You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When memory resources set in Mi for an application, Goldilocks incorrectly displays them in Details.
For example, when I set 3125Mi, Goldilocks shows 3906250Ki. But when I set 3200M, Goldilocks shows 3200M.
What did you expect to happen?
Goldilocks shows correct values in M if resources set in Mi.
For example, if I set 3125Mi, Goldilocks shows 3200M.
How can we reproduce this?
Set memory requests/limits in Mi for your application and check if Goldilocks shows resources correctly in M.
Version
Application version v4.13.0, chart version 9.0.0
Search
I did search for other open and closed issues before opening this.
Code of Conduct
I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This has been an issue for a while. Would love to see someone propose a solution. Units conversion in K8s is a rather frustrating problem to work with.
What happened?
When memory resources set in Mi for an application, Goldilocks incorrectly displays them in Details.
For example, when I set 3125Mi, Goldilocks shows 3906250Ki. But when I set 3200M, Goldilocks shows 3200M.
What did you expect to happen?
Goldilocks shows correct values in M if resources set in Mi.
For example, if I set 3125Mi, Goldilocks shows 3200M.
How can we reproduce this?
Set memory requests/limits in Mi for your application and check if Goldilocks shows resources correctly in M.
Version
Application version v4.13.0, chart version 9.0.0
Search
Code of Conduct
Additional context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: