Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review (and revise) FBCallableStatement implementation [JDBC297] #343

Open
firebird-automations opened this issue Jan 19, 2013 · 9 comments

Comments

@firebird-automations
Copy link

Submitted by: @mrotteveel

Is related to JDBC296
Is related to JDBC229
Is related to JDBC289
Relate to JDBC350
Relate to JDBC402

The current implementation of FBCallableStatement has several problems (see JDBC229, JDBC296), it is not fully JDBCcompliant and I have the feeling that it doesn't support all stored procedure options of Firebird (although that needs more research). The FBCallableStatement needs a thorough review and parts may need to be rewritten.

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Fix Version: Jaybird 2.3 [ 10440 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Link: This issue is related to JDBC296 [ JDBC296 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Link: This issue is related to JDBC229 [ JDBC229 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Link: This issue is related to JDBC289 [ JDBC289 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Link: This issue relate to JDBC350 [ JDBC350 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Link: This issue relate to JDBC402 [ JDBC402 ]

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Fix Version: Jaybird 3.1 [ 10441 ]

Fix Version: Jaybird 3.0 [ 10440 ] =>

@firebird-automations
Copy link
Author

Modified by: @mrotteveel

Fix Version: Jaybird 4 [ 10441 ] =>

@mrotteveel
Copy link
Member

See also issue #775 for something that needs to be addressed when working on this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants