You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to have realistic layer radii.
A good baseline is to use the ITK layout task force report (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2239573 atlas restricted unfortunately) section 2.4 Table 1 and 4. (curious to see similar number for CMS)
We have 5 layers of pixel at radii (in mm) 39 85 155 213 271 and 4 strip layers : 405 562 762 1000 .
(pixel and strip have different position resolution).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We need to have realistic layer radii.
A good baseline is to use the ITK layout task force report (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2239573 atlas restricted unfortunately) section 2.4 Table 1 and 4. (curious to see similar number for CMS)
We have 5 layers of pixel at radii (in mm) 39 85 155 213 271 and 4 strip layers : 405 562 762 1000 .
(pixel and strip have different position resolution).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: