Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unsupported grids? #597

Open
gold2718 opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Remove unsupported grids? #597

gold2718 opened this issue Nov 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
question & help wanted Extra attention is needed
Milestone

Comments

@gold2718
Copy link

Currently, NorESM has no plans to support several grids that are currently allowed. The workhorse grids for NorESM3 are labeled nexxnp4.pg3 which cause CAM to run physics on separate, approximately isotropic finite-volume grid with approximately the same resolution as the dycore. See https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-18-0136.1 for more information.

Candidates for removal are any grid with the following atmosphere component grid:

  • nexxnp4: examples ne30np4, ne5np4. These grids cause CAM to run physics using the spectral element Gauss Lobatto quadrature points which creates noise in the simulation output
  • nexxnp4.pg4: These grids cause CAM to run physics on a higher resolution (16/9) than the dycore.

I suggest keeping the nexxnp4.pg2 grids. These grids cause CAM to run physics on a lower resolution (4/9) than the dycore. This can be useful if faster simulations are needed. See https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001684 for more information.

@mvertens
Copy link

At this point I think we should get rid of grids that don't work or won't be used.

@TomasTorsvik
Copy link
Contributor

@gold2718 - Should we transfer this issue to a NorESM3 milestone?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question & help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants