-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Storing aggregate covariate data in RDBMS server instead of Andromeda #152
Milestone
Comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Currently it appears that the use of an RDBMS is supported [for storing computed features] in
getDbDefaultCovariateData
(FeatureExtraction/R/GetDefaultCovariates.R
Line 152 in bddb9ca
When performing feature extraction on around 1000+ cohorts, storing the aggregate features in andromeda objects on disk becomes more difficult with the size of the features.
It also looks like the code for
getDbDefaultCovariateData
doesn't function correctly for the non-aggreagate features as there is a discrepancy between the executed SQL statements here and here.To store results in a new table will also probably break in the case where the tables already exist, so and
overwriteTables
flag should be included.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: