Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Segfault in maximum_weight_perfect_matching when the graph does not have a perfect matching #10

Open
etiennedeg opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #11
Open

Comments

@etiennedeg
Copy link
Member

etiennedeg commented May 2, 2024

That's really not a nice behavior :\

the fault seems to be on BlossomV.jl side mlewe/BlossomV.jl#25

Ok, in fact, the problem seems to originate from Blossom V itself, this is so bad :(

// Computes a perfect matching of minimum cost.
// NOTE: a perfect matching of finite cost must exist (otherwise the behaviour is not specified).

We can get around this by adding dummy edges with big weights.

@etiennedeg etiennedeg linked a pull request May 3, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant