You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sonar specification sheet has parameters to define beam angles,
Number of beams
Horizontal Aperture (FOV)
Beam Separation
It seems that the azimuth angles (beam angles) in the sonar image should be uniformly spaced with the given beam separation. But it was not true for both simulation and the experiment data.
Simulation beam angle spacings
As long as the plugin is based on the depth_camera, it would be difficult to modify it to evenly spaced or other spacing designs. The depth camera is obtaining data mapped on a z-buffer (evenly spaced) and looking at the image from a point make the spacings as shown below.
Maybe replacing the depth_camera part with a ray-based point cloud generating plugin can solve this problem.
Experiments (oculus) beam angle spacings
I suspect that this beam spacing design is related to hardware design. The way the transducers are aligned.
It's more strange that the beam spacings of oculus are not increasing linearly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sonar specification sheet has parameters to define beam angles,
Number of beams
Horizontal Aperture (FOV)
Beam Separation
It seems that the azimuth angles (beam angles) in the sonar image should be uniformly spaced with the given beam separation. But it was not true for both simulation and the experiment data.
Simulation beam angle spacings
Experiments (oculus) beam angle spacings
It's more strange that the beam spacings of oculus are not increasing linearly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: