Should InvertedIndices call to_indices on all elements in an array of skipped indices? #31
Description
We have the following super bad behavior:
julia> [1, 2, 3, 4][Not(Not([1.5]))]
1-element Vector{Int64}:
2
julia> [1, 2, 3, 4][Not(Not([1.5]))]
1-element Vector{Int64}:
0
julia> [1, 2, 3, 4][Not(Not([1.5]))]
1-element Vector{Int64}:
4294967297
which is a consequence of the fact that:
to_index(I::AbstractArray) = I
in Base.
@mbauman - do you think we should fix it in InvertedIndices.jl or this should be fixed in Base?
CC @nalimilan