Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support generic file structures #104

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
JMBeresford opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #258 or #257
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

Support generic file structures #104

JMBeresford opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 3 comments · Fixed by #258 or #257
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Planned

Comments

@JMBeresford
Copy link
Owner

JMBeresford commented Sep 18, 2024

The current restriction on file structure of a user's library is affecting user adoption of Retrom. Retrom should support arbitrary file/directory structures for a library, and allow a user to define where their entries live via some config.

@Professorvennie
Copy link

I would love to switch to retrom from romm but I am waiting on the folder suppport. Any update on this issue?

@JMBeresford
Copy link
Owner Author

@Professorvennie specifically what folder structure are you referring to? Retrom now supports single-file games in addition to the originally supported multi-file games ( see README for illustrations of each ).

Generic directory structure support is still incoming. I can only guess as to an ETA, but I imagine within a month or so.

I'm always open to contributions as well, for anyone that can't wait fr me to get to it myself 😃

@Jerrys-modz
Copy link

@JMBeresford yes I just can’t read I guess 😅. Just spun up a container! Thank you for the great work!

JMBeresford added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2025
You can now define custom library structures
if the existing Single-File Game and Multi-File
Game options are not flexible enough!

resolves #104
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In progress to Done in Retrom Roadmap Feb 16, 2025
This was referenced Feb 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Planned
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants