Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect domain or incorrect mapping? #1033

Open
MelaniePhilofsky opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Incorrect domain or incorrect mapping? #1033

MelaniePhilofsky opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@MelaniePhilofsky
Copy link

Describe the problem in content or desired feature
concept_id = 447963004 is a standard concept_id with domain_id = Observation. Should this be in the 'Route' domain since it describes the route of administration for a drug? If not, should concept_ids IN (4223964,3157642,3382152,40487500) non-standard concept_ids map to a concept_id with domain_id = 'Observation'? At the University of Colorado, we have drugs with an administration route ' intravenous push' and they are now mapping to concept_id = 447963004, which is in the Observation domain.

How to find it
See above

Expected adjustments
Please change the domain_id of concept_id 447963004 to 'Route' or change the mapping for the non-standard concept_ids in the Route domain to a standard concept_id with domain_id = 'Route'

Screenshots

Screenshot 2024-07-29 at 2 54 14 PM

Additional context

@m-khitrun
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, @MelaniePhilofsky

Concept 447963004, Intravenous push technique describes the particular manipulation technique (push, not piggyback), and it doesn't belong to the hierarchy of Routes. So, this concept should remain in the Observation domain.
We will remap the concept 404816009, Intravenous push to the standard Route 47625008, Intravenous. Nebraska Lexicon is not on the roadmap, its mappings will not be revised.

@m-khitrun m-khitrun self-assigned this Aug 2, 2024
@MelaniePhilofsky
Copy link
Author

Perfect! Thanks, @m-khitrun !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants