-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
What should be said for × and · in "LiteralSpeak" and character navigation mode? #332
Comments
One disadvantage of "times" for the Though "times" is how NVDA verbalizes the Unicode symbol. |
FYI: the Unicode name for the symbol is "Multiplication Sign". I don't that is a great choice: it doubt everyone will think of the same symbol and the name is pretty long. But I suspect it is a little less ambiguous than "times". |
"Multiplication"is very verbose. My maths knowledge is much less than others here, but "times"means multiply to me. Could abbreviate to "mult", but people would need to know what it meant. Andrew |
I'm currently leaning towards "cross". "cross sign" is less semantic, but rather long. I'm still looking for better ideas... |
Going once, going twice... Is everyone ok with "cross"? |
There are many ways to speak these. Most come with some semantic baggage.
·
is probably easiest: perhaps "center dot"×
can be "times", "cross", "cross product", "by". Something like "cross sign" seems too wordy.There are other symbols that need a literal meaning, but this is a starting point and maybe some convention can be established.
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: