From 4f6f9f0deb30d229fcd4a022015ecc7ea3ac1bda Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Moealfadil <142026026+Moealfadil@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 20:05:58 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "Merge branch 'main' into crafting_retrospective"

This reverts commit 04aa0b86013ee0f076c8a622611d0d3e00c2bad5, reversing
changes made to 550d65a3bfd1a35e6eda9a7fa58a32b1866f8e55.
---
 .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
index eba8a7be2..eb18b4638 100644
--- a/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
+++ b/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ about: A template PR for code review with a checklist
 
 - [ ] The function's name describes it's behavior
 - [ ] The function's name matches the file name
-  - _It's ok to have extra helper functions if necessary, like with mergesort_
 - [ ] The function has correct type annotations
 - [ ] The function is not called at the top level of the function file 
   - _Recursive solutions **can** call the function from **inside** the function body_
@@ -69,7 +68,7 @@ about: A template PR for code review with a checklist
 
 ### Don'ts
 
-- [ ] The function's strategy _is not_ described in any docstrings or tests
+- [ ] The function's strategy _is not_ described in the documentation
 - [ ] Comments explain the _strategy_, **not** the _implementation_
 - [ ] The function _does not_ have more comments than code
   - If it does, consider finding a new strategy or a simpler implementation