Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support validation against cached namespace via flag on pynwb.validate #1431

Closed
5 tasks done
oruebel opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1511
Closed
5 tasks done

Support validation against cached namespace via flag on pynwb.validate #1431

oruebel opened this issue Feb 18, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #1511
Assignees
Labels
category: enhancement improvements of code or code behavior priority: high impacts proper operation or use of feature important to most users topic: validator issues related to validation of files

Comments

@oruebel
Copy link
Contributor

oruebel commented Feb 18, 2022

The pynwb.validate function currently validates by default against the core namespace, whereas the command line validator by default uses the cached namespace. The functionality to use cached namespaces should be moved/ported to the validate function.

This is related to the following DANDI issue dandi/dandi-cli#917

Checklist

  • Have you ensured the feature or change was not already reported?
  • Have you included a brief and descriptive title?
  • Have you included a clear description of the problem you are trying to solve?
  • Have you included a minimal code snippet that reproduces the issue you are encountering?
  • Have you checked our Contributing document?
@oruebel oruebel added category: enhancement improvements of code or code behavior priority: high impacts proper operation or use of feature important to most users topic: validator issues related to validation of files labels Feb 18, 2022
@oruebel oruebel self-assigned this Feb 18, 2022
@oruebel oruebel mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2022
6 tasks
@rly rly closed this as completed in #1511 Oct 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category: enhancement improvements of code or code behavior priority: high impacts proper operation or use of feature important to most users topic: validator issues related to validation of files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant