You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The loss functions included are great but are somewhat limited.
There are a lot of R packages that could expand the types of loss functions (but at the loss of R:python parity).
If you were to use yardstick, for example, the benefits would be:
More metrics
Data on direction (e.g larger-is-better) for each metrics. You wouldn't have to do 1 - AUC anymore.
yardstick can compute multiple metrics at once.
Numerous multi-class metrics
Metrics for censored regression
Extensible for user-defined metrics
The downside to the current system is that you might optimize your model on a set of performance scores and judge feature importance on some other score.
Let use know if we can help or put in a PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The loss functions included are great but are somewhat limited.
There are a lot of R packages that could expand the types of loss functions (but at the loss of R:python parity).
If you were to use yardstick, for example, the benefits would be:
The downside to the current system is that you might optimize your model on a set of performance scores and judge feature importance on some other score.
Let use know if we can help or put in a PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: