Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

standaardisatie verschilplaatjes peilhandhaving #220

Open
gijsber opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

standaardisatie verschilplaatjes peilhandhaving #220

gijsber opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
@DanielTollenaar
Labels
Model Evaluatie topologie geometrie/topologie verbetering
Milestone
jan 2025

Comments

@gijsber
Copy link

gijsber commented Jan 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

toepassing van verschilplaatjes script voor zowel hoog NL als laagNL
toepasbaar voor evaluatie van zowel wateraanvoer als waterafvoersituaties
script en/of metadata veralgemeniseren waar nodig
@gijsber gijsber added Model Evaluatie topologie geometrie/topologie verbetering labels Jan 13, 2025
@gijsber gijsber added this to the jan 2025 milestone Jan 13, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🆕 New in Ribasim NL Jan 13, 2025
@gijsber gijsber moved this from 🆕 New to 📋 Backlog in Ribasim NL Jan 13, 2025
@gijsber gijsber changed the title standaardisatie verschilplaatjes peilhandhaving in waterafvoersituatie standaardisatie verschilplaatjes peilhandhaving Jan 13, 2025
@DanielTollenaar DanielTollenaar self-assigned this Jan 27, 2025
@DanielTollenaar DanielTollenaar moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🏗 In progress in Ribasim NL Jan 27, 2025
@gijsber gijsber moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Ribasim NL Jan 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@DanielTollenaar DanielTollenaar

Labels
Model Evaluatie topologie geometrie/topologie verbetering
Projects
Ribasim NL
Status: 👀 In review
Milestone
jan 2025
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@DanielTollenaar @gijsber