computation";"Computation";"Number of days from sowing to initiation of booting (DS39-DS41). However, when planting in dry soils in dryland areas it is counted from the first day of rainfall or irrigation which is sufficient for germination, or from emergence date.";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001078";"BTol_E_1to9";"BORONTOL_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS15-DS65";;"BMS_29024";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000678";"Boron tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant tolerance to high levels of soil boron.";;"BTol";"BORONTOL";"Plant";"Boron tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000792";"BTol Estimation";"Estimation";"The response of a cultivar or genotype is expressed on a score 1-9, where 1= highly susceptible and 9 = highly tolerant, based on the extent of bronze colored necrosis of leaf tips extending down the leaf margins";;;"CO_321:0000468";"1-9 TOL scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= highly susceptible";"4= susceptible to moderately susceptible";"5= moderately susceptible";"2= highly susceptible to susceptible";"3= susceptible";"8= tolerant";"9= highly tolerant";"6= moderately susceptible to moderately tolerant";"7= moderately tolerant";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001079";"CrmStr_E_1to5";"CRMSTR_1_5";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29030";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000065";"Bread crumb structure";"Quality traits";"The cellular structure of wheat bread crumb.";;"CrmStr";;"Bread";"Structure";;;"CO_321:0000287";"CrmStr Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for crumb structure.";;;"CO_321:0000462";"1-5 scoring scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= very poor (VP)";"4= good (G)";"5= very good (VG)";"2= poor (P)";"3= fair (F)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001080";"LofVol_M_ml";"LOFVOL_ml";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_23219";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000124";"Bread loaf volume";"Quality traits";"Baking quality of flour describing bread loaf volume.";;"LofVol";;"Bread";"Loaf volume";;;"CO_321:0000338";"LofVol Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for loaf volume.";;;"CO_321:0000427";"ml";"Numerical";"1.0";"4.0";"25.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001081";"NDVI_M_Idx";"NDVI_index";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29122";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000301";"Canopy normalized difference vegetation index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized difference vegetation index is used to measure vegetative greenness and canopy photosynthetic size.";;"NDVI";;"Canopy";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001082";"NPQI_M_Idx";"NPQI_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29124";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000197";"Canopy normalized pheophytinization index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized pheophytinization index can be used to detect chlorophyll degradation.";;"NPQI";;"Canopy";"Normalized pheophytinization index";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001083";"NWI1_M_Idx";"NWI1_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29125";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000198";"Canopy normalized water index 1";"Physiological traits";"Normalized water index 1 is used track changes in rwc, leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, and foliage minus air temperature differences when plant water stress is well developed (rwc<0.85).";;"NWI1";;"Canopy";"Normalized water index 1";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001084";"NWI2_M_Idx";"NWI2_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29126";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000199";"Canopy normalized water index 2";"Physiological traits";"Normalized water index 2 is used track changes in rwc, leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, and foliage minus air temperature differences when plant water stress is well developed (rwc<0.85).";;"NWI2";;"Canopy";"Normalized water index 2";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001085";"NWI3_M_Idx";"NWI3_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29127";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000200";"Canopy normalized water index 3";"Physiological traits";"Normalized water index 3 is used track changes in rwc, leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, and foliage minus air temperature differences when plant water stress is well developed (rwc<0.85).";;"NWI3";;"Canopy";"Normalized water index 3";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001086";"NWI4_M_Idx";"NWI4_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29128";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000201";"Canopy normalized water index 4";"Physiological traits";"Normalized water index 4 is used track changes in rwc, leaf water potential, stomatal conductance, and foliage minus air temperature differences when plant water stress is well developed (rwc<0.85).";;"NWI4";;"Canopy";"Normalized water index 4";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001087";"PRI_M_Idx";"PRI_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29145";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000202";"Canopy photochemical reflectance index";"Physiological traits";"Photochemical reflectance index is correlated with the de-epoxidation stage of the xanthophylls cycle, with zeaxanthin, and with radiation-use efficiency (filella et al., 1996). higher pri values indicate greater efficiency.";;"PRI";;"Canopy";"Photochemical reflectance index";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001088";"RARSc_M_Idx";"RARSc_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29153";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000203";"Canopy ratio analysis of reflectance spectra carotenoid";"Physiological traits";"Rarsc is an estimation of carotenoid content.";;"RARSc";;"Canopy";"Ratio analysis of reflectance spectra carotenoid";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001089";"RARSa_M_Idx";"RARSa_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29151";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000204";"Canopy ratio analysis of reflectance spectra chlorophyll a";"Physiological traits";"Rarsa is an estimation of chlorophyll a content.";;"RARSa";;"Canopy";"Ratio analysis of reflectance spectra chlorophyll a";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001090";"RARSb_M_Idx";"RARSb_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29152";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000205";"Canopy ratio analysis of reflectance spectra chlorophyll b";"Physiological traits";"Rarsb is an estimation of chlorophyll b content.";;"RARSb";;"Canopy";"Ratio analysis of reflectance spectra chlorophyll b";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001091";"SR_M_Idx";"SR_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29174";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000206";"Canopy simple ratio";"Physiological traits";"A vegetation index related with canopy structure, light absorption and photosynthetic capacity.";;"SR";;"Canopy";"Simple ratio";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001092";"StayGreen_E_1to5";"STAYGREEN_1_5";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS15-DS91";;"BMS_23225";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000059";"Canopy stay green";"Physiological traits";"Ability of the plant to remain/maintain green leaves, stems and spikes at the time of senescing.";;"StayGreen";"STAGRE";"Canopy";"Stay green";;;"CO_321:0000280";"StayGreen Estimation";"Estimation";"Stay-green assessment is conducted through the growing season, starting with the onset of the senescence of the specific organ to be evaluated.";;;"CO_321:0000462";"1-5 scoring scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= very poor (VP)";"4= good (G)";"5= very good (VG)";"2= poor (P)";"3= fair (F)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001093";"SIPI_M_Idx";"SIPI_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29170";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000208";"Canopy structural independent pigment index";"Physiological traits";"Structural independent pigment index uses wavelengths showing the best semi-empirical estimation of the carotenoid chlorophyll a ratio (car:chla ratio), and its formulation minimizes the disrupting effects of leaf surface and mesophyll structure.";;"SIPI";;"Canopy";"Structural independent pigment index";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001094";"CT_M_C";"CT_C";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS24-DS81";;"BMS_29032";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;;"CO_321:0000381";"CT Measurement";"Measurement";"Take measurements at least two times from full ground cover to the end of booting ('pre-heading'), and at least two times from the end of anthesis to late grainfilling ('grain-filling') -with 5-7 days between each measurement to give a reasonably heritable estimate of trait expression.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 1)";"CO_321:0000414";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001095";"CTD_Calc_C";"CTD_C";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Pre-heading and during grain-filling";;"BMS_23015";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000006";"Canopy temperature depression";"Physiological traits";"Difference between ambient temperature and canopy temperature.";;"CTD";;"Canopy";"Temperature depression";;;"CO_321:0000230";"CTD Computation";"Computation";"Standard method for canopy temperature depression.";"xxxx";"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 1)";"CO_321:0000414";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001096";"WI_M_Idx";"WI_index";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;"BMS_29204";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000209";"Canopy water index";"Physiological traits";"Water index use reflectance at 970 nm as a wavelength sensitive to water content, while reflectance at 900 nm is taken as a reference which is similarly affected by canopy and leaf structures but with null absorption by water.";;"WI";;"Canopy";"Water index";;;"CO_321:0000364";"Canopy spectral reflectance Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001097";"ColdTol_E_pct";"COLDTOL_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_23207";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000080";"Cold tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant tolerance to lower temperatures than the optimum.";"Low temperature tolerance, Cold susceptibility";"ColdTol";"COLDTOL, CLDTOL";"Plant";"Cold tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000302";"ColdTol Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth of plants per plot/entry at temperature lower than the optimum temperature and rate the tolerance.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001098";"ColdTol_E_1to5";"COLDTOL_1_5";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29027";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000080";"Cold tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant tolerance to lower temperatures than the optimum.";"Low temperature tolerance, Cold susceptibility";"ColdTol";"COLDTOL, CLDTOL";"Plant";"Cold tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000302";"ColdTol Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth of plants per plot/entry at temperature lower than the optimum temperature and rate the tolerance.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000464";"1-5 TOL scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= highly susceptible";"4= tolerant";"5= highly tolerant";"2= susceptible";"3= intermediate";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001099";"ColeopLng_M_cm";"COLEOPLNG _cm";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS09-DS10";;"BMS_29028";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000029";"Coleoptile length";"Morphological traits";"Length of coleoptile (a protective sheath that surrounds the shoot tip and the embryonic leaves of the young shoot of grasses).";;"ColeopLng";;"Coleoptile";"Length";;;"CO_321:0000250";"ColeopLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for coleoptile length.";;;"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";"1.0";"5.0";"90.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001100";"TilSpSpkInc_E_pct";"TILSP_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"From DS85";;"BMS_23228";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000281";"Common bunt spike incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Common bunt (stinking bunt, covered smut, hill bunt, complete bunt, low bunt, high bunt) incidence in the plants caused by the agent Tilletia species.";;"TilSpSpkInc";"CBSpkInc, TILSP, CB";"Spike";"Common bunt spike incidence";;;"CO_321:0000363";"TilSpSpkInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Common bunt incidence is usually expressed as the percentage of bunted spikes within a row.";;"Wilcoxson and Saari, 1996";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001101";"RootRot_E_0to9pct";"ROOTROT_0_9";"Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_29160";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000649";"Common root rot incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Common root rot incidence in the plants caused by the agents Cochliobolus sativus, fusarium spp., and Pythium species.";;"RootRot";;"Plant";"Common root rot incidence";;;"CO_321:0000695";"RootRot Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for common root rot incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001102";"CookSdF_M_Idx";"COKSDF_index";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29026";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000064";"Cookie spread factor";"Quality traits";"The ratio between average height and width of cookies.";;"CookSdF";"COKSDF";"Cookie";"Spread factor";;;"CO_321:0000286";"CookSdF Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for cookie spread factor.";;;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001103";"GrndCov_GS15_pct";"GRNDCOV_pct__GS15";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS15";;"BMS_29079";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000014";"Crop ground cover";"Agronomical traits";"Crop ground cover, or the percentage of soil surface covered by plant foliage.";;"GrndCov";"GRNDCOV, GC";"Plant";"Ground cover";;;"CO_321:0000237";"GrndCov Measurement (GS15)";"Measurement";"Standard method for ground cover at 5 leaves stage.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001104";"GrndCov_M_pct";"GRNDCOV_pct";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS35";;"BMS_29078";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000014";"Crop ground cover";"Agronomical traits";"Crop ground cover, or the percentage of soil surface covered by plant foliage.";;"GrndCov";"GRNDCOV, GC";"Plant";"Ground cover";;;"CO_321:0000405";"GrndCov Measurement";"Measurement";"High throughput approaches to measuring ground cover are: visual assessment or digital analysis of photographs";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 10)";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001105";"CropGrwRate_Calc_gm2day";"CROPGRWRATE_g_m2_day";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS05-DS89";;"BMS_29031";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000407";"Crop growth rate";"Physiological traits";"It is the rate of dry matter production per unit area.";;"CGR";"CGR";"Plant";"Biomass production";;;"CO_321:0000408";"CropGrwRate Computation";"Computation";"Standard method for crop growth rate.";"xxxx";"Karimi and Siddique, 1991";"CO_321:0000420";"g/m2/day";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001106";"HavenDmg_E_pct";"HAVEN_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;"BMS_29093";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000111";"Cyst nematode damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The wheat cyst nematode damage caused by cyst nematode, Heterodera avenae.";;"HavenDmg";"CCNDmg, HAVEN, CCN";"Root";"Cyst nematode damage";;;"CO_321:0000327";"HavenDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Cereal cyst nematodes are more readily detected on seedlings than on adult plants. The roots of infested plants develop frequent branches and swellings (cysts).";;"Riley et al., 2009, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001107";"DRidge_date_ymd";"DRD_yyyymmdd, DRD";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS14-DS15 approx.";;"BMS_29034";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000182";"Double ridge time";"Phenological traits";"Double ridge time is just when apex changes from the vegetative to the reproductive stage.";;"DRidge";"DR";"Plant";"Double ridge time";;;"CO_321:0000834";"DR date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of double ridge stage (DS14-15 approx.). Double ridge signifies that the plant?s main growing point will produce no more primordial leaves, and instead will produce primordial spikelets of the young spike. The dissection and observation of the main tiller apex on an optic magnifier is required.";;"Kirby and Appleyard, 1984";"CO_321:0000850";"yyyymmdd";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001108";"DRidge_dto_day";"DTDR_days, DR, DTDR";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS14-DS15 approx.";;"BMS_29038";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000182";"Double ridge time";"Phenological traits";"Double ridge time is just when apex changes from the vegetative to the reproductive stage.";;"DRidge";"DR";"Plant";"Double ridge time";;;"CO_321:0000377";"DR DT Computation";"Computation";"Number of days from sowing to double ridge (DS14-15 approx.). However, when planting in dry soils in dryland areas it is counted from the first day of rainfall or irrigation which is sufficient for germination, or from emergence date.";"xxxx";"Kirby and Appleyard, 1984";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001109";"AlvIe_Calc_pct";"ALVIe_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29006";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000210";"Dough alveograph extensibility index";"Quality traits";"It is the extensibility index of the dough. (p200/p)*100, p200: pressure (p) at 4 cm (l= 40mm) of the curve.";;"AlvIe";;"Dough";"Alveograph extensibility index";;;"CO_321:0000385";"ALVEOGRAPH determination AACC 54-30 A";"Measurement";"1. A sample of 60 grams or 250 grams of flour is mixed with a salt solution to form a dough. 2. The dough is sheeted, rested and inflated in the Chopin Alveograph, 2. Five 4.5 centimeter circular dough patties are formed and then rested in the alveograph in a temperature-regulated compartment at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 minutes, 3. Each dough patty is tested individually. The alveograph blows air into a dough patty, which expands into a bubble that eventually breaks, 4. The pressure inside the bubble is recorded as a curve on graph paper. The alveograph determines the gluten strength of a dough by measuring the force required to blow and break a bubble of dough. The results include P Value, L Value, and W Value.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001110";"AlvPG_Calc_Idx";"ALVPG_index";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29009";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000395";"Dough alveograph P/G";"Quality traits";"It is the p/g ratio.";"Tenacity/extensibility ratio";"AlvPG";;"Dough";"Alveograph P/G";;;"CO_321:0000385";"ALVEOGRAPH determination AACC 54-30 A";"Measurement";"1. A sample of 60 grams or 250 grams of flour is mixed with a salt solution to form a dough. 2. The dough is sheeted, rested and inflated in the Chopin Alveograph, 2. Five 4.5 centimeter circular dough patties are formed and then rested in the alveograph in a temperature-regulated compartment at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 minutes, 3. Each dough patty is tested individually. The alveograph blows air into a dough patty, which expands into a bubble that eventually breaks, 4. The pressure inside the bubble is recorded as a curve on graph paper. The alveograph determines the gluten strength of a dough by measuring the force required to blow and break a bubble of dough. The results include P Value, L Value, and W Value.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001111";"AlvPL_Calc_Idx";"ALVPL_index";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29010";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000145";"Dough alveograph P/L";"Quality traits";"Ratio of tenacity (p, maximum pressure required for the deformation of the sample) and extensibility (l, length of the curve) of dough.";"Dough strength and extensibility";"AlvPL";;"Dough";"Alveograph P/L";;;"CO_321:0000385";"ALVEOGRAPH determination AACC 54-30 A";"Measurement";"1. A sample of 60 grams or 250 grams of flour is mixed with a salt solution to form a dough. 2. The dough is sheeted, rested and inflated in the Chopin Alveograph, 2. Five 4.5 centimeter circular dough patties are formed and then rested in the alveograph in a temperature-regulated compartment at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 minutes, 3. Each dough patty is tested individually. The alveograph blows air into a dough patty, which expands into a bubble that eventually breaks, 4. The pressure inside the bubble is recorded as a curve on graph paper. The alveograph determines the gluten strength of a dough by measuring the force required to blow and break a bubble of dough. The results include P Value, L Value, and W Value.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001112";"AlvG_M_mm";"AVLG_mm";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29017";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000211";"Dough alveograph value G";"Quality traits";"G stands for the square root of the volume of air in the bubble that was possible before the bubble burst. shows how flexible the dough was during the test.";"G value, Index of swelling";"AlvG";;"Dough";"Alveograph value G";;;"CO_321:0000385";"ALVEOGRAPH determination AACC 54-30 A";"Measurement";"1. A sample of 60 grams or 250 grams of flour is mixed with a salt solution to form a dough. 2. The dough is sheeted, rested and inflated in the Chopin Alveograph, 2. Five 4.5 centimeter circular dough patties are formed and then rested in the alveograph in a temperature-regulated compartment at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 minutes, 3. Each dough patty is tested individually. The alveograph blows air into a dough patty, which expands into a bubble that eventually breaks, 4. The pressure inside the bubble is recorded as a curve on graph paper. The alveograph determines the gluten strength of a dough by measuring the force required to blow and break a bubble of dough. The results include P Value, L Value, and W Value.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001113";"AlvL_M_mm";"ALVL_mm";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29007";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000212";"Dough alveograph value L";"Quality traits";"L value is the extensibility of the dough before the bubble breaks. it is indicated by the length of the curve.";"L value, Dough extensibility";"AlvL";;"Dough";"Alveograph value L";;;"CO_321:0000385";"ALVEOGRAPH determination AACC 54-30 A";"Measurement";"1. A sample of 60 grams or 250 grams of flour is mixed with a salt solution to form a dough. 2. The dough is sheeted, rested and inflated in the Chopin Alveograph, 2. Five 4.5 centimeter circular dough patties are formed and then rested in the alveograph in a temperature-regulated compartment at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 minutes, 3. Each dough patty is tested individually. The alveograph blows air into a dough patty, which expands into a bubble that eventually breaks, 4. The pressure inside the bubble is recorded as a curve on graph paper. The alveograph determines the gluten strength of a dough by measuring the force required to blow and break a bubble of dough. The results include P Value, L Value, and W Value.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001114";"AlvP_M_mm";"ALVP_mm";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29008";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000213";"Dough alveograph value P";"Quality traits";"P value is the force required to blow the bubble of dough. it is indicated by the maximum height of the curve.";"P value, Dough resistance, Dough tenacity";"AlvP";;"Dough";"Alveograph value P";;;"CO_321:0000385";"ALVEOGRAPH determination AACC 54-30 A";"Measurement";"1. A sample of 60 grams or 250 grams of flour is mixed with a salt solution to form a dough. 2. The dough is sheeted, rested and inflated in the Chopin Alveograph, 2. Five 4.5 centimeter circular dough patties are formed and then rested in the alveograph in a temperature-regulated compartment at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 minutes, 3. Each dough patty is tested individually. The alveograph blows air into a dough patty, which expands into a bubble that eventually breaks, 4. The pressure inside the bubble is recorded as a curve on graph paper. The alveograph determines the gluten strength of a dough by measuring the force required to blow and break a bubble of dough. The results include P Value, L Value, and W Value.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001115";"AlvW_M_joules";"ALVW_joules";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29011";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000144";"Dough alveograph value W";"Quality traits";"Dough strength by alveograph. W value is the area under the curve. it is a combination of dough strength (p value) and extensibility (l value).";"W value, Strength of dough";"AlvW";;"Dough";"Alveograph value W";;;"CO_321:0000385";"ALVEOGRAPH determination AACC 54-30 A";"Measurement";"1. A sample of 60 grams or 250 grams of flour is mixed with a salt solution to form a dough. 2. The dough is sheeted, rested and inflated in the Chopin Alveograph, 2. Five 4.5 centimeter circular dough patties are formed and then rested in the alveograph in a temperature-regulated compartment at 25 degrees Celsius for approximately 20 minutes, 3. Each dough patty is tested individually. The alveograph blows air into a dough patty, which expands into a bubble that eventually breaks, 4. The pressure inside the bubble is recorded as a curve on graph paper. The alveograph determines the gluten strength of a dough by measuring the force required to blow and break a bubble of dough. The results include P Value, L Value, and W Value.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000422";"joules";"Numerical";"0.0";"25.0";"350.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001116";"MixTim_M_min";"MIXTIM_min";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29118";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000149";"Dough Mixograph mixing time";"Quality traits";"Time required for the dough development from beginning of mixing flour and water to the dough reaches maximum consistency (peak).";;"MixTim";;"Dough";"Mixograph mixing time";;;"CO_321:0000389";"MIXOGRAPH determination AACC 54-40 A";"Estimation";"1. A sample of 35 grams of flour on a 14 percent moisture basis is weighed and placed in a mixograph bowl, 2. Water is added to the flour from a buret and the bowl is inserted into the mixograph, 3. The flour and water are mixed together to form a dough, 4. As the dough is mixed, the mixograph records a curve on graph paper.";;;"CO_321:0000426";"min";"Duration";"1.0";"0.4";"8.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001117";"MixTq_M_pctmin";"MIXTQ_pct_min";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29119";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000225";"Dough mixograph torque";"Quality traits";"It is the torque measured during the mixograph test.";;"MixTq";;"Dough";"Mixograph torque";;;"CO_321:0000389";"MIXOGRAPH determination AACC 54-40 A";"Estimation";"1. A sample of 35 grams of flour on a 14 percent moisture basis is weighed and placed in a mixograph bowl, 2. Water is added to the flour from a buret and the bowl is inserted into the mixograph, 3. The flour and water are mixed together to form a dough, 4. As the dough is mixed, the mixograph records a curve on graph paper.";;;"CO_321:0000413";"%/min";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001118";"MixTyp_E_1to6";"MIXTYP_1_6";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29120";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000228";"Dough mixograph type";"Quality traits";"Mixograph type (mixograph curve) is used for determining the strength of dough.";;"MixTyp";;"Dough";"Mixograph type";;;"CO_321:0000389";"MIXOGRAPH determination AACC 54-40 A";"Estimation";"1. A sample of 35 grams of flour on a 14 percent moisture basis is weighed and placed in a mixograph bowl, 2. Water is added to the flour from a buret and the bowl is inserted into the mixograph, 3. The flour and water are mixed together to form a dough, 4. As the dough is mixed, the mixograph records a curve on graph paper.";;;"CO_321:0000866";"1-6 MIXTYP scale";"Nominal";"1.0";;;;"1=";"4=";"5=";"2=";"3=";"6=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001119";"DroughtTol_E_pct";"DROUGHTTOL_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29036";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000131";"Drought tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant tolerance to drought conditions.";;"DroughtTol";;"Plant";"Drought tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000275";"DroughtTol Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth of plants per plot/entry under droughted condition and rate the tolerance.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001120";"DroughtTol_E_1to5";"DROUGHTTOL_1_5";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29035";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000131";"Drought tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant tolerance to drought conditions.";;"DroughtTol";;"Plant";"Drought tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000275";"DroughtTol Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth of plants per plot/entry under droughted condition and rate the tolerance.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001";"CO_321:0000464";"1-5 TOL scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= highly susceptible";"4= tolerant";"5= highly tolerant";"2= susceptible";"3= intermediate";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001121";"TcontInc_E_pct";"TCONT_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"From DS85";;"BMS_29189";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000101";"Dwarf bunt incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Dwarf bunt incidence in the plants caused by the agent Tilletia controversa.";;"TcontInc";"TCONT";"Spike";"Dwarf bunt incidence";;;"CO_321:0000319";"TcontInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for dwarf bunt incidence.";;"Wilcoxson and Saari, 1996";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001122";"Emer_date_ymd";"EMERD_yyyymmdd, EMERD, EDATE, EMERDATE, Emergence date";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS10";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000021";"Emergence time";"Phenological traits";"Emergence time is when the first leaf appears above the soil surface.";;"Emer";"Emer, Em, E";"Plant";"Emergence time";;;"CO_321:0000835";"Emer DS10 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of when 50% of seedlings have emerged (DS10).";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000850";"yyyymmdd";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001123";"Emer_dto_day";"DTE_days, DTE, Days to emergence";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS10";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000021";"Emergence time";"Phenological traits";"Emergence time is when the first leaf appears above the soil surface.";;"Emer";"Emer, Em, E";"Plant";"Emergence time";;;"CO_321:0000242";"Emer DS10 days Computation";"Computation";"Number of days from sowing to the seedling emergence (DS10).";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001124";"PherpResp_E_1to8";"PHPRP_1_8__RESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_29137";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000102";"Eyespot plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Eye spot response in the plants caused by the fungal species Tapesia yallundae (Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoide w-type) and Tapesia acuformis (Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides r-type). Symptoms: the eye shape elliptical lesions forms on lower base of stem and lower leaf sheath. The eyespots are straw yellow in color from the middle and are surrounded by the greenish brown to dark brown rings.";;"PherpResp";"PHPRP";"Plant";"Eyespot plant response";;;"CO_321:0000320";"PherpResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for eye spot field response.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000471";"1-8 generic disease field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no visible infection (0)";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small lesions surrounded by necrotic areas";"I= intermediate (M), lesions of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis";"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small lesions";"R-MR= resistant to moderately resistance (R-MR)";"S= susceptible (S), large lesions, no necrosis or chlorosis";"MS= moderately Susceptible (MS), medium-sized lesions, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible";"MS-S= moderately susceptible to susceptible (MS-S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001125";"FND_date_ymd";"FNDD_yyyymmdd, FNDD";"Research-intensive characterization";"First node detectable (DS31)";;"BMS_29056";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000183";"First node detectable time";"Phenological traits";"First node detectable time is when the stem starts the elongation or jointing period, first node becomes visible as it appears above the soil surface.";;"FND";;"Plant";"First node detectable time";;;"CO_321:0000837";"FND DS31 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of first node detectable (DS31). It is easier to determine in the field than DS30. It is estimated in-field as the day at which the first node can be detected at approximately 1 cm above the tillering node. The observation is performed in the main tiller.";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000850";"yyyymmdd";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001126";"FND_dto_day";"DTFND_days, DTFND, FND";"Research-intensive characterization";"First node detectable (DS31)";;"BMS_29040";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000183";"First node detectable time";"Phenological traits";"First node detectable time is when the stem starts the elongation or jointing period, first node becomes visible as it appears above the soil surface.";;"FND";;"Plant";"First node detectable time";;;"CO_321:0000378";"FND DS31 DT Computation";"Computation";"Number of days from sowing to first node detectable. However, when planting in dry soils in dryland areas it is counted from the first day of rainfall or irrigation which is sufficient for germination, or from emergence date.";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001127";"FLeafA_M_cm2";"FLEAFA _cm2";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29048";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000141";"Flag leaf area";"Morphological traits";"Area of the flag leaf lamina.";;"FLeafA";;"Flag leaf";"Area";;;"CO_321:0000347";"FLeafA Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for flag leaf area.";;;"CO_321:0000419";"cm2";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"60.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001128";"FLeafSen_E_pct";"FLEAFSEN_pct";"Research-intensive characterization";"From DS71";;"BMS_29049";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000194";"Flag leaf senescence";"Physiological traits";"Flag leaf senescence.";;"FLeafSen";"FlagSen";"Flag leaf";"Senescence";;;"CO_321:0000382";"FLeafSen Estimation";"Estimation";"Rate using a scale from 0 (0% senescence) to 10 (100% senescence) using the guide, in increments of 10%.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 12)";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001129";"UagroResp_E_1to8";"UAGRO_1_8__RESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"From booting (DS45)";;"BMS_29199";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000103";"Flag smut plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Flag smut disease response in the plants caused by the agent Urocystic agropyri causing flag smut disease.";;"UagroResp";"UAGRO";"Plant";"Flag smut plant response";;;"CO_321:0000321";"UagroResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for flag smut field response.";;"Wilcoxson and Saari, 1996";"CO_321:0000471";"1-8 generic disease field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no visible infection (0)";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small lesions surrounded by necrotic areas";"I= intermediate (M), lesions of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis";"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small lesions";"R-MR= resistant to moderately resistance (R-MR)";"S= susceptible (S), large lesions, no necrosis or chlorosis";"MS= moderately Susceptible (MS), medium-sized lesions, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible";"MS-S= moderately susceptible to susceptible (MS-S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001130";"FlrCol_M_avalue";"FLRCOL_a_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29050";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000214";"Flour color";"Quality traits";"Flour color.";;"FlrCol";;"Flour";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000416";"a value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001131";"FlrCol_M_bvalue";"FLRCOL_b_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29051";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000214";"Flour color";"Quality traits";"Flour color.";;"FlrCol";;"Flour";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000417";"b value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001132";"FlrCol_M_Lvalue";"FLRCOL_L_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29052";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000214";"Flour color";"Quality traits";"Flour color.";;"FlrCol";;"Flour";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000424";"L value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001133";"FlrFN_M_s";"FLRFN _s";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29053";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000066";"Flour falling number";"Quality traits";"The falling number is defined as the time in seconds required stirring and allowing stirrer to fall a measured distance through a hot aqueous flour or meal gel undergoing liquefaction due to a-amylase activity.";;"FlrFN";;"Flour";"Falling number";;;"CO_321:0000288";"FlrFN Measurement";"Measurement";"1. A 7-gram sample of ground wheat or flour is weighed and combined with 25 milliliter of distilled water in a glass falling number tube with a stirrer and shaken to form a slurry. When grinding a wheat sample to perform a falling number test, it should be at least 300 grams to assure a representative sample, 2. As the slurry is heated in a boiling water bath at 100° Centigrade and stirred constantly, the starch gelatinizes and forms a thick paste, 3. The time it takes the stirrer to drop through the paste is recorded as the falling number value.";;;"CO_321:0000430";"s";"Duration";"0.0";"60.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001134";"FLRGluCon_M_pct";"GLUCON_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29069";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000069";"Flour gluten content";"Quality traits";"Content of wet gluten in flour.";"GLUCON";"FLRGluCon";;"Flour";"Gluten content";;;"CO_321:0000291";"FLRGluCon Measurement";"Measurement";"1. A 10-gram sample of flour or ground wheat is weighed and placed into the glutomatic washing chamber on top of the polyester screen, 2. The sample is mixed and washed with a 2 percent salt solution for 5 minutes, 3. The wet gluten is removed from the washing chamber, placed in the centrifuge holder, and centrifuged, 4. The residue retained on top of the screen and through the screen is weighed.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001135";"GluTyp_E_1to5";"GLUTYP_1_5";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29071";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000070";"Flour gluten type";"Quality traits";"Gluten type whether weak-tenacious/tenacious/weak/medium strong/strong.";;"GluTyp";;"Flour";"Gluten type";;;"CO_321:0000292";"GluTyp Estimation";"Estimation";"Gluten type is determined based on gluten properties data (flour protein content, Alveograph W, Alveograph P/L) following Peña 2011: Wheat End-use Quality types.";;"Peña, 2011";"CO_321:0000472";"1-5 GLUTYP scale";"Ordinal";;;;;"S= Strong (S)";"T= tenacious (T)";"WT= weak-tenacious (WT)";"MS= medium strong (MS)";"W= weak (W)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001136";"FlrProt_Kjl_pct";"FLRPROT_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_23230";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000067";"Flour protein content";"Quality traits";"Total protein content (corrected to 12.5% moisture basis) in refined flour.";;"FlrProt";"FlrPro";"Flour";"Protein content";;;"CO_321:0000289";"Kjeldahl AACC 56-81B";"Measurement";"Kjeldahl AACC 56-81B.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001137";"FlrProt_NIRS_pct";"FLRPROT_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000067";"Flour protein content";"Quality traits";"Total protein content (corrected to 12.5% moisture basis) in refined flour.";;"FlrProt";"FlrPro";"Flour";"Protein content";;;"CO_321:0000944";"NIRS Measurement";"Measurement";"NIR calibrated based on Kjeldahl results.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001138";"FlrSDS_M_ml";"FLRSDS_ml";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_22880";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000146";"Flour SDS sedimentation";"Quality traits";"Testing of refined flour quality by sds-sedimentation, a test estimating gluten-protein overall quality.";"FLRSDS";"FlrSDS";;"Flour";"SDS sedimentation volume";;;"CO_321:0000386";"SDS-sedimentation determination";"Measurement";"A small sample of flour or ground wheat (1.0 grams) is weighed and placed in 25-milliliter glass-stoppered graduated cylinder. This is mixed with different solutions for some minutes and then rested. Finally, the volume of the sediment is recorded after 21 minutes.";;;"CO_321:0000427";"ml";"Numerical";"1.0";"4.0";"25.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001139";"SedIdx_M_mlpct";"SEDINDX_ml_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29164";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000160";"Flour SDS sedimentation index";"Quality traits";"Is the result of dividing sedimentation volume by flour protein content.";"Specific sedimentation value, Relative sedimentation index";"SedIdx";"SEDINDX";"Flour";"Sedimentation index";;;"CO_321:0000398";"SedIdx Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for sedimentation index.";;;"CO_321:0000631";"ml/%";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001140";"FlrYellCls_M_1to3";"FLRYELLCLS_1_3";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29054";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000673";"Flour yellowness";"Quality traits";"Flour yellowness.";;"FlrYellCls";;"Flour";"Yellowness";;;"CO_321:0000847";"FlrYellCls Measurement";"Measurement";"Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color, 5. Flour yellowness classification in classes according the b value (Minolta chromameter) as white (b<12.5), light-yellow (b=12.5-15) or yellow (b>15).";;;"CO_321:0000858";"1-3 FLRYELLCLS scale";"Nominal";;;;;"1= white (b<12.5)";"2= light-yellow (b=12.5-15)";"3= yellow (b>15)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001141";"FlrYld_M_pct";"FLRYLD, FLRYD";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29055";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000068";"Flour yield";"Quality traits";"Proportion of flour recovered during milling.";;"FlrYld";"FlrYd";"Flour";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0000290";"FlrYld Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for flour yield.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001142";"FolDis_E_1to5";"FOLDIS_1_5, FoliarDis_N_T_S_M_V";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22711";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000655";"Foliar disease development";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by foliar diseases.";;"FolDis";;"Leaf";"Foliar disease development";;;"CO_321:0000701";"FolDis Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for foliar disease development.";;;"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001143";"FrostDmg_E_0to9";"FROSTDMGP_0_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29057";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000127";"Frost damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant damage caused by frost.";;"FrostDmg";"DMPFRO";"Plant";"Frost damage";;;"CO_321:0000341";"FrostDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Score the spike damage caused by frost.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000449";"0-9 DAMAGE scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no damage";"3= low damage";"4= low to intermediate damage";"1= trace";"2= very low damage";"7= high damage";"8= high to very high damage";"5= intermediate damage";"6= intermediate to high damage";"9= very high damage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001144";"FrostDmg_E_0to9text";"FROSTDMGP_0_9text";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22928";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000127";"Frost damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant damage caused by frost.";;"FrostDmg";"DMPFRO";"Plant";"Frost damage";;;"CO_321:0000341";"FrostDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Score the spike damage caused by frost.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000794";"0-9 DAMAGE scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001145";"FrostDmg_E_pct";"FROSTDMGP_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22927";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000127";"Frost damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant damage caused by frost.";;"FrostDmg";"DMPFRO";"Plant";"Frost damage";;;"CO_321:0000341";"FrostDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Score the spike damage caused by frost.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001146";"FrostDmg_E_1to5";"FROSTDMG_1_5__SPK, FrostDmg_N_T_S_M_V";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22979";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000127";"Frost damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant damage caused by frost.";;"FrostDmg";"DMPFRO";"Plant";"Frost damage";;;"CO_321:0000341";"FrostDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Score the spike damage caused by frost.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001147";"FrostDmg_E_1to9";"FROSTDMGP_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22929";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000127";"Frost damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant damage caused by frost.";;"FrostDmg";"DMPFRO";"Plant";"Frost damage";;;"CO_321:0000341";"FrostDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Score the spike damage caused by frost.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000465";"1-9 incidence scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= low to medium";"5= medium";"2= very low";"3= low";"8= very high";"9= severe";"6= medium to high";"7= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001148";"FgramInc_E_0to9pcttext";"FGRAM_0_9text__INC";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22868";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000924";"Fusarium graminearum incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium graminearum incidence in the plants.";;"FgramInc";"FGRAML";"Spike";"Fusarium graminearum incidence";;;"CO_321:0000702";"FgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Fusarium graminearum incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001149";"FgramInc_E_pct";"FGRAM_pct__INC";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_22869";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000924";"Fusarium graminearum incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium graminearum incidence in the plants.";;"FgramInc";"FGRAML";"Spike";"Fusarium graminearum incidence";;;"CO_321:0000702";"FgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Fusarium graminearum incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001150";"FgramResp_E_0to5";"FGRAM_0_5__RESP";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_22870";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000925";"Fusarium graminearum plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium graminearum response in the plants.";;"FgramResp";"FGRAML";"Spike";"Fusarium graminearum plant response";;;"CO_321:0000703";"FgramResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Fusarium graminearum response.";;;"CO_321:0000774";"0-5 FHB field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"I= immune (I), 0 % of infection";"MS= moderately susceptible (MS), 12 to 20 % of infection";"S= susceptible (S), 21 to 50 % of infection";"R= resistant (R), 1 to 8 % of infection";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), 9 to 11 % of infection";"VS= very susceptible (VS), > 50 % of infection";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001151";"FgramSev_E_00to99text";"FGRAM_00_99text__SEV";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22866";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000926";"Fusarium graminearum severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium graminearum severity in the plants.";;"FgramSev";"FGRAML";"Spike";"Fusarium graminearum severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000728";"Double digit (00-99) + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001152";"FgramSev_E_00to99";"FGRAM_00_99__SEV";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_22865";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000926";"Fusarium graminearum severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium graminearum severity in the plants.";;"FgramSev";"FGRAML";"Spike";"Fusarium graminearum severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001153";"FHBAUDPC_Calc_pct";"FHB_pct__AUDPC";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_23079";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000651";"Fusarium head blight AUDPC";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent fusarium spp.";;"FHBAUDPC";;"Spike";"Fusarium head blight AUDPC";;;"CO_321:0000696";"FHBAUDPC Computation";"Computation";"Calculate area under disease progress curve.";"xxxx";"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001154";"FHBDON_M_ppm";"FHB_ppm__DON";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29047";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000652";"Fusarium head blight DON content";"Biotic stress traits";"Content of deoxynivalenol or don (vomitoxin) that is often associated with fhb (fusarium spp.) infected grains.";;"FHBDON";;"Grain";"Fusarium head blight DON content";;;"CO_321:0000698";"FHBDON Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for content of deoxynivalenol or DON (vomitoxin) that is often associated with FHB (Fusarium spp.) infected grains.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"15.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001155";"FHBGInc_E_pct";"FHB_pct__GRNINC";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_22843";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000927";"Fusarium head blight grain incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) incidence in the plants caused by the agent fusarium spp.";;"FHBGInc";;"Grain";"Fusarium head blight grain incidence";;;"CO_321:0000699";"FHBGInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for FHB grain incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001156";"FHBSpkInc_E_0to9pcttext";"FHB_0_9text__SPKINC";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22833";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000928";"Fusarium head blight spike incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) incidence in spikes caused by the agent fusarium spp.";;"FHBSpkInc";;"Spike";"Fusarium head blight spike incidence";;;"CO_321:0000294";"FHBSpkInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for FHB spike incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001157";"FHBSpkInc_E_pct";"FHB_pct__SPKINC";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_22831";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000928";"Fusarium head blight spike incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) incidence in spikes caused by the agent fusarium spp.";;"FHBSpkInc";;"Spike";"Fusarium head blight spike incidence";;;"CO_321:0000294";"FHBSpkInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for FHB spike incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001158";"FHBSpkResp_E_0to5";"FHB_0_5__SPKRESP";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_22832";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000929";"Fusarium head blight spike response";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) spike response caused by the agent fusarium spp.";;"FHBSpkResp";;"Spike";"Fusarium head blight spike response";;;"CO_321:0000322";"FHBSpkResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for FHB spike response.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000774";"0-5 FHB field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"I= immune (I), 0 % of infection";"MS= moderately susceptible (MS), 12 to 20 % of infection";"S= susceptible (S), 21 to 50 % of infection";"R= resistant (R), 1 to 8 % of infection";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), 9 to 11 % of infection";"VS= very susceptible (VS), > 50 % of infection";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001159";"FHBSpkResp_E_1to8";"FHB_1_8__SPKRESP";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_29044";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000929";"Fusarium head blight spike response";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) spike response caused by the agent fusarium spp.";;"FHBSpkResp";;"Spike";"Fusarium head blight spike response";;;"CO_321:0000322";"FHBSpkResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for FHB spike response.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000471";"1-8 generic disease field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no visible infection (0)";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small lesions surrounded by necrotic areas";"I= intermediate (M), lesions of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis";"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small lesions";"R-MR= resistant to moderately resistance (R-MR)";"S= susceptible (S), large lesions, no necrosis or chlorosis";"MS= moderately Susceptible (MS), medium-sized lesions, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible";"MS-S= moderately susceptible to susceptible (MS-S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001160";"FHBSpkWt_Calc_pct";"FHB_pct__SPKW";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_23078";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000654";"Fusarium head blight spike weight";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent fusarium spp.";;"FHBSpkWt";;"Spike";"Fusarium head blight spike weight";;;"CO_321:0000700";"FHBSpkWt Computation";"Computation";"Relative spike weight is calculated by dividing spike weight (at maturity) from infected by the non-infected.";"xxxx";"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001161";"FHBSplInc_Calc_Idx";"FHB_index__SPLINC";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_29045";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000711";"Fusarium head blight spikelet incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) spikelets incidence caused by the agent fusarium spp.";;"FHBSplInc";;"Spikelet";"Fusarium head blight spikelet incidence";;;"CO_321:0000373";"FHBSplInc Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as the index (ratio) of infected spikelets over total number of spikelets by Calonectria nivalis (Fusarium nivale, F. graminearum) causing scab disease in spike.";"xxxx";"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001162";"FHBSplInc_Ct_SplInfect";"FHB_num__SPLINC";"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_29046";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000711";"Fusarium head blight spikelet incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) spikelets incidence caused by the agent fusarium spp.";;"FHBSplInc";;"Spikelet";"Fusarium head blight spikelet incidence";;;"CO_321:0000374";"FHBSplInc Counting";"Counting";"Standard method for FHB infected spikelets counting.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000439";"spikelet";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001163";"FnivLBInc_E_0to9pcttext";"FNIVLB_0_9text__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22796";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000930";"Fusarium leaf blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium leaf blotch (pink snow mold, fusarium patch) incidence in the plants caused by the agent Calonectria nivalis (fusarium nivale).";"FNIVLB, FNIVAL";"FnivLBInc";;"Plant";"Fusarium leaf blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000339";"FnivLBInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Fusarium leaf blotch incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2014";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001164";"FnivLBInc_E_pct";"FNIVLB_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22797";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000930";"Fusarium leaf blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium leaf blotch (pink snow mold, fusarium patch) incidence in the plants caused by the agent Calonectria nivalis (fusarium nivale).";"FNIVLB, FNIVAL";"FnivLBInc";;"Plant";"Fusarium leaf blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000339";"FnivLBInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Fusarium leaf blotch incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2014";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001165";"FnivLBSev_E_00to99text";"FNIVLB_00_99text__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22798";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000653";"Fusarium leaf blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium leaf blotch (pink snow mold, fusarium patch) severity in the plants caused by the agent Calonectria nivalis (fusarium nivale).";"FNIVLB, FNIVAL";"FnivLBSev";;"Plant";"Fusarium leaf blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000728";"Double digit (00-99) + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001166";"FnivLBSev_E_00to99";"FNIVLB_00_99__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22795";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000653";"Fusarium leaf blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium leaf blotch (pink snow mold, fusarium patch) severity in the plants caused by the agent Calonectria nivalis (fusarium nivale).";"FNIVLB, FNIVAL";"FnivLBSev";;"Plant";"Fusarium leaf blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001167";"FoxiWilt_E_pct";"FOXYWIL _pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_22863";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000168";"Fusarium wilt incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium wilt incidence in the plants caused by the agent fusarium oxysporum.";;"FoxiWilt";"FOXYWIL";"Plant";"Fusarium wilt incidence";;;"CO_321:0000356";"FoxiWilt Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Fusarium wilt incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001168";"GlmCol_E_1to3";"GLMCOL_1_3";"Descriptor";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29061";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000031";"Glume color";"Morphological traits";"Color observation on the outer glume at maturity.";;"GlmCol";;"Glume";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000251";"GlmCol Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for glume color.";;;"CO_321:0000451";"1-3 GLMCOL scale";"Nominal";;;;;"1= white";"2= red to brown";"3= purple to black";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001169";"GlmGlau_E_0to9";"GLMGLAU_0_9";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29062";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000035";"Glume glaucousness";"Morphological traits";"Glaucousness in glume.";"Glume waxiness";"GlmGlau";;"Glume";"Glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0000255";"GlmGlau Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for glume glaucousness.";;;"CO_321:0000450";"0-9 density scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= absent";"3= sparse";"4= sparse to intermediate";"1= very sparse";"2= very sparse to sparse";"7= dense";"8= dense to very dense";"5= intermediate";"6= intermadiate to dense";"9= very dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001170";"GlmLng_M_mm";"GLMLNG_mm";"Descriptor";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29063";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000032";"Glume length";"Morphological traits";"Length of glume.";;"GlmLng";;"Glume";"Length";;;"CO_321:0000252";"GlmLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for glume length.";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001171";"GlmPubDen_E_0to9";"GLMPUBDEN _0_9";"Descriptor";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29064";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000033";"Glume pubescence density";"Morphological traits";"Glume hairiness density on outer side of sterile glume.";"Glume hairiness";"GlmPubDen";;"Glume";"Pubescence density";;;"CO_321:0000253";"GlmPubDen Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for glume pubescence density.";;;"CO_321:0000450";"0-9 density scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= absent";"3= sparse";"4= sparse to intermediate";"1= very sparse";"2= very sparse to sparse";"7= dense";"8= dense to very dense";"5= intermediate";"6= intermadiate to dense";"9= very dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001172";"GlmPubLng_M_um";"GLMPUBLNG_um";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29065";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000034";"Glume pubescence length";"Morphological traits";"Glume pubescence length on outer side of sterile glume.";;"GlmPubLng";;"Glume";"Pubescence length";;;"CO_321:0000254";"GlmPubLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for glume pubescence length.";;;"CO_321:0000415";"µm";"Numerical";;"0.1";"0.5";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001173";"GlmWid_M_mm";"GLMWID_mm";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29066";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000036";"Glume width";"Morphological traits";"Width of glume.";;"GlmWid";;"Glume";"Width";;;"CO_321:0000256";"GlmWid Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for glume width.";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001174";"GluA1_M_text";"GLUA1_text";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_23236";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000152";"Glutenin Glu-A1 composition";"Quality traits";"High molecular weight glutenin subunits of glu-a1.";;"GluA1";"Glu-A1, HMW-Glu A1";"Flour";"Glutenin Glu-A1 composition";;;"CO_321:0000390";"SDS-PAGE electrophoresis";"Measurement";"1. Extract storage proteins (glutenins/gliadins) from wheat grain, 2. Separate glutenins from gliadins, 3. Run proteins extracts in polyacrylamide gels, 4. Stain the gel and de-stain, 5. Identify the allele for each locus.";;"Payne and Lawrence, 1983, Singh et al., 1991, Peña et al., 2004";"CO_321:0000443";"text";"Text";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001175";"GluA3_M_text";"GLUA3_text";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29067";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000155";"Glutenin Glu-A3 composition";"Quality traits";"Low molecular weight glutenin subunits of glu-a3.";;"GluA3";"Glu-A3, LMW-Glu A3";"Flour";"Glutenin Glu-A3 composition";;;"CO_321:0000390";"SDS-PAGE electrophoresis";"Measurement";"1. Extract storage proteins (glutenins/gliadins) from wheat grain, 2. Separate glutenins from gliadins, 3. Run proteins extracts in polyacrylamide gels, 4. Stain the gel and de-stain, 5. Identify the allele for each locus.";;"Payne and Lawrence, 1983, Singh et al., 1991, Peña et al., 2004";"CO_321:0000443";"text";"Text";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001176";"GluB1_M_text";"GLUB1_text";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_23237";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000153";"Glutenin Glu-B1 composition";"Quality traits";"High molecular weight glutenin subunits of glu-b1.";;"GluB1";"Glu-B1, HMW-Glu B1";"Flour";"Glutenin Glu-B1 composition";;;"CO_321:0000390";"SDS-PAGE electrophoresis";"Measurement";"1. Extract storage proteins (glutenins/gliadins) from wheat grain, 2. Separate glutenins from gliadins, 3. Run proteins extracts in polyacrylamide gels, 4. Stain the gel and de-stain, 5. Identify the allele for each locus.";;"Payne and Lawrence, 1983, Singh et al., 1991, Peña et al., 2004";"CO_321:0000443";"text";"Text";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001177";"GluB3_M_text";"GLUB3_text";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29068";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000156";"Glutenin Glu-B3 composition";"Quality traits";"Low molecular weight glutenin subunits of glu-b3.";;"GluB3";"Glu-B3, LMW-Glu B3";"Flour";"Glutenin Glu-B3 composition";;;"CO_321:0000390";"SDS-PAGE electrophoresis";"Measurement";"1. Extract storage proteins (glutenins/gliadins) from wheat grain, 2. Separate glutenins from gliadins, 3. Run proteins extracts in polyacrylamide gels, 4. Stain the gel and de-stain, 5. Identify the allele for each locus.";;"Payne and Lawrence, 1983, Singh et al., 1991, Peña et al., 2004";"CO_321:0000443";"text";"Text";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001178";"GluD1_M_text";"GLUD1_text";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_23238";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000154";"Glutenin Glu-D1 composition";"Quality traits";"High molecular weight glutenin subunits of glu-d1.";;"GluD1";"Glu-D1, HMW-Glu D1";"Flour";"Glutenin Glu-D1 composition";;;"CO_321:0000390";"SDS-PAGE electrophoresis";"Measurement";"1. Extract storage proteins (glutenins/gliadins) from wheat grain, 2. Separate glutenins from gliadins, 3. Run proteins extracts in polyacrylamide gels, 4. Stain the gel and de-stain, 5. Identify the allele for each locus.";;"Payne and Lawrence, 1983, Singh et al., 1991, Peña et al., 2004";"CO_321:0000443";"text";"Text";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001179";"GluD3_M_text";"GLUD3_text";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29070";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000157";"Glutenin Glu-D3 composition";"Quality traits";"Low molecular weight glutenin subunits of glu-d3.";;"GluD3";"Glu-D3, LMW-Glu D3";"Flour";"Glutenin Glu-D3 composition";;;"CO_321:0000390";"SDS-PAGE electrophoresis";"Measurement";"1. Extract storage proteins (glutenins/gliadins) from wheat grain, 2. Separate glutenins from gliadins, 3. Run proteins extracts in polyacrylamide gels, 4. Stain the gel and de-stain, 5. Identify the allele for each locus.";;"Payne and Lawrence, 1983, Singh et al., 1991, Peña et al., 2004";"CO_321:0000443";"text";"Text";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001180";"GApp_E_0to9";"GRNAPP_0_9";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_22930";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000656";"Grain appearance";"Morphological traits";"Appearance of a single grain.";"Kernel appearance";"GApp";"GRNAPP";"Grain";"Appearance";;;"CO_321:0000823";"GApp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for grain appearance.";;;"CO_321:0000824";"0-9 GRNAPP scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0=";"3=";"4=";"1=";"2=";"7=";"8=";"5=";"6=";"9=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001181";"GApp_E_0to9text";"GRNAPP_0_9text";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22931";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000656";"Grain appearance";"Morphological traits";"Appearance of a single grain.";"Kernel appearance";"GApp";"GRNAPP";"Grain";"Appearance";;;"CO_321:0000823";"GApp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for grain appearance.";;;"CO_321:0000825";"0-9 GRNAPP scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001182";"GCID_M_delta13C";"GRAINCID_delta";"Research-intensive characterization";"From DS87";;"BMS_29073";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000195";"Grain carbon isotope discrimination";"Physiological traits";"Grain carbon isotope discrimination at maturity from drought trials provides genotypic effects most likely to be related to transpiration rate or an integrative measurement of stomatal conductance.";;"GCID";"GrainCID";"Grain";"Carbon isotope discrimination";;;"CO_321:0000383";"CID determination";"Measurement";"Proceed following the protocol for sampling of grains or leaves for CID in Chapter 6 in Pask et al., 2012. Mass spectrometers generate differential values of stable carbon isotope composition (?13C), expressed negative values in parts per thousand (?) (Farquhar et al., 1989): ?13C (?) = [(Rsample/Rstandard)?1] x 1000. Where: the ratio of heavy to light isotope (R = 13C/12C) for the sample is in comparison to Peedee Belemnite (PDB) carbonate (limestone) standard. Following Farquhar et al. (1989) ? rather than using carbon isotope composition values (?13C), positive values for CID (?13C) can be calculated for easier statistical analysis as: ?13C = [(?a-?p)]/[1 + (?p/1000)]";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 6), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000433";"delta 13C";"Numerical";"2.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001183";"GCol_E_1to3";"GRNCOL_1_3";"Descriptor";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29074";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000037";"Grain color";"Quality traits";"Grain color.";"Kernel color";"GCol";"GRNCOL";"Grain";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000257";"GCol Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for grain color.";;;"CO_321:0000452";"1-3 GRNCOL scale";"Nominal";;;;;"W= white";"R= red";"P= purple";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001184";"GCol_M_avalue";"GRNCOL_a_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29075";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000037";"Grain color";"Quality traits";"Grain color.";"Kernel color";"GCol";"GRNCOL";"Grain";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000416";"a value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001185";"GCol_M_bvalue";"GRNCOL_b_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29076";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000037";"Grain color";"Quality traits";"Grain color.";"Kernel color";"GCol";"GRNCOL";"Grain";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000417";"b value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001186";"GCol_M_Lvalue";"GRNCOL_L_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29077";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000037";"Grain color";"Quality traits";"Grain color.";"Kernel color";"GCol";"GRNCOL";"Grain";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000424";"L value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001187";"GCol_E_1to5";"GRNCOL_1_5";"Descriptor";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22991";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000037";"Grain color";"Quality traits";"Grain color.";"Kernel color";"GCol";"GRNCOL";"Grain";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000257";"GCol Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for grain color.";;;"CO_321:0000826";"1-5 GRNCOL scale";"Nominal";;;;;"W= white";"R= red";"P= purple";"W/R= white/red";"R/W= red/white";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001188";"UseTyp_M_1to9+text";"USETYP_1_9_text";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_29200";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000221";"Grain end use type";"Quality traits";"Bread wheat end use quality is classified according several quality attributes.";"Grain use type";"UseTyp";;"Grain";"End use type";;;"CO_321:0000401";"UseTyp Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain use type.";;"Peña, 2009";"CO_321:0000469";"1-9 USETYP scale";"Nominal";"0.0";;;;"1a";"2b";"3a";"1b";"2a";"4b";"5.0";"3b";"4a";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001189";"GFP_calc_day";"GFILLPERIOD_days";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS65-DS87";;"BMS_29058";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000664";"Grain filling period";"Phenological traits";"Time period between anthesis (ds65) and maturity (ds87).";;"GFP";"GFillPeriod, GfillP,";"Plant";"Grain filling period";;;"CO_321:0000838";"GFP pct Computation";"Computation";"Calculated time between anthesis (DS65) and maturity (DS87)of crop cycle duration.";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001190";"GFP_calc_pct";"GFILLPERIOD_pct";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS65-DS87";;"BMS_29059";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000664";"Grain filling period";"Phenological traits";"Time period between anthesis (ds65) and maturity (ds87).";;"GFP";"GFillPeriod, GfillP,";"Plant";"Grain filling period";;;"CO_321:0000945";"GFP days Computation";"Computation";"Calculated time between anthesis (DS65) and maturity (DS87)of crop cycle duration.";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001191";"Germ_M_pct";"GERM_pct, GermiTest_pct";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS00-DS07";;"BMS_22660";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000011";"Grain germination";"Physiological traits";"Proportion of seed that germinate under proper condition.";"Seed germination";"Germ";"Germi, GERM, GERMPCT, GERM%, GERMI, Germination percentage";"Grain";"Germination";;;"CO_321:0000234";"Germ Measurement";"Measurement";"Laboratory seed test for germination should be carried out before seeding to calculate seeding rates or determine the status of storage seed. The percentage of seeds capable of producing normal seedlings under ordinarily favorable conditions (not including seeds which produce weak, malformed, or obviously abnormal sprouts), determined by methods ISTA seed testing protocols.";;"ISTA, 2014 (International Rules for Seed Testing)";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001192";"GHrd_M_1to3";"HRDCLS_1_3";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29097";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000072";"Grain hardness";"Quality traits";"Grain hardness is used as a grading factor to determine the type of wheat. It is a key determinant for classification of wheat and end product quality.";"Grain texture";"GHrd";"HRDCLS, GRNHRD";"Grain";"Hardness";;;"CO_321:0000295";"GHrd Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain hardness class.";;;"CO_321:0000453";"1-3 HRDCLS scale";"Ordinal";;;;;"H= hard (H, <45)";"SH= semi-hard (SH, 45-55)";"S= soft (S, >55)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001193";"GHrd_M_1to4";"HRDCLS_1_4";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29098";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000072";"Grain hardness";"Quality traits";"Grain hardness is used as a grading factor to determine the type of wheat. It is a key determinant for classification of wheat and end product quality.";"Grain texture";"GHrd";"HRDCLS, GRNHRD";"Grain";"Hardness";;;"CO_321:0000295";"GHrd Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain hardness class.";;;"CO_321:0000862";"1-4 HRDCLS scale";"Ordinal";;;;;"H= hard (H, <45)";"S= soft (S, >55)";"SH= semi-hard (SH, 45-50)";"SS= semi-soft (SS, 51-55)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001194";"GHrd_M_pct";"GRNHRD_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_23232";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000072";"Grain hardness";"Quality traits";"Grain hardness is used as a grading factor to determine the type of wheat. It is a key determinant for classification of wheat and end product quality.";"Grain texture";"GHrd";"HRDCLS, GRNHRD";"Grain";"Hardness";;;"CO_321:0000263";"Modified Particle Size Index AACC 55-30 or NIR calibrated based on PSI results";"Measurement";"Modified Particle Size Index AACC 55-30 or NIR calibrated based on PSI results";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001195";"GHrd_M_1to5";"HRDCLS_1_5";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29099";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000072";"Grain hardness";"Quality traits";"Grain hardness is used as a grading factor to determine the type of wheat. It is a key determinant for classification of wheat and end product quality.";"Grain texture";"GHrd";"HRDCLS, GRNHRD";"Grain";"Hardness";;;"CO_321:0000295";"GHrd Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain hardness class.";;;"CO_321:0000459";"1-5 HRDCLS scale";"Ordinal";;;;;"S= soft (S)";"H= hard (H)";"VH= very hard (VH)";"MS= medium soft (MS)";"MH= medium hard (MH)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001196";"GIron_M_ppm";"GRNIRON_ppm";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";"Obsolete";"BMS_29081";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000222";"Grain Iron content";"Quality traits";"Content of iron in grain.";;"GIron";"GRNIRON";"Grain";"Iron content";;;"CO_321:0000402";"GIron Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain iron content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"15.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001197";"GrnIron_M_mgkg";"GRNIRON_mg_kg";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29080";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000222";"Grain Iron content";"Quality traits";"Content of iron in grain.";;"GIron";"GRNIRON";"Grain";"Iron content";;;"CO_321:0000402";"GIron Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain iron content.";;;"CO_321:0000865";"mg/kg";"Numerical";"2.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001198";"GMoi_E_pct";"GRNH20_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22692";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000012";"Grain moisture content";"Agronomical traits";"Moisture content of grain.";;"GMoi";"GRNH20, GrnMoist";"Grain";"Moisture content";;;"CO_321:0000235";"GMoi Estimation";"Estimation";"Moisture content is determined by drying a grain wheat sample in an air oven and comparing the weight of the sample before and after heating. The amount of weight loss is the moisture content. Moisture content results are expressed as a percentage.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001199";"GN_Calc_Grnm2";"GNO, grains/m2, GM2, kernel/m2, KNO, GNO_grains_m2";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29072";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000017";"Grain number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of grains expressed as per unit area or sample.";"Kernel number";"GN";"GNO, GrnNo, KrnNo, KN";"Grain";"Number";;;"CO_321:0000391";"GN Computation";"Computation";"Grain number (GNO) as other yield components can be calculated or measured individually (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives. GNO determines the sink size of the crop and under many conditions it is strongly correlated with yield. Grains/m2 (GNO) = yield (g/m2) / TGW (g) x 1000.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000392";"grain/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";"1000.0";"50000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001200";"GrnSpk_Calc_GrnSpk";"GRNSPK, grains/spike, GRNSPK_num";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22908";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000038";"Grain number per spike";"Agronomical traits";"Number of grains per spike.";"Kernel number per spike, grains per spike";"GrnSpk";"GRNSPK";"Spike";"Grain number";;;"CO_321:0000258";"GrnSpk Computation";"Computation";"The number of grains per spike can be measured independently by threshing a known number of randomly selected spikes per plot (10-20 spikes per plot) or can be calculated as: Grains per spike (GSP) = grains m2 / spikes m2.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000435";"grain/spike";"Numerical";"1.0";"10.0";"300.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001201";"GrnSpl_Calc_GrnSpl";"GRNSPL, grains/spikelet, GRNSPL_num";"Research-intensive characterization";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_23059";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000041";"Grain number per spikelet";"Agronomical traits";"Number of grains per spikelet.";"Kernel number per spikelet";"GrnSpl";;"Spikelet";"Grain number";;;"CO_321:0000261";"GrnSpl Computation";"Computation";"Sample as for spikelets per spike randomly select 5-10 spikes per plot, by selecting at the base of the culm. Count the spikelets, thresh, count grains, and calculate, or less accurately simply calculate from calculated grains per spike and measured spikelet number.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000436";"grain/spikelet";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"30.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001202";"GPhos_M_mgkg";"GRNPHOS_mg_kg";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29082";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000223";"Grain phosphorous content";"Quality traits";"Content of phosphorus in grain.";;"GPhos";"GRNPHOS";"Grain";"Phosphorous content";;;"CO_321:0000403";"GPhos Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain phosphorus content.";;;"CO_321:0000865";"mg/kg";"Numerical";"2.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001203";"GPhos_M_ppm";"GRNPHOS_ppm";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";"Obsolete";"BMS_29083";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000223";"Grain phosphorous content";"Quality traits";"Content of phosphorus in grain.";;"GPhos";"GRNPHOS";"Grain";"Phosphorous content";;;"CO_321:0000403";"GPhos Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain phosphorus content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"15.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001204";"GPlump_E_1to3";"GRNPLUMP_1_3";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_23216";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000039";"Grain plumpness";"Agronomical traits";"The degree of endosperm filling.";;"GPlump";"GRNPLUMP";"Grain";"Plumpness";;;"CO_321:0000259";"GPlump Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for grain plumpness.";;;"CO_321:0000474";"1-3 GRNPLUMP scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= shrivelled (SH)";"2= good (G)";"3= very good (VG)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001205";"GProt_Kjl_pct";"GRNPROT_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_22885";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000073";"Grain protein content";"Quality traits";"Content of protein (corrected to 12.5% moisture basis) in the whole wheat grain samples.";;"GProt";"GRNPROT, GRNPRO";"Grain";"Protein content";;;"CO_321:0000289";"Kjeldahl AACC 56-81B";"Measurement";"Kjeldahl AACC 56-81B.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001206";"GProt_NIRS_pct";"GRNPROT_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000073";"Grain protein content";"Quality traits";"Content of protein (corrected to 12.5% moisture basis) in the whole wheat grain samples.";;"GProt";"GRNPROT, GRNPRO";"Grain";"Protein content";;;"CO_321:0000946";"NIRS Measurement";"Measurement";"NIR calibrated based on Kjeldahl results.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001207";"GReten_M_pct";"GRNRETEN_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29084";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000642";"Grain retention";"Agronomical traits";"Proportion of big grain remaining above the sieve.";;"GReten";"GRNRETEN";"Grain";"Retention proportion";;;"CO_321:0000798";"GReten Measurement";"Measurement";"Measured as weight by percentage of all matter remaining above a 2 mm slotted screen ? 40 shakes in the direction of the slots.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001208";"GScreen_M_pct";"GRNSCREEN_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29085";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000643";"Grain screenings";"Agronomical traits";"Proportion of small grain passing through a sieve.";;"GScreen";"GRNSCREEN";"Grain";"Screenings proportion";;;"CO_321:0000799";"GScreen Measurement";"Measurement";"Measured as weight by percentage of all matter passing through a 2 mm slotted screen ? 40 shakes in the direction of the slots";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001209";"GSize_E_1to3";"GRNSIZE_1_3";"Descriptor";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_23217";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0000260";"GSize Estimation";"Estimation";"Visual observation of grains size.";;;"CO_321:0000455";"1-3 SIZE scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= small";"2= medium";"3= large";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001210";"TestWt_M_gl";"TESTWT_g_l";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_22685";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000159";"Grain test weight";"Quality traits";"Test weight or specific weight is the weight of a fixed volume of clean grains.";"Grain hectoliter weight, Grain specific weigh, Test weight";"TestWt";;"Grain";"Test weight";;;"CO_321:0000397";"AACC 55-10 or SeedCount management procedure";"Measurement";"Standard method for test weight.";;;"CO_321:0000867";"g/l";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001211";"TestWt_M_kghl";"TESTWT_kg_hl";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_22684";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000159";"Grain test weight";"Quality traits";"Test weight or specific weight is the weight of a fixed volume of clean grains.";"Grain hectoliter weight, Grain specific weigh, Test weight";"TestWt";;"Grain";"Test weight";;;"CO_321:0000397";"AACC 55-10 or SeedCount management procedure";"Measurement";"Standard method for test weight.";;;"CO_321:0000423";"kg/hl";"Numerical";"1.0";"37.0";"87.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001212";"GVtr_E_1to3";"SEDVTR_1_3";"Descriptor";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29165";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000042";"Grain vitreousness";"Quality traits";"One of the key quality parameters in the determination of durum quality referring to translucent or glass-like appearance when seeds are transversely sectioned and observed whether not vitreous/partly vitreous/vitreous. it is associated with high protein and hard grain.";"Seed vitreousness";"GVtr";"SdVtr, SEDVTR";"Grain";"Vitreousness";;;"CO_321:0000262";"GVtr Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for seed vitreousness.";;;"CO_321:0000454";"1-3 SEDVTR scale";"Ordinal";;;;;"NV= not vitreous (NV)";"PV= partly vitreous (PV)";"V= vitreous (V)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001213";"GW_M_g1000grn";"TGW, TKW, THOUWT, TGW_g";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22683";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;;"CO_321:0000246";"GW Measurement";"Measurement";"Dry grains at 70oC and weigh.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0001033";"g/1000 grain";"Numerical";"1.0";"20.0";"70.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001214";"GW_M_g100grn";"GW100_g";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29001";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;;"CO_321:0000246";"GW Measurement";"Measurement";"Dry grains at 70oC and weigh.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0001432";"g/100 grain";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001215";"GW_M_g200grn";"GW200_g";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29003";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;;"CO_321:0000246";"GW Measurement";"Measurement";"Dry grains at 70oC and weigh.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0001433";"g/200 grain";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001216";"GYellBer_M_pct";"YELBER_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29209";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000174";"Grain yellow berry incidence";"Quality traits";"Refers to grains showing chalky or starchy endosperm areas.";;"GYellBer";"YELBER";"Grain";"Yellow berry incidence";;;"CO_321:0000399";"GYellBer Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for yellow berry incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001217";"GY_Calc_gm2";"Yld_gm2, GY_gm2, GRNYLD_g_m2";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29086";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0001028";"GY Computation";"Computation";"Use formulae to calculate grain yield in g/m2";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000805";"g/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001218";"GY_Calc_kgha";"Yld_kgha, GY_kgha, GRNYLD_kg_ha";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_18000";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0001028";"GY Computation";"Computation";"Use formulae to calculate grain yield in g/m2";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000804";"kg/ha";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"20000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001219";"GY_Calc_tha";"Yld_tha, GY_tha, GRNYLD_t_ha";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22661";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0001028";"GY Computation";"Computation";"Use formulae to calculate grain yield in g/m2";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000432";"t/ha";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"20.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001220";"GY_M_gPlnt";"GRNYLD_g_pl";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29087";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0000236";"GY Measurement";"Measurement";"The weight of the grain harvested is registered on a scale, decide which method suit better for your objectives. In breeding trials, a sample area (rather than the whole plot) is generally used for estimating yield. Discard borders when combine harvest for a better estimation of yield.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0001431";"g/plant";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001221";"GY_M_gPlot";"PLOTGRNYLD_g";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22662";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0000236";"GY Measurement";"Measurement";"The weight of the grain harvested is registered on a scale, decide which method suit better for your objectives. In breeding trials, a sample area (rather than the whole plot) is generally used for estimating yield. Discard borders when combine harvest for a better estimation of yield.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000412";"g/plot";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"12000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001222";"GY_M_kgPlot";"PLOTGRNYLD_kg";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22665";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0000236";"GY Measurement";"Measurement";"The weight of the grain harvested is registered on a scale, decide which method suit better for your objectives. In breeding trials, a sample area (rather than the whole plot) is generally used for estimating yield. Discard borders when combine harvest for a better estimation of yield.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000806";"kg/plot";"Numerical";"3.0";"1.0";"6.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001223";"GY_PctChk_pct";"YLDCHECK_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29210";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0000950";"GY Relative to check Computation";"Computation";"Calculate grain yield of an entry as percentage over a local check.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001224";"GYFac_Calc_num";"YLDFAC_num";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_23176";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000645";"Grain yield factor";"Agronomical traits";"Yield factor.";;"GYFac";"YLDFAC";"Grain";"Yield factor";;;"CO_321:0000822";"GYFac Computation";"Computation";"Standard method for yield factor";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000896";"num";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001225";"GZinc_M_mgkg";"GRNZINC_mg_kg";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29088";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000224";"Grain Zinc content";"Quality traits";"Content of zinc in grain.";;"GZinc";"GRNZINC";"Grain";"Zinc content";;;"CO_321:0000404";"GZinc Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain zinc content.";;;"CO_321:0000865";"mg/kg";"Numerical";"2.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001226";"GZinc_M_ppm";"GRNZINC_ppm";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";"Obsolete";"BMS_29089";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000224";"Grain Zinc content";"Quality traits";"Content of zinc in grain.";;"GZinc";"GRNZINC";"Grain";"Zinc content";;;"CO_321:0000404";"GZinc Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain zinc content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"15.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001227";"GrwCls_E_1to3";"GROWTHCLS_1_3";"Descriptor";"DS55-DS81";;"BMS_29090";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000665";"Growth class";"Phenological traits";"Classification of vernalization responsive growth habit as winter, facultative or spring wheat.";"Seasonality, Vernalization response";"GrwCls";;"Plant";"Growth class";;;"CO_321:0000839";"GrwCls Estimation";"Estimation";"Classification of vernalization responsive growth habit as winter, facultative or spring wheat";;;"CO_321:0000851";"1-3 GROWTHCLS scale";"Nominal";;;;;"W= winter";"I= facultative (intermediate)";"S= spring";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001228";"GrwStg_Zdks_00to99";"GRWSTG_00_99, DECODS";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS00-DS99";;"BMS_22995";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000016";"Growth stage";"Phenological traits";"Growth/developmental stages based on Zadoks decimal code.";;"GrwStg";"DECODS";"Plant";"Growth stage";;;"CO_321:0000239";"GrwStg Zadoks Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth stage or development stage (DS) of wheat plants using the Zadoks scale decimal code, based on 10 major stages, with each stage divided into sub-stages.";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000476";"Zadoks or decimal code (00-99)";"Ordinal";;;;;"96= Ripening, 50% of viable seed germinates";"97= Ripening, Seed not dormant";"94= Ripening, Overripe, straw dead and collapsing";"95= Ripening, Seed dormant";"22= Tillering, Main shoot and 2 Tillers";"87= Dough development, Hard dough (thumbnail impression held)";"85= Dough development, Soft dough (firm, thumbnail mark not held)";"20= Tillering, Main shoot only";"83= Dough development, Early dough (elastic, dry and shiny)";"21= Tillering, Main shoot and 1 Tiller";"81= Dough development, Very early dough (slides when crushed)";"93= Ripening, Kernel loosening in daytime";"92= Ripening, Kernel hard (not dented by thumbnail)";"91= Ripening, Kernel hard (difficult to divide, 16% water)";"14= Seedling development , 4 leaves unfolded";"15= Seedling development , 5 leaves unfolded";"13= Seedling development , 3 leaves unfolded";"18= Seedling development , 8 leaves unfolded";"19= Seedling development , 9 or more leaves unfolded";"16= Seedling development , 6 leaves unfolded";"17= Seedling development , 7 leaves unfolded";"73= Kernel and milk development, Early milk (liquid off -white)";"75= Kernel and milk development, Medium milk (milky liquid)";"77= Kernel and milk development, Late milk (more solids in milk)";"55= Heading, ½ of head emerged";"53= Heading, ¼ of head emerged";"59= Heading, Emergence of head complete";"57= Heading, ¾ of head emerged";"65= Flowering or anthesis, Flowering half complete";"61= Flowering or anthesis, Start of flowering";"71= Kernel and milk development, Kernel watery ripe (clear liquid)";"69= Flowering or anthesis, Flowering complete";"49= Booting, First awns visible";"51= Heading, First spikelet of head visible";"00= Germination, Dry seed";"45= Booting, Boot swollen";"05= Germination, Radicle emerged from seed";"43= Booting, Boot just visibly swollen";"07= Germination, Coleoptile emerged from seed";"41= Booting, Flag leaf sheath extending";"01= Germination, Water uptake (imbibition) started";"03= Germination, Imbibition complete";"39= Stem elongation or jointing, Flag leaf ligule/collar just visible";"11= Seedling development , First leaf unfolded";"37= Stem elongation or jointing, Flag leaf just visible";"12= Seedling development , 2 leaves unfolded";"36= Stem elongation or jointing, 6th node detectable";"09= Germination, Leaf just at coleoptile tip";"35= Stem elongation or jointing, 5th node detectable";"10= Seedling development , First leaf emerged";"34= Stem elongation or jointing, 4th node detectable";"47= Booting, Flag leaf sheath opening";"33= Stem elongation or jointing, 3rd node detectable";"98= Ripening, Secondary dormancy";"99= Ripening, Secondary dormancy lost";"28= Tillering, Main shoot and 8 Tillers";"27= Tillering, Main shoot and 7 Tillers";"30= Stem elongation or jointing, Pseudo stem erection";"29= Tillering, Main shoot and 9 or more Tillers 89 Late hard dough (difficult to dent)";"24= Tillering, Main shoot and 4 Tillers";"23= Tillering, Main shoot and 3 Tillers";"26= Tillering, Main shoot and 6 Tillers";"25= Tillering, Main shoot and 5 Tillers";"32= Stem elongation or jointing, 2nd node detectable";"31= Stem elongation or jointing, 1st node detectable";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001229";"HailDmg_E_0to9";"HAILDMG_0_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29092";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000126";"Hail damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant damage caused by hail.";;"HailDmg";;"Plant";"Hail damage";;;"CO_321:0000340";"HailDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Score the damage caused by hail.";;;"CO_321:0000449";"0-9 DAMAGE scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no damage";"3= low damage";"4= low to intermediate damage";"1= trace";"2= very low damage";"7= high damage";"8= high to very high damage";"5= intermediate damage";"6= intermediate to high damage";"9= very high damage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001230";"HailDmg_E_1to5";"HAILDMG_1_5, HailDmg_N_T_S_M_V";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22717";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000126";"Hail damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant damage caused by hail.";;"HailDmg";;"Plant";"Hail damage";;;"CO_321:0000340";"HailDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Score the damage caused by hail.";;;"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001231";"HI_Calc_Idx";"HI_index";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_18120";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000123";"Harvest index";"Agronomical traits";"A ratio of grain yield to total above ground biomass.";"Biomass partitioning to grain";"HI";;"Plant";"Biomass partitioning to grain";;;"CO_321:0001030";"HI Computation";"Computation";"Harvest index is expressed in percentage and can be calculated as Harvest index (%) = (Grain yield/Biomass)*100.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001232";"HI_Calc_pct";"HI_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_22693";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000123";"Harvest index";"Agronomical traits";"A ratio of grain yield to total above ground biomass.";"Biomass partitioning to grain";"HI";;"Plant";"Biomass partitioning to grain";;;"CO_321:0001030";"HI Computation";"Computation";"Harvest index is expressed in percentage and can be calculated as Harvest index (%) = (Grain yield/Biomass)*100.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001233";"Hd_date_jd";"HEADD_jd, HEADD, HEADDATE";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Heading (spike emergence)(DS55)";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22900";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000007";"Heading time";"Phenological traits";"Heading time extends from the time of emergence of the tip of the spike from the flag leaf sheath to when the spike has completely emerged but has not yet started to flower.";;"Hd";"Head, Heading, H";"Plant";"Heading time";;;"CO_321:0000840";"Hd DS55 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of heading (DS55) when 50% of the spike is emerged (i.e., middle of the spike at the flag leaf ligule) on 50% of all stems.";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000855";"Julian date (JD)";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001234";"Hd_date_ymd";"HEADD_yyyymmdd, HEADD, HEADDATE";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Heading (spike emergence)(DS55)";;"BMS_22899";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000007";"Heading time";"Phenological traits";"Heading time extends from the time of emergence of the tip of the spike from the flag leaf sheath to when the spike has completely emerged but has not yet started to flower.";;"Hd";"Head, Heading, H";"Plant";"Heading time";;;"CO_321:0000840";"Hd DS55 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of heading (DS55) when 50% of the spike is emerged (i.e., middle of the spike at the flag leaf ligule) on 50% of all stems.";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000850";"yyyymmdd";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001235";"Hd_dto_day";"DTH_days, DTH, HEAD, DAYSHD";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Heading (spike emergence)(DS55)";;"BMS_22898";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000007";"Heading time";"Phenological traits";"Heading time extends from the time of emergence of the tip of the spike from the flag leaf sheath to when the spike has completely emerged but has not yet started to flower.";;"Hd";"Head, Heading, H";"Plant";"Heading time";;;"CO_321:0000231";"Hd DS55 days Computation";"Computation";"Number of days required from sowing to spike emergence from the flag leaf (DS55). However, when planting in dry soils in dryland areas it is counted from the first day of rainfall or irrigation which is sufficient for germination, or from emergence date.";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001236";"Hd_relat_1to5";"RELTHD_1_5, RELTHD";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Heading (spike emergence)(DS55)";;"BMS_23223";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000007";"Heading time";"Phenological traits";"Heading time extends from the time of emergence of the tip of the spike from the flag leaf sheath to when the spike has completely emerged but has not yet started to flower.";;"Hd";"Head, Heading, H";"Plant";"Heading time";;;"CO_321:0000244";"Hd DS55 relative Estimation";"Estimation";"Assessment of heading (DS55) compared to best local check which represents the best locally adopted germplasm at each location grown in standard or normal environment.";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000460";"1-5 Phenological relative scale";"Ordinal";"0.0";;;;"VE= very early (VE)";"L= late (L)";"VL= very late (VL)";"E= early (E)";"M= moderate (M)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001237";"HeatTol_E_1to5";"HEATTTOL_1_5";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29094";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000176";"Heat tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant tolerance to heat conditions.";;"HeatTol";;"Plant";"Heat tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000365";"HeatTol Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth of plants per plot/entry under heat condition and rate the tolerance.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001";"CO_321:0000464";"1-5 TOL scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= highly susceptible";"4= tolerant";"5= highly tolerant";"2= susceptible";"3= intermediate";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001238";"HelSpInc_E_0to9pcttext";"HELSP_0_9text";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22753";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000922";"Helminthosporium species incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"The disease incidence in the plants caused by the agent helminthosporium species.";;"HelSpInc";;"Plant";"Helminthosporium species incidence";;;"CO_321:0000876";"HelSpInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Helminthosporium species incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001239";"HelSpLegacy_E_1to9";"HELSP_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22755";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000923";"Helminthosporium species legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"The disease incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent helminthosporium species.";;"HelSpLegacy";;"Plant";"Helminthosporium species legacy";;;"CO_321:0000704";"HelSpLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Helminthosporium species legacy.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000789";"1-9 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1=";"4=";"5=";"2=";"3=";"8=";"9=";"6=";"7=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001240";"HelSpSev_E_00to99text";"HELSP_00_99text";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22754";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000686";"Helminthosporium species severity";"Biotic stress traits";"The disease severity in the plants caused by the agent Helminthosporium species.";;"HelSpSev";;"Plant";"Helminthosporium species severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000728";"Double digit (00-99) + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001241";"HelSpSev_E_00to99";"HELSP_00_99";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22752";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000686";"Helminthosporium species severity";"Biotic stress traits";"The disease severity in the plants caused by the agent Helminthosporium species.";;"HelSpSev";;"Plant";"Helminthosporium species severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001242";"HerbicideDmg_E_1to5";"HERBDMG_1_5, HerbDmg_N_T_S_M_V";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22716";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000679";"Herbicide damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant damage caused by herbicide.";;"HerbicideDmg";"HerbDmg";"Plant";"Herbicide damage";;;"CO_321:0000795";"HerbicideDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for herbicide damage.";;;"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001243";"HesFlyDmg_E_pct";"HESFDMG _pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29095";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000088";"Hessian fly damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by hessian fly, Maytiola destructor.";;"HesFlyDmg";"HESFDMG";"Plant";"Hessian fly damage";;;"CO_321:0000309";"HesFlyDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for hessian fly damage.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001244";"InfertTN_Ct_InTllrm";"INFERTNO_tll_m";"Trial evaluation";"DS65-DS81";;"BMS_29101";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000644";"Infertile tiller number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of infertile tillers per unit area, sample or plant.";;"InfertTN";;"Infertile tiller";"Number";;;"CO_321:0000801";"InfertTN Counting";"Counting";"Count the number of infertile tillers.";;;"CO_321:0000802";"infertile tiller/m";"Numerical";"0.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001245";"InfertTN_Ct_InTllrm2";"INFERTNO_tll_m2";"Trial evaluation";"DS65-DS81";;"BMS_29102";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000644";"Infertile tiller number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of infertile tillers per unit area, sample or plant.";;"InfertTN";;"Infertile tiller";"Number";;;"CO_321:0000801";"InfertTN Counting";"Counting";"Count the number of infertile tillers.";;;"CO_321:0000803";"infertile tiller/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001246";"ISBM_Calc_gm2";"ISBM_g_m2";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS11-DS87";;"BMS_29103";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000393";"In-season aboveground biomass";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at any developmental stage and/or at regular intervals from the emergence to physiological maturity.";;"ISBM";;"Plant";"Aboveground biomass In-season";;;"CO_321:0001029";"ISBM Computation";"Computation";"Sampling is typically performed at sequential developmental stages/time intervals through crop growth. Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. In most cases, determinations of dry mass are made on representative sub-samples to reduce oven space requirement, take additional measurements (e.g., fertile culm count) etc. Several protocols available (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 15)";"CO_321:0000805";"g/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001247";"ISBM_Calc_kgha";"ISBM_kg_ha";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS11-DS87";;"BMS_29105";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000393";"In-season aboveground biomass";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at any developmental stage and/or at regular intervals from the emergence to physiological maturity.";;"ISBM";;"Plant";"Aboveground biomass In-season";;;"CO_321:0001029";"ISBM Computation";"Computation";"Sampling is typically performed at sequential developmental stages/time intervals through crop growth. Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. In most cases, determinations of dry mass are made on representative sub-samples to reduce oven space requirement, take additional measurements (e.g., fertile culm count) etc. Several protocols available (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 15)";"CO_321:0000804";"kg/ha";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"20000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001248";"ISBM_Calc_tha";"ISBM_t_ha";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS11-DS87";;"BMS_29107";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000393";"In-season aboveground biomass";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at any developmental stage and/or at regular intervals from the emergence to physiological maturity.";;"ISBM";;"Plant";"Aboveground biomass In-season";;;"CO_321:0001029";"ISBM Computation";"Computation";"Sampling is typically performed at sequential developmental stages/time intervals through crop growth. Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. In most cases, determinations of dry mass are made on representative sub-samples to reduce oven space requirement, take additional measurements (e.g., fertile culm count) etc. Several protocols available (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 15)";"CO_321:0000432";"t/ha";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"20.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001249";"ISBM_M_gPlot";"ISBM_g_plot";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS11-DS87";;"BMS_29104";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000393";"In-season aboveground biomass";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at any developmental stage and/or at regular intervals from the emergence to physiological maturity.";;"ISBM";;"Plant";"Aboveground biomass In-season";;;"CO_321:0000394";"ISBM Measurement";"Measurement";"Sampling is typically performed at sequential developmental stages/time intervals through crop growth. Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. In most cases, determinations of dry mass are made on representative sub-samples to reduce oven space requirement, take additional measurements (e.g., fertile culm count) etc. Several protocols available (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 15)";"CO_321:0000412";"g/plot";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"12000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001250";"ISBM_M_kgPlot";"ISBM_kg_plot";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS11-DS87";;"BMS_29106";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000393";"In-season aboveground biomass";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at any developmental stage and/or at regular intervals from the emergence to physiological maturity.";;"ISBM";;"Plant";"Aboveground biomass In-season";;;"CO_321:0000394";"ISBM Measurement";"Measurement";"Sampling is typically performed at sequential developmental stages/time intervals through crop growth. Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. In most cases, determinations of dry mass are made on representative sub-samples to reduce oven space requirement, take additional measurements (e.g., fertile culm count) etc. Several protocols available (Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012), decide which method suit better for your objectives.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 15)";"CO_321:0000806";"kg/plot";"Numerical";"3.0";"1.0";"6.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001251";"InsectDmg_E_pct";"INSECTDMG_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_28000";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000089";"Insect damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by insects.";;"InsectDmg";;"Plant";"Insect damage";;;"CO_321:0000705";"InsectDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for insect damage.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001252";"InsectDmg_E_1to5";"INSECTDMG_1_5, InsectDmg_N_T_S_M_V";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22713";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000089";"Insect damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by insects.";;"InsectDmg";;"Plant";"Insect damage";;;"CO_321:0000705";"InsectDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for insect damage.";;;"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001253";"TindiInc_E_pct";"TINDI_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29192";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000106";"Karnal bunt incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Karnal bunt incidence in the plants caused by the agent Tilletia indica (syn. Neovossia indica).";;"TindiInc";"KBInc, TINDI, KB";"Spike";"Karnal bunt incidence";;;"CO_321:0000323";"TindiInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for karnal bunt incidence.";;"Wilcoxson and Saari, 1996";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001254";"LAI_Calc_Idx";"LAI_index";"Research-intensive characterization";"Seedling development to late grain-filling (DS12-DS81)";;"BMS_29108";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000184";"Leaf area index";"Agronomical traits";"It is a dimensionless quantity that characterizes plant canopies and defined as the leaf area per unit ground surface area.";;"LAI";;"Plant";"Leaf area index";;;"CO_321:0000362";"LAI Computation";"Computation";"LAI can be determined directly by taking a sample of canopy from a plant canopy, measuring the leaf area per sample plot with an area meter or image scanner and dividing it by the plot land surface area. Indirect methods use ceptometer to measure canopy geometry or light extinction and relate it to LAI. (LAI = leaf area / ground area, m2 / m2).";"(LAI = leaf area / ground area, m2 / m2)";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001255";"LeafCID_M_delta13C";"LEAVESCID_delta";"Research-intensive characterization";"From DS21";;"BMS_29116";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000196";"Leaf carbon isotope discrimination";"Physiological traits";"Leaves carbon isotope discrimination can be measured in the leaves during early canopy development in well irrigated trials, in which case genotypic effects will be related mainly to transpiration efficiency.";;"LeafCID";"LeavesCID";"Leaf";"Carbon isotope discrimination";;;"CO_321:0000383";"CID determination";"Measurement";"Proceed following the protocol for sampling of grains or leaves for CID in Chapter 6 in Pask et al., 2012. Mass spectrometers generate differential values of stable carbon isotope composition (?13C), expressed negative values in parts per thousand (?) (Farquhar et al., 1989): ?13C (?) = [(Rsample/Rstandard)?1] x 1000. Where: the ratio of heavy to light isotope (R = 13C/12C) for the sample is in comparison to Peedee Belemnite (PDB) carbonate (limestone) standard. Following Farquhar et al. (1989) ? rather than using carbon isotope composition values (?13C), positive values for CID (?13C) can be calculated for easier statistical analysis as: ?13C = [(?a-?p)]/[1 + (?p/1000)]";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 6), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000433";"delta 13C";"Numerical";"2.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001256";"Chl_M_CCI";"CHL_CCI";"Trial evaluation";"DS12-DS85";;"BMS_23055";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000028";"Leaf chlorophyll content";"Physiological traits";"Chlorophyll content in leaf green tissue. It includes both chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b. Chlorophyll is the green pigment found in plants.";;"Chl";"ChloC, ChlCont, LChl";"Leaf";"Chlorophyll content";;;"CO_321:0000249";"Chl Measurement";"Measurement";"The chlorophyll content of leaves (and other green tissues) can be quickly, and non-destructively measured using a hand-held battery portable optical meter (e.g., Minolta SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter) which measures the chlorophyll content via light transmittance (absorbance of red light at 650 nm and infrared light at 940 nm) and compensates for differing leaf thicknesses. Readings from the instrument are not absolute chlorophyll values, instead each reading is a ?chlorophyll concentration index? (CCI, ranging from 0 to 99.9). Measurements are typically made on the flag leaf (once fully expanded), although measurements of lower leaves may be taken to assess canopy chlorophyll profiles.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000418";"CCI";"Numerical";"1.0";"10.0";"75.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001257";"LeafGlau_E_0to9";"LEAFGLAU_0_9";"Research-intensive characterization";;;"BMS_29109";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000048";"Leaf glaucousness";"Morphological traits";"Glaucousness in leaf.";;"LeafGlau";;"Leaf";"Glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0000268";"LeafGlau Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf glaucousness.";;;"CO_321:0000450";"0-9 density scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= absent";"3= sparse";"4= sparse to intermediate";"1= very sparse";"2= very sparse to sparse";"7= dense";"8= dense to very dense";"5= intermediate";"6= intermadiate to dense";"9= very dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001258";"LeafGlau_E_1to5";"LEAFGLAU_1_5";"Research-intensive characterization";;;"BMS_23056";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000048";"Leaf glaucousness";"Morphological traits";"Glaucousness in leaf.";;"LeafGlau";;"Leaf";"Glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0000268";"LeafGlau Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf glaucousness.";;;"CO_321:0000827";"1-5 density scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1 = absent";"4 = dense";"5 = very dense";"2 = sparse";"3 = intermediate";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001259";"LeafLng_M_cm";"LEAFLNG_cm";"Research-intensive characterization";;;"BMS_29110";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000044";"Leaf length";"Morphological traits";"Length of leaf.";;"LeafLng";;"Leaf";"Length";;;"CO_321:0000264";"LeafLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for leaf length.";;;"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";"1.0";"5.0";"90.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001260";"LeafPubDen_E_0to9";"LEAFPUBDEN_0_9";"Research-intensive characterization";;;"BMS_29111";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000045";"Leaf pubescence density";"Morphological traits";"Leaf hairiness density.";;"LeafPubDen";;"Leaf";"Pubescence density";;;"CO_321:0000265";"LeafPubDen Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf pubescence density.";;;"CO_321:0000450";"0-9 density scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= absent";"3= sparse";"4= sparse to intermediate";"1= very sparse";"2= very sparse to sparse";"7= dense";"8= dense to very dense";"5= intermediate";"6= intermadiate to dense";"9= very dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001261";"LeafPubLng_M_um";"LEAFPUBLNG _um";"Research-intensive characterization";;;"BMS_29112";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000046";"Leaf pubescence length";"Morphological traits";"Leaf pubescent length.";;"LeafPubLng";;"Leaf";"Pubescence length";;;"CO_321:0000266";"LeafPubLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for leaf pubescence length.";;;"CO_321:0000415";"µm";"Numerical";;"0.1";"0.5";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001262";"PrecoCI_Calc_pct";"PRECO_pct__CI";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22758";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000897";"Leaf rust coefficient of infection";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";"Leaf rust CI";"PrecoCI";"BwRustCI, LRCI";"Leaf";"Leaf rust coefficient of infection";;;"CO_321:0001026";"Rust Coefficient of infection Computation";"Computation";"Coefficient of infection (CI) calculated by multiplying the severity times a constant for host response: where immune = 0.0, R=0.2, MR =0.4, MS =0.8, and S=1.0.";"xxxx";"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001263";"PrecoInc_E_1to9";"PRECO_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22761";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000898";"Leaf rust incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) incidence in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoInc";"BwRustInc, LRInc";"Leaf";"Leaf rust incidence";;;"CO_321:0000707";"PrecoInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf rust incidence.";;"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000465";"1-9 incidence scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= low to medium";"5= medium";"2= very low";"3= low";"8= very high";"9= severe";"6= medium to high";"7= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001264";"PrecoLegacy_E_9to1";"PRECO_9_1";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22762";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000899";"Leaf rust legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoLegacy";"BwRustLegacy, LRLegacy";"Leaf";"Leaf rust legacy";;;"CO_321:0000900";"PrecoLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf rust legacy.";;"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000877";"9-1 PRECO scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"9=";"6=";"5=";"8=";"7=";"2=";"1=";"4=";"3=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001265";"PrecoNote_E_text";"PRECO_text";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29144";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000687";"Leaf rust notes";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoNote";"BrwRustInc, LRInc";"Leaf";"Leaf rust notes";;;"CO_321:0000708";"Note Estimation";"Estimation";"Notes taken in the field.";;"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000443";"text";"Text";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001266";"PrecoResp_E_0to4";"PRECO_0_4__RESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22764";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000178";"Leaf rust plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoResp";"BwRustResp, LRResp";"Leaf";"Leaf rust plant response";;;"CO_321:0000706";"PrecoResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf rust response.";;"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000768";"0-4 PRECO scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"I= immune (0), no uredinia or other macroscopic sign of infection";"MS= moderately susceptible (MS), medium-sized pustules, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible";"S= susceptible (S), large pustules, no necrosis or chlorosis";"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small pustules";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small pustules surrounded by necrotic areas";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001267";"PrecoResp_E_1to4";"PRECO_1_4__RESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22763";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000178";"Leaf rust plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoResp";"BwRustResp, LRResp";"Leaf";"Leaf rust plant response";;;"CO_321:0000706";"PrecoResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf rust response.";;"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000773";"1-4 PRECO scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small pustules";"S= susceptible (S), large pustules, no necrosis or chlorosis";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small pustules surrounded by necrotic areas";"MS= moderately susceptible (MS), medium-sized pustules, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001268";"PrecoResp_E_1to8";"PRECO_1_8__ADLTRESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29143";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000178";"Leaf rust plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoResp";"BwRustResp, LRResp";"Leaf";"Leaf rust plant response";;;"CO_321:0000360";"Adult plants rust field response Estimation";"Estimation";"Response (type of disease reaction) in adult plant to leaf/stem/stripe rust, refers to the infection type and is classified according to the following scale: 0-No visible infection. R-Resistant, necrotic areas with or without small pustules. MR-Moderately Resistant, small pustules surrounded by necrotic areas. M-Intermediate, pustules of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis. MS-Moderately Susceptible, medium-sized pustules, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible. S-Susceptible, large pustules, no necrosis or chlorosis.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000473";"1-8 rust field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no visible infection (0)";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small pustules surrounded by necrotic areas";"I= intermediate (M), pustules of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis";"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small pustules";"R-MR= resistant to moderately resistance (R-MR)";"S= susceptible (S), large pustules, no necrosis or chlorosis";"MS= moderately susceptible (MS), medium-sized pustules, no necrosis, but some clorosis possible";"MS-S= moderately susceptible to susceptible (MS-S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001269";"PrecoSdlgResp_E_0to8";"PRECO_0_8__SEEDRESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS11-DS15";;"BMS_29142";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000901";"Leaf rust seedling response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoSdlgResp";"BwRustSdlgResp, LRSdlgResp";"Seedling";"Leaf rust seedling response";;;"CO_321:0000604";"Seedling rust field response Estimation";"Estimation";"Seedling host responses are normally scored as susceptible or resistant depending on the infection type produced with a designated isolate in a particular environment. The infection type produced will often change if the environment is altered.";;"Roelfs, A.P., R.P. Singh, and E.E. Saari. 1992. Rust Diseases of Wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.";"CO_321:0000606";"0-8 Rust infection type";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"I= immune, no uredinia or other macroscopic sign of infection (0)";"2= moderately resistant, small to medium uredinia often surrounded by Chlorosis or necrosis, green island may be surrounded by chlorotic or necrotic border (2)";"X= heterogeneous, random distribution of variable-sized uredinia on single leaf (X)";",= nearly immune, no uredinia, but hypersensitive necrotic or chlorotic flecks present (,)";"1= very resistant, small uredinia surrounded by necrosis (1)";"3= moderately susceptible, medium-sized uredinia that may be associated with chlorosis (3)";"4= susceptible, large uredinia without chlorosis (4)";"Y= heterogeneous, ordered distribution of variable-sized uredinia, with larger uredinia at leaf tip (Y)";"Z= Heterogeneous, ordered distribution of variable-sized uredinia, with larger uredinia at leaf base (Z)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001270";"PrecoSev_E_pct";"PRECO_pct__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22760";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000902";"Leaf rust severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoSev";"BwRustSev, LRSev";"Leaf";"Leaf rust severity";;;"CO_321:0000693";"Rust severity Estimation";"Estimation";"Severity of rust is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001271";"PrecoSev_E_0to12";"PRECO_0_12__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22759";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000902";"Leaf rust severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoSev";"BwRustSev, LRSev";"Leaf";"Leaf rust severity";;;"CO_321:0000324";"Modified cobb scale for severity";"Estimation";"Severity of leaf/stem/stripe rust is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000753";"0-12 Modified Cobb Scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= 0% (no uredia)";"10= 10% (3.7% occupied by uredia)";"20= 20% (7.4% occupied by uredia)";"1= 1% (0.37% occupied by uredia)";"5= 5% (1.85% occupied by uredia)";"50= 50% (18.5% occupied by uredia)";"60= 60% (22.2% occupied by uredia)";"30= 30% (11.1% occupied by uredia)";"40= 40% (14.8% occupied by uredia)";"80= 80% (29.6% occupied by uredia)";"90= 90% (33.3% occupied by uredia)";"70= 70% (25.9% occupied by uredia)";"100= 100% (37% occupied by uredia)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001272";"StomaCond_M_mmolm2s";"STMCOND_mmol_m2_s";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS12-DS81";;"BMS_29177";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000018";"Leaf stomatal conductance";"Physiological traits";"Rate of passage of either water vapor or carbon dioxide through the stomata.";;"StomaCond";"Cond, GS, STMCOND";"Leaf";"Stomatal conductance";;;"CO_321:0000240";"StomaCond Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for stomatal conductance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 2)";"CO_321:0000429";"mmol/m2/s";"Numerical";"0.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001273";"StomaFrq_Ct_stomamm2";"STMFRQ_num, STMFRQ";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS12-DS81";;"BMS_29179";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000143";"Leaf stomatal frequency";"Morphological traits";"Number of stomata counted per unit area on the leaf surface.";;"StomaFrq";;"Leaf";"Stomatal frequency";;;"CO_321:0000349";"StomaFrq Counting";"Counting";"Standard method for stomatal frequency.";;;"CO_321:0000442";"stoma/mm2";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001274";"StomaRes_M_sm";"STMRES_s_m";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS12-DS81";;"BMS_29181";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000063";"Leaf stomatal resistance";"Physiological traits";"Resistance to diffusion of water vapor through a plant stomata.";;"StomaRes";"Res, STMRES";"Leaf";"Stomatal resistance";;;"CO_321:0000285";"StomaRes Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for stomatal resistance.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 2)";"CO_321:0000431";"s/m";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"200.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001275";"StomaSiz_M_um";"STMSIZ _um";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS12-DS81";;"BMS_29182";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000142";"Leaf stomatal size";"Morphological traits";"Stomata size.";;"StomaSiz";"STMSIZ";"Leaf";"Stomatal size";;;"CO_321:0000348";"StomaSiz Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for stomatal size.";;;"CO_321:0000415";"µm";"Numerical";;"0.1";"0.5";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001276";"LeafThk_M_um";"LEAFTHK_mm";"Research-intensive characterization";;;"BMS_29113";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000047";"Leaf thickness";"Morphological traits";"Measurement of leaf thickness.";;"LeafThk";;"Leaf";"Thickness";;;"CO_321:0000267";"LeafThk Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for leaf thickness.";;;"CO_321:0000415";"µm";"Numerical";;"0.1";"0.5";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001277";"LeafTNecro_E_pct";"LEAFTNECR _pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the symptom.";;"BMS_29114";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000175";"Leaf tip necrosis incidence";"Morphological traits";"A physiological phenomenon caused by hot, dry and windy weather. the whole tip of the flag leaf tends to be necrotic and will often fold over. leaf tip necrosis progresses from the margins of the flag leaf tip and lower leaves as well show some signs of it. leaf tip necrosis is observed to some extent in all wheat varieties containing the leaf rust gene resistance gene lr34.";;"LeafTNecro";"LEAFTNECR";"Leaf";"Tip necrosis";;;"CO_321:0000361";"LeafTNecro Estimation";"Estimation";"Leaf tip necrosis is observed and rated in percentage.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001278";"LeafWid_M_mm";"LEAFWID_mm";"Research-intensive characterization";;;"BMS_29115";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000049";"Leaf width";"Morphological traits";"Width of leaf.";;"LeafWid";;"Leaf";"Width";;;"CO_321:0000269";"LeafWid Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for leaf width.";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001279";"Lodg_E_0to9pcttext";"LODG_0_9text";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22904";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000167";"Lodging incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Indicates incidence of lodged plants.";;"Lodg";"LOD";"Plant";"Lodging incidence";;;"CO_321:0000355";"Lodg Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimate of the area lodged in the sampled plot.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001280";"Lodg_E_pct";"LODG_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_18060";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000167";"Lodging incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Indicates incidence of lodged plants.";;"Lodg";"LOD";"Plant";"Lodging incidence";;;"CO_321:0000355";"Lodg Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimate of the area lodged in the sampled plot.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001281";"Lodg_E_0to5pct";"LODG_0_5";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22906";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000167";"Lodging incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Indicates incidence of lodged plants.";;"Lodg";"LOD";"Plant";"Lodging incidence";;;"CO_321:0000355";"Lodg Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimate of the area lodged in the sampled plot.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000807";"0-5 percentage scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 60% coverage";"4= 80% coverage";"1= 20% coverage";"2= 40% coverage";"5= 100% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001282";"Lodg_E_0to9pct";"LODG_0_9";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29117";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000167";"Lodging incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Indicates incidence of lodged plants.";;"Lodg";"LOD";"Plant";"Lodging incidence";;;"CO_321:0000355";"Lodg Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimate of the area lodged in the sampled plot.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001283";"Lodg_E_1to5";"LODG_1_5, LodgInc_N_T_S_M_V";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22681";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000167";"Lodging incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Indicates incidence of lodged plants.";;"Lodg";"LOD";"Plant";"Lodging incidence";;;"CO_321:0000355";"Lodg Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimate of the area lodged in the sampled plot.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001284";"Lodg_E_1to9";"LODG_1_9";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22905";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000167";"Lodging incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Indicates incidence of lodged plants.";;"Lodg";"LOD";"Plant";"Lodging incidence";;;"CO_321:0000355";"Lodg Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimate of the area lodged in the sampled plot.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000465";"1-9 incidence scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= low to medium";"5= medium";"2= very low";"3= low";"8= very high";"9= severe";"6= medium to high";"7= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001285";"UtritInc_E_pct";"UTRIT_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_22840";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000921";"Loose smut incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Loose smut incidence in the plants caused by Ustilago tritici.";;"UtritInc";"UTRIT";"Spike";"Loose smut incidence";;;"CO_321:0000325";"UtritInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for loose smut incidence.";;"Wilcoxson and Saari, 1996";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001286";"UtritInc_E_1to9";"UTRIT_1_9__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;"BMS_29201";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000921";"Loose smut incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Loose smut incidence in the plants caused by Ustilago tritici.";;"UtritInc";"UTRIT";"Spike";"Loose smut incidence";;;"CO_321:0000325";"UtritInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for loose smut incidence.";;"Wilcoxson and Saari, 1996";"CO_321:0000465";"1-9 incidence scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= low to medium";"5= medium";"2= very low";"3= low";"8= very high";"9= severe";"6= medium to high";"7= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001287";"Mat_relat_1to6";"RELTMT_1_6, RELTMT";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Physiological maturity (DS87 approx.)";;"BMS_22696";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000022";"Maturity time";"Phenological traits";"Maturity time starts at hard dough stage (ds87) often called physiological maturity.";;"Mat";"Mt, M, Maturity";"Plant";"Maturity time";;;"CO_321:0000243";"Mat DS87 relative Estimation";"Estimation";"Assessment of physiological maturity (approx. DS87) compared to best local check which represents the best locally adopted germplasm at each location grown in standard or normal environment.";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000856";"1-6 Phenological relative scale";"Ordinal";;;;;"1= very early (VE)";"4= normal, similar to local check (N)";"5= late (L)";"2= early (E)";"3= early to normal (E-N)";"6= very late (VL)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001288";"Mat_date_jd";"MATD_jd, MATD, MATDATE";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Physiological maturity (DS87 approx.)";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22680";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000022";"Maturity time";"Phenological traits";"Maturity time starts at hard dough stage (ds87) often called physiological maturity.";;"Mat";"Mt, M, Maturity";"Plant";"Maturity time";;;"CO_321:0000842";"Mat DS87 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of physiological maturity (approx. DS87). It is estimated as when the grain reaches the maximum dry weight and the grain becomes viable. It is most easily determined in-field when 50% of the peduncles are ripe (i.e., yellow).";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000855";"Julian date (JD)";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001289";"Mat_date_ymd";"MATD_yyyymmdd, MATD, MATDATE";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Physiological maturity (DS87 approx.)";;"BMS_22678";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000022";"Maturity time";"Phenological traits";"Maturity time starts at hard dough stage (ds87) often called physiological maturity.";;"Mat";"Mt, M, Maturity";"Plant";"Maturity time";;;"CO_321:0000842";"Mat DS87 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of physiological maturity (approx. DS87). It is estimated as when the grain reaches the maximum dry weight and the grain becomes viable. It is most easily determined in-field when 50% of the peduncles are ripe (i.e., yellow).";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000850";"yyyymmdd";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001290";"Mat_dto_day";"DTM_days, DTM, DAYSMT, MAT";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Physiological maturity (DS87 approx.)";;"BMS_22677";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000022";"Maturity time";"Phenological traits";"Maturity time starts at hard dough stage (ds87) often called physiological maturity.";;"Mat";"Mt, M, Maturity";"Plant";"Maturity time";;;"CO_321:0000232";"Mat DS87 DT Computation";"Computation";"Number of days required from sowing to physiological maturity (approx. DS87). However, when planting in dry soils in dryland areas it is counted from the first day of rainfall or irrigation which is sufficient for germination, or from emergence date.";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001291";"Mat_relat_1to5";"RELTMT_1_5, RELTMT";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Physiological maturity (DS87 approx.)";;"BMS_29155";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000022";"Maturity time";"Phenological traits";"Maturity time starts at hard dough stage (ds87) often called physiological maturity.";;"Mat";"Mt, M, Maturity";"Plant";"Maturity time";;;"CO_321:0000243";"Mat DS87 relative Estimation";"Estimation";"Assessment of physiological maturity (approx. DS87) compared to best local check which represents the best locally adopted germplasm at each location grown in standard or normal environment.";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000460";"1-5 Phenological relative scale";"Ordinal";"0.0";;;;"VE= very early (VE)";"L= late (L)";"VL= very late (VL)";"E= early (E)";"M= moderate (M)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001292";"HtereInc_E_pct";"HTERE_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22818";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000170";"Net blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Net blotch incidence in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora teres (helminthosporium teres).";;"HtereInc";;"Leaf";"Net blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000357";"HtereInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for net blotch incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001293";"HtereSev_E_00to99";"HTERE_00_99__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22815";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000406";"Net blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Net blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora teres (Helminthosporium teres).";;"HtereSev";;"Leaf";"Net blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001294";"NodeNO_Ct_node";"NODENO _num";"Descriptor";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29123";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000051";"Node number";"Morphological traits";"Number of nodes in the main stem.";;"NodeN";;"Stem";"Node number";;;"CO_321:0000271";"NodeN Counting";"Counting";"Standard method for node number.";;;"CO_321:0000437";"node";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"15.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001295";"PedGlau_E_0to9";"PEDGLAU_0_9";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29129";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000054";"Peduncle glaucousness";"Morphological traits";"Glaucousness in peduncle.";;"PedGlau";;"Peduncle";"Glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0000274";"PedGlau Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for peduncle glaucousness.";;;"CO_321:0000450";"0-9 density scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= absent";"3= sparse";"4= sparse to intermediate";"1= very sparse";"2= very sparse to sparse";"7= dense";"8= dense to very dense";"5= intermediate";"6= intermadiate to dense";"9= very dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001296";"PedLng_M_cm";"PEDLNG _cm";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_23053";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000052";"Peduncle length";"Morphological traits";"Length of peduncle.";;"PedLng";;"Peduncle";"Length";;;"CO_321:0000272";"PedLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for peduncle length.";;;"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";"1.0";"5.0";"90.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001297";"NeckBreak_E_pct";"NBREAK_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;"BMS_29121";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000050";"Peduncle neck break";"Agronomical traits";"Observation of spike break from the base of head.";;"NeckBreak";"NBreak";"Peduncle";"Neck break";;;"CO_321:0000270";"NeckBreak Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for neck break.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001298";"PedPubDen_E_0to9";"PEDPBD_0_9";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29130";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000053";"Peduncle pubescence density";"Morphological traits";"Peduncle hairiness density.";;"PedPubDen";"PEDPBD";"Peduncle";"Pubescence density";;;"CO_321:0000273";"PedPubDen Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for peduncle pubescence density.";;;"CO_321:0000450";"0-9 density scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= absent";"3= sparse";"4= sparse to intermediate";"1= very sparse";"2= very sparse to sparse";"7= dense";"8= dense to very dense";"5= intermediate";"6= intermadiate to dense";"9= very dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001299";"ErlVig_E_1to5";"ERLVIG_1_5";"Trial evaluation";"DS13-DS23";;"BMS_22682";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000009";"Plant early vigour";"Agronomical traits";"Capacity of a seedling or plant to grow vegetatively in early stages of development.";"Seedling vigour, Plant early vigor";"ErlVig";"ERLVIG";"Plant";"Early vigour";;;"CO_321:0000233";"ErlVig Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe vigour of the plants per plot/entry and rate it.";;;"CO_321:0000462";"1-5 scoring scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= very poor (VP)";"4= good (G)";"5= very good (VG)";"2= poor (P)";"3= fair (F)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001300";"GrwHabit_E_1to5";"GHABIT_1_5";"Descriptor";"DS25-DS30";;"BMS_23213";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000015";"Plant growth habit";"Agronomical traits";"The growth habit of the plant whether erect/semi-erect/semi-spreading/spreading/prostrate.";;"GrwHabit";"GHabit";"Plant";"Growth habit";;;"CO_321:0000238";"GrwHabit Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth habit of wheat plants during tillering stages and rate whether erect/semi-erect/prostrate/semi-spreading/spreading";;;"CO_321:0000458";"1-5 GHABIT scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"E= erect (E)";"S= spreading (S)";"P= Prostrate (P)";"SE= semi-erect (SE)";"SS= semi-spreading (SS)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001301";"PH_M_cm";"PH_cm";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS75-DS89";;"BMS_18020";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000020";"Plant height";"Agronomical traits";"Height of plant from ground to top of spike, excluding awns.";;"PH";"PlntHt, PHt";"Plant";"Height";;;"CO_321:0000241";"PH Measurement";"Measurement";"Measure the length of individual culms from soil surface to the tip of the spike (do not include awn) and record to the nearest centimeter. (Average of 4-10 plants/culms per plot).";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";"1.0";"5.0";"90.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001302";"PH_M_m";"PH_m";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS75-DS89";;"BMS_22673";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000020";"Plant height";"Agronomical traits";"Height of plant from ground to top of spike, excluding awns.";;"PH";"PlntHt, PHt";"Plant";"Height";;;"CO_321:0000241";"PH Measurement";"Measurement";"Measure the length of individual culms from soil surface to the tip of the spike (do not include awn) and record to the nearest centimeter. (Average of 4-10 plants/culms per plot).";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000813";"m";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"2.5";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001303";"PH_E_1to5";"RELTPH_1_5";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS75-DS89";;"BMS_22672";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000020";"Plant height";"Agronomical traits";"Height of plant from ground to top of spike, excluding awns.";;"PH";"PlntHt, PHt";"Plant";"Height";;;"CO_321:0000245";"PH Estimation";"Estimation";"Score a relative plant height to local check using 1-5 scale where 3 is used for the local check (1 = short, 5 = tall). Assessment of plant height compared to best local check which represents the best locally adopted germplasm at each location grown in standard or normal environment.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000461";"1-5 RELTPH scale";"Ordinal";"0.0";;;;"VS= very short (VS)";"T= tall (T)";"VT= very tall (VT)";"S= short (S)";"M= medium (M)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001304";"HNecro_E_0to1";"HNECRO_0_1";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the symptom.";;"BMS_29096";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000186";"Plant hybrid necrosis incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Observation of hybrid necrosis.";"Dwarf clumping";"HNecro";;"Plant";"Hybrid necrosis incidence";;;"CO_321:0000367";"HNecro Estimation";"Estimation";"Some forms of spotting and necrosis result from chromosomal instability or genetic aberrations, these disorders are known as hybrid necrosis. Affected plants show differing degrees of necrosis, often associated with stunting or dwarf clumping. Hybrid necrosis usually is observed in early generation material, and affected progeny are eliminated";;;"CO_321:0000599";"0-1 absent-present";"Nominal";;;;;"1= present";"0= absent";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001305";"PhotopResp_E_1to9";"PHOTORESPO_1_9";"Descriptor";"DS65";;"BMS_29136";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000672";"Plant photoperiod response";"Physiological traits";"Extent to which long days hasten flowering.";"Daylength sensitivity";"PhotopResp";"PhotoRespo";"Plant";"Photoperiod response";;;"CO_321:0000846";"PhotopResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the tendency of flowering according day-length";;;"CO_321:0000857";"1-9 PHOTORESP scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= insensitive";"3= low";"4= low to intermediate";"1= very low";"2= very low to low";"7= moderate";"8= moderate to high";"5= intermediate";"6= intermediate to moderate";"9= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001306";"PlntStnd_Calc_Plntha";"PLNTSTND_pl_ha";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS89";;"BMS_29138";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000187";"Plant stand";"Agronomical traits";"Plant population or plant density.";"Plant establishment, Crop stand, Plant density, Plant population";"PlntStnd";"PStand";"Plant";"Stand";;;"CO_321:0000955";"PlntStnd Computation";"Computation";"Calculate number of plant per area.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000814";"plant/ha";"Numerical";"0.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001307";"PlntStnd_Calc_Plntm2";"PLNTSTND_pl_m2";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS89";;"BMS_29140";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000187";"Plant stand";"Agronomical traits";"Plant population or plant density.";"Plant establishment, Crop stand, Plant density, Plant population";"PlntStnd";"PStand";"Plant";"Stand";;;"CO_321:0000955";"PlntStnd Computation";"Computation";"Calculate number of plant per area.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000817";"plant/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001308";"PlntStnd_Ct_Plntm";"PLNTSTND_pl_m";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS89";;"BMS_29139";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000187";"Plant stand";"Agronomical traits";"Plant population or plant density.";"Plant establishment, Crop stand, Plant density, Plant population";"PlntStnd";"PStand";"Plant";"Stand";;;"CO_321:0000368";"PlntStnd Counting";"Counting";"Counting the number of plant per area or row.";;;"CO_321:0000815";"plant/m";"Numerical";"0.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001309";"PlntStnd_Ct_PlntPlot";"PLNTSTND_pl_plot";"Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS89";;"BMS_18070";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000187";"Plant stand";"Agronomical traits";"Plant population or plant density.";"Plant establishment, Crop stand, Plant density, Plant population";"PlntStnd";"PStand";"Plant";"Stand";;;"CO_321:0000368";"PlntStnd Counting";"Counting";"Counting the number of plant per area or row.";;;"CO_321:0000816";"plant/plot";"Numerical";"0.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001310";"VgP_calc_day";"VEGPERIOD_days";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS10-DS31";;"BMS_29202";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000670";"Plant vegetative period";"Phenological traits";"Time period between emergence (ds10) and first node detectable (ds31).";;"VgP";"VegPeriod, VegP, VP";"Plant";"Vegetative period";;;"CO_321:0001429";"VgP Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as time in days between emergence (DS10) and first node detectable (DS31).";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001311";"VgP_calc_pct";"VEGPERIOD_pct";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS10-DS31";;"BMS_29203";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000670";"Plant vegetative period";"Phenological traits";"Time period between emergence (ds10) and first node detectable (ds31).";;"VgP";"VegPeriod, VegP, VP";"Plant";"Vegetative period";;;"CO_321:0001429";"VgP Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as time in days between emergence (DS10) and first node detectable (DS31).";"xxxx";"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001312";"PlntVig_E_1to5";"PLNTVIG_1_5";"Trial evaluation";"DS13-DS81";;"BMS_18080";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000680";"Plant vigour";"Agronomical traits";"Capacity of the plant to grow.";"Plant vigor";"PlntVig";"Vig";"Plant";"Vigour";;;"CO_321:0001428";"PlntVig Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe vigour of the plants per plot/entry and rate it.";;;"CO_321:0000462";"1-5 scoring scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= very poor (VP)";"4= good (G)";"5= very good (VG)";"2= poor (P)";"3= fair (F)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001313";"EgramInc_E_0to9pcttext";"EGRAM_0_9text__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22804";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000937";"Powdery mildew incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew incidence in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramInc";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew incidence";;;"CO_321:0000330";"EgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for powdery mildew incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001314";"EgramInc_E_pct";"EGRAM_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_22805";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000937";"Powdery mildew incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew incidence in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramInc";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew incidence";;;"CO_321:0000330";"EgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for powdery mildew incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001315";"EgramInc_E_0to5";"EGRAM_0_5__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_22807";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000937";"Powdery mildew incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew incidence in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramInc";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew incidence";;;"CO_321:0000330";"EgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for powdery mildew incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000782";"0-5 incidence scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= none";"3= medium";"4= high";"1= very low";"2= low";"5= severe";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001316";"EgramInc_E_1to5";"EGRAM_1_5__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_22810";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000937";"Powdery mildew incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew incidence in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramInc";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew incidence";;;"CO_321:0000330";"EgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for powdery mildew incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000788";"1-5 incidence scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= high";"5= severe";"2= low";"3= medium";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001317";"EgramInc_E_1to9";"EGRAM_1_9__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_22808";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000937";"Powdery mildew incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew incidence in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramInc";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew incidence";;;"CO_321:0000330";"EgramInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for powdery mildew incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000465";"1-9 incidence scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= low to medium";"5= medium";"2= very low";"3= low";"8= very high";"9= severe";"6= medium to high";"7= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001318";"EgramLegacy_E_9to1";"EGRAM_9_1";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22809";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000938";"Powdery mildew legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramLegacy";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew legacy";;;"CO_321:0000878";"EgramLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for powdery mildew legacy.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000790";"9-1 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"9=";"6=";"5=";"8=";"7=";"2=";"1=";"4=";"3=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001319";"EgramSev_E_00to99text";"EGRAM_00_99text__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22803";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000939";"Powdery mildew severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew severity in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramSev";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000728";"Double digit (00-99) + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001320";"EgramSev_E_00to99";"EGRAM_00_99__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_22806";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000939";"Powdery mildew severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew severity in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramSev";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001321";"PnegleDmg_E_pct";"PNEGLE_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;"BMS_29141";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000112";"Pratylenchus neglectus damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by root-lesion nematode, Pratylenchus neglectus.";;"PnegleDmg";"PNEGLE, RLN";"Root";"Pratylenchus neglectus damage";;;"CO_321:0000328";"PnegleDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Above-ground symptoms of root lesion nematodes are often indistinct and difficult to identify, but include poor vigor, stunted growth, poor tillering, and wilting in response to moisture stress. Often, crop growth in an infected field will be irregular or patchy. Below ground, cereal roots will display generalized root browning, with lesions rapidly coalescing to produce extensive areas of discoloration. Lesions are only readily observed on the roots in the very early stages of infection. Lateral roots will be reduced in both length and number, and the root system may be thin and poorly branched or appear necrotic.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001322";"PthornDmg_E_pct";"PTHORN_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;"BMS_29150";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000113";"Pratylenchus thornei damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by root-lesion nematode, Pratylenchus thornei.";;"PthornDmg";"PTHORN, RLN";"Root";"Pratylenchus thornei damage";;;"CO_321:0000329";"PthornDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Above-ground symptoms of root lesion nematodes are often indistinct and difficult to identify, but include poor vigor, stunted growth, poor tillering, and wilting in response to moisture stress. Often, crop growth in an infected field will be irregular or patchy. Below ground, cereal roots will display generalized root browning, with lesions rapidly coalescing to produce extensive areas of discoloration. Lesions are only readily observed on the roots in the very early stages of infection. Lateral roots will be reduced in both length and number, and the root system may be thin and poorly branched or appear necrotic.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001323";"RepP_Calc_day";"REPPERIOD_days";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS14-DS65";;"BMS_29156";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000668";"Reproductive period";"Phenological traits";"Time between double ridge (approx. ds14) and anthesis (ds65).";;"RepP";"RepPeriod, RP";"Plant";"Reproductive period";;;"CO_321:0001430";"RepP Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as time between double ridge (approx. DS14) and anthesis (DS65) as percentage of crop cycle duration.";"xxxx";"Kirby and Appleyard, 1984, Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001324";"RepP_Calc_pct";"REPPERIOD_pct";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS14-DS65";;"BMS_29157";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000668";"Reproductive period";"Phenological traits";"Time between double ridge (approx. ds14) and anthesis (ds65).";;"RepP";"RepPeriod, RP";"Plant";"Reproductive period";;;"CO_321:0001430";"RepP Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as time between double ridge (approx. DS14) and anthesis (DS65) as percentage of crop cycle duration.";"xxxx";"Kirby and Appleyard, 1984, Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001325";"RsolaInc_E_0to9pct";"RSOLA_0_9";"Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_29161";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000681";"Rhizoctonia root rot incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Rhizoctonia root rot incidence in the plants caused by the agent Rhizoctonia solani.";;"RsolaInc";"RSOLA";"Plant";"Rhizoctonia root rot incidence";;;"CO_321:0000712";"RsolaInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for rhizoctonia root rot incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001326";"RodentDmg_E_pct";"RODDMG_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29159";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000090";"Rodent damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by rodent.";;"RodentDmg";"RODDMG";"Plant";"Rodent damage";;;"CO_321:0000310";"RodentDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for rodent damage.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001327";"RootDis_E_1to5";"ROOTDIS_1_5, RootDis_N_T_S_M_V";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22712";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000682";"Root disease development";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by root diseases.";;"RootDis";;"Root";"Root disease development";;;"CO_321:0000713";"RootDis Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for root disease development.";;;"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001328";"RLNDmg_E_pct";"RLESDMG_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;"BMS_29158";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000161";"Root lesion nematode damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by root-lesion nematodes, Pratylenchus spp.";;"RLNDmg";"RLESDMG, RLN";"Root";"Root lesion nematode damage";;;"CO_321:0000350";"RLNDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Above-ground symptoms of root lesion nematodes are often indistinct and difficult to identify, but include poor vigor, stunted growth, poor tillering, and wilting in response to moisture stress. Often, crop growth in an infected field will be irregular or patchy. Below ground, cereal roots will display generalized root browning, with lesions rapidly coalescing to produce extensive areas of discoloration. Lesions are only readily observed on the roots in the very early stages of infection. Lateral roots will be reduced in both length and number, and the root system may be thin and poorly branched or appear necrotic.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001329";"DnoxiDmg_E_pct";"DNOXI_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29033";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000091";"Russian wheat aphid damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxis.";;"DnoxiDmg";"DNOXI";"Plant";"Russian wheat aphid damage";;;"CO_321:0000311";"DnoxiDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for russian wheat aphid damage.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001330";"SaltTol_E_1to9";"SALTOL _1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS15-DS65";;"BMS_29162";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000132";"Salinity tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant tolerance to soil salinity.";;"SaltTol";"SALTOL";"Plant";"Salinity tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000344";"SaltTol Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth of plants per plot/entry at the field presenting soil salinity and rate the tolerance.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 8)";"CO_321:0000468";"1-9 TOL scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= highly susceptible";"4= susceptible to moderately susceptible";"5= moderately susceptible";"2= highly susceptible to susceptible";"3= susceptible";"8= tolerant";"9= highly tolerant";"6= moderately susceptible to moderately tolerant";"7= moderately tolerant";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001331";"SawflyDmg_E_pct";"CPYGM_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29029";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000092";"Sawfly damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by sawfly, Cephus cinctus.";;"SawflyDmg";"CcincDmg, CPYGMDmg";"Plant";"Sawfly damage";;;"CO_321:0000312";"SawflyDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for sawfly damage.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001332";"SGNDmg_E_pct";"ATRITDMG _pct";"Trial evaluation";"From DS35";;"BMS_29016";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000110";"Seed gall nematode damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The wheat seed-gall nematode damage caused by Anguina tritici.";;"SGNDmg";"AtritDmg";"Plant";"Seed gall nematode damage";;;"CO_321:0000326";"SGNDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Distorted leaves and stems are evident prior to heading. As diseased plants approach maturity, galls are formed in the florets, replacing the kernels. The galls are similar in shape to the seed they replace and are dark brown in color. Large numbers of motile larvae are present within the galls and become active after the galls have been moistened. These nematodes can act as vectors of Clavibacter tritici.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001333";"SemoCol_M_bvalue";"SEMOCOL_b_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29166";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000075";"Semolina color";"Quality traits";"The semolina color.";;"SemoCol";;"Semolina";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000417";"b value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001334";"SemoProt_Kjl_pct";"SEMOPROT _pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29167";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000074";"Semolina protein content";"Quality traits";"Protein content in durum wheat semolina.";;"SemoProt";;"Semolina";"Protein content";;;"CO_321:0000289";"Kjeldahl AACC 56-81B";"Measurement";"Kjeldahl AACC 56-81B.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001335";"SemoProt_NIRS_pct";"SEMOPROT _pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000074";"Semolina protein content";"Quality traits";"Protein content in durum wheat semolina.";;"SemoProt";;"Semolina";"Protein content";;;"CO_321:0000957";"NIRS Measurement";"Measurement";"NIR calibrated based on Kjeldahl results.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001336";"SemoYellPig_M_ppm";"SEMOYELPIG_ppm";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29168";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000674";"Semolina yellow pigment content";"Quality traits";"Semolina yellow pigment content due to the presence of xanthophyll and other related compounds.";;"SemoYellPig";"SEMOYELPIG";"Semolina";"Yellow pigment content";;;"CO_321:0000848";"SemoYellPig Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for semolina yellow pigment.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"15.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001337";"SepSPInc_E_pct";"SEPSP_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_23030";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000914";"Septoria blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria blotch incidence in the plants caused by the agent Septoria species.";;"SepSPInc";;"Leaf";"Septoria blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000915";"SepSPInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria species incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001338";"SepSpLegacy_E_1to9";"SEPSP_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_23028";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000916";"Septoria blotch legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria blotch incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Septoria species.";;"SepSpLegacy";;"Leaf";"Septoria blotch legacy";;;"CO_321:0000358";"SepSpLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria species legacy.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000789";"1-9 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1=";"4=";"5=";"2=";"3=";"8=";"9=";"6=";"7=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001339";"SepSpLegacy_E_9to1";"SEPSP_9_1";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_23033";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000916";"Septoria blotch legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria blotch incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Septoria species.";;"SepSpLegacy";;"Leaf";"Septoria blotch legacy";;;"CO_321:0000358";"SepSpLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria species legacy.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000790";"9-1 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"9=";"6=";"5=";"8=";"7=";"2=";"1=";"4=";"3=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001340";"SepSpResp_E_0to5";"SEPSP_0_5__RESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_23031";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000715";"Septoria blotch plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria blotch response in the plants caused by the agent Septoria species.";;"SepSpResp";;"Leaf";"Septoria blotch plant response";;;"CO_321:0000716";"SepSpResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria species response.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000735";"0-5 Septoria Response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"Imm= Immune (Imm) - No pycnidial formation, no symptoms or occasional hypersensitive fleck.";"I= Intermediate (I) - Light pycnidial format ion. Coalescing of lesions normally noticeable towards the leaf tip and elsewhere on the leaf.";"S= Susceptible (S) - Moderate pycnidial formation, lesions coalescing considerably.";"HR= Highly Resistant (HR) - No or only occasional isolated pycnidia formed, particularly in older leaf tissue, hypersensitive flecking in younger leaf tissue.";"R= Resistant (R) - Very light pycnidial formation. Some coalescing of lesions mainly toward the leaf tip and in older leaf tissue.";"VS= Very susceptible (VS), large, abundant pycnidia, lesions coalescing extensively";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001341";"SepSpResp_E_1to5";"SEPSP_1_5__RESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_23032";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000715";"Septoria blotch plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria blotch response in the plants caused by the agent Septoria species.";;"SepSpResp";;"Leaf";"Septoria blotch plant response";;;"CO_321:0000716";"SepSpResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria species response.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000729";"1-5 Septoria response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"VR= very resistant (VR), average pycnidial density of 0-5%";"MS= moderately susceptible (MS), average pycnidial density coverage of 30-40%";"S= susceptible (S), pycnidial density greater than 40%";"R= resistant (R), average pycnidial density of 5-15%";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), average pycnidial density coverage of 15-30%";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001342";"SepSpSev_E_00to99text";"SEPSP_00_99text__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_23029";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000714";"Septoria blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Septoria species.";;"SepSpSev";;"Leaf";"Septoria blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000728";"Double digit (00-99) + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001343";"SepSpSev_E_0to9pcttext";"SEPSP_0_9text__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_23027";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000714";"Septoria blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Septoria species.";;"SepSpSev";;"Leaf";"Septoria blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000879";"SepSpSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria species causing Septoria blotch severity.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001344";"SepSpSev_E_00to99";"SEPSP_00_99__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_23026";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000714";"Septoria blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Septoria species.";;"SepSpSev";;"Leaf";"Septoria blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001345";"SnodoInc_E_0to9pcttext";"SNODO_0_9text__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22777";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000917";"Septoria nodorum blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria nodorum blotch incidence in the plants caused by the agent Stagonospora nodorum (syn. Septoria glume blotch) (Phaeosphaeria nodorum (E. Müller) Hedjaroude (syn. Stagonospora nodorum).";;"SnodoInc";;"Plant";"Septoria nodorum blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000880";"SnodoInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria nodorum blotch incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001346";"SnodoInc_E_pct";"SNODO_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22780";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000917";"Septoria nodorum blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria nodorum blotch incidence in the plants caused by the agent Stagonospora nodorum (syn. Septoria glume blotch) (Phaeosphaeria nodorum (E. Müller) Hedjaroude (syn. Stagonospora nodorum).";;"SnodoInc";;"Plant";"Septoria nodorum blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000880";"SnodoInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria nodorum blotch incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001347";"SnodoLegacy_E_1to9";"SNODO_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22781";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000918";"Septoria nodorum blotch legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria nodorum blotch incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Stagonospora nodorum (syn. Septoria glume blotch) (Phaeosphaeria nodorum (E. Müller) Hedjaroude (syn. Stagonospora nodorum).";;"SnodoLegacy";;"Plant";"Septoria nodorum blotch legacy";;;"CO_321:0000343";"SnodoLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria nodorum blotch legacy.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000789";"1-9 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1=";"4=";"5=";"2=";"3=";"8=";"9=";"6=";"7=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001348";"SnodoLegacy_E_9to1";"SNODO_9_1";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22782";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000918";"Septoria nodorum blotch legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria nodorum blotch incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Stagonospora nodorum (syn. Septoria glume blotch) (Phaeosphaeria nodorum (E. Müller) Hedjaroude (syn. Stagonospora nodorum).";;"SnodoLegacy";;"Plant";"Septoria nodorum blotch legacy";;;"CO_321:0000343";"SnodoLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria nodorum blotch legacy.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000790";"9-1 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"9=";"6=";"5=";"8=";"7=";"2=";"1=";"4=";"3=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001349";"SnodoSev_E_00to99+text";"SNODO_00_99__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22776";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000717";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Stagonospora nodorum (syn. Septoria glume blotch) (Phaeosphaeria nodorum (E. Müller) Hedjaroude (syn. Stagonospora nodorum).";;"SnodoSev";;"Plant";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001350";"StritInc_E_0to9pcttext";"STRIT_0_9text__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22769";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000919";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence in the plants caused by the agent Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici). symptoms: the lesions are linear and restricted laterally.";;"StritInc";"STRIT";"Plant";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000881";"StritInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria tritici blotch incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001351";"StritInc_E_pct";"STRIT_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22770";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000919";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence in the plants caused by the agent Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici). symptoms: the lesions are linear and restricted laterally.";;"StritInc";"STRIT";"Plant";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000881";"StritInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria tritici blotch incidence.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001352";"StritLegacy_E_1to9";"STRIT_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22774";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000920";"Septoria tritici blotch legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici). symptoms: the lesions are linear and restricted laterally.";;"StritLegacy";"STRIT";"Plant";"Septoria tritici blotch legacy";;;"CO_321:0000333";"StritLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria tritici blotch legacy.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000789";"1-9 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1=";"4=";"5=";"2=";"3=";"8=";"9=";"6=";"7=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001353";"StritLegacy_E_9to1";"STRIT_9_1";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22772";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000920";"Septoria tritici blotch legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici). symptoms: the lesions are linear and restricted laterally.";;"StritLegacy";"STRIT";"Plant";"Septoria tritici blotch legacy";;;"CO_321:0000333";"StritLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria tritici blotch legacy.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000790";"9-1 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"9=";"6=";"5=";"8=";"7=";"2=";"1=";"4=";"3=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001354";"StritResp_E_0to5";"STRIT_0_5__RESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22773";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000719";"Septoria tritici blotch plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria tritici blotch response in the plants caused by the agent Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici). symptoms: the lesions are linear and restricted laterally.";;"StritResp";"STRIT";"Plant";"Septoria tritici blotch plant response";;;"CO_321:0000720";"StritResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria tritici blotch response.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000735";"0-5 Septoria Response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"Imm= Immune (Imm) - No pycnidial formation, no symptoms or occasional hypersensitive fleck.";"I= Intermediate (I) - Light pycnidial format ion. Coalescing of lesions normally noticeable towards the leaf tip and elsewhere on the leaf.";"S= Susceptible (S) - Moderate pycnidial formation, lesions coalescing considerably.";"HR= Highly Resistant (HR) - No or only occasional isolated pycnidia formed, particularly in older leaf tissue, hypersensitive flecking in younger leaf tissue.";"R= Resistant (R) - Very light pycnidial formation. Some coalescing of lesions mainly toward the leaf tip and in older leaf tissue.";"VS= Very susceptible (VS), large, abundant pycnidia, lesions coalescing extensively";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001355";"StritSev_E_00to99text";"STRIT_00_99text__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22771";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000718";"Septoria tritici blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria tritici blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici). symptoms: the lesions are linear and restricted laterally.";;"StritSev";"STRIT";"Plant";"Septoria tritici blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000728";"Double digit (00-99) + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001356";"StritSev_E_00to99";"STRIT_00_99__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22768";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000718";"Septoria tritici blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria tritici blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici). symptoms: the lesions are linear and restricted laterally.";;"StritSev";"STRIT";"Plant";"Septoria tritici blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001357";"RcereInc_E_0to9";"RCERE_0_9";"Trial evaluation";"DS55-DS79";;"BMS_29154";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000683";"Sharp eyespot incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Sharp eyespot incidence in the plants caused by the agent Rhizoctonia cerealis.";;"RcereInc";"RCERE";"Plant";"Sharp eyespot incidence";;;"CO_321:0000721";"RcereInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Main shoots are assessed for sharp eyespot disease.";;;"CO_321:0000742";"0-9 RCERE scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No symptom of sharp eyespot";"3= one or more sharp eyespot lesions girdling in total less than or equal to 1/5 of the stem circumference, with the stem remaining un-softened";"4= one or more sharp eyespot lesions girdling in total less than or equal to 2/5 of the stem circumference, with the stem remaining un-softened";"1= One or more sharp eyespot lesions on lower sheaths but no symptoms on the stem";"2= one or more sharp eyespot lesions on upper (as well as lower) sheaths but no symptoms on the stem";"7= one or more sharp eyespot lesions girdling in total less than or equal to 5/5 of the stem circumference, with the stem remaining un-softened";"8= stem softened with sharp eyespot lesions on the stem";"5= one or more sharp eyespot lesions girdling in total less than or equal to 3/5 of the stem circumference, with the stem remaining un-softened";"6= one or more sharp eyespot lesions girdling in total less than or equal to 4/5 of the stem circumference, with the stem remaining un-softened";"9= head prematurely ripened (whitehead) or plant collapsed with sharp eyespot lesions on the stem, or shoot killed as the ear emerges from the sheath with sharp eyespot lesions on the shoot";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001358";"SnailDmg_E_pct";"SNAILDMG_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29171";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000093";"Snail damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by snails.";;"SnailDmg";;"Plant";"Snail damage";;;"CO_321:0000313";"SnailDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for snail damage.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001359";"SBMVInc_E_0to9pct";"SBMV_0_9";"Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_29163";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000173";"Soil borne mosaic incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Soil borne mosaic incidence in the plants caused by the agent soilborne wheat mosaic virus (sbwmv) which is vectored by Plasmodiophorid polymyxa graminis.";;"SBMVInc";"SBMV";"Leaf";"Soil borne mosaic incidence";;;"CO_321:0000359";"SBMVInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for soil borne mosaic virus incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001360";"SrolfResp_E_1to8";"SROLF_1_8";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_29175";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000115";"Southern blight plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Southern blight response in the plants caused by the agent Corticum rolfsii (Sclerotium rolfsii).";"SROLF";"SrolfResp";;"Plant";"Southern blight plant response";;;"CO_321:0000331";"SrolfResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for southern blight response.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000471";"1-8 generic disease field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no visible infection (0)";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small lesions surrounded by necrotic areas";"I= intermediate (M), lesions of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis";"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small lesions";"R-MR= resistant to moderately resistance (R-MR)";"S= susceptible (S), large lesions, no necrosis or chlorosis";"MS= moderately Susceptible (MS), medium-sized lesions, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible";"MS-S= moderately susceptible to susceptible (MS-S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001361";"Awns_E_0to9";"AWNS_0_9";"Descriptor";"DS65-DS89";;"BMS_22992";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000027";"Spike awnedness";"Morphological traits";"Observation of awn type whether awnless/awnletted (short awns)/awned (conspicious awns).";;"Awns";;"Spike";"Awnedness";;;"CO_321:0000248";"Awns Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for awnedness.";;;"CO_321:0000447";"0-9 AWNS scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= awnless";"3= awnletted (short)";"4 =";"1 =";"2 =";"7 = awned (conspicuous)";"8 =";"5 =";"6 =";"9 =";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001362";"SpkDen_E_1to9";"SPKDEN_1_9";"Descriptor";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29173";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000055";"Spike density";"Morphological traits";"Density or compactness of a wheat spike.";"Spike compactness, ear compactness";"SpkDen";;"Spike";"Density";;;"CO_321:0000276";"SpkDen Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for spike density.";;;"CO_321:0000467";"1-9 SPKDEN scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";"1.0";"9.0";;"1= very lax";"4= lax to intermediate";"5 = intermediate";"2= very lax to lax";"3= lax";"8= dense to very dense";"9 = very dense";"6= intermediate to dense";"7 = dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001363";"SpkDis_E_1to5";"SPKDIS_1_5, SpkDis_N_T_S_M_V";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22986";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000684";"Spike disease development";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by spike diseases.";;"SpkDis";;"Spike";"Spike disease development";;;"CO_321:0000722";"SpkDis Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for spike disease development.";;;"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001364";"SpkLng_M_cm";"SPKLNG_cm";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS75-DS89";;"BMS_23057";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000056";"Spike length";"Morphological traits";"Length of spike.";;"SpkLng";;"Spike";"Length";;;"CO_321:0000277";"SpkLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Measured in centimeters from the base of the spike to the tip excluding the awns (average of 6-10 random spikes in plot).";;;"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";"1.0";"5.0";"90.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001365";"SN_Calc_Spksm2";"SNO_spk_m2";"Trial evaluation";"DS75-DS89";;"BMS_22909";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000166";"Spike number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of spikes (fertile culms) per unit area, sample or plant.";"Ear number";"SN";"SNO, SpkNO, SpkNo";"Spike";"Number";;;"CO_321:0000958";"SN Computation";"Computation";"Calculated from yield components sampling.";"xxxx";"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000441";"spike/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001366";"SN_M_Spksm";"SNO_spk_m";"Trial evaluation";"DS75-DS89";;"BMS_29172";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000166";"Spike number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of spikes (fertile culms) per unit area, sample or plant.";"Ear number";"SN";"SNO, SpkNO, SpkNo";"Spike";"Number";;;"CO_321:0000354";"SN Measurement";"Measurement";"It can be easily and non-destructively measured during grain-filling (i.e., before physiological maturity) by counting in a given area or length of row.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000818";"spike/m";"Numerical";"0.0";"10.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001367";"Shattering_E_pct";"SHATTERING_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"From DS91";;"BMS_29169";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000057";"Spike shattering";"Agronomical traits";"Observation of grains dehiscence from spike at maturity.";;"Shattering";"Rachis brittleness";"Spike";"Shattering";;;"CO_321:0000278";"Shattering Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for spike shattering.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001368";"Threshblty_E_1to9";"THRESHBLTY_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;"BMS_29190";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000659";"Spike threshability";"Morphological traits";"Threshability (ease to thresh) is a score where several spike-related traits such as rachis fragility (brittle or non-brittle rachis) and glume tenacity (hulled or free-threshing).";;"Threshblty";;"Spike";"Threshability";;;"CO_321:0000831";"Threshblty Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe threshability by hand threshing of one or two spikes and rate it according how easily grains are separated from the rachis and glumes using 1 (hard to thresh) to 9 (easy to thresh) scale.";;;"CO_321:0000828";"1-9 general scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= low to moderate";"5= moderate";"2= very low";"3= low";"8= high to very high";"9= very high";"6= moderate to high";"7= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001369";"SplN_Ct_SplSpk";"SPLSPK_num, SPLSPK, spikelets/spike";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS75-DS89";;"BMS_23058";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000058";"Spikelet number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of spikelets per spike.";;"SplN";"SplNo";"Spikelet";"Number";;;"CO_321:0000279";"SplN Counting";"Counting";"Both the total number of spikelets and the number of fertile spikelets (i.e., those containing grain) per spike should be counted towards the end of grain-filling, but before physiological maturity (to avoid losses due to movement through the plots). Randomly sample 5-10 spikes per plot, by selecting at the base of the culm. Count the total number of spikelets (pair-by-pair, from the base to the tip), then obtain the average. When sampling large numbers of samples or plots, time may be saved by randomly counting one side of the spike and multiplying by two.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000440";"spikelet/spike";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"50.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001370";"HsatiLInc_E_0to9pcttext";"HSATIL_0_9text__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22784";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000912";"Spot blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Spot blotch incidence in the plants caused by the agent Cochliobolus sativus (helminthosporium sativum).";;"HsatiLInc";"HSATIL";"Leaf";"Spot blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000882";"HsatiLInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Spot blotch incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001371";"HsatiLInc_E_pct";"HSATIL_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22785";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000912";"Spot blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Spot blotch incidence in the plants caused by the agent Cochliobolus sativus (helminthosporium sativum).";;"HsatiLInc";"HSATIL";"Leaf";"Spot blotch incidence";;;"CO_321:0000882";"HsatiLInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Spot blotch incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001372";"HsatiLLegacy_E_1to9";"HSATIL_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22788";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000913";"Spot blotch legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Spot blotch incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Cochliobolus sativus (helminthosporium sativum).";;"HsatiLLegacy";"HSATIL";"Leaf";"Spot blotch legacy";;;"CO_321:0000332";"HsatiLLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Spot blotch legacy.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000789";"1-9 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1=";"4=";"5=";"2=";"3=";"8=";"9=";"6=";"7=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001373";"HsatiLLegacy_E_9to1";"HSATIL_9_1";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22789";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000913";"Spot blotch legacy";"Biotic stress traits";"Spot blotch incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Cochliobolus sativus (helminthosporium sativum).";;"HsatiLLegacy";"HSATIL";"Leaf";"Spot blotch legacy";;;"CO_321:0000332";"HsatiLLegacy Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Spot blotch legacy.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000790";"9-1 disease scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"9=";"6=";"5=";"8=";"7=";"2=";"1=";"4=";"3=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001374";"HsatiLSev_E_00to99text";"HSATIL_00_99text__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22786";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000723";"Spot blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Spot blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Cochliobolus sativus (Helminthosporium sativum).";;"HsatiLSev";"HSATIL";"Leaf";"Spot blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000728";"Double digit (00-99) + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001375";"HsatiLSev_E_00to99";"HSATIL_00_99__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22783";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000723";"Spot blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Spot blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Cochliobolus sativus (Helminthosporium sativum).";;"HsatiLSev";"HSATIL";"Leaf";"Spot blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001376";"SproutTol_E_1to9";"SPROUTTOL _1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS85-DS99";;"BMS_22920";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000081";"Sprouting tolerance";"Abiotic stress traits";"Tolerance of grain to sprout when in the spike.";"Pre-harvest sprouting tolerance";"SproutTol";;"Grain";"Sprouting tolerance";;;"CO_321:0000303";"SproutTol Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the tendency of grain to sprout when in the spike and rate the tolerance.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 12)";"CO_321:0000468";"1-9 TOL scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= highly susceptible";"4= susceptible to moderately susceptible";"5= moderately susceptible";"2= highly susceptible to susceptible";"3= susceptible";"8= tolerant";"9= highly tolerant";"6= moderately susceptible to moderately tolerant";"7= moderately tolerant";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001377";"StmDia_M_mm";"STMDIA_mm";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS87";;"BMS_29178";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000062";"Stem diameter";"Morphological traits";"Stem outer diameter.";"Straw diameter, Culm diameter";"StmDia";"STMDIA";"Stem";"Diameter";;;"CO_321:0000284";"StmDia Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for stem diameter.";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001378";"StmLng_M_cm";"STMLNG_cm";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29180";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000060";"Stem length";"Morphological traits";"Length of stem.";"Culm length";"StmLng";;"Stem";"Length";;;"CO_321:0000282";"StmLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for stem length.";;;"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";"1.0";"5.0";"90.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001379";"PgramCI_Calc_pct";"PGRAM_pct__CI";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22756";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000688";"Stem rust coefficient of infection";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici.";"Stem rust CI, Stem rust";"PgramCI";;"Plant";"Stem rust coefficient of infection";;;"CO_321:0001026";"Rust Coefficient of infection Computation";"Computation";"Coefficient of infection (CI) calculated by multiplying the severity times a constant for host response: where immune = 0.0, R=0.2, MR =0.4, MS =0.8, and S=1.0.";"xxxx";"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001380";"PgramNote_E_text";"PGRAM_text";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29134";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000903";"Stem rust notes";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici.";;"PgramNote";;"Plant";"Stem rust notes";;;"CO_321:0000708";"Note Estimation";"Estimation";"Notes taken in the field.";;"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000443";"text";"Text";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001381";"PgramResp_E_1to8";"PGRAM_1_8__ADLTRESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29132";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000177";"Stem rust plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici.";"Stem rust";"PgramResp";"PGRAM";"Plant";"Stem rust plant response";;;"CO_321:0000360";"Adult plants rust field response Estimation";"Estimation";"Response (type of disease reaction) in adult plant to leaf/stem/stripe rust, refers to the infection type and is classified according to the following scale: 0-No visible infection. R-Resistant, necrotic areas with or without small pustules. MR-Moderately Resistant, small pustules surrounded by necrotic areas. M-Intermediate, pustules of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis. MS-Moderately Susceptible, medium-sized pustules, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible. S-Susceptible, large pustules, no necrosis or chlorosis.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000473";"1-8 rust field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no visible infection (0)";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small pustules surrounded by necrotic areas";"I= intermediate (M), pustules of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis";"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small pustules";"R-MR= resistant to moderately resistance (R-MR)";"S= susceptible (S), large pustules, no necrosis or chlorosis";"MS= moderately susceptible (MS), medium-sized pustules, no necrosis, but some clorosis possible";"MS-S= moderately susceptible to susceptible (MS-S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001382";"PgramSdlgResp_E_0to8";"PGRAM_0_8__SEEDRESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS11-DS15";;"BMS_29131";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000904";"Stem rust seedling response";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici.";"Stem rust";"PgramSdlgResp";"PGRAM";"Seedling";"Stem rust seedling response";;;"CO_321:0000604";"Seedling rust field response Estimation";"Estimation";"Seedling host responses are normally scored as susceptible or resistant depending on the infection type produced with a designated isolate in a particular environment. The infection type produced will often change if the environment is altered.";;"Roelfs, A.P., R.P. Singh, and E.E. Saari. 1992. Rust Diseases of Wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.";"CO_321:0000606";"0-8 Rust infection type";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"I= immune, no uredinia or other macroscopic sign of infection (0)";"2= moderately resistant, small to medium uredinia often surrounded by Chlorosis or necrosis, green island may be surrounded by chlorotic or necrotic border (2)";"X= heterogeneous, random distribution of variable-sized uredinia on single leaf (X)";",= nearly immune, no uredinia, but hypersensitive necrotic or chlorotic flecks present (,)";"1= very resistant, small uredinia surrounded by necrosis (1)";"3= moderately susceptible, medium-sized uredinia that may be associated with chlorosis (3)";"4= susceptible, large uredinia without chlorosis (4)";"Y= heterogeneous, ordered distribution of variable-sized uredinia, with larger uredinia at leaf tip (Y)";"Z= Heterogeneous, ordered distribution of variable-sized uredinia, with larger uredinia at leaf base (Z)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001383";"PgramSev_E_pct";"PGRAM_pct__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29133";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000905";"Stem rust severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici.";"Stem rust";"PgramSev";"PGRAM";"Plant";"Stem rust severity";;;"CO_321:0000693";"Rust severity Estimation";"Estimation";"Severity of rust is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001384";"PgramSev_E_0to12";"PGRAM_0_12__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22757";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000905";"Stem rust severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici.";"Stem rust";"PgramSev";"PGRAM";"Plant";"Stem rust severity";;;"CO_321:0000324";"Modified cobb scale for severity";"Estimation";"Severity of leaf/stem/stripe rust is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000753";"0-12 Modified Cobb Scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= 0% (no uredia)";"10= 10% (3.7% occupied by uredia)";"20= 20% (7.4% occupied by uredia)";"1= 1% (0.37% occupied by uredia)";"5= 5% (1.85% occupied by uredia)";"50= 50% (18.5% occupied by uredia)";"60= 60% (22.2% occupied by uredia)";"30= 30% (11.1% occupied by uredia)";"40= 40% (14.8% occupied by uredia)";"80= 80% (29.6% occupied by uredia)";"90= 90% (33.3% occupied by uredia)";"70= 70% (25.9% occupied by uredia)";"100= 100% (37% occupied by uredia)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001385";"StmSol_E_1to3";"STMSOL_1_3";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS75";;"BMS_29183";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000061";"Stem solidness";"Morphological traits";"Solidness of stem.";"Culm solidness";"StmSol";;"Stem";"Solidness";;;"CO_321:0000283";"StmSol Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for stem solidness.";;;"CO_321:0000456";"1-3 STMSOL scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= hollow";"2= intermediate";"3= solid";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001386";"StmStrength_E_1to9";"STMSTRENGTH_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS61-DS87";;"BMS_29184";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000657";"Stem strength";"Morphological traits";"Strength of the culm.";"Straw strength, Culm strength";"StmStrength";;"Stem";"Strength";;;"CO_321:0000829";"StmStrength Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for stem strength.";;;"CO_321:0000828";"1-9 general scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= low to moderate";"5= moderate";"2= very low";"3= low";"8= high to very high";"9= very high";"6= moderate to high";"7= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001387";"StmWallThk_M_um";"STMTHK_um";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS61-DS87";;"BMS_29185";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000658";"Stem wall thickness";"Morphological traits";"Stem wall thickness.";;"StmWallThk";"STMTHK";"Stem";"Wall thickness";;;"CO_321:0000830";"StmWallThk Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for stem wall thickness.";;;"CO_321:0000415";"µm";"Numerical";;"0.1";"0.5";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001388";"StmWSC_M_pct";"STEMWSC_pct";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS55-DS99";;"BMS_29176";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000207";"Stem water soluble carbohydrate";"Physiological traits";"Water soluble carbohydrates accumulate up to and around anthesis and are partitioned to the stem, from where they are later available as a reservoir for remobilization to the developing grains. These reserves are an important source of carbon for grain filling.";;"StmWSC";"STEMWSC, WSC,";"Stem";"Water soluble carbohydrate content";;;"CO_321:0000384";"StmWSC Measurement";"Measurement";"Sampling for water soluble carbohydrate is often combined with in-season biomass sampling and partitioning. Ensure to plan sampling approach carefully to allow for maximal data collection/economy of sampling (e.g., data on partitioning weights can be collected on the same 20 culm sample). The leaf lamina and/or leaf sheath may also be analyzed for WSC separately, or not removed from the stem for ?whole stem? analysis. Lab analysis is performed by NIR or wet chemical method.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 16)";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001389";"SpkSterility_E_0to6";"STERIND_0_6";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS71-DS79";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_23013";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000165";"Spike sterility index";"Agronomical traits";"Spike sterility observed as infertile florets.";;"SpkSterility";"SterInd";"Spike";"Sterility";;;"CO_321:0000353";"SpkSterility Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for sterility index.";;;"CO_321:0000819";"0-6 Sterility scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0=";"3=";"4=";"1=";"2=";"5=";"6=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001390";"SpkSterility_Calc_pct";"STERIND_pct";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS71-DS79";;"BMS_23014";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000165";"Spike sterility index";"Agronomical traits";"Spike sterility observed as infertile florets.";;"SpkSterility";"SterInd";"Spike";"Sterility";;;"CO_321:0000959";"SpkSterility Computation";"Computation";"Standard method for sterility index computation.";"xxxx";;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001391";"PstriCI_Calc_pct";"PSTRI_pct__CI";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22765";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000689";"Stripe rust coefficient of infection";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";"Stripe rust CI, Stripe rust";"PstriCI";"YRustCI, YRCI, PSTRIL";"Leaf";"Stripe rust coefficient of infection";;;"CO_321:0001026";"Rust Coefficient of infection Computation";"Computation";"Coefficient of infection (CI) calculated by multiplying the severity times a constant for host response: where immune = 0.0, R=0.2, MR =0.4, MS =0.8, and S=1.0.";"xxxx";"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001392";"PstriInc_E_1to9";"PSTRI_1_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22767";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000906";"Stripe rust incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) incidence in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";"Stripe rust";"PstriInc";"YRustInc, YRInc, PSTRIL";"Leaf";"Stripe rust incidence";;;"CO_321:0000725";"PstriInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Stripe rust incidence.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000465";"1-9 incidence scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none";"4= low to medium";"5= medium";"2= very low";"3= low";"8= very high";"9= severe";"6= medium to high";"7= high";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001393";"PstriNote_E_text";"PSTRI_text";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29149";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000907";"Stripe rust notes";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";;"PstriNote";"YRustNote, YRNote, PSTRIL";"Leaf";"Stripe rust notes";;;"CO_321:0000708";"Note Estimation";"Estimation";"Notes taken in the field.";;"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000443";"text";"Text";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001394";"PstriResp_E_0to9";"PSTRI_0_9__RESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29146";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000179";"Stripe rust plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";"Stripe rust";"PstriResp";"YRustResp, YRResp, PSTRIL";"Leaf";"Stripe rust plant response";;;"CO_321:0000375";"Field response McNEAL Estimation";"Estimation";"Response (type of disease reaction) in adult plant to stripe rust, refers to the infection type and is classified according to the MCNEAL scale.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000466";"0-9 Mc Neal scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"I= immune";"MR= moderately resistant";"LM= light moderate";"VR= very resistance";"R= resistant";"LMS= light moderate susceptible";"S= susceptible";"M= moderate";"MS= moderate susceptible";"VS= very susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001395";"PstriResp_E_1to8";"PSTRI_1_8__ADLTRESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29147";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000179";"Stripe rust plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";"Stripe rust";"PstriResp";"YRustResp, YRResp, PSTRIL";"Leaf";"Stripe rust plant response";;;"CO_321:0000360";"Adult plants rust field response Estimation";"Estimation";"Response (type of disease reaction) in adult plant to leaf/stem/stripe rust, refers to the infection type and is classified according to the following scale: 0-No visible infection. R-Resistant, necrotic areas with or without small pustules. MR-Moderately Resistant, small pustules surrounded by necrotic areas. M-Intermediate, pustules of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis. MS-Moderately Susceptible, medium-sized pustules, no necrosis, but some chlorosis possible. S-Susceptible, large pustules, no necrosis or chlorosis.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000473";"1-8 rust field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no visible infection (0)";"MR= moderately resistant (MR), small pustules surrounded by necrotic areas";"I= intermediate (M), pustules of variable size, some necrosis and/or chlorosis";"R= resistant (R), necrotic areas with or without small pustules";"R-MR= resistant to moderately resistance (R-MR)";"S= susceptible (S), large pustules, no necrosis or chlorosis";"MS= moderately susceptible (MS), medium-sized pustules, no necrosis, but some clorosis possible";"MS-S= moderately susceptible to susceptible (MS-S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001396";"PstriSev_E_pct";"PSTRI_pct__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29148";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000908";"Stripe rust severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";"Stripe rust";"PstriSev";"YRustSev, YRSev, PSTRIL";"Leaf";"Stripe rust severity";;;"CO_321:0000693";"Rust severity Estimation";"Estimation";"Severity of rust is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001397";"PstriSev_E_0to12";"PSTRI_0_12__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22766";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000908";"Stripe rust severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";"Stripe rust";"PstriSev";"YRustSev, YRSev, PSTRIL";"Leaf";"Stripe rust severity";;;"CO_321:0000324";"Modified cobb scale for severity";"Estimation";"Severity of leaf/stem/stripe rust is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000753";"0-12 Modified Cobb Scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= 0% (no uredia)";"10= 10% (3.7% occupied by uredia)";"20= 20% (7.4% occupied by uredia)";"1= 1% (0.37% occupied by uredia)";"5= 5% (1.85% occupied by uredia)";"50= 50% (18.5% occupied by uredia)";"60= 60% (22.2% occupied by uredia)";"30= 30% (11.1% occupied by uredia)";"40= 40% (14.8% occupied by uredia)";"80= 80% (29.6% occupied by uredia)";"90= 90% (33.3% occupied by uredia)";"70= 70% (25.9% occupied by uredia)";"100= 100% (37% occupied by uredia)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001398";"PstriSpkSev_E_pct";"PSTRI_pct__SPKSEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22823";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000909";"Stripe rust spike severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";"Stripe rust";"PstriSpkSev";"YRustSpkSev, YRSpkSev, PSTRIL";"Spike";"Stripe rust spike severity";;;"CO_321:0000883";"PstriSpkSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Severity of rust in spike is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001399";"SuPDmg_E_1to5";"SUPDMG _1_5";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29186";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000094";"Suni pest damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by suni pest (Eurygaster spp., sunn pest, suni bug).";;"SuPDmg";;"Plant";"Suni pest damage";;;"CO_321:0000314";"SuPDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for suni pest damage.";;;"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001400";"GgtriInc_E_pct";"GGTRI_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_29060";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000119";"Take all incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Take-all incidence in the plants caused by the agent Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (ggt).";;"GgtriInc";"GGTRI";"Plant";"Take all incidence";;;"CO_321:0000334";"GgtriInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for take all incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001401";"GgtriInc_E_1to5";"GGTRI_1_5_INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";;"BMS_23212";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000119";"Take all incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Take-all incidence in the plants caused by the agent Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (ggt).";;"GgtriInc";"GGTRI";"Plant";"Take all incidence";;;"CO_321:0000334";"GgtriInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for take all incidence.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001402";"TanSpotInc_E_0to9pcttext";"TANSPOT_0_9text";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22791";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000910";"Tan spot incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Tan spot (Pyrenophora yellow leaf blotch, yellow spot) incidence in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (helminthosporium tritici-repentis). Symptoms: the lesions appear as tan to brown flecks, which expand into large, irregular, oval- or lens-shaped tan blotches with a yellow or chlorotic margin.";;"TanSpotInc";;"Leaf";"Tan spot incidence";;;"CO_321:0000726";"TanSpotInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for tan spot incidence in adult plants.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000727";"0-9 percentage scale + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001403";"TanSpotInc_E_pct";"TANSPOT_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22793";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000910";"Tan spot incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Tan spot (Pyrenophora yellow leaf blotch, yellow spot) incidence in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (helminthosporium tritici-repentis). Symptoms: the lesions appear as tan to brown flecks, which expand into large, irregular, oval- or lens-shaped tan blotches with a yellow or chlorotic margin.";;"TanSpotInc";;"Leaf";"Tan spot incidence";;;"CO_321:0000726";"TanSpotInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for tan spot incidence in adult plants.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001404";"TanSpotResp_E_1to5";"TANSPOT_1_5__ADLTRESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_29188";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000345";"Tan spot plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Tan spot (Pyrenophora yellow leaf blotch, yellow spot) response in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (helminthosporium tritici-repentis). Symptoms: the lesions appear as tan to brown flecks, which expand into large, irregular, oval- or lens-shaped tan blotches with a yellow or chlorotic margin.";;"TanSpotResp";;"Leaf";"Tan spot plant response";;;"CO_321:0000724";"TanSpotResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for scoring tan spot response in adult plants.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000463";"1-5 TANSPOT field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"R= Resistant, small dark brown to black spots without any surrounding chlorosis or tan necrosis";"MS= Moderately susceptible, small dark brown to black spots completely surrounded with chlorotic or tan necrostic zones, some of the lesions coalescing";"S= Susceptible, small dark brown to black centres may or may not be distinguishable, most lesions consist of coalescing chlorotic or tan necrotic zones";"MR= Moderately-resistant, small dark brown to black spots with very little chlorosis or tan necrosis";"MR-MS= Moderately resistant to moderately susceptible, small dark brown to black spots completely surrounded by a distinct chlorotic or tan necrosis";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001405";"TanSpotSdlgResp_E_0to5";"TANSPOT_0_5__SEEDRESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS11-DS15";;"BMS_29187";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000911";"Tan spot seedling response";"Biotic stress traits";"Tan spot (Pyrenophora yellow leaf blotch, yellow spot) response in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (helminthosporium tritici-repentis). Symptoms: the lesions appear as tan to brown flecks, which expand into large, irregular, oval- or lens-shaped tan blotches with a yellow or chlorotic margin.";;"TanSpotSdlgResp";;"Seedling";"Tan spot seedling response";;;"CO_321:0000603";"TanSpotSdlgResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for scoring tan spot response in seedlings.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Duveiller et al., 2012, Lamari and Bernier, 1998.";"CO_321:0000445";"0-5 TANSPOT field response scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No visible infection on plants";"MR-MS= Moderately resistant to moderately susceptible, small dark brown to black spots completely surrounded by a distinct chlorotic or tan necrosis";"MS= Moderately susceptible, small dark brown to black spots completely surrounded with chlorotic or tan necrostic zones, some of the lesions coalescing";"R= Resistant, small dark brown to black spots without any surrounding chlorosis or tan necrosis";"MR= Moderately-resistant, small dark brown to black spots with very little chlorosis or tan necrosis";"S= Susceptible, small dark brown to black centres may or may not be distinguishable, most lesions consist of coalescing chlorotic or tan necrotic zones";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001406";"TanSpotSev_E_00to99text";"TANSPOT_00_99text__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";"BMS_22792";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000650";"Tan spot severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Tan spot (Pyrenophora yellow leaf blotch, yellow spot) severity in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Helminthosporium tritici-repentis). Symptoms: the lesions appear as tan to brown flecks, which expand into large, irregular, oval- or lens-shaped tan blotches with a yellow or chlorotic margin.";;"TanSpotSev";;"Leaf";"Tan spot severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000728";"Double digit (00-99) + text";"Text";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001407";"TanSpotSev_E_00to99";"TANSPOT_00_99__SEV";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;"BMS_22790";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000650";"Tan spot severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Tan spot (Pyrenophora yellow leaf blotch, yellow spot) severity in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Helminthosporium tritici-repentis). Symptoms: the lesions appear as tan to brown flecks, which expand into large, irregular, oval- or lens-shaped tan blotches with a yellow or chlorotic margin.";;"TanSpotSev";;"Leaf";"Tan spot severity";;;"CO_321:0000690";"Double digit Estimation";"Estimation";"The method was improved by using two digits, representing the vertical disease progress and an estimate of severity. The first digit gives the relative height of the disease using the original 0-9 Saari-Prescott scale as a measure. The second digit shows the disease severity as a percentage but in terms of 0-9. Because it is difficult to evaluate diseases on dead leaves, disease notes should be taken when at least four leaves are still alive and green (soft to mid-dough growth stage). Then visually evaluate the average percentage severity on only those leaves of the uppermost four that are infected. In practice, the percent severity is estimated on an overall score. The following format is used for scoring severity: 10% coverage = 1, 20% coverage = 2, 30% coverage = 3, 40% coverage = 4, 50% coverage = 5, 60% coverage = 6, 70% coverage = 7, 80% coverage = 8, 90% coverage = 9. The score of 10 is not used.";;"Duveiller et al., 1998, Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000470";"Double digit (00-99)";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"27= 20% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"25= 20% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"26= 20% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"19= 10% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"20= 20";"18= 10% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"23= 20% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"24= 20% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"21= 20% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"22= 20% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"96= 90% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"97= 90% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"94= 90% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"95= 90% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"99= 90% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"98= 90% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"87= 80% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"83= 80% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"84= 80% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"85= 80% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"86= 80% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"91= 90% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"90= 90";"93= 90% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"92= 90% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"89= 80% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"88= 80% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"76= 70% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"77= 70% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"74= 70% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"75= 70% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"72= 70% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"73= 70% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"82= 80% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"81= 80% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"80= 80";"79= 70% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"78= 70% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"70= 70";"71= 70% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"68= 60% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"69= 60% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"64= 60% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"63= 60% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"62= 60% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"61= 60% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"67= 60% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"66= 60% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"65= 60% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"58= 50% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"59= 50% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"60= 60";"51= 50% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"50= 50";"53= 50% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"52= 50% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"55= 50% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"54= 50% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"57= 50% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"56= 50% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"48= 40% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"49= 40% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"00= no disease";"46= 40% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"12= 10% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"45= 40% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"13= 10% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"44= 40% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"10= 10";"43= 40% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"11= 10% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"42= 40% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"16= 10% plant height affected, 60% coverage";"41= 40% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"17= 10% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"40= 40";"14= 10% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"39= 30% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"15= 10% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"47= 40% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"38= 30% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"33= 30% plant height affected, 30% coverage";"32= 30% plant height affected, 20% coverage";"35= 30% plant height affected, 50% coverage";"34= 30% plant height affected, 40% coverage";"29= 20% plant height affected, 90% coverage";"28= 20% plant height affected, 80% coverage";"31= 30% plant height affected, 10% coverage";"30= 30";"37= 30% plant height affected, 70% coverage";"36= 30% plant height affected, 60% coverage"
;"CO_321:0001408";"TSpl_date_ymd";"TSD_yyyymmdd, TSD";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS25-DS30 approx.";;"BMS_29197";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000940";"Terminal spikelet time";"Phenological traits";"Terminal spikelet time is when the last spikelet, the terminal spikelet, has been produced.";;"TSpl";"TS";"Plant";"Terminal spikelet time";;;"CO_321:0000844";"TSpl date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of terminal spikelet stage (DS25-30 approx.). It is estimated as the date at which the final spikelet can be observed on the forming spike within the stem of the main culm, typically measured on around 3-5 plants per plot. It required a main tiller dissection and an observation of the apex on an optic magnifier.";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000850";"yyyymmdd";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001409";"TSpl_dto_day";"DTTS_days, DTTS";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS25-DS30 approx.";;"BMS_29042";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000940";"Terminal spikelet time";"Phenological traits";"Terminal spikelet time is when the last spikelet, the terminal spikelet, has been produced.";;"TSpl";"TS";"Plant";"Terminal spikelet time";;;"CO_321:0000380";"TSpl DT Computation";"Computation";"Number of days from sowing to terminal spikelet (DS25-30 approx.). However, when planting in dry soils in dryland areas it is counted from the first day of rainfall or irrigation which is sufficient for germination, or from emergence date.";"xxxx";"Kirby and Appleyard, 1984";"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";"0.0";"40.0";"240.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001410";"TN_Ct_Tllrm";"TNO_tll_m";"Trial evaluation";"DS30-DS55";;"BMS_29194";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000190";"Tiller number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of total tillers (fertile and infertile) per unit area, sample or plant.";;"TN";"TllNo, TNO";"Tiller";"Tiller number";;;"CO_321:0000371";"TN Counting";"Counting";"Count or calculate the number of total tillers (fertile and infertile) per lineal meter, per plant or per square meter.";;;"CO_321:0000820";"tiller/m";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001411";"TN_Ct_Tllrm2";"TNO_tll_m2";"Trial evaluation";"DS30-DS55";;"BMS_29195";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000190";"Tiller number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of total tillers (fertile and infertile) per unit area, sample or plant.";;"TN";"TllNo, TNO";"Tiller";"Tiller number";;;"CO_321:0000371";"TN Counting";"Counting";"Count or calculate the number of total tillers (fertile and infertile) per lineal meter, per plant or per square meter.";;;"CO_321:0000821";"tiller/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"10000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001412";"TN_Ct_TllrPlnt";"TNO_tll_pl";"Trial evaluation";"DS30-DS55";;"BMS_29196";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000190";"Tiller number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of total tillers (fertile and infertile) per unit area, sample or plant.";;"TN";"TllNo, TNO";"Tiller";"Tiller number";;;"CO_321:0000371";"TN Counting";"Counting";"Count or calculate the number of total tillers (fertile and infertile) per lineal meter, per plant or per square meter.";;;"CO_321:0000444";"tiller/plant";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001413";"TllrCapacity_E_1to5";"TllrCAPACITY_1_5";"Trial evaluation";"DS30-DS45";;"BMS_29191";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000189";"Tillering capacity";"Agronomical traits";"An tillering capacity.";"Plant Tillering capacity";"TllrCapacity";;"Plant";"Tillering capacity";;;"CO_321:0000370";"TllrCapacity Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for tillering capacity.";;;"CO_321:0000462";"1-5 scoring scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= very poor (VP)";"4= good (G)";"5= very good (VG)";"2= poor (P)";"3= fair (F)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001414";"TlaevInc_E_pct";"TLAEV_pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"From DS85";;"BMS_29193";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000099";"Tilletia laevis bunt incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Bunt incidence in the plants caused by the agent Tilletia laevis (stinking bunt, covered smut, hill bunt, complete bunt, low bunt, high bunt).";;"TlaevInc";"TLAEV, CB";"Spike";"Tilletia laevis bunt incidence";;;"CO_321:0000317";"TlaevInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Tilletia laevis incidence is usually expressed as the percentage of bunted spikes within a row.";;"Wilcoxson and Saari, 1996";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001415";"TtritInc_E_pct";"TTRIT _pct__INC";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"From DS85";;"BMS_29198";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000100";"Tilletia tritici bunt incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Bunt incidence in the plants caused by the agent Tilletia tritici (stinking bunt, covered smut, hill bunt, complete bunt, low bunt, high bunt).";;"TtritInc";"TTRIT, CB";"Spike";"Tilletia tritici bunt incidence";;;"CO_321:0000318";"TtritInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Tilletia tritici incidence is usually expressed as the percentage of bunted spikes within a row.";;"Wilcoxson and Saari, 1996";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001416";"T1BL1RS_M_0to1";"T1BL1RS_0_1";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29002";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000158";"Translocation 1BL/1RS";"Quality traits";"The 1bl/1rs translocation in wheat resulted from replacing the short arm of the chromosome 1b of wheat by the short arm of the chromosome 1r of rye (Secale cereale l.).";"1BL/1RS translocation";"T1BL1RS";"1BL1RS";"Translocation 1BL/1RS";"Absence/Presence";;;"CO_321:0000396";"SDS-PAGE Electrophoresis (1BL1RS)";"Measurement";"Detect in the SDS-PAGE gel the presence of some protein bands from rye chromosome translocation.";;;"CO_321:0000599";"0-1 absent-present";"Nominal";;;;;"1= present";"0= absent";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001417";"WtrLoggDmg_E_0to9";"H2ODMG _0_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_29091";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000128";"Waterlogging damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plants killed as a result of winter conditions.";;"WtrLoggDmg";"H2ODMG";"Plant";"Waterlogging damage";;;"CO_321:0000342";"WtrLoggDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Score the damage caused by waterlogging";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 11)";"CO_321:0000449";"0-9 DAMAGE scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no damage";"3= low damage";"4= low to intermediate damage";"1= trace";"2= very low damage";"7= high damage";"8= high to very high damage";"5= intermediate damage";"6= intermediate to high damage";"9= very high damage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001418";"WMFlrCol_M_avalue";"WMFLRCOL_a_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29205";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000227";"Whole meal flour color";"Quality traits";"The whole meal flour color.";;"WMFlrCol";;"Whole meal flour";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000416";"a value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001419";"WMFlrCol_M_bvalue";"WMFLRCOL_b_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29206";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000227";"Whole meal flour color";"Quality traits";"The whole meal flour color.";;"WMFlrCol";;"Whole meal flour";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000417";"b value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001420";"WMFlrCol_M_Lvalue";"WMFLRCOL_L_value";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29207";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000227";"Whole meal flour color";"Quality traits";"The whole meal flour color.";;"WMFlrCol";;"Whole meal flour";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000400";"Minolta Chroma Meter Test";"Measurement";"Measurement of flour/whole meal/grain color with the Minolta chromameter, L value represents whiteness, a* value (reddishness) represents red and green colors and b* value (yellowness) represents yellow and blue colors. Using the Minolta Chroma Meter Test: 1. A sample of flour/whole meal/grain is placed on the granular materials attachment and compacted, 2. The Minolta Chroma Meter is inserted into the granular materials attachment, 3. Measurements are taken and recorded, 4.Color results are reported in terms of 3-dimensional color values based on the following rating scale: L* value whiteness: 100 white, 0 black, a* value positive +60 red color, negative values -60 green color, b* value positive +60 yellow color, negative values -60 blue color.";;;"CO_321:0000424";"L value";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001421";"WMFlrFN_M_s";"WMFLRFN_s";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_29208";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000071";"Whole meal flour falling number";"Quality traits";"Indication of the amount of sprout damage that has occurred within a wheat sample. falling number value of 350 seconds or longer indicates a low enzyme activity and very sound wheat quality. as the amount of enzyme activity increases, the falling number decreases. Values below 200 seconds indicate high levels of enzyme activity.";;"WMFlrFN";;"Whole meal flour";"Falling number";;;"CO_321:0000293";"WMFlrFN Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for whole meal flour falling number.";;;"CO_321:0000430";"s";"Duration";"0.0";"60.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001422";"WMFlrSDS_M_ml";"WMFLRSDS_ml";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_23004";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000147";"Whole meal flour SDS sedimentation";"Quality traits";"Testing of whole-meal flour quality by SDS-sedimentation, a test estimating gluten-protein overall quality.";"grain SDS-sedimentation, whole meal flour SDS-sedimentation";"WMFlrSDS";;"Whole meal flour";"SDS-sedimentation volume";;;"CO_321:0000386";"SDS-sedimentation determination";"Measurement";"A small sample of flour or ground wheat (1.0 grams) is weighed and placed in 25-milliliter glass-stoppered graduated cylinder. This is mixed with different solutions for some minutes and then rested. Finally, the volume of the sediment is recorded after 21 minutes.";;;"CO_321:0000427";"ml";"Numerical";"1.0";"4.0";"25.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001423";"WMFlrYellPig_M_ppm";"WMFLRYELPIG_ppm";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;"BMS_22895";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000677";"Whole meal flour yellow pigment content";"Quality traits";"Whole meal flour yellow pigment content due to the presence of xanthophyll and other related compounds.";;"WMFlrYellPig";"WMFLRYELPIG";"Whole meal flour";"Yellow pigment content";;;"CO_321:0000849";"WMFlrYellPig Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for whole meal flour yellow pigment.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"15.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001424";"WKill_E_0to9";"WKILL_0_9";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_23073";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000164";"Winter kill damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plants killed as a result of winter conditions.";"Winter susceptibility";"WKill";;"Plant";"Winter kill damage";;;"CO_321:0000352";"WKill Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe winterkill of plants per plot and rate it.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000449";"0-9 DAMAGE scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= no damage";"3= low damage";"4= low to intermediate damage";"1= trace";"2= very low damage";"7= high damage";"8= high to very high damage";"5= intermediate damage";"6= intermediate to high damage";"9= very high damage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001425";"WKill_E_pct";"WKILL_pct";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_23072";"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000164";"Winter kill damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plants killed as a result of winter conditions.";"Winter susceptibility";"WKill";;"Plant";"Winter kill damage";;;"CO_321:0000352";"WKill Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe winterkill of plants per plot and rate it.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001426";"WKill_E_1to5";"WKILL_1_5";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_23074";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000164";"Winter kill damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plants killed as a result of winter conditions.";"Winter susceptibility";"WKill";;"Plant";"Winter kill damage";;;"CO_321:0000352";"WKill Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe winterkill of plants per plot and rate it.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0000457";"1-5 DMG scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= none (N)";"4= moderate (M)";"5= very severe (V)";"2= trace (T)";"3 = slight (S)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001427";"WormDmg_E_pct";"WORMDMG_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After the event";;"BMS_22923";"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000685";"Worm damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by worms.";;"WormDmg";;"Plant";"Worm damage";;;"CO_321:0000605";"WormDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for worm damage.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001438";"BLBSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000932";"Bacterial leaf blight severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Wheat bacterial leaf blight severity in the plants caused by the agent Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae. symptoms: small (less than 0.04 inches) water-soaked lesions expand and eventually coalesce. initial lesions become necrotic and turn from gray-green to tan-white. Entire leaves may become necrotic, but heads and glumes are typically symptomless.";"BLB, PSYRI";"BLBSev";"PsyriSev";"Leaf";"Bacterial leaf blight severity";;;"CO_321:0000964";"BLBSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for wheat bacterial leaf blight severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001439";"RsecaSev_E_pct";;"Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000710";"Barley scald severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Barley scald severity in the plants caused by the agent Rhynchosporium secalis.";;"RsecaSev";"RSECA";"Plant";"Barley scald severity";;;"CO_321:0000965";"RsecaSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for barley scald blight severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001440";"FgramSev_E_pct";;"Trial evaluation";"From DS75";;;"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000926";"Fusarium graminearum severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium graminearum severity in the plants.";;"FgramSev";"FGRAML";"Spike";"Fusarium graminearum severity";;;"CO_321:0000968";"FgramSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Fusarium graminearum severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001441";"FnivLBSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000653";"Fusarium leaf blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium leaf blotch (pink snow mold, fusarium patch) severity in the plants caused by the agent Calonectria nivalis (fusarium nivale).";"FNIVLB, FNIVAL";"FnivLBSev";;"Plant";"Fusarium leaf blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000969";"FnivLBSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Fusarium leaf blotch severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001442";"HelSpSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000686";"Helminthosporium species severity";"Biotic stress traits";"The disease severity in the plants caused by the agent Helminthosporium species.";;"HelSpSev";;"Plant";"Helminthosporium species severity";;;"CO_321:0000986";"HelSpSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Helminthosporium species causing spot blotch severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001443";"HtereSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000406";"Net blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Net blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora teres (Helminthosporium teres).";;"HtereSev";;"Leaf";"Net blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000987";"HtereSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for net blotch severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001444";"EgramSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease.";"Obsolete/legacy";;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000939";"Powdery mildew severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew severity in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramSev";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew severity";;;"CO_321:0000988";"EgramSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for powdery mildew severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001445";"SepSpSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";;"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000714";"Septoria blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Septoria species.";;"SepSpSev";;"Leaf";"Septoria blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000879";"SepSpSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria species causing Septoria blotch severity.";;"Saari and Prescott, 1975, Eyal et al., 1987, Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001446";"SnodoSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000717";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Stagonospora nodorum (syn. Septoria glume blotch) (Phaeosphaeria nodorum (E. Müller) Hedjaroude (syn. Stagonospora nodorum).";;"SnodoSev";;"Plant";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000991";"SnodoSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria nodorum blotch severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001447";"StritSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000718";"Septoria tritici blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria tritici blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici). symptoms: the lesions are linear and restricted laterally.";;"StritSev";"STRIT";"Plant";"Septoria tritici blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000992";"StritSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria tritici blotch severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001448";"HsatiLSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000723";"Spot blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Spot blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Cochliobolus sativus (Helminthosporium sativum).";;"HsatiLSev";"HSATIL";"Leaf";"Spot blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0001013";"HsatiLSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for spot blotch severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001449";"TanSpotSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";"Obsolete/legacy";;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000650";"Tan spot severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Tan spot (Pyrenophora yellow leaf blotch, yellow spot) severity in the plants caused by the agent Pyrenophora tritici-repentis (Helminthosporium tritici-repentis). Symptoms: the lesions appear as tan to brown flecks, which expand into large, irregular, oval- or lens-shaped tan blotches with a yellow or chlorotic margin.";;"TanSpotSev";;"Leaf";"Tan spot severity";;;"CO_321:0001434";"TanSpotSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for tan spot severity.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001450";"MgrisSev_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"Disease assessment is conducted through the growing season starting with the onset of the disease. Mainly from DS61.";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001031";"Wheat blast severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Wheat blast severity in the spikes caused by the agent Magnaporthe grisea (Pyricularia oryzae). Symptoms: It can infect all above-ground parts of the wheat plant, but head blast, resembling Fusarium head blight in appearance, is the most common symptom in the field. Infected spikes become bleached and produce small shriveled seed or none at all.";;"MgrisSev";;"Spike";"Wheat blast severity";;;"CO_321:0001435";"MgrisSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for wheat blast severity.";;;"CO_321:0000414";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001451";"ForgDM_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001032";"Forage dry matter";"Agronomical traits";"Forage dry matter.";;"ForgDM";;"Plant";"Forage dry matter";;;"CO_321:0001436";"ForgDM Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for forage dry matter.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001452";"Wsurv_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000963";"Winter survival";"Abiotic stress traits";"Ability to survive or withstand cold temperatures in the late fall, winter, or early spring.";"winter hardiness";"Wsurv";;"Plant";"Winter survival";;;"CO_321:0001437";"Wsurv Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for winter survival.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001453";"AwnCol_E_1to6";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000960";"Awn color";"Morphological traits";"Awn color.";;"AwnCol";;"Awn";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000983";"AwnCol Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for awn color.";;;"CO_321:0001012";"1-6 COLOR scale";"Nominal";"1.0";"0.0";;;"1= White";"4= Purple";"5= Amber";"2= Red";"3= Black";"6= Mixed";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001454";"GNDVI_M_Idx";"GNDVI_index";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000961";"Canopy green normalized difference vegetation index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized difference vegetation index is used to measure vegetative greenness and canopy photosynthetic size.";;"GNDVI";;"Canopy";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;;"CO_321:0000984";"GNDVI Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001455";"RNDVI_M_Idx";"RNDVI_index";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS10-DS85";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"23-sept-14";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000962";"Canopy red normalized difference vegetation index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized difference vegetation index is used to measure vegetative greenness and canopy photosynthetic size.";;"RNDVI";;"Canopy";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;;"CO_321:0000985";"RNDVI Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";;;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001456";"GAmyloPec_M_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000966";"Grain amylopectin content";"Quality traits";"Content of amylopectin in grain.";;"GAmyloPec";;"Grain";"Amylopectin content";;;"CO_321:0000989";"GAmyloPec Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain amylopectin content.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001457";"GLys_M_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000967";"Grain lysine content";"Quality traits";"Lysine content of the kernel/grain.";;"GLys";;"Grain";"Lysine content";;;"CO_321:0000990";"GLys Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain lysine content.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001458";"RachLng_M_mm";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000970";"Rachis length";"Morphological traits";"Length of rachis.";;"RachLng";;"Rachis";"Length";;;"CO_321:0000993";"RachLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for rachis length.";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001459";"SpkTyp_E_1to6";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000971";"Spike type";"Morphological traits";"Shape characteristics of typical mature spikes.";;"SpkTyp";;"Spike";"Type";;;"CO_321:0000994";"SpkTyp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for spike type.";;;"CO_321:0001014";"1-6 SPKTYPE scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= Fusiform";"4= Clavate";"5= Elliptical";"2= Branched";"3= Oblong";"6= Mixed";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001460";"StdEst_E_1to3";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000972";"Stand establishment";"Agronomical traits";"Measurement of plant emergence and vigor in the field.";;"StdEst";;"Plant";"Establish";;;"CO_321:0000995";"StdEst Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for standard establishment.";;;"CO_321:0001015";"1-3 STDEST scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= Good";"2= Moderate";"3= Poor";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001461";"StmCol_E_1to6";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000973";"Stem color";"Morphological traits";"Color of the stems.";;"StmCol";;"Stem";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000996";"StmCol Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for stem color.";;;"CO_321:0001012";"1-6 COLOR scale";"Nominal";"1.0";"0.0";;;"1= White";"4= Purple";"5= Amber";"2= Red";"3= Black";"6= Mixed";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001462";"StrawBreak_E_1to9";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000974";"Straw breakage";"Agronomical traits";"Amount of straw breakage.";;"StrawBreak";;"Straw";"Breakage";;;"CO_321:0000997";"StrawBreak Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for straw breakage.";;;"CO_321:0001016";"1-9 STRAWBREAK scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= No breakage";"4= 40% plants with broken straw";"5= 50% plants with broken straw";"2= 20% plants with broken straw";"3= 30% plants with broken straw";"8= 80% plants with broken straw";"9= 90% plants with broken straw";"6= 60% plants with broken straw";"7= 70% plants with broken straw";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001463";"StrawCol_E_1to6";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000975";"Straw color";"Morphological traits";"Color of straw.";;"StrawCol";;"Straw";"Color";;;"CO_321:0000998";"StrawCol Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for straw color.";;;"CO_321:0001012";"1-6 COLOR scale";"Nominal";"1.0";"0.0";;;"1= White";"4= Purple";"5= Amber";"2= Red";"3= Black";"6= Mixed";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001464";"StrawStn_E_1to3";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000976";"Straw strength";"Agronomical traits";"Strength of straw.";;"StrawStn";;"Straw";"Strength";;;"CO_321:0000999";"StrawStn Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for straw strength.";;;"CO_321:0001017";"1-3 STRAWStrength";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= weak";"2=mid-strong";"3= strong";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001465";"StrawYld_E_tha";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000977";"Straw yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of straw.";;"StrawYld";;"Straw";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0001000";"StrawYld Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for straw yield.";;;"CO_321:0000432";"t/ha";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"20.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001466";"WMFlrAsh_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000978";"Whole meal flour ash content";"Quality traits";"Ash content in flour.";;"WMFlrAsh";;"Whole meal flour";"Ash content";;;"CO_321:0001001";"WMFlrAsh Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for ash content in whole meal flour.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001467";"GLng_M_mm";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;;"CO_321:0001002";"GLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for whole grain length.";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001468";"GWid_M_mm";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000980";"Grain width";"Quality traits";"Width of whole grain.";;"GWid";"kernel width";"Grain";"Width";;;"CO_321:0001003";"GWid Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for whole grain width.";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001469";"GThk_M_mm";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000981";"Grain thickness";"Quality traits";"Thickness of whole grain.";;"GThk";"kernel thickeness";"Grain";"Thickness";;;"CO_321:0001004";"GThk Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for whole grain thickness.";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001470";"GSize_ScreenCount1_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001005";"Image Analysis Screen Count1";"Counting";"Standard method for screening grain size distribution >2.8 Screen using Seed Count (SC5000R)machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001471";"GSize_ScreenCount2_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001006";"Image Analysis Screen Count2";"Counting";"Standard method for screening grain size distribution ranging from 2.8 ? 2.5 Screen using Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001472";"GSize_ScreenCount3_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001007";"Image Analysis Screen Count3";"Counting";"Standard method for screening grain size distribution ranging from 2.5 ? 2.2 Screen using Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001473";"GSize_ScreenCount4_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001008";"Image Analysis Screen Count4";"Counting";"Standard method for screening grain size distribution ranging from 2.2 ? 2.0 Screen using Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001474";"GSize_ScreenCount5_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001009";"Image Analysis Screen Count5";"Counting";"Standard method for screening grain size distribution ranging from 2.0 ? 1.6 Screen using Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001475";"GSize_ScreenCount6_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001010";"Image Analysis Screen Count6";"Counting";"Standard method for screening grain size distribution <1.6 Screen using Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001476";"GSize_ScreenMass1_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001020";"Image Analysis Screen Mass1";"Counting";"Measurement of grain size distribution based on the percent mass of the grains greater than 2.8 mm based on screenings using the Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;"Estimation";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001477";"GSize_ScreenMass2_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001021";"Image Analysis Screen Mass2";"Counting";"Measurement of grain size distribution based on the percent mass of the grains that fall between 2.8 mm - 2.5 mm based on screenings using the Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001478";"GSize_ScreenMass3_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001022";"Image Analysis Screen Mass3";"Counting";"Measurement of grain size distribution based on the percent mass of the grains that fall between 2.5 mm - 2.2 mm based on screenings using the Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001479";"GSize_ScreenMass4_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001023";"Image Analysis Screen Mass4";"Counting";"Measurement of grain size distribution based on the percent mass of the grains that fall between 2.2 mm - 2.0 mm based on screenings using the Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001480";"GSize_ScreenMass5_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001024";"Image Analysis Screen Mass5";"Counting";"Measurement of grain size distribution based on the percent mass of the grains that fall between 2.0 mm - 1.6 mm based on screenings using the Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001481";"GSize_ScreenMass6_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Kate Dreher, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000040";"Grain size";"Morphological traits";"Grain size.";"Kernel size";"GSize";"GSiz, Ksize, GrnSize";"Grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:0001025";"Image Analysis Screen Mass6";"Counting";"Measurement of grain size distribution based on the percent mass of the grains that are below 1.6 mm based on screenings using the Seed Count (SC5000R) machine.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001482";"AnthExt_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Bhoja Basnet, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000982";"Anther extrusion";"Agronomical traits";"Extrusion of anthers.";;"AnthExt";;"Anther";"Anther extrusion";;;"CO_321:0001011";"AnthExt Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for anther extrusion.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001483";"AnthExt_E_0to9";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Bhoja Basnet, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"05-janv-16";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000982";"Anther extrusion";"Agronomical traits";"Extrusion of anthers.";;"AnthExt";;"Anther";"Anther extrusion";;;"CO_321:0001011";"AnthExt Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for anther extrusion.";;;"CO_321:0001018";"0-9 AnthExt";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"0= No anther extrusion";"3= 30% anther extrusion";"4= 40% anther extrusion";"1= 10% anther extrusion";"2= 20% anther extrusion";"7= 70% anther extrusion";"8= 80% anther extrusion";"5= 50% anther extrusion";"6= 60% anther extrusion";"8= >90% anther extrusion";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001595";"InfertSpkN_Ct_SplSpk";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT, T3";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001484";"Infertile spike number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of infertile spikelet per spike.";;"InfertSpkN";"InflSPKLSP";"Spike";"Number";;;"CO_321:0001530";"InfertSpkN Counting";"Counting";"The number of infertile spikelets (i.e., those NOT containing grain) per spike should be counted towards the end of grain-filling, but before physiological maturity (to avoid losses due to movement through the plots). Randomly sample 5-10 spikes per plot, by selecting at the base of the culm. Count the total number of spikelets (pair-by-pair, from the base to the tip), then obtain the average.";;;"CO_321:0000440";"spikelet/spike";"Numerical";"1.0";"1.0";"50.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001596";"RSpkGP_Calc_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001485";"Rapid spike growth period";"Phenological traits";"Rapid spike growth period.";;"RSpkGP";"RSGP";"Canopy";"Grain Filling duration";;;"CO_321:0001531";"RSpkGP Computation";"Computation";"Phase period where the spike growth the most regarding the whole crop cycle and can be calculated as (anthesis date-initiation of booting date)/days to maturity *100.";"(DTA-DTInB)/DTM *100";;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001597";"CGR_Calc_gm2day";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000407";"Crop growth rate";"Physiological traits";"It is the rate of dry matter production per unit area.";;"CGR";"CGR";"Plant";"Biomass production";;;"CO_321:0001532";"CGR Computation";"Computation";"It is measured during rapid spike growth phase. Cut all aboveground biomass in a predetermined area (A). Avoid border effects by sampling away from edges of plot. Then, CRG is the production of biomass per day between initiation of booting and seven days after anthesis. Calculated as (Biomass 7DAA/m2 - Biomass InB/m2)/Days from InB to 7DAA.";"(Biomass 7DAA/m2 - Biomass InB/m2)/Days from InB to 7DAA.";;"CO_321:0000420";"g/m2/day";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001599";"SN_Calc_Spksm2";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT, T3";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000166";"Spike number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of spikes (fertile culms) per unit area, sample or plant.";"Ear number";"SN";"SNO, SpkNO, SpkNo";"Spike";"Number";;;"CO_321:0001534";"SN Computation";"Computation";"Calculated from biomass seven days after anthesis (7DAA) sampling.";;;"CO_321:0000441";"spike/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001600";"GYPR_Calc_gm2day";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001486";"Grain yield production rate";"Agronomical traits";"Grain yield production rate.";;"GYPR";;"Grain";"Yield production rate";;;"CO_321:0001535";"GYPR Computation";"Computation";"Calculated with grain yield obtained /days to maturity.";;;"CO_321:0000420";"g/m2/day";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001601";"BMPR_Calc_gm2day";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001487";"Biomass production rate";"Agronomical traits";"Biomass production rate.";;"BMPR";;"Biomass";"Production per day";;;"CO_321:0001536";"BMPR Computation";"Computation";"Calculated with final biomass obtained /days to maturity.";;;"CO_321:0000420";"g/m2/day";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001602";"TTTS_Calc_Cday";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001488";"Terminal spikelet thermal time";"Phenological traits";"Thermal Time from emergence to Terminal Spikelet (GS30).";;"TTTS";;"Plant";"Terminal spikelet thermal time";;;"CO_321:0001537";"TTTS Computation";"Computation";"Calculated with climatic data where degree days are accumulating since emergence until terminal spikelet(thermal time from da1+day2+day3...). To calculate daily thermal time= (Temperature max + Temperature min)/2.";;;"CO_321:0001587";"°C day";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"2000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001603";"TTIB_Calc_Cday";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001489";"Booting initiation thermal time";"Phenological traits";"Thermal Time from emergence to Initiation of Booting (GS41).";;"TTIB";;"Plant";"Initiation of Booting thermal time";;;"CO_321:0001538";"TTIB Computation";"Computation";"Calculated with climatic data where degree days are accumulating since emergence until initiation of booting (thermal time from da1+day2+day3...). To calculate daily thermal time= (Temperature max + Temperature min)/2.";;;"CO_321:0001587";"°C day";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"2000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001604";"TTB_Calc_Cday";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001490";"Booting thermal time";"Phenological traits";"Thermal Time from emergence to Booting (GS45).";;"TTB";;"Plant";"Booting thermal time";;;"CO_321:0001539";"TTB Computation";"Computation";"Calculated with climatic data where degree days are accumulating since emergence until booting (thermal time from da1+day2+day3...). To calculate daily thermal time= (Temperature max + Temperature min)/2.";;;"CO_321:0001587";"°C day";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"2000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001605";"TTH_Calc_Cday";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001491";"Heading thermal time";"Phenological traits";"Thermal Time from emergence to Heading (GS55).";;"TTH";;"Plant";"Heading thermal time";;;"CO_321:0001540";"TTH Computation";"Computation";"Calculated with climatic data where degree days are accumulating since emergence until emergence (thermal time from da1+day2+day3...). To calculate daily thermal time= (Temperature max + Temperature min)/2.";;;"CO_321:0001587";"°C day";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"2000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001606";"TTA_Calc_Cday";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001492";"Anthesis thermal time";"Phenological traits";"Thermal Time from emergence to Anthesis (GS65).";;"TTA";;"Plant";"Anthesis thermal time";;;"CO_321:0001541";"TTA Computation";"Computation";"Calculated with climatic data where degree days are accumulating since emergence until anthesis (thermal time from da1+day2+day3...). To calculate daily thermal time= (Temperature max + Temperature min)/2.";;;"CO_321:0001587";"°C day";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"2000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001607";"TTM_calc_Cday";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001493";"Physiological maturity thermal time";"Phenological traits";"Thermal Time from emergence to Physiological Maturity (GS87).";;"TTM";;"Plant";"Physiological maturity thermal time";;;"CO_321:0001542";"TTM Computation";"Computation";"Calculated with climatic data where degree days are accumulating since emergence until physiological maturity (thermal time from da1+day2+day3...). To calculate daily thermal time= (Temperature max + Temperature min)/2.";;;"CO_321:0001587";"°C day";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"2000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001608";"StmWSC_NIR_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000207";"Stem water soluble carbohydrate";"Physiological traits";"Water soluble carbohydrates accumulate up to and around anthesis and are partitioned to the stem, from where they are later available as a reservoir for remobilization to the developing grains. These reserves are an important source of carbon for grain filling.";;"StmWSC";"STEMWSC, WSC,";"Stem";"Water soluble carbohydrate content";;;"CO_321:0001543";"StmWSC NIR Measurement";"Measurement";"Water soluble carbohydrates of stem dry weight measured with NIRs.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001609";"StmWSC_Atrone_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000207";"Stem water soluble carbohydrate";"Physiological traits";"Water soluble carbohydrates accumulate up to and around anthesis and are partitioned to the stem, from where they are later available as a reservoir for remobilization to the developing grains. These reserves are an important source of carbon for grain filling.";;"StmWSC";"STEMWSC, WSC,";"Stem";"Water soluble carbohydrate content";;;"CO_321:0001544";"StmWSC Atrone Measurement";"Measurement";"Water soluble carbohydrates of stem dry weight measured with chemical method Antrone.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001610";"SpkPho_Textile_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001494";"Spike photosynthesis contribution";"Physiological traits";"Photosynthetic contribution of the spike (ear) to grain yield.";;"SpkPho";;"Spike";"Spike Photosynthesis";;;"CO_321:0001545";"SpkPho Computation";"Computation";"Textile treatment is used to inhibit photosynthesis of the spikes through shading(comparison between control and treated spikes). Randomly selected spikes (for example: 12 spikes) per plot are covered with a special designed textile 10 days after anthesis under irrigation and drought or 10 days after heading under heat environments. Then, at physiological maturity the spikes are harvested together with 12 control spikes and the number of grains and weight are recorded and compared the treated spikes with the control ones (Sanchez-Bragado et al., 2016).";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001611";"FE_Calc_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001495";"Fruiting efficiency";"Physiological traits";"The final outcome of the floret developmental rates (determining the number of floret primordia that reach the stage of fertile florets at anthesis) and the proportion of grain set per fertile floret (the opposite to grain abortion), per unit of spike weight.";;"FE";;"Spike";"Fruiting efficiency";;;"CO_321:0001546";"FE Computation";"Computation";"Spike fertility index. Dry weight of 20 randomly selected spikes at anthesis. Fruiting Efficiency= number of grains at maturity / spike dry matter at anthesis.";;;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001612";"SpkPI_Calc_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001496";"Spike partitioning index";"Physiological traits";"Spike partitioning index.";;"SpkPI";"SPI";"Spike";"Partitioning index";;;"CO_321:0001547";"SpkPI Computation";"Computation";"Calculated from shoots sampled seven days after anthesis and SPI is expressed as a ratio and can be calculated as SPI= (dry weight of spikes at anthesis+7/dry weight of the whole plants (shoots) at anthesis+7).";"SpikeDW Anth+7/Shoot DW Anth+7";;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001613";"LeafPI_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001497";"Leaf lamina partitioning index";"Physiological traits";"Leaf lamina partitioning index.";;"LeafPI";"LPI";"Leaf";"Lamina partitioning index";;;"CO_321:0001548";"LeafPI Computation";"Measurement";"Leaf Lamina Coefficient = Lamina DM measured at7 DAA/whole plant DM at 7 DAA. Individual shoots (for example: 10-20) are harvested seven days after anthesis and the shoots are separated into: spikes, leaf laminas, true stem, leaf sheath. The dry weight of leaf lamina is recorded and the total dry weight calculated. The partitioning index is calculated comparing the weight of each individual part regarding the total weight of the plant.";;;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001614";"LeafSPI_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001498";"Leaf sheath partitioning index";"Physiological traits";"Leaf sheath partitioning index.";;"LeafSPI";"LSPI";"Leaf";"Sheath partitioning index";;;"CO_321:0001549";"LeafSPI Computation";"Measurement";"Leaf Sheath Coefficient = Leaf Sheath DM measured at 7 DAA/whole plant DM at 7 DAA. Individual shoots (for example: 10-20) are harvested seven days after anthesis and the shoots are separated into: spikes, leaf laminas, true stem, leaf sheath. The dry weight of leaf sheath is recorded and the total dry weight calculated. The partitioning index is calculated comparing the weight of each individual part regarding the total weight of the plant.";;;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001615";"TSPI_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001499";"True stem partitioning index";"Physiological traits";"True stem partitioning index.";;"TSPI";"TSPI";"Stem";"True stem partitioning index";;;"CO_321:0001550";"TSPI Computation";"Measurement";"True Stem Coefficient = True stem DM measured at 7 DAA/whole plant DM at 7 DAA. Individual shoots (for example: 10-20) are harvested seven days after anthesis and the shoots are separated into: spikes, leaf laminas, true stem, leaf sheath. The dry weight of true stem is recorded and the total dry weight calculated. The partitioning index is calculated comparing the weight of each individual part regarding the total weight of the plant.";;;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001616";"SLA_M_m2kg1";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001500";"Specific leaf area";"Physiological traits";"A ratio of the leaf area to dry mass.";;"SLA";;"Leaf";"Specific leaf area";;;"CO_321:0001551";"SLA Measurement";"Measurement";"Leaf area of flag leaf or all laminas is measured. Then the leaves are oven dried at 60-70oC for 48h and the dry weight is recorded. Then, the specific leaf area is calculated as the ratio of leaf area to dry mass SLA= leaf area/dry mass.";;;"CO_321:0000805";"g/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001617";"Anet_M_umolCO2m2s2";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001501";"Leaf net photosynthesis rate";"Physiological traits";"Carbon fixation by photosynthesis.";;"Anet";;"Leaf";"Net photosynthesis rate";;;"CO_321:0001552";"Anet Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for gas exchange and fluorescence measurements.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0001588";"µmol CO2/m2/s";"Numerical";"2.0";"-5.0";"60.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001618";"Asat_M_umolCO2m2s1";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001502";"Leaf light-saturated net photosynthesis";"Physiological traits";"Carbon fixation by photosynthesis at saturating light.";;"Asat";;"Leaf";"Light-saturated net photosynthesis";;;"CO_321:0001553";"Asat Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for gas exchange and fluorescence measurements.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0001588";"µmol CO2/m2/s";"Numerical";"2.0";"-5.0";"60.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001619";"Amax_M_umolCO2m2s2";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001503";"Leaf light and carbon dioxide-saturated net photosynthesis";"Physiological traits";"Carbon fixation by photosynthesis at saturating light and CO2.";;"Amax";;"Leaf";"Light and carbon dioxide-saturated net photosynthesis";;;"CO_321:0001554";"Amax Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for gas exchange and fluorescence measurements.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0001588";"µmol CO2/m2/s";"Numerical";"2.0";"-5.0";"60.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001620";"Ci_M_umolCO2mol1";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001504";"Leaf intercellular carbon dioxide concentration";"Physiological traits";"Intercellular carbon dioxide concentration.";;"Ci";;"Leaf";"Intercellular carbon dioxide concentration";;;"CO_321:0001555";"Ci Computation";"Measurement";"Standard method for gas exchange and fluorescence measurements.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0001589";"µmol CO2/mol";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"500.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001621";"PhiPS2_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001505";"Leaf quantum yield of photosystem II";"Physiological traits";"Quantum yield of electron transfer at PSII.";;"PhiPS2";;"Leaf";"Quantum yield of photosystem II";;;"CO_321:0001556";"PhiPS2 Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for fluorescence measurement.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001622";"PhiCO2_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001506";"Leaf quantum yield of carbon dioxide fixation";"Physiological traits";"Quantum yield of carbon dioxide (CO2) fixation.";;"PhiCO2";;"Leaf";"Quantum yield of carbon dioxide fixation";;;"CO_321:0001557";"PhiCO2 Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for gas exchange measurement.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001623";"ETR_M_?molm2s1";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001507";"Leaf electron transport rate";"Physiological traits";"Transfer of electrons during photosynthesis in light saturated leaf.";;"ETR";;"Leaf";"Electron transport rate";;;"CO_321:0001558";"ETR Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for gas exchange and fluorescence measurements.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0001590";"?mol/m2/s";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"500.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001624";"FmDA_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001508";"Leaf maximal fluorescence intensity";"Physiological traits";"Maximal level of fluorescence intensity measured in the leaf.";;"FmLA";;"Leaf";"Maximal fluorescence intensity";;;"CO_321:0001559";"FmDA Measurement";"Measurement";"Maximal level of fluorescence measured from a dark adapted leaf.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001625";"FmLA_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001508";"Leaf maximal fluorescence intensity";"Physiological traits";"Maximal level of fluorescence intensity measured in the leaf.";;"FmLA";;"Leaf";"Maximal fluorescence intensity";;;"CO_321:0001560";"FmLA Measurement";"Measurement";"Maximal level of fluorescence measured from a light adapted leaf.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001626";"FoDA_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001509";"Leaf minimal fluorescence intensity";"Physiological traits";"Minimal level of fluorescence intensity measured in the leaf.";;"FoLA";;"Leaf";"Minimal fluorescence intensity";;;"CO_321:0001561";"FoDA Measurement";"Measurement";"Minimal level of fluorescence measured from a dark adapted leaf.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001627";"FoLA_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001509";"Leaf minimal fluorescence intensity";"Physiological traits";"Minimal level of fluorescence intensity measured in the leaf.";;"FoLA";;"Leaf";"Minimal fluorescence intensity";;;"CO_321:0001562";"FoLA Measurement";"Measurement";"Minimal level of fluorescence measured from a light adapted leaf.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001628";"FvDA_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001510";"leaf variable fluorescence";"Physiological traits";"Variable fluorescence measured in the leaf.";;"FvLA";;"Leaf";"Variable fluorescence";;;"CO_321:0001563";"FvDA Measurement";"Measurement";"Variable fluorescence measured from a dark adapted leaf.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001629";"FvLA_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001510";"leaf variable fluorescence";"Physiological traits";"Variable fluorescence measured in the leaf.";;"FvLA";;"Leaf";"Variable fluorescence";;;"CO_321:0001564";"FvLA Measurement";"Measurement";"Variable fluorescence measured from a light adapted leaf.";;;"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001630";"FvDAFmDA_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001511";"leaf maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry";"Physiological traits";"Maximum quantum yield of PSII measured in the leaf.";;"FvLAFmLA";;"Leaf";"Maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry";;;"CO_321:0001565";"FvDAFmLA measurement";"Measurement";"Maximum quantum yield of PSII measured from a dark adapted leaf.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001631";"FvLAFmLA_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001511";"leaf maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry";"Physiological traits";"Maximum quantum yield of PSII measured in the leaf.";;"FvLAFmLA";;"Leaf";"Maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry";;;"CO_321:0001566";"FvLAFmLA measurement";"Measurement";"Maximum quantum yield of PSII measured from a light adapted leaf.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001632";"Fs_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001512";"Leaf steady-state fluorescence";"Physiological traits";"The fluorescence emitting during steady state.";;"Fs";;"Leaf";"Steady-state fluorescence";;;"CO_321:0001567";"Fs Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for gas exchange and fluorescence measurements.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001633";"LeafTR_M_mmolH2Om2s1";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001513";"Leaf transpiration rate";"Physiological traits";"Leaf transpiration rate.";;"LeafTR";"Tr";"Leaf";"Leaf transpiration rate";;;"CO_321:0001568";"LeafTR Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for gas exchange and fluorescence measurements.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0001591";"mmol H2O/m2/s";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001634";"CiCa_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001514";"Leaf intercellular to ambient carbon dioxide ratio";"Physiological traits";"Intercellular to ambient carbon dioxide ratio.";;"CiCa";;"Leaf";"Intercellular to ambient carbon dioxide ratio";;;"CO_321:0001569";"CiCa Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for gas exchange and fluorescence measurements.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 13, Molero and Lopes.";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001635";"LI_M_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001515";"Canopy light interception";"Physiological traits";"Light energy intercepted by the canopy.";;"LI";;"Canopy";"Light interception";;;"CO_321:0001570";"LI Computation";"Computation";"Measurement of the light intercepted by the canopy using a ceptometer as described in Pask et al., 2012, chapter 11, Mullan and Pietragalla.";;"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 11, Mullan and Pietragalla";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001636";"RUE_Calc_gMJ";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001516";"Radiation use efficiency";"Physiological traits";"The amount of biomass produced per unit of intercepted solar radiation.";;"RUE_T";;"Canopy";"Radiation Use Efficiency";;;"CO_321:0001571";"RUE Computation";"Computation";"Measurement of Radiation Use Efficiency as described in Pask et al., 2012, chapter 11, Mullan and Pietragalla.";"Radiation Use Efficiency = Biomass / (MJ accumm* (LI/100))";"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 11, Mullan and Pietragalla";"CO_321:0001592";"g/MJ";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"10.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001637";"RUET_Calc_gMJ";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001516";"Radiation use efficiency";"Physiological traits";"The amount of biomass produced per unit of intercepted solar radiation.";;"RUE_T";;"Canopy";"Radiation Use Efficiency";;;"CO_321:0001572";"RUET Computation";"Computation";"Measurement of Radiation Use Efficiency as described in Pask et al., 2012, chapter 11, Mullan and Pietragalla.";"Radiation Use Efficiency = (Biomass at Maturity-Biomass at 40 DAE) / (MJ accummulated between 40 DAE until Physiological maturity* (LI/100))";"Pask et al., 2012, chapter 11, Mullan and Pietragalla";"CO_321:0001592";"g/MJ";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"10.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001638";"LeafPSSRa_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001517";"Pigment simple ratio chlorophyll a";"Physiological traits";"Chlorophyll content in leaf green tissue. It includes ONLY chlorophyll-a. Chlorophyll is the green pigment found in plants.";;"LeafPSSRa";"PSSRa";"Leaf";"Chlorophyll content";;;"CO_321:0001573";"LeafPSSRa Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";"R800/R675";"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001639";"LeafPSSRb_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001518";"Pigment simple ratio chlorophyll b";"Physiological traits";"Chlorophyll content in leaf green tissue. It includes ONLY chlorophyll-b. Chlorophyll is the green pigment found in plants.";;"LeafPSSRb";"PSSRb";"Leaf";"Chlorophyll content";;;"CO_321:0001574";"LeafPSSRb Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for spectral reflectance.";"R800/R650";"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001640";"LeafR675_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001519";"Leaf spectral reflectance 675 nm";"Physiological traits";"The normalized amount of electromagnetic radiation that is reflected by the leaf at R675 nm wavelength.";;"LeafR675";"R675";"Leaf";"Spectral reflectance";;;"CO_321:0001575";"Leaf R675 Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for leaf spectral reflectance normalized to R675.";"R675";"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001641";"LeafR550_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001520";"Leaf spectral reflectance 550 nm";"Physiological traits";"The normalized amount of electromagnetic radiation that is reflected by the leaf at R550 nm wavelength.";;"LeafR550";"R550";"Leaf";"Spectral reflectance";;;"CO_321:0001576";"Leaf R550 Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for leaf spectral reflectance normalized to R550.";"R550";"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001642";"LeafR750R550_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001521";"Leaf spectral reflectance 750/550 nm";"Physiological traits";"The normalized amount of electromagnetic radiation that is reflected by the leaf at R750/R550 nm wavelength.";;"LeafR750R700";"R750R700";"Leaf";"Spectral reflectance";;;"CO_321:0001577";"Leaf R750/R550 Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for leaf spectral reflectance normalized to R750/R550.";"R750/550";"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001643";"LeafR750R700_M_Idx";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001522";"Leaf spectral reflectance 750/700 nm";"Physiological traits";"The normalized amount of electromagnetic radiation that is reflected by the leaf at R750/R700 nm wavelength.";;"LeafR750R700";"R750R700";"Leaf";"Spectral reflectance";;;"CO_321:0001578";"Leaf R750/R700 Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for leaf spectral reflectance normalized to R750/700.";"R750/700";"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 7), Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 5)";"CO_321:0000421";"index";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"1000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001644";"SpkDW_Calc_gm2";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Gemma Molero, Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"22/07/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001523";"Spike dry weight";"Agronomical traits";"Dry weight of spike(s).";;"SpkDW";;"Spike";"Spike dry weight";;;"CO_321:0001579";"SpkDW Computation";"Computation";"Standard spike dry weight method.";;;"CO_321:0000805";"g/m2";"Numerical";"0.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001645";"FLeafLLng_M_cm";;"Research-intensive characterization";;;;"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001524";"Flag leaf lamina length";"Morphological traits";"Length of flag leaf lamina.";;"FLeafLLng";;"Flag leaf lamina";"Length";;;"CO_321:0001580";"FLeafLLng Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for flag leaf lamina length.";;;"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";"1.0";"5.0";"90.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001646";"FLeafLWid_M_mm";;"Research-intensive characterization";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001525";"Flag leaf lamina width";"Morphological traits";"Width of flag leaf lamina.";;"FLeafLWid";;"Flag leaf lamina";"Width";;;"CO_321:0001581";"FLeafLWid Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for flag leaf lamina width.";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";"1.0";"2.0";"40.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001647";"SpkGW_M_g";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;;"CIMMYT, T3";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla, Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001526";"Grain weight per spike";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight per spike.";;"SpkGW";;"Spike";"Grain weight";;;"CO_321:0001582";"SpkGW Measurement";"Measurement";"Dry grains at 70oC and weigh.";;;"CO_321:0001593";"g";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001648";"PstriSdlgResp_E_0to8";"PSTRI_0_8__SEEDRESP";"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS11-DS15";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001527";"Stripe rust seedling response";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) response in the seedlings caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";"Stripe rust";"PstriSdlgResp";"YRustResp, YRResp, PSTRIL";"Seedling";"Stripe rust seedling response";;;"CO_321:0001583";"Seedling rust field response Estimation";"Estimation";"Seedling host responses are normally scored as susceptible or resistant depending on the infection type produced with a designated isolate in a particular environment. The infection type produced will often change if the environment is altered.";;"Roelfs, A.P., R.P. Singh, and E.E. Saari. 1992. Rust Diseases of Wheat: Concepts and methods of disease management. Mexico, D.F.: CIMMYT.";"CO_321:0000606";"0-8 Rust infection type";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"I= immune, no uredinia or other macroscopic sign of infection (0)";"2= moderately resistant, small to medium uredinia often surrounded by Chlorosis or necrosis, green island may be surrounded by chlorotic or necrotic border (2)";"X= heterogeneous, random distribution of variable-sized uredinia on single leaf (X)";",= nearly immune, no uredinia, but hypersensitive necrotic or chlorotic flecks present (,)";"1= very resistant, small uredinia surrounded by necrosis (1)";"3= moderately susceptible, medium-sized uredinia that may be associated with chlorosis (3)";"4= susceptible, large uredinia without chlorosis (4)";"Y= heterogeneous, ordered distribution of variable-sized uredinia, with larger uredinia at leaf tip (Y)";"Z= Heterogeneous, ordered distribution of variable-sized uredinia, with larger uredinia at leaf base (Z)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001649";"LRollSev_E_1to5";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001528";"Leaf rolling severity";"Abiotic stress traits";"Severity of leaf rolling, usually scored under drought stress.";;"LRollSev";;"Leaf";"Rolling severity";;;"CO_321:0001584";"LRollSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf rolling severity.";;;"CO_321:0001594";"1-5 LRoll scale";"Ordinal";;;;;"1= unrolled, turgid";"4= rolled leaf rim covers part of leaf blade";"5= leaf is severely rolled";"2= leaf rim starts to roll";"3= leaf has shape of a V";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001650";"LRollInc_E_pct";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";;;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001529";"Leaf rolling incidence";"Abiotic stress traits";"Incidence of leaf rolling, usually scored under drought stress.";;"LRollInc";;"Leaf";"Rolling incidence";;;"CO_321:0001585";"LRollInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf rolling incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"100.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001651";"ISBM_E_1to5";;"Nursery/Trial evaluation";"DS11-DS87";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha, Julian Pietragalla";"25-oct-15";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000393";"In-season aboveground biomass";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass at any developmental stage and/or at regular intervals from the emergence to physiological maturity.";;"ISBM";;"Plant";"Aboveground biomass In-season";;;"CO_321:0001586";"ISBM Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for In-season aboveground biomass.";;;"CO_321:0000462";"1-5 scoring scale";"Ordinal";"1.0";;;;"1= very poor (VP)";"4= good (G)";"5= very good (VG)";"2= poor (P)";"3= fair (F)";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001657";"GrnTllr_Calc_GrnTllr";;"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha";"03-May-2018";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001652";"Grain number per tiller";"Agronomical traits";"Number of grains per tiller.";;"GRATIL";;"Tiller";"Grain number";;;"CO_321:0001654";"GrnTllr Computation";"Computation";;;;"CO_321:0001656";"grains/tiller";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001658";"TllrGW_M_g";;"Trial evaluation";"After physiological maturity (DS87)";;;"CIMMYT";"Rosemary Shrestha";"03-May-2018";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001653";"Grain weight per tiller";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight per tiller.";;"GWTTILL";;"Tiller";"Grain weight";;;"CO_321:0001655";"TllrGW Measurement";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:0001593";"g";"Numerical";"1.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001700";"GNitr_NIRS_pct";"GRN_pct";"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010105";"Grain Nitrogen content";"Quality traits";"Whole-grain Nitrogen content.";;"GNitr";"GNC";"Grain";"Nitrogen content";;;"CO_321:0000946";"NIRS Measurement";"Measurement";"NIR calibrated based on Kjeldahl results.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001701";"STRNitr_NIRS_pct";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010043";"Straw Nitrogen content";"Physiological traits";"Nitrogen content of the above ground straw biomass.";;"STRNitr";"StrawN";"Straw";"Nitrogen content";;;"CO_321:0001678";"STR NIRS Measurement";"Measurement";"Straw NIR calibrated.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001702";"AGBMNitr_M_pct";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001662";"Above ground biomass nitrogen content";"Physiological traits";"Nitrogen content of the above ground biomass.";;"BMNitr";"AGN";"Plant";"Nitrogen content";;;"CO_321:0001682";"BM NIRS Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as sum of straw Nitrogen content and grain Nitrogen content according to the biomass partition into straw and grain.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001703";"NHI_Calc_pct";"Nitrogen harvest index";"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001666";"Nitrogen harvest index";"Physiological traits";"The fraction of Nitrogen recovered in the harvested grain as a function of the total Nitrogen taken up.";;"NHI";;"Plant";"Nitrogen harvest index";;;"CO_321:0001686";"NHI Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as total grain Nitrogen divided by the total biomass Nitrogen.";"NHI= grain Nitrogen / above ground biomass Nitrogen";"Cormier et al.,2016";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001704";"GFibre_NIRS_pct";"GRNFibre_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001673";"Grain fibre content";"Quality traits";"Content of fibre (corrected to 12.5% moisture basis) in the whole wheat grain samples.";;"Gfibre";"GRNFibre";"Grain";"Fibre content";;;"CO_321:0001693";"NIRS Fibre Measurement";"Measurement";"NIR calibrated";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001705";"GStarch_NIRS_pct";"GRNStarch_pct";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001674";"Grain starch content";"Quality traits";"Content of starch (corrected to 12.5% moisture basis) in the whole wheat grain samples.";;"Gstarch";"GRNSTARCH";"Grain";"Starch content";;;"CO_321:0001695";"NIRS Starch Measurement";"Measurement";"NIR calibrated";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001706";"GPD_Calc_pct";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001672";"Grain protein deviation";"Physiological traits";"Deviation from the grain yield -grain protein linear regression.";;"GPD";;"Plant";"Grain Protein Deviation";;;"CO_321:0001692";"GPD Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as the deviation from the yield-protein linear regression.";;"Cormier et al.,2016";"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001707";"StrawYld_Calc_tha";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000977";"Straw yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of straw.";;"StrawYld";"STRBM, StrawDW";"Straw";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0001677";"StrawYield_Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as difference between biomass and grain yield.";;"Bell and Fischer, 1994, Reynolds et al., 2001, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000432";"t/ha";"Numerical";"2.0";"0.0";"20.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001708";"Awns_E_0to1";"AWNS_0_1";"Descriptor";"DS65-DS89";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000027";"Spike awnedness";"Morphological traits";"Observation of awn type whether awnless/awnletted (short awns)/awned (conspicious awns).";;"Awns";;"Spike";"Awnedness";;;"CO_321:0001676";"Awns Presence";"Estimation";"Standard method for awn presence estimation.";;;"CO_321:0000599";"0-1 absent-present";"Nominal";;;;;"0= absent";"1= present";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001709";"GNUP_Calc_kgha";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001663";"Grain Nitrogen uptake";"Physiological traits";"Uptake of Nitrogen in the whole wheat grain samples.";;"GNUp";;"Grain";"Nitrogen uptake";;;"CO_321:0001683";"GNUp Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as total amount of Nitrogen in the grain at harvest.";;;"CO_321:0000804";"kg/ha";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001710";"STRNUP_Calc_kgha";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001665";"Straw Nitrogen uptake";"Physiological traits";"Uptake of Nitrogen in the whole above ground straw.";;"STRNUp";;"Straw";"Nitrogen uptake";;;"CO_321:0001685";"STRNUp Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as total amount of Nitrogen in the straw at harvest.";;;"CO_321:0000804";"kg/ha";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001711";"BMNUP_Calc_kgha";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001664";"Above ground biomass nitrogen uptake";"Physiological traits";"Uptake of Nitrogen in the above ground biomass at maturity.";;"BMNUp";;"Plant";"Nitrogen uptake";;;"CO_321:0001684";"BMNUp Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as total amount of Nitrogen in the above-ground biomass at harvest.";;;"CO_321:0000804";"kg/ha";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001712";"GFPTT_Calc_Cday";"GFILLPERIOD_thermal_time";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS65-DS87";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001659";"Grain filling period thermal time";"Phenological traits";"Time period between anthesis (ds65) and maturity (ds87) in thermal time.";;"GFPTT";"GfillPeriodTT";"Plant";"Grain filling period thermal time";;;"CO_321:0001679";"GFPTT Computation";"Computation";"Calculated with climatic data where degree days are accumulating between anthesis (DS65) and maturity (DS87) of crop cycle duration (thermal time from day1+day2+day3...). To calculate daily thermal time= (Temperature max + Temperature min)/2.";;;"CO_321:0001587";"degree C day";"Numerical";"1.0";"0.0";"2000.0";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001713";"GsurfA_M_mm2";"GRSA_M_mm2";"Trial evaluation";"After harvest (From DS87)";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001675";"Grain surface area";"Morphological traits";"Surface of whole grain.";;"GsurfA";"GRSA";"Grain";"Surface area";;;"CO_321:0001694";"GSurfA_Measurement";"Measurement";"Marvin method for whole surface area.";;"https://www.marvitech.de/en/products-for-seed-analysis/";"CO_321:0001696";"mm2";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001714";"GFR_Calc_gday";"GFILLRATE";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS65-DS87";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001660";"Grain fill rate";"Phenological traits";"Grain weight increase per day in the period between anthesis (ds65) and maturity (ds87).";;"GFR";"GfillRate";"Plant";"Grain fill rate";;;"CO_321:0001680";"GFR Computation";"Computation";"Calculated daily grain weight increase between anthesis (DS65) and maturity (DS87) of crop cycle duration.";;;"CO_321:0001697";"g/day";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001715";"GFRTT_Calc_gCday";"GFILLRATE_thermal_time";"Research-intensive characterization";"DS65-DS87";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001661";"Grain fill rate thermal time";"Phenological traits";"Grain weight increase per degree day in the period between anthesis (ds65) and maturity (ds87).";;"GFRTT";"GfillRateTT";"Plant";"Grain fill rate thermal time";;;"CO_321:0001681";"GFRTT Computation";"Computation";"Calculated grain weight increase per degree day with climatic data where degree days are accumulating between anthesis (DS65) and maturity (DS87) of crop cycle duration (thermal time from day1+day2+day3...). To calculate daily thermal time= (Temperature max + Temperature min)/2.";;;"CO_321:0001698";"g/degree C day";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001716";"NupE_Calc_kgkgN";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001667";"Nitrogen uptake efficiency";"Physiological traits";"N-uptake efficiency as the total amount of Nitrogen in the above-ground plant at harvest in relation to the available Nitrogen in soil.";;"BMNUpE";"NupE";"Plant";"Nitrogen Uptake Efficiency";;;"CO_321:0001687";"NupE Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as above ground biomass Nitrogen content divided by soil Nitrogen";"NUpE= above ground biomass Nitrogen / soil Nitrogen";"Cormier et al.,2016";"CO_321:0001699";"kg/kg N";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001717";"NutE_Calc_kgkgN";"Nitrogen utilisation efficiency";"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001668";"Grain Nitrogen utilization efficiency";"Physiological traits";"Nitrogen utilization efficiency as the grain dry mass in relation to the total amount of Nitrogen in above-ground plant at harvest.";;"NutE";;"Grain";"Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency";;;"CO_321:0001688";"Nute Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as grain yield per unit of Nitrogen taken up.";"NutE= grain yield / above ground Nitrogen";"Cormier et al.,2016";"CO_321:0001699";"kg/kg N";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001718";"BMNUtE_Calc_kgkgN";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001669";"Biomass Nitrogen utilization efficiency";"Physiological traits";"Biomass Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency as the biomass in relation to the total amount of N in above-ground plant at harvest.";;"BMNUtE";;"Plant";"Nitrogen Utilization Efficiency";;;"CO_321:0001689";"BMNUte Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as biomass per unit of Nitrogen taken up.";"BMNUtE= above ground biomass / above ground Nitrogen";;"CO_321:0001699";"kg/kg N";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001719";"NUE_Calc_kgkgN";"Nitrogen use efficiency";"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001670";"Nitrogen use efficiency";"Physiological traits";"The grain dry mass (grain yield) production per Nitrogen available to a plant.";;"NUE";;"Grain";"Nitrogen Use Efficiency";;;"CO_321:0001690";"NUE Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as the grain yield divided by the total soil Nitrogen.";"NUE = Grain Yield at Maturity / Soil Nitrogen";"Cormier et al.,2016";"CO_321:0001699";"kg/kg N";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0001720";"BMNUE_Calc_kgkgN";;"Research-intensive characterization";"After harvest";;;"JIC";"Luzie U Wingen";"24-Jul-2020";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001671";"Above ground biomass nitrogen efficiency";"Physiological traits";"The above ground biomass production per total Nitrogen available to a plant.";;"BMNUE";;"Plant";"Nitrogen Use Efficiency";;;"CO_321:0001691";"BMNUE Computation";"Computation";"Calculated as the above ground biomass divided by the total soil Nitrogen.";"BMNUE = Above Ground Biomass at Maturity / Soil Nitrogen";"Cormier et al.,2016";"CO_321:0001699";"kg/kg N";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501001";"Ant_E_jd";"ANT_jd";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000121";"Anthesis time";"Phenological traits";"Anthesis or flowering time is the period during which a flower is fully open and functional. pollination and fertilization occur during this period.";"Flowering time";"Ant";"Flowering, Flw, A";"Plant";"Anthesis time";;;"CO_321:0000832";"Ant DS65 date Estimation";"Estimation";"Record date of anthesis (DS65) when 50% of spikes have flowered (i.e. at least 1 anther dehisced).";;"Zadoks et al., 1974, Pask et al., 2012";"CO_321:0000855";"Julian date (JD)";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501003";"BlkGlmCol_M_0to1";"BLKGLMCOL_0_1";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500046";"Pseudo-black glume color";"Morphological traits";"Pseudo-black chaff or melanism. False black chaff is a physiological condition resulting from a deposition of melaniod pigments and is completely associated with the presence of the stem rust resistance gene Sr2. Symptoms include brown to black discoloration of the glume extending from slight longitudinal marks to large black areas covering most of the glume surface. In severe expression, the stem area below the last node may become distinctly brown to black discoloured. The trait appears post-flowering with a peak at late milk-soft dough stage.";;"BlkGlmCol";;"Glume";"Glume color";;;"CO_321:0500208";"Pseudo-Black Presence Measurement";"Measurement";"Scoring of pseudo-black chaff as presence / absence (1/0)";;;"CO_321:0500502";"0-1 Absence/Presence";"Ordinal";1;0;1;;"0= Absent";"1= Present";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501004";"BLSSev_E_0to9";"BLS_0_9";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001019";"Bacterial leaf streak severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Bacterial leaf streak severity in the plants caused by the agent Xanthomonas translucens. The disease, called black chaff when on the glumes.";"BLS, black chaff";"BLSSev";"PsyriSev";"Leaf";"Bacterial leaf streak severity";;;"CO_321:0500103";"BLS Estimation";"Estimation";"Common name: Bacterial leaf streak. Causal organism: Xanthomonas translucens pv. Undulosa. Severity rating: 0=no disease , 9=all leaf photosynthetic area lost.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501005";"BQ_Rating_1to6";"BQ_RATING";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500001";"Baking quality";"Quality traits";"Baking quality assessment";;"BQ";;"Flour";"Baking quality";;;"CO_321:0500101";"Baking Quality Rating Estimation";"Estimation";"The baking quality of a genotype relative to the standard variety used for that nursery. A= 1, B= 2, C= 3, D= 4, E= 5, F= 6.";;;"CO_321:0500517";"1-6 Grade Rating";"Ordinal";1;1;6;;"1= A";"2= B";"3= C";"4= D";"5= E";"6= F";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501006";"BQ_Score_pct";"BQ_SCORE";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500001";"Baking quality";"Quality traits";"Baking quality assessment";;"BQ";;"Flour";"Baking quality";;;"CO_321:0500102";"Baking Quality Score Estimation";"Estimation";"Combined cookie diameter and sucrose SRC relative to a check variety.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501007";"BYDInc_E_pct";"BYD_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000096";"Barley yellow dwarf incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Wheat yellow dwarf incidence in the plants caused by the agent wheat yellow dwarf virus.";;"BYDInc";"BYDV";"Plant";"Barley yellow dwarf incidence";;;"CO_321:0500104";"BYDInc Estimation - Average";"Estimation";"The mean BYDV incidence across multiple ratings; see BYDV incidence T1, BYDV incidence T2, and BYDV incidence T3.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501011";"BYDResp_E_1to9";"BYDRESP_1_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500002";"Barley yellow dwarf plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Plant response to barley yellow dwarf virus.";;"BYDResp";;"Plant";"Barley yellow dwarf response";;;"CO_321:0500108";"BYDResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Barley yellow dwarf virus plant response. Resistant= 1, susceptible= 9.";;;"CO_321:0500520";"1-9 response scale";"Ordinal";1;1;9;;"1= Resistant";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5=";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9= Susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501019";"CanopyTemp_Ant_M_c";"CANOPYTEMP_ANT_c";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500004";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"Surface temperature of the canopy";;"CanopyTemp";;"Canopy";"Canopy Temperature";;;"CO_321:0500116";"CanopyTempAnt Measurement";"Measurement";"Canopy temperature at anthesis (Feekes 10.5.1-10.5.3) measured using a hand-held infrared thermometer.";;;"CO_321:0500523";"degrees C";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501020";"CanopyTemp_GF_M_c";"CANOPYTEMP_GF_c";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500004";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"Surface temperature of the canopy";;"CanopyTemp";;"Canopy";"Canopy Temperature";;;"CO_321:0500119";"CanopyTempGF Measurement";"Measurement";"Canopy temperature at grain fill (Feekes 11.1-11.2 ) measured using a hand-held infrared thermometer.";;;"CO_321:0500523";"degrees C";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501021";"CanopyTempDep_Ant_Calc_c";"CANOPYTEMPDEP_ANT_c, CTD_ANT_c";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500005";"Canopy temperature depression";"Physiological traits";"Canopy temperature depression (CTD) is the difference between the ambient air temperature (Ta) and the canopy temperature (Tc): CTD=Ta-Tc.";;"CanopyTempDep";"CTD";"Canopy";"Canopy Temperature Depression";;;"CO_321:0500117";"CanopyTempDepAnt Computation";"Computation";"Canopy temperature depression at anthesis (Feekes 10.5.1-10.5.3)";;;"CO_321:0500523";"degrees C";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501022";"CanopyTempDep_GF_Calc_c";"CANOPYTEMPDEP_GF_c, CTD_GF_c";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500005";"Canopy temperature depression";"Physiological traits";"Canopy temperature depression (CTD) is the difference between the ambient air temperature (Ta) and the canopy temperature (Tc): CTD=Ta-Tc.";;"CanopyTempDep";"CTD";"Canopy";"Canopy Temperature Depression";;;"CO_321:0500118";"CanopyTempDepGF Computation";"Computation";"Canopy temperature depression at grain fill (Feekes 11.1-11.2)";;;"CO_321:0500523";"degrees C";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501023";"CD_M_cm";"CD_cm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500006";"Cookie diameter";"Quality traits";"Diameter of sugar snap cookie. Reflects genetic and environmental factors. Cookie diameters should be compared to those of standard cultivars.";;"CD";;"Cookie";"Cookie diameter";;;"CO_321:0500120";"Cookie Diameter Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for cookie diameter measurement.";;;"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";1;5;90;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501024";"CD_Rating_sd";"CD_RATING_sd";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500006";"Cookie diameter";"Quality traits";"Diameter of sugar snap cookie. Reflects genetic and environmental factors. Cookie diameters should be compared to those of standard cultivars.";;"CD";;"Cookie";"Cookie diameter";;;"CO_321:0500121";"Cookie Diameter Rating Computation";"Computation";"Standard deviations from the mean cookie diameter of check varieties. questionable= -1, above average= 1.";;;"CO_321:0500501";"-1 to 1 standard deviations";"Numerical";1;-1;1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501025";"Chl_M_spad";"CHL_spad";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000028";"Leaf chlorophyll content";"Physiological traits";"Chlorophyll content in leaf green tissue. It includes both chlorophyll-a and chlorophyll-b. Chlorophyll is the green pigment found in plants.";;"Chl";"ChloC, ChlCont, LChl";"Leaf";"Chlorophyll content";;;"CO_321:0000249";"Chl Measurement";"Measurement";"The chlorophyll content of leaves (and other green tissues) can be quickly, and non-destructively measured using a hand-held battery portable optical meter (e.g., Minolta SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter) which measures the chlorophyll content via light transmittance (absorbance of red light at 650 nm and infrared light at 940 nm) and compensates for differing leaf thicknesses. Readings from the instrument are not absolute chlorophyll values, instead each reading is a ?chlorophyll concentration index? (CCI ranging from 0 to 99.9). Measurements are typically made on the flag leaf (once fully expanded), although measurements of lower leaves may be taken to assess canopy chlorophyll profiles.";;"Pask et al., 2012 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0500527";"spad";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501026";"EgramResp_E_0to10";"EGRAM_0_10__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500045";"Powdery midlew plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew plant response caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramResp";;"Leaf";"Powdery mildew response";;;"CO_321:0500122";"EgramResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Powdery mildew plant response scoring.";;;"CO_321:0500508";"0-10 response scale";"Ordinal";1;0;10;;"0= 0 to <1% leaf area affected on any leaf";"1= 1-50% leaf area affected on 4th leaf";"2= 1-5% leaf area affected on 3rd leaf";"3= 5-15% leaf area affected on 3rd leaf";"4= >15% leaf area affected on 3rd leaf";"5= 1-5% leaf area affected on 2nd leaf";"6= 5-15% leaf area affected on 2nd leaf";"7= >15% leaf area affected on 2nd leaf";"8= 1-5% leaf area affected on flag leaf";"9= 5-15% leaf area affected on flag leaf";"10= >15% leaf area affected on flag leaf";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501027";"FertSpkN_Ct_SplSpk";"FERTSPKN_SPLSPK";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500007";"Fertile spikelet number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of fertile spikelets per spike.";;"FertSpkN";;"Spike";"Number";;;"CO_321:0500123";"Fertile SplN Counting";"Counting";"Average count of fertile spikelets per spike.";;;"CO_321:0000440";"spikelet/spike";"Numerical";1;1;50;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501028";"FgramResp_E_1to9";"FRAM_1_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000925";"Fusarium graminearum plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium graminearum response in the plants.";;"FgramResp";;"Spike";"Fusarium graminearum plant response";;;"CO_321:0000703";"FgramResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Fusarium graminearum response.";;;"CO_321:0500520";"1-9 response scale";"Ordinal";1;1;9;;"1= Resistant";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5=";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9= Susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501029";"FGramSev_GH_E_pct";"FGRAM_GH_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000926";"Fusarium graminearum severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium graminearum severity in the plants.";;"FgramSev";"FGRAML";"Spike";"Fusarium graminearum severity";;;"CO_321:0500124";"FgramSev Greenhouse Estimation";"Estimation";"Average percent of inoculated heads infected with Fusarium head blight (FHB) in greenhouse tests.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501030";"FHBDI_Calc_pct";"FHBDI_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500019";"Fusarium head blight disease index";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) disease index. Index calculated as the disease incidence x severity/100, where incidence= % infected spikes in the sample (non-zero spikes/total spikes evaluated x 100), and severity= % of infected spikelets per spike.";;"FHBDI";;"Plant";"Fusarium head blight disease index";;;"CO_321:0500125";"FHB Disease Index Computation - Average";"Computation";"For trials where the FHB disease index was calculated at multiple time points, this variable holds the average FHB disease index across each time point.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501038";"FHBDON_15ADON_M_ppm";"FHB_15ADON_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000652";"Fusarium head blight DON content";"Biotic stress traits";"Content of deoxynivalenol or don (vomitoxin) that is often associated with fhb (fusarium spp.) infected grains.";;"FHBDON";;"Grain";"Fusarium head blight DON content";;;"CO_321:0500135";"FHB15-ADON Measurement";"Measurement";"Concentration of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) in the acetylated form 15-ADON.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501039";"FHBDON_3ADON_M_ppm";"FHB_3ADON_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000652";"Fusarium head blight DON content";"Biotic stress traits";"Content of deoxynivalenol or don (vomitoxin) that is often associated with fhb (fusarium spp.) infected grains.";;"FHBDON";;"Grain";"Fusarium head blight DON content";;;"CO_321:0500136";"FHB3-ADON Measurement";"Measurement";"Concentration of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) in the acetylated form 3-ADON.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501040";"FHBFlorets_M_pct";"FHBFLORETS_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500020";"Fusarium head blight diseased florets";"Biotic stress traits";"Percentage of florets infected with Fusarium head blight (FHB) following point inoculation.";;"FHBFlorets";;"Spike";"Fusarium head blight diseased florets";;;"CO_321:0500133";"FHB Infected Florets Measurement";"Measurement";"Percentage of florets infected with Fusarium head blight (FHB) following point inoculation.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501041";"FHBISK_Calc_pct";"FHBISK_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500021";"Fusarium head blight ISK index";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium head blight (scab) ISK Index.";;"FHBISK";;"Plant";"Fusarium head blight ISK index";;;"CO_321:0500134";"FHB ISK Index Computation";"Computation";"Fusarium disease index that combines FHB incidence, FHB severity, and FHB grain (kernel) incidence (ISK)";" calculated as 0.3 * FHB incidence + 0.3 * FHB severity + 0.4 * FHB grain incidence.";;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501042";"FLeafAng_E_1to9";"FLEAFANG_1_9";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500008";"Flag leaf angle";"Morphological traits";"Visual estimation of flag leaf angle";;"FLeafAng";;"Flag leaf";"Flag leaf angle";;;"CO_321:0500143";"Flag Leaf Angle Estimation - Z50";"Estimation";"Flag leaf angle is scored based on the visual estimate of flag leaf angle at Zadock scale 50 (inflorescence emergence). Leaf angle score: 1=100% flag leaves full upright. 9=100% flag leaves very lax";;;"CO_321:0500519";"1-9 Leaf Angle Rating";"Ordinal";1;1;9;;"1= 100% flag leaves full upright";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5=";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9= 100% flag leaves very lax";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501044";"FLeafChl_M_spad";"FLEAFCHL_spad";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500009";"Flag leaf chlorophyll content";"Physiological traits";"Chlorophyll content of the flag leaf";;"FLeafChl";;"Flag leaf";"Flag leaf chlorophyll";;;"CO_321:0500145";"FLeafChl Measurement";"Measurement";"Chlorophyll content of the flag leaf measured by a SPAD (Special Products Analysis Division of Minolta) meter. A SPAD unit is not directly related to optical transmission through a leaf.";;;"CO_321:0500527";"spad";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501047";"FLeafGlau_E_0to10";"FLEAFGLAU_0_10";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500010";"Flag leaf glaucousness";"Morphological traits";"Assessment of glaucousness in flag leaf";;"FLeafGlau";;"Flag leaf";"Flag leaf glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0500144";"Flag Leaf Glaucousness Estimation";"Estimation";"Assessment of glaucousness in flag leaf i.e. visual manifestation of epicuticular wax; no glaucousness= 0, fully covered= 10.";;;"CO_321:0500506";"0-10 Glaucousness Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;10;;"0= no glaucousness";"1=";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5=";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9=";"10= fully covered";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501048";"FLeafGreenTime_Calc_day";"FLEAFGREENTIME_days, FLEAFGREENDAYS";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500012";"Flag leaf stay-green time";"Phenological traits";"Number of days between heading and flag leaf senescence (= flag leaf senescence - days to heading).";;"FLeafGreenTime";;"Flag leaf";"Flag leaf green time";;;"CO_321:0500148";"FLeafGreenTime Computation";"Computation";"Number of days between heading and flag leaf senescence (= flag leaf senescence - days to heading).";;;"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";0;40;240;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501049";"FLeafLWid_M_cm";"FLAGLEAFWID_cm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001525";"Flag leaf lamina width";"Morphological traits";"Width of flag leaf lamina.";;"FLeafLWid";;"Flag leaf lamina";"Width";;;"CO_321:0001581";"FLeafLWid Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for flag leaf lamina width.";;;"CO_321:0000411";"cm";"Numerical";1;5;90;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501050";"FLeafSen_M_0to9";"FLEAFSEN_0_9";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000194";"Flag leaf senescence";"Physiological traits";"Flag leaf senescence.";;"FLeafSen";"FlagSen";"Flag leaf";"Senescence";;;"CO_321:0500149";"FLeafSen Estimation";"Estimation";"Assessment of the extent of flag leaf senescence i.e. the progressive yellowing of the flag leaf.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501053";"FLeafSenTime_Calc_day";"FLEAFSENTIME_days, FLEAFSENDAYS";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500011";"Flag leaf senescence time";"Phenological traits";"Number of days required for 50% of the flag leaves to lose green color.";;"FLeafSenTime";"FlagSenTime";"Flag leaf";"Flag leaf senescence time";;;"CO_321:0500152";"FLeafSenTime Computation";"Computation";"Number of days required for 50% of the flag leaves to lose green color.";;;"CO_321:0000434";"day";"Duration";0;40;240;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501054";"FlrYld_E_sd";"FLRYLD_sd";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000068";"Flour yield";"Quality traits";"Proportion of flour recovered during milling.";;"FlrYld";"FlrYd";"Flour";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0500153";"FlrYld Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard deviations from the mean flour yield of check varieties. Questionable= -1, above average= 1.";;;"CO_321:0500501";"-1 to 1 standard deviations";"Numerical";1;-1;1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501055";"ForAsh_M_pct";"FORASH_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500013";"Forage ash content";"Quality traits";"Ash concentration of forage";;"ForAsh";;"Plant";"Forage Ash";;;"CO_321:0500154";"ForAsh NIR Measurement";"Measurement";"Measurement of Forage Ash by NIR";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501056";"ForFib_M_pct";"FORFIB_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500014";"Forage fiber content";"Quality traits";"Fober concentration of forage";;"ForFib";;"Plant";"Forage Fiber";;;"CO_321:0500155";"ForFib NIR Measurement";"Measurement";"Measurement of Forage Fiber by NIR";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501057";"ForgDM_Calc_kgha";"FORGDM_kg_ha";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001032";"Forage dry matter";"Agronomical traits";"Forage dry matter.";;"ForgDM";;"Plant";"Forage dry matter";;;"CO_321:0500156";"ForgDM Computation";"Computation";"Computation of above ground biomass, on dry weight basis, of plant material at heading (DS55).";;;"CO_321:0000804";"kg/ha";"Numerical";0;0;20000;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501058";"ForMst_M_pct";"FORMST_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500015";"Forage moisture content";"Quality traits";"Moisture in forage sample";;"ForMst";;"Plant";"Forage Moisture";;;"CO_321:0500157";"ForMst NIR Measurement";"Measurement";"Measurement of Forage Moisture";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501059";"ForNDF_M_pct";"FORNDF_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500016";"Forage NDF content";"Quality traits";"Neutral detergent fiber concentration of forage";;"ForNDF";;"Plant";"Forage NDF";;;"CO_321:0500158";"ForNDF NIR Measurement";"Measurement";"Measurement of Forage NDF by NIR";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501060";"ForPrt_M_pct";"FORPRT_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500017";"Forage protein content";"Quality traits";"Protein concentration of forage";;"ForPrt";;"Plant";"Forage Protein";;;"CO_321:0500159";"ForPrt NIR Measurement";"Measurement";"Measurement of Forage Protein by NIR";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501061";"ForStr_M_pct";"FORSTR_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500018";"Forage starch content";"Quality traits";"Starch concentration of forage";;"ForStr";;"Plant";"Forage Starch";;;"CO_321:0500160";"ForStr NIR Measurement";"Measurement";"Measurement of Forage Starch by NIR";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501062";"FrostDmg_E_0to3";"FROSTDMG_0_3";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000127";"Frost damage";"Abiotic stress traits";"Plant damage caused by frost.";;"FrostDmg";"DMPFRO";"Plant";"Frost damage";;;"CO_321:0000341";"FrostDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Score the spike damage caused by frost.";;"Reynolds et al., 2001 (Ch. 9)";"CO_321:0500509";"0-3 injury scale";"Ordinal";1;0;3;;"0= no injury";"1= minimal injury";"2= moderate injury";"3= maximum injury";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501063";"GArse_M_ppm";"GRNARSE_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500024";"Grain Arsenic content";"Quality traits";"Content of Arsenic in grain.";;"GArse";"GRNARSE";"Grain";"Arsenic content";;;"CO_321:0500161";"GArsenic Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain arsenic content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501064";"GCadm_M_ppm";"GRNCADM_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500026";"Grain Cadmium content";"Quality traits";"Content of Cadmium in grain.";;"GCadm";"GRNCADM";"Grain";"Cadmium content";;;"CO_321:0500162";"GCadmium Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain cadmium content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501065";"GCalc_M_ppm";"GRNCALC_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500027";"Grain Calcium content";"Quality traits";"Content of Calcium in grain.";;"GCalc";"GRNCALC";"Grain";"Calcium content";;;"CO_321:0500163";"GCalcium Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain calcium content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501066";"GCoba_M_ppm";"GRNCOBA_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500028";"Grain Cobalt content";"Quality traits";"Content of Cobalt in grain.";;"GCoba";"GRNCOBA";"Grain";"Cobalt content";;;"CO_321:0500164";"GCobalt Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain cobalt content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501067";"GCopp_M_ppm";"GRNCOPP_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500029";"Grain Copper content";"Quality traits";"Content of Copper in grain.";;"GCopp";"GRNCOPP";"Grain";"Copper content";;;"CO_321:0500165";"GCopper Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain copper content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501068";"GHrd_Calc_skcs";"GHRD_skcs";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000072";"Grain hardness";"Quality traits";"Grain hardness is used as a grading factor to determine the type of wheat. It is a key determinant for classification of wheat and end product quality.";"Grain texture";"GHrd";"HRDCLS, GRNHRD";"Grain";"Hardness";;;"CO_321:0500227";"Single Kernel Characterization System Computation";"Computation";"Grain hardness analysis using the single kernel characterization system 4100 (SKCS, Perten Instruments, Huddinge, Sweden).";;;"CO_321:0500526";"skcs index";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501069";"Glau_E_1to9";"GLAU_1_9";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500022";"Glaucousness";"Morphological traits";"Overall plant glaucousness";"waxiness";"Glau";;"Plant";"Glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0500166";"Glau Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimation of overall plant glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0500518";"1-9 Glaucousness Rating";"Ordinal";1;1;9;;"1= No glaucousness";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5=";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9= Very dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501070";"GLead_M_ppm";"GRNLEAD_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500030";"Grain lead content";"Quality traits";"Content of Lead in grain.";;"GLead";"GRNLEAD";"Grain";"Lead content";;;"CO_321:0500167";"GLead Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain lead content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501071";"GLith_M_ppm";"GRNLITH_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500031";"Grain Lithium content";"Quality traits";"Content of Lithium in grain.";;"GLith";"GRNLITH";"Grain";"Lithium content";;;"CO_321:0500168";"GLithium Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain lithium content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501072";"GlmPub_M_0to1";"GLMPUB_0_1";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500023";"Glume pubescence presence";"Morphological traits";"The presence of fine hairs on the external face of the glumes";"glume pubescence";"GlmPub";;"Glume";"Glume pubescence";;;"CO_321:0500169";"Glume Pubescence Presence Measurement";"Measurement";"Glume pubescence scored as absence/presence (0/1)";;;"CO_321:0500502";"0-1 Absence/Presence";"Ordinal";1;0;1;;"0= Absent";"1= Present";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501073";"GLys_M_pct";"GLYS_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000967";"Grain lysine content";"Quality traits";"Lysine content of the kernel/grain.";;"GLys";;"Grain";"Lysine content";;;"CO_321:0500170";"GLys Protein Measurement";"Measurement";"Lysine in the grain, expressed as percent of protein.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501074";"GMagn_M_ppm";"GRNMAGN_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500032";"Grain Magnesium content";"Quality traits";"Content of Magnesium in grain.";;"GMagn";"GRNMAGN";"Grain";"Magnesium content";;;"CO_321:0500171";"GMagnesium Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain magnesium content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501075";"GMang_M_ppm";"GRNMANG_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500033";"Grain Manganese content";"Quality traits";"Content Manganese in grain.";;"GMang";"GRNMANG";"Grain";"Manganese content";;;"CO_321:0500172";"GManganese Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain manganese content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501076";"GMoly_M_ppm";"GRNMOLY_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500034";"Grain Molybdenum content";"Quality traits";"Content of Molybdenum in grain.";;"GMoly";"GRNMOLY";"Grain";"Molybdenum content";;;"CO_321:0500173";"GMolybdenum Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain molybdenum content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501077";"GN_10Spk_M_grain";"GN_10Spk_grain";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000017";"Grain number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of grains expressed as per unit area or sample.";"Kernel number";"GN";"GNO, GrnNo, KrnNo, KN";"Grain";"Number";;;"CO_321:0500174";"GN 10 Spikes Estimation";"Estimation";"Grain number counted from 10 spikes of the main tillers";;;"CO_321:0500524";"grain";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501078";"GNick_M_ppm";"GRNNICK_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500035";"Grain Nickel content";"Quality traits";"Content of Nickel in grain.";;"GNick";"GRNNICK";"Grain";"Nickel content";;;"CO_321:0500175";"GNickel Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain nickel content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501079";"GPota_M_ppm";"GRNPOTA_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500036";"Grain Potassium content";"Quality traits";"Content of Potasium in grain.";;"GPota";"GRNPOTA";"Grain";"Potasium content";;;"CO_321:0500176";"GPotassium Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain potassium content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501080";"GrnAsh_M_pct";"GRNASH_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500025";"Grain ash content";"Quality traits";"Grain ash concentration";;"GrnAsh";;"Grain";"Grain ash";;;"CO_321:0500177";"Grain Ash Measurement";"Measurement";"Grain ash concentration determined by NIR infrared transmittance at 12% moisture";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501081";"GrwHabit_E_1to4";"GRWHABIT_1_4";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000015";"Plant growth habit";"Agronomical traits";"The growth habit of the plant whether erect/semi-erect/semi-spreading/spreading/prostrate.";;"GrwHabit";"GHabit";"Plant";"Growth habit";;;"CO_321:0000238";"GrwHabit Estimation";"Estimation";"Observe the growth habit of wheat plants during tillering stages and rate whether erect/semi-erect/prostrate/semi-spreading/spreading";;;"CO_321:0500515";"1-4 Growth Habit Rating";"Ordinal";1;1;4;;"1= erect";"2=";"3=";"4= prostrate";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501082";"GSulp_M_ppm";"GRNSULP_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500037";"Grain Sulphur content";"Quality traits";"Content of Sulphur in grain.";;"GSulp";"GRNSULP";"Grain";"Sulphur content";;;"CO_321:0500179";"GSulphur Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for grain sulphur content.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501083";"GW_30Spk_E_g";"GW_30_g";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;;"CO_321:0500182";"GW Estimation";"Estimation";"Grain yield (g dwt) from 1 m row cut at physiological maturity (DS87).";;;"CO_321:0001593";"g";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501084";"GW_Calc_mg";"GW_mg";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;;"CO_321:0500228";"SKCS Computation";"Computation";"Grain weight using the single kernel characterization system 4100 (SKCS, Perten Instruments, Huddinge, Sweden).";;;"CO_321:0500525";"mg";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501085";"GW_E_g";"GW_g";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;;"CO_321:0500183";"GY 10 Spikes Estimation";"Estimation";"Grain yield expressed in kilograms per hectare, measured from ten spikes on the main tillers.";;;"CO_321:0000804";"kg/ha";"Numerical";0;0;20000;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501086";"GW_E_g1000grn";"TGW_MAIN, TKW_MAIN, THOUWT_MAIN, TGW_MAIN_g";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;;"CO_321:0500181";"GW 30 Spikes Estimation";"Estimation";"Weight of seeds from 30 wheat spikes.";;;"CO_321:0001593";"g";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501087";"GWid_M_mm";"GWID_mm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500038";"Grain Width";"Morphological traits";"Width of grain";;"GWid";;"Grain";"Grain width";;;"CO_321:0500178";"Grain Width Measurement";"Measurement";"Grain width analysis using the single kernel characterization system 4100 (SKCS, Perten Instruments, Huddinge, Sweden)";;;"CO_321:0000428";"mm";"Numerical";1;2;40;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501088";"GY_E_kgha";"GY_MAIN_kgha";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;;"CO_321:0500180";"GW 10 Spikes Estimation";"Estimation";"Seed size estimated by weighing 1000 seeds from ten spikes on the main tillers.";;;"CO_321:0001033";"g/1000 grain";"Numerical";1;20;70;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501089";"HesFlyDmg_B_E_0to9";"HESFDMG_B_0_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000088";"Hessian fly damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by hessian fly, Maytiola destructor.";;"HesFlyDmg";"HESFDMG";"Plant";"Hessian fly damage";;;"CO_321:0500184";"HesFlyDmg BiotypeB Estimation";"Estimation";"Plant response to hessian fly biotype B";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501090";"HesFlyDmg_C_E_0to9";"HESFDMG_C_0_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000088";"Hessian fly damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by hessian fly, Maytiola destructor.";;"HesFlyDmg";"HESFDMG";"Plant";"Hessian fly damage";;;"CO_321:0500185";"HesFlyDmg BiotypeC Estimation";"Estimation";"Plant response to hessian fly biotype C";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501091";"HesFlyDmg_D_E_0to9";"HESFDMG_D_0_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000088";"Hessian fly damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by hessian fly, Maytiola destructor.";;"HesFlyDmg";"HESFDMG";"Plant";"Hessian fly damage";;;"CO_321:0500186";"HesFlyDmg BiotypeD Estimation";"Estimation";"Plant response to hessian fly biotype D";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501092";"HesFlyDmg_E_1to9";"HESFDMG_1_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000088";"Hessian fly damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by hessian fly, Maytiola destructor.";;"HesFlyDmg";"HESFDMG";"Plant";"Hessian fly damage";;;"CO_321:0000309";"HesFlyDmg Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for hessian fly damage.";;"Duveiller et al., 2012";"CO_321:0500520";"1-9 response scale";"Ordinal";1;1;9;;"1= Resistant";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5=";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9= Susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501093";"HesFlyDmg_L_E_0to9";"HESFDMG_L_0_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000088";"Hessian fly damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by hessian fly, Maytiola destructor.";;"HesFlyDmg";"HESFDMG";"Plant";"Hessian fly damage";;;"CO_321:0500187";"HesFlyDmg BiotypeL Estimation";"Estimation";"Plant response to hessian fly biotype L";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501094";"HesFlyDmg_O_E_0to9";"HESFDMG_O_0_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000088";"Hessian fly damage";"Biotic stress traits";"The plant damage caused by hessian fly, Maytiola destructor.";;"HesFlyDmg";"HESFDMG";"Plant";"Hessian fly damage";;;"CO_321:0500188";"HesFlyDmg BiotypeO Estimation";"Estimation";"Plant response to hessian fly biotype O";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501095";"InfertSpkN_E_0to10";"INFERTSPKN_0_10";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001484";"Infertile spike number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of infertile spikelet per spike.";;"InfertSpkN";"InflSPKLSP";"Spike";"Number";;;"CO_321:0500189";"InfertSpkN Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimation of the number of infertile spikelets per spike.";;;"CO_321:0500507";"0-10 Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;10;;"0=0%";"1= 10%";"2= 20%";"3= 30%";"4= 40%";"5= 50%";"6= 60%";"7= 70%";"8= 80%";"9= 90%";"10= 100%";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501096";"LASRC_Rating_sd";"LASRC_RATING";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500039";"Lactic Acid SRC";"Quality traits";"Lactic acid solvent retention capacity";;"LASRC";;"Flour";"Lactic Acid SRC";;;"CO_321:0500191";"Lactic Acid SRC Rating Estimation";"Estimation";"Lactic acid solvent retention capacity (SRC) rated as the standard deviations from the mean lactic acid SRC of check varieties. Questionable= -1, above average= 1.";;;"CO_321:0500501";"-1 to 1 standard deviations";"Numerical";1;-1;1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501097";"LASRC_Score_pct";"LASRC_SCORE";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500039";"Lactic Acid SRC";"Quality traits";"Lactic acid solvent retention capacity";;"LASRC";;"Flour";"Lactic Acid SRC";;;"CO_321:0500190";"Lactic Acid SRC Score Estimation";"Estimation";"Measure of gluten strength. Typical values are below 85% for weak soft varieties, and above 105% or 110% for strong soft varieties.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501098";"Lodg_E_Z50_pct";"LODG_Z50_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000167";"Lodging incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Indicates incidence of lodged plants.";;"Lodg";"LOD";"Plant";"Lodging incidence";;;"CO_321:0500192";"Lodg Z50 Estimation";"Estimation";;;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501099";"Lodg_E_Z55_pct";"LODG_Z55_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000167";"Lodging incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Indicates incidence of lodged plants.";;"Lodg";"LOD";"Plant";"Lodging incidence";;;"CO_321:0500193";"Lodg Z55 Estimation";"Estimation";;;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501100";"Mat_canopy_jd";"MAT_CANOPY_jd";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000022";"Maturity time";"Phenological traits";"Maturity time starts at hard dough stage (ds87) often called physiological maturity.";;"Mat";"Mt, M, Maturity";"Plant";"Maturity time";;;"CO_321:0500194";"Mat DS87 canopy Estimation";"Estimation";"Julian calendar date of canopy maturity i.e. when 50% of the green canopy completely loses color.";;;"CO_321:0000855";"Julian date (JD)";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501101";"Mat_Spk_jd";"MAT_SPK_JD";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000022";"Maturity time";"Phenological traits";"Maturity time starts at hard dough stage (ds87) often called physiological maturity.";;"Mat";"Mt, M, Maturity";"Plant";"Maturity time";;;"CO_321:0500195";"Mat DS87 spike Estimation";"Estimation";"Julian calendar date of spike maturity i.e. when 50% of the spikes completely lose color.";;;"CO_321:0000855";"Julian date (JD)";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501102";"MQ_Rating_1to6";"MQ_RATING";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500041";"Milling quality";"Quality traits";"Flour yield of a genotype relative to the standard variety used for that nursery";;"MQ";;"Flour";"Milling quality";;;"CO_321:0500196";"Milling Quality Rating Estimation";"Estimation";"Flour yield of a genotype relative to the standard variety used for that nursery. A= 1, B= 2, C= 3, D= 4, E= 5, F= 6.";;;"CO_321:0500517";"1-6 Grade Rating";"Ordinal";1;1;6;;"1= A";"2= B";"3= C";"4= D";"5= E";"6= F";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501103";"MQ_Score_pct";"MQ_SCORE";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500041";"Milling quality";"Quality traits";"Flour yield of a genotype relative to the standard variety used for that nursery";;"MQ";;"Flour";"Milling quality";;;"CO_321:0500197";"Milling Quality Score Estimation";"Estimation";"Flour yield adjusted by comparison to a check variety.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501104";"MSE_Rating_1to6";"MSE_RATING";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500042";"Modified softness equivalent";"Quality traits";"Softness equivalent is a flour particle size test that is correlated to break flour yields. Softness equivalent rating of a genotype relative to the standard variety used for that nursery.";;"MSE";;"Flour";"Modified softness equivalent";;;"CO_321:0500198";"MSE Rating Estimation";"Estimation";"Softness equivalent is a flour particle size test that is correlated to break flour yields. Softness equivalent rating of a genotype relative to the standard variety used for that nursery. A= 1, B= 2, C= 3, D= 4, E= 5, F= 6.";;;"CO_321:0500517";"1-6 Grade Rating";"Ordinal";1;1;6;;"1= A";"2= B";"3= C";"4= D";"5= E";"6= F";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501105";"MSE_Score_pct";"MSE_SCORE";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500042";"Modified softness equivalent";"Quality traits";"Softness equivalent is a flour particle size test that is correlated to break flour yields. Softness equivalent rating of a genotype relative to the standard variety used for that nursery.";;"MSE";;"Flour";"Modified softness equivalent";;;"CO_321:0500199";"MSE Score Estimation";"Estimation";"Softness equivalent is a flour particle size test that is correlated to break flour yields";" score calculated as (grain weight - bran weight) - mids / (grain weight - bran weight). Smaller amounts of mids means smaller particle size, greater break flour, greater SE. Adjusted to 15% moisture.";;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501106";"MTW_M_g";"MTW_g";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500040";"Micro Test Weight";"Biotic stress traits";"Micro Test Weight";;"MTW";;"Plant";"Micro test weight";;;"CO_321:0500200";"MTW Measurement";"Measurement";"The fixed Column weight of the VSK sample that fits in a 15.7 mL copper vessel measuring 20 mm in diameter and 50 mm in height";;;"CO_321:0001593";"g";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501107";"NIV_M_ppm";"NIV_ppm";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500043";"Nivalenol level";"Biotic stress traits";"Nivalenol concentration";;"NIV";;"Plant";"Nivalenol level";;;"CO_321:0500201";"Nivalenol Measurement";"Measurement";"Measure of the level of the compound Nivalenol.";;;"CO_321:0000425";"ppm";"Numerical";1;1;15;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501108";"PedGlau_E_0to4";"PEDGLAU_0_4";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000054";"Peduncle glaucousness";"Morphological traits";"Glaucousness in peduncle.";;"PedGlau";;"Peduncle";"Glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0000274";"PedGlau Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for peduncle glaucousness.";;;"CO_321:0500511";"0-4 Glaucousness Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;4;;"0= No glaucousness";"1=";"2=";"3=";"4= Fully covered";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501109";"PgramInc_E_pct";"PGRAM_pct__INC";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500053";"Stem rust incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) incidence in the plants caused by the agenct Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici.";;"PgramInc";;"Plant";"Stem rust incidence";;;"CO_321:0500209";"Rust Incidence Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimation of stem rust incidence";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501110";"PgramInf_BCCBC_E_0to9";"PGRAM_BCCBC_0_9__INF";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500054";"Stem rust infection type";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) infection type exhibited by seedlings inoculated during greenhouse trials.";;"PgramInf";;"Plant";"Stem rust infection type";;;"CO_321:0500212";"Rust Infection Type BCCBC Estimation";"Estimation";"A qualitative analysis of the type of disease symptoms exhibited by seedlings inoculated with stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) race BCCBC during greenhouse trials. The original ratings, made using the scale from Stakman et al. (1962), were converted to a 0-9 linear disease scale for analysis: 0, 1-, 1, 1+, 2-, 2 2+, 3-, 3, 3+ were coded as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, respectively (Zhang et al, 2014).";;"Zhang et al, 2014";"CO_321:0500514";"0-9 Stakman Scale Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;9;;"0= 0";"1= 1-";"2= 1";"3= 1+";"4= 2-";"5= 2";"6= 2+";"7= 3-";"8= 3";"9= 3+";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501111";"PgramInf_FIELD_E_0to9";"PGRAM_FIELD_0_9__INF";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500054";"Stem rust infection type";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) infection type exhibited by seedlings inoculated during greenhouse trials.";;"PgramInf";;"Plant";"Stem rust infection type";;;"CO_321:0500213";"Rust Infection Type Field Bulk Estimation";"Estimation";"A qualitative analysis of the type of disease symptoms exhibited by seedlings inoculated with stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) a bulk of stem rust races from the field during greenhouse trials. The original ratings, made using the scale from Stakman et al. (1962), were converted to a 0-9 linear disease scale for analysis: 0, 1-, 1, 1+, 2-, 2 2+, 3-, 3, 3+ were coded as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, respectively (Zhang et al, 2014).";;"Zhang et al, 2014";"CO_321:0500514";"0-9 Stakman Scale Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;9;;"0= 0";"1= 1-";"2= 1";"3= 1+";"4= 2-";"5= 2";"6= 2+";"7= 3-";"8= 3";"9= 3+";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501112";"PgramInf_JRCQC_E_0to9";"PGRAM_JRCQC_0_9__INF";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500054";"Stem rust infection type";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) infection type exhibited by seedlings inoculated during greenhouse trials.";;"PgramInf";;"Plant";"Stem rust infection type";;;"CO_321:0500214";"Rust Infection Type JRCQC Estimation";"Estimation";"A qualitative analysis of the type of disease symptoms exhibited by seedlings inoculated with stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) race JRCQC during greenhouse trials. The original ratings, made using the scale from Stakman et al. (1962), were converted to a 0-9 linear disease scale for analysis: 0, 1-, 1, 1+, 2-, 2 2+, 3-, 3, 3+ were coded as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, respectively (Zhang et al, 2014).";;"Zhang et al, 2014";"CO_321:0500514";"0-9 Stakman Scale Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;9;;"0= 0";"1= 1-";"2= 1";"3= 1+";"4= 2-";"5= 2";"6= 2+";"7= 3-";"8= 3";"9= 3+";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501113";"PgramInf_TRTTF_E_0to9";"PGRAM_TRTTF_0_9__INF";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500054";"Stem rust infection type";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) infection type exhibited by seedlings inoculated during greenhouse trials.";;"PgramInf";;"Plant";"Stem rust infection type";;;"CO_321:0500215";"Rust Infection Type TRTTF Estimation";"Estimation";"A qualitative analysis of the type of disease symptoms exhibited by seedlings inoculated with stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) race TRTTF during greenhouse trials. The original ratings, made using the scale from Stakman et al. (1962), were converted to a 0-9 linear disease scale for analysis: 0, 1-, 1, 1+, 2-, 2 2+, 3-, 3, 3+ were coded as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, respectively (Zhang et al, 2014).";;"Zhang et al, 2014";"CO_321:0500514";"0-9 Stakman Scale Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;9;;"0= 0";"1= 1-";"2= 1";"3= 1+";"4= 2-";"5= 2";"6= 2+";"7= 3-";"8= 3";"9= 3+";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501114";"PgramInf_TTKSK_E_0to9";"PGRAM_TTKSK_0_9__INF";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500054";"Stem rust infection type";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) infection type exhibited by seedlings inoculated during greenhouse trials.";;"PgramInf";;"Plant";"Stem rust infection type";;;"CO_321:0500216";"Rust Infection Type TTKSK Estimation";"Estimation";"A qualitative analysis of the type of disease symptoms exhibited by seedlings inoculated with stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) race TTKSK during greenhouse trials. The original ratings, made using the scale from Stakman et al. (1962), were converted to a 0-9 linear disease scale for analysis: 0, 1-, 1, 1+, 2-, 2 2+, 3-, 3, 3+ were coded as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, respectively (Zhang et al, 2014).";;"Zhang et al, 2014";"CO_321:0500514";"0-9 Stakman Scale Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;9;;"0= 0";"1= 1-";"2= 1";"3= 1+";"4= 2-";"5= 2";"6= 2+";"7= 3-";"8= 3";"9= 3+";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501115";"PgramInf_TTTF_E_0to9";"PGRAM_TTTTF_0_9__INF";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500054";"Stem rust infection type";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) infection type exhibited by seedlings inoculated during greenhouse trials.";;"PgramInf";;"Plant";"Stem rust infection type";;;"CO_321:0500217";"Rust Infection Type TTTTF Estimation";"Estimation";"A qualitative analysis of the type of disease symptoms exhibited by seedlings inoculated with stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici) race TTTTF during greenhouse trials. The original ratings, made using the scale from Stakman et al. (1962), were converted to a 0-9 linear disease scale for analysis: 0, 1-, 1, 1+, 2-, 2 2+, 3-, 3, 3+ were coded as 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, respectively (Zhang et al, 2014).";;"Zhang et al, 2014";"CO_321:0500514";"0-9 Stakman Scale Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;9;;"0= 0";"1= 1-";"2= 1";"3= 1+";"4= 2-";"5= 2";"6= 2+";"7= 3-";"8= 3";"9= 3+";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501116";"PgramResp_E_0to1";"PGRAM_0_1__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000177";"Stem rust plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici.";"Stem rust";"PgramResp";"PGRAM";"Plant";"Stem rust plant response";;;"CO_321:0500210";"Rust Infection Response Estimation - Final";"Estimation";"A qualitative anaylsis of the type of stem rust (Puccinia graminis f. sp. Tritici) symptoms that are exhibited. Infection responses are limited to: Resistant (R): small uredinia surrounded by chlorosis or necrosis ; Moderately resistant (MR): medium sized uredinia surrounded by chlorosis or necrosis ; Moderately susceptible (MS): medium-large compatible uredinia without chlorosis and necrosis ; Susceptible (S): large, compatible uredinia without chlorosis and necrosis. The following numerical scale has been used to quantify conventional notations of infection response: R= 0.2, MR= 0.4, MS= 0.8, S= 1.0 (Yu et al. 2011). Stem rust infection response is typically recorded in conjunction with stem rust severity.";;;"CO_321:0500504";"0-1 Rating";"Numerical";1;0;1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501118";"PgramSev_E_0to9";"PGRAM_0_9__SEV";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000905";"Stem rust severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Stem rust (black rust) severity in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici.";"Stem rust";"PgramSev";"PGRAM";"Plant";"Stem rust severity";;;"CO_321:0000693";"Rust severity Estimation";"Estimation";"Severity of rust is recorded as a percentage, according to the modified Cobb scale. As this relies upon observation it cannot be absolutely accurate. Thus it is common to use the following intervals: 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 100 percent infection.";;"Peterson et al., 1948, Roelfs et al., 1992, McIntosh et al., 1995";"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501120";"PlntStnd_E_0to9";"PLNTSTND_0_9";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000187";"Plant stand";"Agronomical traits";"Plant population or plant density.";"Plant establishment, Crop stand, Plant density, Plant population";"PlntStnd";"Pstand";"Plant";"Stand";;;"CO_321:0500202";"PlntStnd Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimation of the number of living plants.";;;"CO_321:0000450";"0-9 density scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= absent";"3= sparse";"4= sparse to intermediate";"1= very sparse";"2= very sparse to sparse";"7= dense";"8= dense to very dense";"5= intermediate";"6= intermadiate to dense";"9= very dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501121";"PPOActivity_E_au";"PPOActivity_au";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500044";"Polyphenol oxidase activity";"Quality traits";"Measures oxidation of an L-DOPA substrate to a red-colored product as an indirect measure of PPO activity";;"PPOActivity";"PPO";"Flour";"PPO activity";;;"CO_321:0500203";"PPO Activity Estimation";"Estimation";"Measures oxidation of an L-DOPA substrate to a red-colored product as an indirect measure of PPO activity";;;"CO_321:0500503";"0-1 Absorbance Units";"Numerical";1;0;1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501122";"PrecoResp_E_0to1";"PRECO_0_1__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000178";"Leaf rust plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoResp";"BwRustResp, LRResp";"Leaf";"Leaf rust plant response";;;"CO_321:0000706";"PrecoResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf rust response.";;"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0500505";"0-1 response";"Numerical";1;0;1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501123";"PrecoResp_E_0to9";"PRECO_0_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000178";"Leaf rust plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoResp";"BwRustResp, LRResp";"Leaf";"Leaf rust plant response";;;"CO_321:0000706";"PrecoResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for leaf rust response.";;"Roelfs et al., 1992";"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501124";"PrecoSdlgResp_CA1.2_E_0to9";"PRECO_CA1.2_0_9__SEEDRESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000901";"Leaf rust seedling response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoSdlgResp";"BwRustSdlgResp, LRSdlgResp";"Seedling";"Leaf rust seedling response";;;"CO_321:0500204";"PrecoResp Seedling CA1.2 Estimation";"Estimation";"Leaf rust seedling response to CA1.2";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501125";"PrecoSdlgResp_E_0to4";"PRECO_0_4__SEEDRESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000901";"Leaf rust seedling response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoSdlgResp";"BwRustSdlgResp, LRSdlgResp";"Seedling";"Leaf rust seedling response";;;"CO_321:0500205";"PrecoResp Seedling Estimation";"Estimation";"Leaf rust seedling response";;;"CO_321:0500510";"0-4 disease rating with qualifiers";"Ordinal";;;;;"0=";"1=";"2=";"3=";"4=";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501126";"PrecoSdlgResp_FieldMix_E_0to9";"PRECO_FIELDMIX_0_9__SEEDRESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000901";"Leaf rust seedling response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoSdlgResp";"BwRustSdlgResp, LRSdlgResp";"Seedling";"Leaf rust seedling response";;;"CO_321:0500206";"PrecoResp Seedling Field Mix Estimation";"Estimation";"Leaf rust seedling response to Field Mix";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501127";"PrecoSdlgResp_Race1_E_0to9";"PRECO_RACE1_0_9__SEEDRESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000901";"Leaf rust seedling response";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";;"PrecoSdlgResp";"BwRustSdlgResp, LRSdlgResp";"Seedling";"Leaf rust seedling response";;;"CO_321:0500207";"PrecoResp Seedling Race 1 Estimation";"Estimation";"Leaf rust seedling response to Race 1";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501138";"SBMVCI_Calc_0to5";"SBMVCI_0_5__CI";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500049";"Soil borne mosaic infection coefficient";"Biotic stress traits";"Soil borne mosaic infection coefficient";;"SBMVCI";;"Plant";"Soil borne mosaic infection coefficient";;;"CO_321:0500223";"SBMV Infection Coefficient";"Computation";"Calculation of soil borne mosaic coefficient of infection";;;"CO_321:0500512";"0-5 Rating";"Ordinal";1;0;5;;"0= disease free";"1=";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5= severe disease symptoms";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501139";"SBMVInc_E_pct";"SBMV_pct__INC";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000173";"Soil borne mosaic incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Soil borne mosaic incidence in the plants caused by the agent soilborne wheat mosaic virus (sbwmv) which is vectored by Plasmodiophorid polymyxa graminis.";;"SBMVInc";"SBMV";"Leaf";"Soil borne mosaic incidence";;;"CO_321:0000359";"SBMVInc Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for soil borne mosaic virus incidence.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501140";"SBMVResp_E_0to9";"SBMV_0_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500050";"Soil borne mosaic plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Soil borne mosaic response in the plants caused by the agent Polymyxa graminis.";;"SBMVResp";;"Plant";"Soil borne moasic plant response";;;"CO_321:0500224";"SBMV Response Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimation of plant response to wheat soil-borne mosaic virus";;;"CO_321:0500513";"0-9 Response Scale";"Ordinal";1;0;9;;"0= resistant";"1=";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5=";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9= susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501141";"SE_Rating_sd";"SE_RATING";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500048";"Softness equivalent";"Quality traits";"Softness equivalent is a flour particle size test that is correlated to break flour yields";;"SE";;"Flour";"Softness equivalent";;;"CO_321:0500225";"SE Rating Estimation";"Estimation";"Rated as the standard deviations from the mean softness equivalent of check varieties. Questionable= -1, above average= 1.";;;"CO_321:0500501";"-1 to 1 standard deviations";"Numerical";1;-1;1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501142";"SE_Score_pct";"SE_SCORE";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500048";"Softness equivalent";"Quality traits";"Softness equivalent is a flour particle size test that is correlated to break flour yields";;"SE";;"Flour";"Softness equivalent";;;"CO_321:0500226";"SE Score Estimation";"Estimation";"Score calculated as (grain weight - bran weight) - mids / (grain weight - bran weight). Smaller amounts of mids means smaller particle size, greater break flour, greater SE. Not adjusted to standard moisture.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501143";"Shattering_E_0to9";"SHATTERING_0_9";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000057";"Spike shattering";"Agronomical traits";"Observation of grains dehiscence from spike at maturity.";;"Shattering";"Rachis brittleness";"Spike";"Shattering";;;"CO_321:0000278";"Shattering Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for spike shattering.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501144";"SnodoResp_E_0to9";"SNODO_0_9__RESP";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500047";"Septoria nodorum blotch plant response";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria nodorum blotch plant response caused by the agent Stagonospora nodorum (syn. Septoria glume blotch) (Phaeosphaeria nodorum (E. Müller) Hedjaroude (syn. Stagonospora nodorum).";;"SnodoResp";;"Plant";"Septoria nodorum blotch response";;;"CO_321:0500229";"SnodoResp Estimation";"Estimation";"Rating of Septoria nodorum blotch plant response.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501145";"SnodoSev_E_0to9";"SNODO_0_9__SEV";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000717";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Stagonospora nodorum (syn. Septoria glume blotch) (Phaeosphaeria nodorum (E. Müller) Hedjaroude (syn. Stagonospora nodorum).";;"SnodoSev";;"Plant";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0000991";"SnodoSev Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for Septoria nodorum blotch severity.";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501146";"SnodoSev_Spike_E_0to9";"SNODO_SPIKE_0_9__SEV";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000717";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity in the plants caused by the agent Stagonospora nodorum (syn. Septoria glume blotch) (Phaeosphaeria nodorum (E. Müller) Hedjaroude (syn. Stagonospora nodorum).";;"SnodoSev";;"Plant";"Septoria nodorum blotch severity";;;"CO_321:0500230";"SnodoSev Spike Estimation";"Estimation";"Rating of Septoria nodorum blotch severity of symptoms on spikes";;;"CO_321:0000446";"0-9 percentage scale";"Ordinal";1;;;;"0= No visible affection";"3= 30% coverage";"4= 40% coverage";"1= 10% coverage";"2= 20% coverage";"7= 70% coverage";"8= 80% coverage";"5= 50% coverage";"6= 60% coverage";"9= 90% coverage";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501147";"SpkCol_E_1to5";"SPKCOL_1_5";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500051";"Spike Color";"Morphological traits";"Color of spike.";;"SpkCol";;"Spike";"Spike color";;;"CO_321:0500231";"SpkCol Estimation";"Estimation";"Visual rating of spike color during grain filling";;;"CO_321:0500516";"1-5 Color Rating";"Ordinal";1;1;5;;"1= yellow/green";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5= blue";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501148";"SpkDW_M_g";"SPKDW_g";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001523";"Spike dry weight";"Agronomical traits";"Dry weight of spike(s).";;"SpkDW";;"Spike";"Spike dry weight";;;"CO_321:0500232";"SpkDW Measurement";"Measurement";"Spike weight (grain + glumes/rachis/awns) in g dwt m-1 row from plants cut at physiological maturity (DS87).";;;"CO_321:0001593";"g";"Numerical";1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501149";"SpkGlau_E_1to9";"SPKGLAU_1_9";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500052";"Spike glaucousness";"Morphological traits";"Glaucousness on spike";;"SpkGlau";;"Spike";"Spike glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0500233";"SpkGlau Estimation";"Estimation";"Estimation of spike glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0500518";"1-9 Glaucousness Rating";"Ordinal";1;1;9;;"1= No glaucousness";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5=";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9= Very dense";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501150";"SpkGlau_M_0to1";"SPKGLAU_0_1";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500052";"Spike glaucousness";"Morphological traits";"Glaucousness on spike";;"SpkGlau";;"Spike";"Spike glaucousness";;;"CO_321:0500234";"SpkGlau Presence Measurement";"Measurement";"Spike glaucousness scored as absence/presence (0/1)";;;"CO_321:0500502";"0-1 Absence/Presence";"Ordinal";1;0;1;;"0= Absent";"1= Present";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501151";"SSRC_Rating_sd";"SSRC_Rating";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500055";"Sucrose SRC";"Quality traits";"Sucrose solvent retention capacity (SRC) is the best predictor of cookie quality.";;"SSRC";;"Flour";"Sucrose SRC";;;"CO_321:0500235";"Sucrose SRC Rating Estimation";"Estimation";"Rated as the standard deviations from the mean sucrose SRC of check varieties. Questionable= -1, above average= 1.";;;"CO_321:0500501";"-1 to 1 standard deviations";"Numerical";1;-1;1;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501152";"SSRC_Score_pct";"SSRC_Score";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500055";"Sucrose SRC";"Quality traits";"Sucrose solvent retention capacity (SRC) is the best predictor of cookie quality.";;"SSRC";;"Flour";"Sucrose SRC";;;"CO_321:0500236";"Sucrose SRC Score Estimation";"Estimation";"Sugar snap cookie diameters decrease by 0.07 cm for each percentage point increase in sucrose SRC score.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501153";"StmDia_M_1to9";"STMDIA_1_9";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000062";"Stem diameter";"Morphological traits";"Stem outer diameter.";"Straw diameter, Culm diameter";"StmDia";"STMDIA";"Stem";"Diameter";;;"CO_321:0000284";"StmDia Measurement";"Measurement";"Standard method for stem diameter.";;;"CO_321:0500521";"1-9 Thickness Rating";"Ordinal";1;1;9;;"1= Very Thin";"2=";"3=";"4=";"5=";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9= Maximal Thickness";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501154";"StmSol_E_5to25";"STMSOL_5_25";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000061";"Stem solidness";"Morphological traits";"Solidness of stem.";"Culm solidness";"StmSol";;"Stem";"Solidness";;;"CO_321:0000283";"StmSol Estimation";"Estimation";"Standard method for stem solidness.";;;"CO_321:0500522";"5-25 5 Stem Solidness Rating";"Ordinal";1;5;25;;"5= All 5 Stems Hollow";"6=";"7=";"8=";"9=";"10=";"11=";"12=";"13=";"14=";"15=";"16=";"17=";"18=";"19=";"20=";"21=";"22=";"23=";"24=";"25= All 5 Stems Solid";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501155";"VegPrt_M_pct";"VEGPRT_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"21-dec-18";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500056";"Vegetative protein content at maturity";"Quality traits";"Protein concentration of vegetative biomass harvested at physiological maturity";;"VegPrt";;"Plant";"Vegetative protein";;;"CO_321:0500237";"Vegetative Protein Measurement";"Measurement";"Protein concentration of vegetative biomass harvested at physiological maturity";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:0501156";"CanopySen_Avg_M_pct";"CANOPYSEN_AVG_pct";"Trial evaluation";;;;"T3";"Jean-Luc Jannink";"03-Feb-19";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0500003";"Canopy senescence";"Physiological traits";"Percentage (%) of leaf area (canopy) that has lost green color during the process of physiological maturity";;"CanopySen";;"Canopy";"Canopy Senescence";;;"CO_321:0500238";"Canopy Senescence Measurement - Average";"Measurement";"Percentage (%) of leaf area (canopy) that has lost green color during the process of physiological maturity - average of observations.";;;"CO_321:0000410";"%";"Numerical";1;0;100;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000003";"ABSN.Z65.Z92_kg/ha";"Post-anthesis nitrogen absorption";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000003";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010001";"Post-anthesis nitrogen absorption ";"Agronomical";;;;"PANU";"plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1020027";"ABSN.Z92 - ABSN.Z65";"Computation";;"(ABSN.Z92 - ABSN.Z65)";;"UO:0000283";"kg/ha";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000283";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000004";"AE_score";"Anther extrusion";;;;"WIPO:0000004";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010002";"Anther extrusion";"Morphological";;;;;"Anther";"extrusion";;;"CO_321:1021083";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030002";"1 to 5 note";"Ordinal";;;;;"1=weak extrusion";"5=strong extrusion";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000005";"A-F0(<=10)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 10mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000005";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021082";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000006";"A-F1(<=12)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 12mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000006";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021081";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000007";"A-F2(<=14)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 14mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000007";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021080";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000008";"A-F3(<=16)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 16mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000008";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021079";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000009";"A-F4(<=18)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 18mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000009";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021078";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000010";"A-F5(<=20)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 20mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000010";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021077";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000011";"A-F6(<=22)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 22mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000011";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021076";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000012";"A-F7(<=24)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 24mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000012";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021075";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000013";"A-F8(<=26)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 26mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000013";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021074";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000014";"A-F9(<=28)_%";"Grain with area inferior to 28mm2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000014";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010003";"Grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1021073";"Automated grain physical analysis";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000015";"AGDM_g/m2";"Above-ground dry matter per area";;;;"WIPO:0000015";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000005";"Aboveground biomass";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass.";"Biological yield, All above-ground biomass at maturity, Above-ground dry matter";"BM";"AGBM, BMMat, BIOMAS";"Plant";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";;"WIPO:0010004";"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030003";"g/m2";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000016";"AGDM.Z65.Z92_t/ha";"Post-anthesis dry matter assimilation";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000016";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010100";"Post-anthesis dry matter assimilation";"Agronomical";" (AGDM.Z92 - AGDM.Z65)";;;;"Plant";"Aboveground biomass";;;"CO_321:1021072";"Dry Matter assimilation ratio";"Estimation";"(AGDM.Z92 - AGDM.Z65)";;;"CO_321:1030003";"g/m2";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000018";"AGDM.Z92_g/m2";"Above-ground dry matter per area at harvest";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000018";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000005";"Aboveground biomass";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass.";"Biological yield, All above-ground biomass at maturity, Above-ground dry matter";"BM";"AGBM, BMMat, BIOMAS";"Plant";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";;"WIPO:0010004";"CO_321:1021070";"Post harvest direct measure";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030003";"g/m2";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000026";"D.Z00_jj/mm/aa";"Sowing date (Z00)";;"Z.00 (Dry seed)";;"WIPO:0000026";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_715:0000007";"Sowing date";"Phenological";;;;;"Study";"event";;;"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030007";"jj/mm/aa ";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000029";"D.Z10_jj/mm/aa";"Plant emergence (Z10)";;"Z10 (First leaf through coleoptile)";;"WIPO:0000029";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000021";"Emergence time";"Phenological";;"Plant emergence";;;"plant";"emergence";;;"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030008";"jj/mm/aa";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000032";"D.Z30_jj/mm/aa";"Ear at 1cm (Z30)";;"Z30 (Pseudostem (youngest leaf sheath erection))";;"WIPO:0000032";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010104";"Ear at 1cm";"Phenological";;;;;"plant";"ear time";;;"CO_321:1021067";"Visual estimation";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030008";"jj/mm/aa";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000035";"D.Z55_jj/mm/aa";"Ear emergence (Z55) / D.Z55.DAYS_SUM_jj/mm/aa";;"Z55 (Ear half emerged)";;"WIPO:0000035";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010012";"Ear emergence";"Phenological";;;;;"ear";"emergence";;;"CO_321:1020005";"Direct measure spike";"Measurement";"Arvalis methode: 50% spikes half emerged";;;"CO_321:1030008";"jj/mm/aa";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000036";"D.Z55_d";"Ear emergence (Z55) / D.Z55.DAYS_SUM_d";;"Z55 (Ear half emerged)";;"WIPO:0000036";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010012";"Ear emergence";"Phenological";;;;;"ear";"emergence";;;"CO_321:1020005";"Direct measure spike";"Measurement";"Arvalis methode: 50% spikes half emerged";;;"CO_321:1030012";"d";"Duration";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000037";"D.Z55_dd";"Ear emergence (Z55) / D.Z55.DAYS_SUM_dd";;"Z55 (Ear half emerged)";;"WIPO:0000037";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010012";"Ear emergence";"Phenological";;;;;"ear";"emergence";;;"CO_321:1020005";"Direct measure spike";"Measurement";"Arvalis methode: 50% spikes half emerged";;;"CO_321:1030013";"dd";"Duration";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000038";"D.Z65_jj/mm/aa";"Flowering date (Z65)";;"Z65 (Anthesis half-way (anthers occurring half way to tip and base of ear))";;"WIPO:0000038";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010013";"Flowering date";"Phenological";;;;;"plant";"flower time";;;"CO_321:1020006";"Direct measure spikes stamen";"Measurement";"Arvalis methode: 50% spikes visible stamen";;;"CO_321:1030008";"jj/mm/aa";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000039";"D.Z65_d";"Flowering date (Z65)";;"Z65 (Anthesis half-way (anthers occurring half way to tip and base of ear))";;"WIPO:0000039";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010013";"Flowering date";"Phenological";;;;;"plant";"flower time";;;"CO_321:1020006";"Direct measure spikes stamen";"Measurement";"Arvalis methode: 50% spikes visible stamen";;;"CO_321:1030012";"d";"Duration";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000041";"D.Z92_jj/mm/aa";"Harvest date (Z92)";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000041";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_715:0000008";"Harvest date";"Phenological";;;;;"Study";"event";;;"CO_321:1021066";"Visual estimation";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030008";"jj/mm/aa ";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000047";"EFFG_%";"Grain nitrogen coming from remobilization";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000047";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010016";"Grain nitrogen coming from remobilization";"Agronomical";"Grain nitrogen coming from remobilization (REMN / GNY)";;;;"Grain";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1021065";"REMN / GNY";"Estimation";"ratio between REMN / GNY";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000048";"EFFREMN_%";"Nitrogen remobilization efficiency";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000048";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010017";"Nitrogen remobilization efficiency";"Agronomical";"Nitrogen remobilization efficiency (REMN / ABSN.Z65)";;;;"plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1021064";"REMN / ABSN.Z65";"Estimation";"ratio between REMN / ABSN.Z65";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000049";"SEN-END_d";"End of senescence computed from anthesis date";;;;"WIPO:0000049";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010018";"End of senescence converted from flowering date ";"Morphological";;;;;"plant";"Senescence";;;"CO_321:1020033";"Senescence computed from anthesis";"Computation";"(SEN-START + SEN-DUR)";;;"CO_321:1030012";"d";"Duration";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000051";"ENR-F1.Z69_score";"Leaf F1 rolling (Z69)";;"Z69 (Anthesis complete)";;"WIPO:0000051";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010108";"Leaf rolling";"Morphological";;;;;"leaf";"rolling";;;"CO_321:1021063";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000052";"ENR-F1.Z75_score";"Leaf F1 rolling (Z75)";;"Z75 (Medium milk)";;"WIPO:0000052";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010108";"Leaf rolling";"Morphological";;;;;"leaf";"rolling";;;"CO_321:1021062";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000053";"ENR-F1.Z83_score";"Leaf F1 rolling (Z83)";;"Z83 (Early dough)";;"WIPO:0000053";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010108";"Leaf rolling";"Morphological";;;;;"leaf";"rolling";;;"CO_321:1021061";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000054";"AGDM.Z65_t/ha";"Above-ground dry matter per area at anthesis";;"Z65 (Anthesis half-way (anthers occurring half way to tip and base of ear))";;"WIPO:0000054";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000005";"Aboveground biomass";"Agronomical traits";"All above-ground biomass.";"Biological yield, All above-ground biomass at maturity, Above-ground dry matter";"BM";"AGBM, BMMat, BIOMAS";"Plant";"Aboveground biomass at maturity";;"WIPO:0010004";"CO_321:1020007";"Direct measure for 0,7 m2";"Measurement";"Arvalis method : on 0.7 m2";;;"CO_321:1030003";"g/m2";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000055";"N.Z65_%";"Above-ground nitrogen concentration (Z65)";;"Z65 (Anthesis half-way (anthers occurring half way to tip and base of ear))";;"WIPO:0000055";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010109";"Above-ground nitrogen concentration";"Quality";;;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1020008";"Direct measure Dumas";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: Analyse Dumas / NIRS";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000056";"FUS-FDK_%";"Fusarium dammaged kernels";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000056";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010101";"Fusarium dammaged kernels";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Grain";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1020009";"manual harvest";"Measurement";"manual harvest";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000058";"FUS-SPK.350DD_%";"Spikes with fusarium at 350DD post fusarium inoculation (INOC+350DD)";;"INOC+350DD";;"WIPO:0000058";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010115";"Infected spikes observed on 100 spikes";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1020043";"Infected spikes observed on 100 spikes";"Measurement";;;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000059";"FUS-SPK.450DD_%";"Spikes with fusarium at 450DD post fusarium inoculation (INOC+450DD)";;"INOC+450DD";;"WIPO:0000059";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010115";"Infected spikes observed on 100 spikes";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1020043";"Infected spikes observed on 100 spikes";"Measurement";;;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000067";"GNC_%";"Grain nitrogen concentration";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000067";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010105";"Grain nitrogen concentration";"Quality";;;;;"Grain";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1020010";"15 spikes direct measure";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: on 15 spikes ";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000068";"GNY_kg/ha";"Grain nitrogen yield";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000068";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010106";"Grain nitrogen yield";"Quality";;;;;"Grain";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1020008";"Direct measure Dumas";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: Analyse Dumas / NIRS";" (GY x GNC) / 100";;"UO:0000283";"kg/ha";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000283";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000069";"GPA";"Grains per area";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000069";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000017";"Grain number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of grains expressed as per unit area or sample.";"Kernel number";"GN";"GNO, GrnNo, KrnNo, KN";"Grain";"Number";;"WIPO:0010107";"CO_321:1020010";"15 spikes direct measure";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: on 15 spikes ";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000070";"GPC_%";"Grain protein concentration, protein content";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000070";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010015";"Grain protein concentration";"Quality";;;;;"Grain";"protein";;;"CO_321:1020012";"Direct measure NIRS";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: NIRS measure on harvester ";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000072";"G/P";"Grain to straw dry matter ratio";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000072";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010098";"Grain to straw dry matter ratio";"Agronomical";;;;;"Grain";"dry matter";;;"CO_321:1020010";"15 spikes direct measure";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: on 15 spikes ";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000074";"GY_q/ha";"Grain yield at 0% humidity , rdt";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000074";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;"WIPO:0010019";"CO_321:1020013";"Direct measure harvest 0% humidity";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: Mechanised harvest 0% humidity";;;"CO_321:1030011";" q/ha";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000076";"GY15";"Grain yield at 15% humidity ";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000076";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;"WIPO:0010019";"CO_321:1020014";"Direct measure harvest 15% humidity";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: Mechanised harvest 15% humidity";;;"CO_321:1030011";" q/ha";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000078";"PLOT-HA_m2";"Plot harvested area";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000078";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010021";"Plot harvested area";"Agronomical";;;;;"plot";"harvest";;;"CO_321:1021055";"Direct measure";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000080";"m2";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000080";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000079";"SPIKELENGTH.Z30_mm";"Spike length (mm) (Z30)";;"Z30 (Pseudostem (youngest leaf sheath erection))";;"WIPO:0000079";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000056";"Spike length";"Morphological traits";"Length of spike.";;"SpkLng";;"Spike";"Length";;"WIPO:0010022";"CO_321:1021054";"Direct measure";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030017";"mm";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000080";"HI";"Harvest index";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000080";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000123";"Harvest index";"Agronomical traits";"A ratio of grain yield to total above ground biomass.";"Biomass partitioning to grain";"HI";;"Plant";"Biomass partitioning to grain";;"WIPO:0010023";"CO_321:1021053";"Harvest index estimation";"Estimation";"A ratio of grain yield to total above ground biomass.";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000081";"AIR-HYGRO";"Hygrometry";;;;"WIPO:0000081";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010024";"Hygrometry";"Abiotic stress";"Air Humidity";;;;"Air";"Humidity";;;"CO_321:1020021";"Wheather station measure";"Measurement";"Wheather station measure";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000085";"FUS-INOC-DATE_jj/mm/aa";"Fusarium inoculation date";;;;"WIPO:0000085";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010026";"Fusarium inoculation date";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1021050";"Direct observation";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030008";"jj/mm/aa";"Date";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000086";"FUS-INOC-GROUP";"Fusarium inoculation group";;;;"WIPO:0000086";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010027";"Fusarium inoculation group";"Biotic stress";"Depending on inoculation date";;;;"Plant";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1021049";"Direct observation";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000087";"SEN-DUR_d";"Senescence phase duration in day";;;;"WIPO:0000087";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010028";"Senescence duration";"Morphological";;;;;"Plant";"Senescence";;;"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030012";"d";"Duration";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000088";"SEN-DUR_dd";"Senescence phase duration in degree day";;;;"WIPO:0000088";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010028";"Senescence duration ";"Morphological";;;;;"Plant";"Senescence";;;"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030013";"dd";"Duration";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000089";"L-F0(<=4.5)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 4.5mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000089";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000090";"L-F1(<=5.0)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 5.0mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000090";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000091";"L-F2(<=5.5)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 5.5mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000091";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000092";"L-F3(<=6.0)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 6.0mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000092";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000093";"L-F4(<=6.5)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 6.5mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000093";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000094";"L-F5(<=7.0)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 7.0mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000094";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000095";"L-F6(<=7.5)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 7.5mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000095";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000096";"L-F7(<=8.0)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 8.0mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000096";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000097";"L-F8(<=8.5)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 8.5mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000097";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000098";"L-F9(<=9.0)_%";"Grain with length inferior to 9.0mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000098";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056,WIPO:0010029";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000099";"LS_score";"Lodging score, Susceptibility to lodging";;;;"WIPO:0000099";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000167";"Lodging incidence";"Agronomical traits";"Indicates incidence of lodged plants.";;"Lodg";"LOD";"Plant";"Lodging incidence";;"WIPO:0010030";"CO_321:1020016";"Direct measure lodging";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: 1-10 scale based on lodged surface percentage and lodge angle";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000100";"MARVIN-NBGRAINS";"Marvin used grains number";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000100";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000017";"Grain number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of grains expressed as per unit area or sample.";"Kernel number";"GN";"GNO, GrnNo, KrnNo, KN";"Grain";"Number";;"WIPO:0010131";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000101";"FUS-SCORE_score";"Fusarium score, Susceptibility to fusarium head blight";;;;"WIPO:0000101";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000924";"Fusarium graminearum incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Fusarium graminearum incidence in the plants.";;"FgramInc";"FGRAML";"Spike";"Fusarium graminearum incidence";;;"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000104";"FUS-SPK_%";"Spikelets with fusarium";;;;"WIPO:0000104";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010096";"Spikelets with fusarium";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Spikelet";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1021048";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000105";"FUS-SPK.350DD_score";"Spikes with fusarium at 350DD post fusarium inoculation (INOC+350DD)";;"INOC+350DD";;"WIPO:0000105";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010095";"Spikes with fusarium post fusarium inoculation";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Spike";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1021047";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000106";"FUS-SPK.450DD_score";"Spikes with fusarium at 450DD post fusarium inoculation (INOC+450DD)";;"INOC+450DD";;"WIPO:0000106";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010095";"Spikes with fusarium post fusarium inoculation";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Spike";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1021046";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000107";"FUS-SCORE.350DD_score";"Fusarium score at 350DD post fusarium inoculation (INOC+350DD)";;"INOC+350DD";;"WIPO:0000107";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010097";"Fusarium score post fusarium inoculation";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1021045";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000108";"FUS-SCORE.450DD_score";"Fusarium score at 450DD post fusarium inoculation (INOC+450DD)";;"INOC+450DD";;"WIPO:0000108";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010097";"Fusarium score post fusarium inoculation";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1021044";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000109";"ST-SCORE_score";"Septoria score, Susceptibility to septoria tritici";;;;"WIPO:0000109";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000919";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence in the plants caused by the agent Mycosphaerella graminicola (Septoria tritici). symptoms: the lesions are linear and restricted laterally.";"Septoria score";"StritInc";"STRIT";"Plant";"Septoria tritici blotch incidence";;"WIPO:0010033";"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000110";"ST-INOC-DATE_jj/mm/aa";"Septoria inoculation date";;;;"WIPO:0000110";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010034";"Septoria inoculation date";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"Septoria";;;"CO_321:1021043";"Direct observation";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030008";"jj/mm/aa ";"Time";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000113";"ST-FDI";"Septoria tritici - Field Disease Index";;;;"WIPO:0000113";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010035";"Septoria tritici - Field Disease Index";"Biotic stress";"FLAG est la feuille drapeau FLAG-1 est la feuille sous la feuille drapeau (avant derniere feuille) . Pour chaque interaction 5 feuilles FLAG et 5 feuilles FLAG-1 sont notees sur une echelle de 0 a 9. FLAGmean et FLAG-1mean correspondent a la moyenne de ces 5 notes.";;;;"Plant";"Septoria";;;"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;"calculated measure FDI=[(FLAGmean+1)/10]*[(FLAG-1mean+1)/10]*100";;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000114";"ST-F1-SCORE_score";"Septoria score on leaf 1";;;;"WIPO:0000114";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010036";"Septoria score on leaf ";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"Septoria";;;"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000115";"ST-F2-SCORE_score";"Septoria score on leaf 2";;;;"WIPO:0000115";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010036";"Septoria score on leaf ";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"Septoria";;;"CO_321:1020018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000116";"ST-SDI_score";"Septoria tritici - Seedling Disease Index";;;;"WIPO:0000116";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010037";"Septoria tritici - Seedling Disease Index";"Biotic stress";"GREEN, NECROSIS et PYCNIDIA respectively correspond to the innoculated surface percentage of the first true leaf (VERTE, NECROSEE, or SPORULANTE). The values of each parameters are therefore between 0 and 100%. Furthermore, GREEN+NECROSIS can not be above 100%.";;;;"Plant";"Septoria";;;"CO_321:1020041";"Seedling Disease Index measurement";"Measurement";;"ST-SDI=[(201-(2*%GREEN)+(1*%NECROSIS)+(3*%PYCNIDIA))/60]-[1/60]";;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000117";"ST-SPO_score";"Septoria sporulation score";;;;"WIPO:0000117";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010038";"Score septoriose : sporulations sur plantules";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"Septoria";;;"CO_321:1021042";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000119";"NDVI";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;;;"WIPO:0000119";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000301";"Canopy normalized difference vegetation index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized difference vegetation index is used to measure vegetative greenness and canopy photosynthetic size.";;"NDVI";;"Canopy";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;"WIPO:0010040";"CO_321:1020045";"NIRS computation";"Computation";" (NIRrefc-REDrefc)/(NIRrefc+REDrefc)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000120";"NDVI.Z71";"Normalized difference vegetation index (Z71)";;"Z71 (Kernel water ripe (no starch))";;"WIPO:0000120";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000301";"Canopy normalized difference vegetation index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized difference vegetation index is used to measure vegetative greenness and canopy photosynthetic size.";;"NDVI";;"Canopy";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;"WIPO:0010040";"CO_321:1020045";"NIRS computation";"Computation";" (NIRrefc-REDrefc)/(NIRrefc+REDrefc)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000121";"NDVI.Z73";"Normalized difference vegetation index (Z73)";;"Z73 (Early milk)";;"WIPO:0000121";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000301";"Canopy normalized difference vegetation index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized difference vegetation index is used to measure vegetative greenness and canopy photosynthetic size.";;"NDVI";;"Canopy";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;"WIPO:0010040";"CO_321:1020045";"NIRS computation";"Computation";" (NIRrefc-REDrefc)/(NIRrefc+REDrefc)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000122";"NDVI.Z75";"Normalized difference vegetation index (Z75)";;"Z75 (Medium milk)";;"WIPO:0000122";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000301";"Canopy normalized difference vegetation index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized difference vegetation index is used to measure vegetative greenness and canopy photosynthetic size.";;"NDVI";;"Canopy";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;"WIPO:0010040";"CO_321:1020045";"NIRS computation";"Computation";" (NIRrefc-REDrefc)/(NIRrefc+REDrefc)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000123";"NDVI.Z80";"Normalized difference vegetation index (Z80)";;"Z80 (Kernel no longer watery but still soft and dough-like.)";;"WIPO:0000123";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000301";"Canopy normalized difference vegetation index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized difference vegetation index is used to measure vegetative greenness and canopy photosynthetic size.";;"NDVI";;"Canopy";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;"WIPO:0010040";"CO_321:1020045";"NIRS computation";"Computation";" (NIRrefc-REDrefc)/(NIRrefc+REDrefc)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000124";"NDVI.Z65";"Normalized difference vegetation index (Z65)";;"Z65 (Anthesis half-way (anthers occurring half way to tip and base of ear))";;"WIPO:0000124";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000301";"Canopy normalized difference vegetation index";"Physiological traits";"Normalized difference vegetation index is used to measure vegetative greenness and canopy photosynthetic size.";;"NDVI";;"Canopy";"Normalized difference vegetation index";;"WIPO:0010040";"CO_321:1020045";"NIRS computation";"Computation";" (NIRrefc-REDrefc)/(NIRrefc+REDrefc)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000125";"ABSN-MAX.Z65_kg/ha";"Maximun above-ground nitrogen per area at anthesis";;"Z65 (Anthesis half-way (anthers occurring half way to tip and base of ear))";;"WIPO:0000125";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010046";"Maximun above-ground nitrogen";"Agronomical";;;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1020026";"top 5% of ABSN of the trial";"Measurement";;;"Cormier et al 2014";"UO:0000283";"kg/ha";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000283";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000134";"NT.Z13";"Tillers per area (Z13)";;"Z13 (Three leaves emerged)";;"WIPO:0000134";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000190";"Tiller number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of total tillers (fertile and infertile) per unit area, sample or plant.";;"TN";"TllNo, TNO";"Tiller";"Number";;"WIPO:0010044";"CO_321:1021038";"Direct measure";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000189";"count unit";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000189";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000136";"ABSN-MAX.Z92_kg/ha";"Maximun above-ground nitrogen per area at harvest";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000136";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010046";"Maximun above-ground nitrogen";"Agronomical";;;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1020026";"top 5% of ABSN of the trial";"Measurement";;;;"UO:0000283";"kg/ha";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000283";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000138";"NUE";"Nitrogen use efficiency";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000138";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010048";"Nitrogen use efficiency ";"Quality";" (GY / available N)";;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1021035";"Nitrogen use efficiency ratio estimation";"Estimation";" (GY / available N)";;;"CO_321:1030014";"kg biomasse/kg d'N";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000139";"NUE-prot";"Nitrogen use efficiency to protein";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000139";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010049";"N use efficiency to protein ";"Quality";" (GPC / available N)";;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1021034";"Nitrogen use efficiency to protein ratio estimation";"Estimation";" (GPC / available N)";;;"CO_321:1030099";"%/Kg";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000140";"NUpE.Z65_%";"Nitrogen uptake efficiency at anthesis (Z65)";;"Z65 (Anthesis half-way (anthers occurring half way to tip and base of ear))";;"WIPO:0000140";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010050";"N uptake efficiency";"Quality";" (ABSN / available N)";;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1021033";"N uptake efficiency";"Estimation";" (ABSN / available N)";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000141";"NUpE.Z92_%";"Nitrogen uptake efficiency at maturity (Z92)";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000141";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010050";"N uptake efficiency";"Quality";" (ABSN / available N)";;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1021032";"N uptake efficiency";"Estimation";" (ABSN / available N)";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000142";"NUtE";"Nitrogen utilisation efficiency";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000142";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010052";"Nitrogen utilisation efficiency ";"Quality";"(GY / ABSN)";;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1021031";"Nitrogen use efficiency ratio estimation";"Estimation";"(GY / ABSN)";;;"CO_321:1030014";"kg biomasse/kg d'N";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000143";"NUtE-prot";"Nitrogen utilisation efficiency to protein";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000143";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010053";"Nitrogen utilisation efficiency to protein";"Quality";"(GPC / ABSN)";;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1021030";"Nitrogen utilisation efficiency to protein ratio estimation";"Estimation";"(GPC / ABSN)";;;"CO_321:1030015";"% de proteines/kg N/ha";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000144";"GRAIN-AREA_mm2";"Mean grain area";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000144";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010054";"Mean grain area";"Morphological";;;;;"Grain";"area";;;"CO_321:1020040";"Measure with Marvin or OptoMachine";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin or OptoMachine";;;"CO_321:1030016";"mm2";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000145";"PM-SCORE_score";"Powdey mildew score, Susceptibility to powdery mildew";;;;"WIPO:0000145";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000937";"Powdery mildew incidence";"Biotic stress traits";"Powdery mildew incidence in the plants caused by the agent Blumeria graminis (Erysiphe graminis) f. sp. tritici.";;"EgramInc";"EGRAM";"Leaf";"Powdery mildew incidence";;"WIPO:0010055";"CO_321:1021029";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000146";"GRAIN-LENGTH_mm";"Mean grain length";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000146";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000979";"Grain length";"Quality traits";"Length of whole grain.";;"GLng";"kernel length";"Grain";"Length";;"WIPO:0010056";"CO_321:1020040";"Measure with Marvin or OptoMachine";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin or OptoMachine";;;"CO_321:1030017";"mm";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000147";"GRAIN-WIDTH_mm";"Mean grain width";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000147";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000980";"Grain width";"Quality traits";"Width of whole grain.";;"GWid";"kernel width";"Grain";"Width";;"WIPO:0010057";"CO_321:1020040";"Measure with Marvin or OptoMachine";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin or OptoMachine";;;"CO_321:1030017";"mm";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000148";"PH_mm";"Plant height";;;;"WIPO:0000148";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000020";"Plant height";"Agronomical traits";"Height of plant from ground to top of spike, excluding awns.";;"PH";"PlntHt, PHt";"Plant";"Height";;"WIPO:0010058";"CO_321:1020030";"Direct measure with measuring rod";"Measurement";"Arvalis method : 5 measures with measuring rod";;;"CO_321:1030017";"mm";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000150";"PPA.Z11_plants/m2";"Plants per area (Z11)";;"Z11 (First leaf emerged)";;"WIPO:0000150";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010059";"Plants per area";"Quality";;;;;"Plant";"count";;;"CO_321:1021028";"Direct observation";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030018";"plants/m2";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000151";"PPA.Z13_plants/m2";"Plants per area (Z13)";;"Z13 (Three leaves emerged)";;"WIPO:0000151";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010059";"Plants per area";"Quality";;;;;"Plant";"count";;;"CO_321:1020007";"Direct measure for 0,7 m2";"Measurement";"Arvalis method : on 0.7 m2";;;"CO_321:1030018";"plants/m2";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000152";"BR-SCORE_1 to 9 score";"Brown rust score";;;;"WIPO:0000152";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010060";"Brown rust score";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"brown rust";;;"CO_321:1021027";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000159";"FUS-RelW";"Relative weight of fusarium-infected grains";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000159";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010093";"Fusarium fungal mass";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Grain";"Fusarium";;;"CO_321:1020044";"Infected/Non infected";"Computation";"Ratio infected grain weight/non infected grain weight";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000160";"REMN_kg/ha";"Post-anthesis N remobilization";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000160";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010063";"Post-anthesis nitrogen remobilization ";"Quality";"(ABSN.Z65 - NSA.Z92)";;;;"Plant";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1021026";"Post-anthesis nitrogen remobilization estimation";"Estimation";"(ABSN.Z65 - NSA.Z92)";;;"UO:0000283";"kg/ha";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000283";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000161";"RH_%";"Grain relative humidity";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000161";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000012";"Grain moisture content";"Agronomical traits";"Moisture content of grain.";"Grain humidity";"GMoi";"GRNH20, GrnMoist";"Grain";"Moisture content";;"WIPO:0010064";"CO_321:1020031";"Direct or computed measure on harvester";;"Arvalis method : Harvester on board measure, on harvest sample machine . Direct measure or (PF -PS)/PF*100";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000162";"YR-SCORE_score";"Yellow rust score, Susceptibility to stripe rust";;;;"WIPO:0000162";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000907";"Stripe rust notes";"Biotic stress traits";"Stripe rust (yellow rust) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia striiformis f.sp. tritici.";"Stripe rust, Disease score Yellow Rust";"PstriNote";"YRustNote, YRNote, PSTRIL";"Leaf";"Stripe rust notes";;"WIPO:0010065";"CO_321:1021025";"Score estimation";;"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000163";"SA";"Spikes per area, spikes/m2";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000163";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000055";"Spike density";"Morphological traits";"Density or compactness of a wheat spike.";"Spike compactness, ear compactness, Spikes per area ";"SpkDen";;"Spike";"Density";;"WIPO:0010066";"CO_321:1020032";"Direct measure nb of spikes per area";;"Arvalis method : from 0.25 to 0.7 m2";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000168";"SSPS";"Sterile spikelets per spike";;;;"WIPO:0000168";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000058";"Spikelet number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of spikelets per spike.";"Fertile spikelets per spike, spikelet / spike";"SplN";"SplNo";"Spikelet";"Number";;"WIPO:0010067";"CO_321:1021020";"Direct measure";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000169";"SEN-START_d";"Start of senescence computed from anthesis date";;;;"WIPO:0000169";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010068";"Start of senescence converted from flowering date";"Morphological";;;;;"Plant";"Senescence";;;"CO_321:1021019";"Direct observation from anthesis";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030012";"d ";"Duration";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000171";"STR-DM.Z92_kg/ha";"Straw dry matter at harvest (Z92)";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000171";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0001032";"Forage dry matter";"Agronomical traits";"Forage dry matter.";"Straw dry matter at harvest ";"ForgDM";;"Plant";"Forage dry matter";;;"CO_321:1020010";"15 spikes direct measure";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: on 15 spikes ";"Straw = (stem + leaf + shaff)";;"UO:0000009";"kg";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000009";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000172";"STR-N.Z92_%";"Straw nitrogen concentration (Z92)";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000172";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010070";"Staw nitrogen concentration";"Quality";;;;;"Straw";"nitrogen";;;"CO_321:1020010";"15 spikes direct measure";"Measurement";"Arvalis method: on 15 spikes ";"Straw = (stem + leaf + shaff)";;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000173";"SW_kg/hl";"Grain specific weight";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000173";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000159";"Grain test weight";"Quality traits";"Test weight or specific weight is the weight of a fixed volume of clean grains.";"Grain hectoliter weight, Grain specific weigh, Test weight";"TestWt";;"Grain";"Test weight";;"WIPO:0010071";"CO_321:1020034";"Direct measure on harvester";"Measurement";"Arvalis method : Harvester on board measure, on harvest sample machine ";;;"CO_321:1030019";"kg/hl";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000174";"T-CANOP.Z45_°C";"Canopy temperature (Z45)";;"Z45 (Boots swollen)";;"WIPO:0000174";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1021018";"Direct measure";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000175";"T-CANOP_°C";"Canopy temperature";;;;"WIPO:0000175";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1021017";"Direct measure";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000176";"MARVIN-GW";"Marvin used grains weight";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000176";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;"WIPO:0010073";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000177";"TKW_g";"Thousand grain weight at 0% humidity, PMG(g)";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000177";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;"WIPO:0010074";"CO_321:1020036";"1200 grains direct measure";"Measurement";"Arvalis method : on 1200 grains from mechanised harvest";;;"CO_321:1030010";"g";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000179";"TKW15_g";"Thousand grain weight at 15% humidity, PMG(g)";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000179";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;"WIPO:0010074";"CO_321:1021016";"Thousand grain weight at 15% humidity measure";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030010";"g";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000180";"TKWbrut_g";"Raw thousand grain weight, Thousand kernel weight at harvest humidity";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000180";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;"WIPO:0010074, WIPO:0010076";"CO_321:1021015";"Raw Thousand kernel weight measure";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030010";"g";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000181";"T-CANOP-MAX_°C";"Maximum canopy temperature";;;;"WIPO:0000181";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1020035";"Thermometer";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000182";"T-CANOP-MAX.Z75_°C";"Maximum canopy temperature (Z75)";;"Z75 (Medium milk)";;"WIPO:0000182";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1020035";"Thermometer";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000183";"T-CANOP-MIN_°C";"Minimum canopy temperature";;;;"WIPO:0000183";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1020035";"Thermometer";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000184";"T-CANOP-MIN.Z75_°C";"Minimum canopy temperature (Z75)";;"Z75 (Medium milk)";;"WIPO:0000184";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1020035";"Thermometer";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000185";"T-CANOP-MOY_°C";"Mean canopy temperature";;;;"WIPO:0000185";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1020035";"Thermometer";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000186";"T-CANOP-MOY.Z75_°C";"Mean canopy temperature (Z75)";;"Z75 (Medium milk)";;"WIPO:0000186";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1020035";"Thermometer";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000187";"T-CANOP-NEUTRE_°C";"Neutral canopy temperature";;;;"WIPO:0000187";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1020035";"Thermometer";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000188";"T-CANOP-REF.Z75_°C";"Reference canopy temperature (Z75)";;"Z75 (Medium milk)";;"WIPO:0000188";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000193";"Canopy temperature";"Physiological traits";"The surface temperature of the canopy is related to the amount of transpiration resulting in evaporative cooling.";;"CT";"CanoTemp, CanTemp";"Canopy";"Temperature";;"WIPO:0010072";"CO_321:1020035";"Thermometer";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030020";"°C";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000189";"TSPS";"Total spikelets per spike";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000189";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000058";"Spikelet number";"Agronomical traits";"Number of spikelets per spike.";"Fertile spikelets per spike, spikelet / spike";"SplN";"SplNo";"Spikelet";"Number";;"WIPO:0010080";"CO_321:1021014";"Direct observation";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000190";"PLOT-VALID_score";"Plot agronomic validity";;;;"WIPO:0000190";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010081";"Plot agronomic validity";"Morphological";;;;;"plot";"agronomy";;;"CO_321:1021013";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000191";"VI";"Vegetation index";;;;"WIPO:0000191";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010082";"Vegetation index";"Physiological";;;;;"plot";"index";;;"CO_321:1020020";;"Measurement";"GreenSeeker protocol (computed from measured wavelength on vegetation cover)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000192";"VI.Z71";"Vegetation index (Z71)";;"Z71 (Kernel water ripe (no starch))";;"WIPO:0000192";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010082";"Vegetation index";"Physiological";;;;;"plot";"index";;;"CO_321:1020020";;"Measurement";"GreenSeeker protocol (computed from measured wavelength on vegetation cover)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000193";"VI.Z73";"Vegetation index (Z73)";;"Z73 (Early milk)";;"WIPO:0000193";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010082";"Vegetation index";"Physiological";;;;;"plot";"index";;;"CO_321:1020020";;"Measurement";"GreenSeeker protocol (computed from measured wavelength on vegetation cover)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000194";"VI.Z75";"Vegetation index (Z75)";;"Z75 (Medium milk)";;"WIPO:0000194";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010082";"Vegetation index";"Physiological";;;;;"plot";"index";;;"CO_321:1020020";;"Measurement";"GreenSeeker protocol (computed from measured wavelength on vegetation cover)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000195";"VI.Z80";"Vegetation index (Z80)";;"Z80 (Kernel no longer watery but still soft and dough-like.)";;"WIPO:0000195";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010082";"Vegetation index";"Physiological";;;;;"plot";"index";;;"CO_321:1020020";;"Measurement";"GreenSeeker protocol (computed from measured wavelength on vegetation cover)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000196";"VI.Z85";"Vegetation index (Z85)";;"Z85 (Soft dough)";;"WIPO:0000196";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010082";"Vegetation index";"Physiological";;;;;"plot";"index";;;"CO_321:1020020";"Greenseeker protocol";"Measurement";"GreenSeeker protocol (computed from measured wavelength on vegetation cover)";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000190";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000197";"MARVIN-TKW_g";"Marvin estimated thousand kernel weight";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000197";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;"WIPO:0010083";"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"CO_321:1030010";"g";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000198";"W-F0(<=2.50)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 2.5mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000198";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000199";"W-F1(<=2.75)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 2.75mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000199";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000200";"W-F2(<=3.00)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 3.0mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000200";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000201";"W-F3(<=3.25)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 3.25mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000201";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000202";"W-F4(<=3.50)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 3.5mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000202";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000203";"W-F5(<=3.75)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 3.75mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000203";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000204";"W-F6(<=4.00)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 4.0mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000204";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000205";"W-F7(<=4.25)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 4.25mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000205";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000206";"W-F8(<=4.50)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 4.5mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000206";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000207";"W-F9(<=4.75)_%";"Grain with diameter inferior to 4.75mm";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000207";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010084";"Grain diameter";"Morphological";;;;;"grain";"Size";;;"CO_321:1020028";"Marvin";"Estimation";"Estimated with the Marvin";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;"http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UO_0000187";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000210";"GLAI_note";"Green leaf area index";;;;"WIPO:0000210";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000184";"Leaf area index";"Agronomical traits";"It is a dimensionless quantity that characterizes plant canopies and defined as the leaf area per unit ground surface area.";"Grain leaf area index";"LAI";;"Plant";"Leaf area index";;"WIPO:0010011";"CO_321:1021011";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030022";"surface verte globale du couvert note de 1 a 10";"Ordinal";;1;10;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000216";"HA";"Grain hardness";;"Z92 (Grain hard, not dented by thumbnail)";;"WIPO:0000216";"INRAE";"Jacques Le Gouis";"15/06/2016";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000072";"Grain hardness";"Quality traits";"Grain hardness is used as a grading factor to determine the type of wheat. It is a key determinant for classification of wheat and end product quality.";"Grain texture";"GHrd";"HRDCLS, GRNHRD";"Grain";"Hardness";;"WIPO:0010088";"CO_321:1021010";"Direct measure";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000217";"r";"Yield";;;;"WIPO:0000217";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000013";"Grain yield";"Agronomical traits";"Amount (weight) of grains that was harvested.";;"GY";"GrnYld, Yld";"Grain";"Yield";;"WIPO:0010019";"CO_321:1020029";"Reference variety comparaison";"Measurement";"Yield expressed as a percentage of the average yield of reference varieties.";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000218";"ht";"Height";;;;"WIPO:0000218";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000020";"Plant height";"Agronomical traits";"Height of plant from ground to top of spike, excluding awns.";;"PH";"PlntHt, PHt";"Plant";"Height";;"WIPO:0010058";"CO_321:1021009";"Direct measure";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000015";"cm";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000219";"prec";"Earliness at earing";;;;"WIPO:0000219";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010127";"Precocity";"Agronomical";;;;;"Plant";"ear time";;;"CO_321:1021008";"Direct observation";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030012";"d";"Duration";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000220";"ps";"Test weight";;;;"WIPO:0000220";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000025";"Grain weight";"Agronomical traits";"Grain weight usually expressed as weight of single, one hundred, two hundred or thousand grains.";"kernel weight";"GW";"GrnWt, GrnW, KW, KrnWt";"Grain";"Weight";;"WIPO:0010074";"CO_321:1020047";" Wheight of 100 litter of grain";"Measurement";;;;"CO_321:1030100";"kg/hl";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000221";"rb";"Susceptibility to leaf rust";;;;"WIPO:0000221";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:0000687";"Leaf rust notes";"Biotic stress traits";"Leaf rust (brown rust) incidence/severity/response in the plants caused by the agent Puccinia recondita.";"Susceptibility to leaf rust";"PrecoNote";"BrwRustInc, LRInc";"Leaf";"Leaf rust notes";;"WIPO:0010129";"CO_321:1020046";"Disease intensity score on a 1 to 9 increasing scale (1: no disease, 9: very severe).";;;;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000222";"zel";"Zeleny sedimentation test";;;;"WIPO:0000222";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010130";"Zeleny sedimentation test";"Other";;;;;"flour";"index";;;"CO_321:1021007";"Zeleny sedimentation test";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000098";"ml";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000223";"pel";"P/L: Alveograph Chopin: ratio tenacity/extensibility";;;;"WIPO:0000223";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010131";"ratio tenacity/extensibility";"Quality";;;;;"flour";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020054";"Alveograph Chopin";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000190";"ratio";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000224";"sds";"SDS sedimentation test";;;;"WIPO:0000224";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010132";"SDS sedimentation test";"Other";;;;;"flour";"quality";;;"CO_321:1021006";"SDS sedimentation test";"Measurement";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000098";"ml";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000225";"vp";"Potential viscosity ethanolic";;;;"WIPO:0000225";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010146";"Potential viscosity ethanolic";"Quality";;;;;"flour";"quality";;;"CO_321:1021005";"Potential viscosity ethanolic estimation";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000226";"W";"Alveograph Chopin: strength parameter";;;;"WIPO:0000226";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010156";"strength parameter";"Quality";;;;;"flour";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020054";"Alveograph Chopin";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000227";"P";"Alveograph Chopin: tenacity parameter";;;;"WIPO:0000227";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010155";"tenacity parameter";"Quality";;;;;"flour";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020054";"Alveograph Chopin";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000228";"L";"Alveograph Chopin: extensibility parameter";;;;"WIPO:0000228";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010154";"extensibility parameter";"Quality";;;;;"flour";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020054";"Alveograph Chopin";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000229";"P/L";"Pelshenke test";;;;"WIPO:0000229";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010153";"Pelshenke test";"Quality";"This method is based on the capacity of a ball of yeasted dough to retain the gas produced during fermentation. The method provides an indication of gluten strength in wheat, i.e., the longer the gas retention (time elapsed for ball to disintegrate), the higher the gluten strength. It is used as a screening method in wheat breeding.";;;;"flour";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020054";"Alveograph Chopin";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030101";"mn";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000230";"G";"Alveograph Chopin: swelling parameter";;;;"WIPO:0000230";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010152";"swelling parameter";"Quality";;;;;"flour";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020054";"Alveograph Chopin";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000231";"hag";"Hagberg falling number";;;;"WIPO:0000231";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010145";"hag";"Quality";;;;;"flour";"quality";;;"CO_321:1021004";"Hagberg falling number";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000232";"NpateC";"Breadmaking test CNERNA: dough score";;;;"WIPO:0000232";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010151";"dough score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020053";"Breadmaking test CNERNA";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000233";"NpainC";"Breadmaking test CNERNA: bread score";;;;"WIPO:0000233";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010150";"bread score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020052";"Breadmaking test CNERNA";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000234";"NtotC";"Breadmaking test CNERNA: total score";;;;"WIPO:0000234";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010148";"total score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020052";"Breadmaking test CNERNA";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000235";"volC";"Breadmaking test CNERNA: bread volume";;;;"WIPO:0000235";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010147";"bread volume";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020052";"Breadmaking test CNERNA";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000236";"NpateG";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: dough score";;;;"WIPO:0000236";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010151";"dough score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020051";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (G)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000237";"NpainG";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: bread score";;;;"WIPO:0000237";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010150";"bread score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020051";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (G)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000238";"NmieG";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: crumb score";;;;"WIPO:0000238";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010149";"crumb score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020051";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (G)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000239";"NtotG";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: total score";;;;"WIPO:0000239";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010148";"total score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020051";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (G)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000240";"volG";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: bread volume";;;;"WIPO:0000240";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010147";"bread volume";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020051";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (G)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000241";"NpateL";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: dough score";;;;"WIPO:0000241";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010151";"dough score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020050";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (L)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000242";"NpainL";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: bread score";;;;"WIPO:0000242";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010150";"bread score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020050";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (L)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000243";"NmieL";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: crumb score";;;;"WIPO:0000243";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010149";"crumb score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020050";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (L)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000244";"NtotL";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: total score";;;;"WIPO:0000244";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010148";"total score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020050";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (L)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000245";"volL";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: bread volume";;;;"WIPO:0000245";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010147";"bread volume";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020050";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (L)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000246";"NpateS";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: dough score";;;;"WIPO:0000246";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010151";"dough score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020049";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (S)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000247";"NpainS";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: bread score";;;;"WIPO:0000247";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010150";"bread score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020049";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (S)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000248";"NmieS";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: crumb score";;;;"WIPO:0000248";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010149";"crumb score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020049";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (S)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000249";"NtotS";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: total score";;;;"WIPO:0000249";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010148";"total score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020049";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (S)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000250";"volS";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: bread volume";;;;"WIPO:0000250";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010147";"bread volume";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020049";"Breadmaking test BIPEA (S)";"Estimation";"Unavailable method description";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000251";"pvp";"Susceptibility to cercosporella (plantlet stage)";;;;"WIPO:0000251";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010139";"Susceptibility to cercosporella";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"cersporella";;;"CO_321:1021003";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030102";"Scale from 2 to 5";"Ordinal";;;;;"2: resistant";"3: intermediate";"5: sensitive";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000252";"pva";"Susceptibility to cercosporella (adult stage)";;;;"WIPO:0000252";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010139";"Susceptibility to cercosporella";"Biotic stress";;;;;"Plant";"cersporella";;;"CO_321:1021002";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030102";"Scale from 2 to 5";"Ordinal";;;;;"2: resistant";"3: intermediate";"5: sensitive";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000253";"NpateD";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: dough score";;;;"WIPO:0000253";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010151";"dough score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020048";"Gallardon";"Estimation";"Providers (bakeries): Gallardon.";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000254";"NpainD";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: bread score";;;;"WIPO:0000254";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010150";"bread score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020048";"Gallardon";"Estimation";"Providers (bakeries): Gallardon.";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000255";"NmieD";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: crumb score";;;;"WIPO:0000255";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010149";"crumb score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020048";"Gallardon";"Estimation";"Providers (bakeries): Gallardon.";;;"UO:0000187";"%";"Numerical";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000256";"NtotD";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: total score";;;;"WIPO:0000256";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010148";"total score";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020048";"Gallardon";"Estimation";"Providers (bakeries): Gallardon.";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000257";"volD";"Breadmaking test BIPEA: bread volume";;;;"WIPO:0000257";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010147";"bread volume";"Quality";;;;;"Breadmaking";"quality";;;"CO_321:1020048";"Gallardon";"Estimation";"Providers (bakeries): Gallardon.";;;"CO_321:1030109";"N.A";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;"CO_321:1000271";"fr";"Frost susceptibility";;;;"WIPO:0000271";"INRAE";"Arnaud Gauffretau, Francois-Xavier Oury";"21/09/2017";"EN";"Wheat";"CO_321:1010144";"Frost susceptibility";"Abiotic stress traits";;;;;"Plant";"Frost damage";;;"CO_321:1021001";"Score estimation";"Estimation";"Score estimation";;;"CO_321:1030006";"1 to 9 note";"Ordinal";;1;9;;" 1 = Resistant";"9 = susceptible";;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;