Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ratings #359

Open
ipeevski opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 8 comments
Open

Add ratings #359

ipeevski opened this issue Jan 10, 2024 · 8 comments

Comments

@ipeevski
Copy link

User and/or site owner ratings.

A way to get the good upscalers towards the top of the list, so it's easier to find ones to try first.

It should also include sorting by rating by default.

@joeyballentine
Copy link
Contributor

Only problem with this is it requires us to have a live server and backend and database to store that since it's live/constantly changing data. Right now the entire site is statically built content hosted for free.

I agree though, that would be really nice.

@ipeevski
Copy link
Author

You can start by just adding your own votes (dev ones, or added via PRs). Add it to the json as a separate field.
It's still better than nothing ...
Alternatively, you could do something creative, like do a client-side lookup on number of google results for each :) I'm grasping

@calvinrbnspiess
Copy link

I would greet this feature too. This project seems very interesting, but for me as a novice to ai upsacling the sheer amount of available models is just overwhelming. A versatile rating system, maybe coupled with Github authentication would help to cluster the quality of the available models - maybe also with a comment functionality.

Think of it like printables.com which is a good example of what this platform could be.

As an idea how to make this feature suitable for a community-driven project, you could consider to switch from Github Pages to Vercel.com. Their hobby plan could suit the project and offers some serverless storage functionality in the meantime.

@joeyballentine
Copy link
Contributor

Wow, that hobby plan seems pretty generous. We'll definitely consider switching to that. Thanks!

@n0kovo
Copy link

n0kovo commented Mar 31, 2024

Came by to make this exact proposal.

@metamountain
Copy link

metamountain commented Jun 28, 2024

I would love comparable pictures....Perhaps just like the ones for digital cameras...
image

@BangDroid
Copy link

Weighing in to add my support for this idea too. OpenModelsDB seems like it could be such a great resource, great potential, but choosing a model right now is a bit like stabbing in the dark, imo.
But whatever feedback or rating system is implemented there should be considerations for hardening against botting or automated voting.

@FNsi
Copy link

FNsi commented Nov 7, 2024

Could be another cvital but enhance model only

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants