You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Chrome recently added deliveryType which can be set to cached, navigational-prefetch or not empty string ''.
This is available at performance.getEntriesByType('navigation')[0].deliveryType for the document which could be useful to explain the TTFB (and hence FCP and LCP).
Should this supplement/expand the navigationType in the Metric type? Or should this be a separate field? They are not completely distinct (and may be even less so in the future if the usage of deliveryType expands), but maybe just splitting the navigate type into cached, navigational-prefetch, or navigate could be sufficient for now?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We decided this should be a separate field rather than merged into navigationType as there are instances where you'd need both. And given it's then just a straight look up from the navigation entry (which is already available in the attribution data) there is little need to add it.
However, leaving this issue open as might add a comment similar to serverTiming comment so people are aware of this:
Chrome recently added
deliveryType
which can be set tocached
,navigational-prefetch
or not empty string''
.This is available at
performance.getEntriesByType('navigation')[0].deliveryType
for the document which could be useful to explain the TTFB (and hence FCP and LCP).Should this supplement/expand the
navigationType
in theMetric
type? Or should this be a separate field? They are not completely distinct (and may be even less so in the future if the usage ofdeliveryType
expands), but maybe just splitting thenavigate
type intocached
,navigational-prefetch
, ornavigate
could be sufficient for now?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: