We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
作者您好,SPN代码我运行后和您的论文里的结果基本一致,但是有关cora, pubmed , citeseer三个数据集的精度结果我有些困惑,目前大部分论文关于这三个数据集的节点分类的精度大致在Cora: 大约80%,PubMed:大约80%,citeseer:大约70%,为什么您的论文中关于这三个数据集的精度在50%-60%之间,是不是评估标准设置的不一样。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
作者您好,SPN代码我运行后和您的论文里的结果基本一致,但是有关cora, pubmed , citeseer三个数据集的精度结果我有些困惑,目前大部分论文关于这三个数据集的节点分类的精度大致在Cora: 大约80%,PubMed:大约80%,citeseer:大约70%,为什么您的论文中关于这三个数据集的精度在50%-60%之间,是不是评估标准设置的不一样。
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: