Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Request refactor: Implement ISO definition for ConicalSurface #1264

Open
1 of 2 tasks
GabrielJMS opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
1 of 2 tasks

Request refactor: Implement ISO definition for ConicalSurface #1264

GabrielJMS opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@GabrielJMS
Copy link
Contributor

  • I'm submitting a ...

    • bug report
    • feature request
  • What is the current behavior?

  • If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and if possible a minimal demo of the problem Avoid reference to other packages

  • What is the expected behavior?

  • What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
    Implement Conical Surface with the parametrization proposed by ISO 10303-21 to better precision and compatibility with others CAD kernel.
    NOTE 1 This form of representation is designed to provide the greatest geometric precision for those parts of the surface which are close to the location point C. For this reason the apex should only be selected as location point if the region of the surface close to the apex is of interest.
    see: https://www.steptools.com/stds/smrl/data/resource_docs/geometric_and_topological_representation/sys/4_schema.htm#geometry_schema.conical_surface

image

image

  • Possible fixes

  • Please tell us about your environment:

    • branch:
    • commit:
    • python version:
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant