You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since the current version stores all errors in a single partition, as the row count grows, performance starts to deteriorate. A better solution would be to try to minimize the number of rows in a partition to just a few hundred.
"A highly uneven distribution of entities across partitions may limit the performance of the larger and more active partitions"
A better solution might be to either
Partition on a day, or an hour that can also be a range query (numeric) representation like 20150616
A fixed partition size with a counter so 000001, 000002, and an additional table that has some pointer info to know which dates fall in to which partition buckets.
But those are just two ideas. We're using this in production and now that our table size has increased, performance is dramatically slow (lookups of up to 30 seconds!)
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think the only problem with that is the paging functionality. There'll have to be some internal logic that figures out how to assemble a page and keep track of a cursor window depending on how large / how many partitions to pull. Ideas?
Hmmm... the partition key is already being set to the application name. I think your best bet would be to either delete or migrate older errors elsewhere.
I'm surprised that it is taking that long though since Azure Tables has a default sort that we use (PartitionKey ASC, RowKey ASC).
Since the current version stores all errors in a single partition, as the row count grows, performance starts to deteriorate. A better solution would be to try to minimize the number of rows in a partition to just a few hundred.
From the guidelines on designing a scalable table solution doc here: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/hh508997.aspx
"A highly uneven distribution of entities across partitions may limit the performance of the larger and more active partitions"
A better solution might be to either
But those are just two ideas. We're using this in production and now that our table size has increased, performance is dramatically slow (lookups of up to 30 seconds!)
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: