Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JsonAnyGetter ignores JsonSerialize(contentUsing=...) #1124

Closed
jimirocks opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

JsonAnyGetter ignores JsonSerialize(contentUsing=...) #1124

jimirocks opened this issue Feb 10, 2016 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@jimirocks
Copy link

version: 2.7.0

it seems I can use @JsonSerialize(using=...) for the whole map, but I can't find working solution to use custom serializer for values only.

@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Sounds like a bug, missing handling of expected way to customize handling. Thank you for reporting this.

cowtowncoder added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 12, 2016
@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Yes, I can reproduce this.

@cowtowncoder cowtowncoder modified the milestones: 1.9.13, 2.7.2 Feb 27, 2016
@cowtowncoder
Copy link
Member

Finally had time to dig in here. And, even better, this was one of those good old-time bugs that was NOT super difficult to solve in the end. So will be fixed in 2.7.2.

cowtowncoder added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 27, 2016
jimirocks added a commit to gooddata/gooddata-java that referenced this issue May 20, 2016
jimirocks added a commit to gooddata/gooddata-java that referenced this issue May 31, 2016
jimirocks added a commit to gooddata/gooddata-java that referenced this issue May 31, 2016
jimirocks added a commit to gooddata/gooddata-java that referenced this issue Jul 1, 2016
jimirocks added a commit to gooddata/gooddata-java that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2016
jimirocks added a commit to gooddata/gooddata-java that referenced this issue Jul 14, 2016
There was a BUG in jackson FasterXML/jackson-databind#1124 fixed in 2.7.2.
In addition spring 4.3.0 officially claims compatibility with jackson 2.8.0
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants