-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 281
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature]: please make this wonderful process working before detailer #218
Comments
Very good to know that changing the name is able to change the extension order. |
Yes, denoising strength should be low - otherwise ADetailer completely changes the face |
MANY MANY THANKS, It works! problem solved. |
I am not sure. But since last update (0.6.1 BETA2) this seems not to work anymore. Reactor is always the last inpainter. So, something applied to face, for example freckles, are overwritten by the swapped face. Can someone confirm this? Update: In "Single Source Image" mode all is working. But the when activating "Save Original" or using "Folder" mode, makes adetailer beeing processed BEFORE reactor. (When extention folder are correctly named in order and reactor is listed in UI before adetailer) |
Feature description
First of all, many thanks to your great efforts.
I'm askng to change the sequence of process of reactor applying before the detailer process..
At a moment, after the detailer, such as adetailer, is applied then the reactor is applying. And definitely, this dramatically reduces the qualty of face. The face restoration is far less effective than the detailer, as we all aware.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: