SDL - There is no reason to know if shift is down when pressing a numpad key with NumLock ON

[mandaxyzw]

Operating system and version:
Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (10.0, Build 18363)

Description of the bug (and if possible, steps to reproduce the bug):

SDL_Keymod mod = SDL_GetModState();
int shift = !!(mod & KMOD_SHIFT); // The reason of !! is to convert number into 0 or 1 and it's not a Boolean but an int.

// Steps:
//
// - The shift key is down.
// - I press the normal keys A or B or C or ...
// - The value of the variable 'shift' is 1 which is correct.
//
// - The shift key is down AND the numlock is ON.
// - I press the numpad keys 1 or 2 or 3 or ...
// - The value of the variable 'shift' is 0 which is wrong because what I expected is 1 but it's not.

What did you expect to happen instead?
I want to get the input [End] for [1], [↓] for [2], [PgDn] for [3], etc. but I can't because there is no reason to know if the shift is down with NumLock ON because as I explain above, the value of 'shift' is always 0 at the time when the numpad keys are down, but 'shift' will be 1 at the time when the numpad keys are up.

[ensiform]

Code block doesn't exist within OpenJK

[xycaleth]

This sounds like an issue with SDL to me? I'd suggest submitting an issue to the SDL library instead

[ensiform]

Pretty sure we made the NumLock to behave like the vanilla game in terms of how the key works though compared to say ioquake3 behavior.