-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 91
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Langchain Chatbot #58
Comments
1. 📝 IndexingI'm indexing the files within your repository.2. 🔎 SearchingI'm searching for relevant snippets in your repository.I found the following snippets in your repository. View SnippetsLines 15 to 30 in 5f913d0
Lines 30 to 45 in 5f913d0
Lines 45 to 60 in 5f913d0
Lines 60 to 75 in 5f913d0
3. 🌐 PlanningI'm creating a plan for the discussion and coding steps.I have created the following workflow as a basis for how the discussion and coding will be derived. 💡 StepsUpdate MongoDBHandlerAction: Update Credentials ModuleAction: Update IngestDocs ModuleAction: Update QueryDocs ModuleAction: Test the ChangesAction: I have created the following workflow as a basis for how the discussion and coding will be derived. 💡 StepsRefactor MongoDBHandlerAction: Refactor Credentials ClassAction: Refactor IngestDocs ClassAction: Refactor QueryDocs ClassAction: Write Tests for MongoDBHandlerAction: Write Tests for Credentials ClassAction: Write Tests for IngestDocs ClassAction: Write Tests for QueryDocs ClassAction: Code ReviewAction: I have created the following workflow as a basis for how the discussion and coding will be derived. 💡 StepsCreate Rollback MechanismAction: Modify IngestDocs ClassAction: Modify QueryDocs ClassAction: Create TestsAction: Run TestsAction: |
Given the complexity of the task and the dependencies on Step 1, I suggest breaking down Step 1 into smaller tasks. This could include separate tasks for creating the methods for sending requests, handling responses, and error handling. This would make the task more manageable and allow for more focused testing. Additionally, consider implementing a code review process to catch potential issues early. This could involve another developer reviewing the changes before they are committed. |
I agree, given the complexity of the task and the dependencies between the steps, I suggest implementing a rollback mechanism. This will ensure that if a step fails, the changes made in that step and any subsequent steps can be undone, preventing inconsistencies and bugs. Additionally, consider using a feature branch for the changes to avoid impacting the main branch. This will allow for isolated testing and development without affecting the main codebase. Lastly, while mock data is useful for initial testing, it's important to also test with real data to ensure the changes work as expected in a real-world scenario. |
Switch to API
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: