Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Post-launch updates for automate.fedramp.gov site #25

Open
9 tasks
Rene2mt opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
9 tasks

Post-launch updates for automate.fedramp.gov site #25

Rene2mt opened this issue Jun 21, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@Rene2mt
Copy link
Member

Rene2mt commented Jun 21, 2024

The following moderate and low priority items are de-scoped from issue #21 and will be addressed after the initial launch of the site.

  • 4. Header (Automating Control-Based Assessment) Image

    • Scope: theme (@david-waltermire)
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Description: The image is static; not a carousel. Consider removing out of the box and increasing the font size. Adapt to FedRAMP.gov styling.
    • Action: TBD
  • 5. Remove "PMO" references

    • Priority: Moderate
    • Description: FedRAMP is going away from using the word "PMO" as a moniker or persona.
    • Action: OSCAL automation team needs to remove during editorial pass through the site.
      • Need to be consistent with marketplace and the main FedRAMP site
      • In general, nomenclature needs to be more consistent
  • 8. How to Participate

    • Priority: Low
    • Description: Need a "How to participate" link on the home page.
    • Action: TBD
  • 10. Fix Content Spacing

    • Scope: theme (@david-waltermire)
    • Priority: Moderate
    • Descritpion: Consider more space between callout boxes, images, etc. Content is dense.
    • Action: Dev team to address during pre-release
  • 11. Graphics Colors

    • Priority: Moderate
    • Description: Graphics don't align with FedRAMP branding. Need to use FedRAMP color palette.
    • Action: Dev team to work with Shiva where graphics need to be redone.
  • 13. Callout boxes

    • Scope: theme (@david-waltermire)
    • Priority: Low
    • Description: Recommend the FedRAMP light blue or light gray and removing drop shadow to align with FedRAMP styles.
    • Action: Dev team to make updates
  • 16. Resize images / image quality issues

    • Priority: Moderate
    • Descritption: Many small screenshots; consider a pop up or expand/collapse
      • Appendix M is an example of diagram that needs to be updated
    • Action: Dev team to increment site images.
      • Dev team may need graphics support for complex images
      • Dev team will incrementally start adding diagram-as-code
  • 20. Headers (H1 and H2) - could be matched to publication

    • Scope: theme (@david-waltermire)
    • Priority: Low
    • Description: Driven by USWDS...font sizes and styles are okay
    • Action: Dev team to consider
  • 21. Mobile view

    • Scope: theme (@david-waltermire)
    • Priority: Low
    • Description: Site needs to be responsive and render well on (mobile and tablet) devices.
      • Consider keeping search in mobile view...disappears
      • Users are not likely use on phone but yes on tablet
    • Action: Shiva to review.
@DimitriZhurkin
Copy link
Contributor

DimitriZhurkin commented Jul 2, 2024

Folks,

In the Documentation drop-down menu, the General Concepts item is missing.

Also, the Documentation > Documentation label should be Documentation > FedRAMP OSCAL Documentation. To elaborate, in info design, navigation labels typically match page titles.

HTH.

documentation-dropdown-menu

@DimitriZhurkin
Copy link
Contributor

DimitriZhurkin commented Jul 2, 2024

The About drop-down menu seems to exhibit a similar issue, where these labels are missing:

  • Background
  • What is OSCAL?
  • Use of OSCAL by FedRAMP
  • FedRAMP Automation and Modernization

about-dropdown-menu

@DimitriZhurkin
Copy link
Contributor

In the navigation panel, sometimes it is difficult to distinguish between nested levels.

Mostly, it affects the second-level child items, which appear to be at the top level.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🆕 New
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants