Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Asset 389: bad answer ID for Beta-2 Agonists (Activators) #79

Open
colleenXu opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Asset 389: bad answer ID for Beta-2 Agonists (Activators) #79

colleenXu opened this issue Jun 28, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Bad Asset Curie The given asset curie is not correct Too General The asset is too general to be a good test

Comments

@colleenXu
Copy link

Asset 389 says the expected output name is Beta-2 Agonists (Activators). However, the output ID OMIT:0027329 is likely something no ARA/KP recognizes. NodeNorm doesn't resolve this ID.

If this test is kept, I imagine the expected output ID needs to be changed.
But this test was also mentioned in the "too general" issue brought up in #64.
@maximusunc maximusunc added Bad Asset Curie The given asset curie is not correct Too General The asset is too general to be a good test labels Jul 12, 2024
@sandrine-muller-research
Copy link

I am not the owner of this asset but I agree that asset is out of scope (too general case, like #76)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Bad Asset Curie The given asset curie is not correct Too General The asset is too general to be a good test
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@sandrine-muller-research @maximusunc @colleenXu